Iceweasel
Diamond Member
That's reckless endangerment pretty much anywhere. Never heard of anywhere where it wasn't.It certainly isn't illegal to leave a gun or knife around children.
Stupid ? Yes . Illegal? No
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's reckless endangerment pretty much anywhere. Never heard of anywhere where it wasn't.It certainly isn't illegal to leave a gun or knife around children.
Stupid ? Yes . Illegal? No
That's reckless endangerment pretty much anywhere. Never heard of anywhere where it wasn't.[/QUOTE]It's illegal to leave a gun, knife, explosives, poison, etc. around children.I would propose legislation to require unattended guns be child proofed/locked up to prevent access by children. Some sort of child proof safety should be engaged on all unattended guns when a child has access. Examples, of ways to child proof a gun would span from any sort of child safe latch on a container for the gun, such as a turn and press latch on a purse, to a bio trigger lock on the gun.What legislation are you proposing as a result of that 2 year old killing his mother? If your answer is nothing then you are proving my point
It certainly isn't illegal to leave a gun or knife around children.
Stupid ? Yes . Illegal? No
My particular understanding? How can you add a safety device that doesn't add complexity? Instead of blowing wind out of your ass explain it.Not necessarily. It only adds complexity by your particular understanding. There is no specific reason why child proofing has to add complexity or slow you down.It adds complexity by definition. It could slow you down, you don't know that. The simple solution would be to keep your weapon on you instead of laying around in a shopping cart. Which may not even have been legal.Child proofing does not require making it hard to open for an adult.
That doesn't even make sense. There is no such law about anything like that. It doesn't matter if a child is used to it or not. The charges would happen if the kid did do something because that's how they would find out about it.It certainly isn't . It CAN be, if the child does something with the gun they shouldn't have. that's true. But just having a gun out where a child can et used to being around them and such isn't illegal. IMO it's stupid though.
There's no such thing as a "responsible" gun owner. One horrible incident can change a life forever.
Toddler shoots kills mother inside Idaho Walmart Local News - Home
HAYDEN, Idaho -
2-year-old boy accidentally shot and killed his mother after he reached into her purse at a northern Idaho Wal-Mart and her concealed gun fired, authorities said Tuesday.
Kootenai County sheriff's spokesman Stu Miller told The Associated Press the woman was shopping with her son and three other children. Her family had come to the area to visit relatives, he said.
The woman, whose identity was not released, had a concealed weapons permit. Miller said the young boy was left in a shopping cart, reached into the victim's purse and grabbed a small caliber handgun, which discharged one time.
The Mom was an idiot who failed to follow a very basic set of safety rules.
People DO have to do that to drive around and they do lethally stupid shit every day. I'll bet she did know proper safety but just chose to be lazy about it. At least she won't be reproducing any more.The problem is - people don't have to show that they are aware of safe handling of guns or anything to get a permit. There's something wrong there in my opinion.
There's no such thing as a "responsible" gun owner. One horrible incident can change a life forever.
Toddler shoots kills mother inside Idaho Walmart Local News - Home
HAYDEN, Idaho -
2-year-old boy accidentally shot and killed his mother after he reached into her purse at a northern Idaho Wal-Mart and her concealed gun fired, authorities said Tuesday.
Kootenai County sheriff's spokesman Stu Miller told The Associated Press the woman was shopping with her son and three other children. Her family had come to the area to visit relatives, he said.
The woman, whose identity was not released, had a concealed weapons permit. Miller said the young boy was left in a shopping cart, reached into the victim's purse and grabbed a small caliber handgun, which discharged one time.
The Mom was an idiot who failed to follow a very basic set of safety rules.
The problem is - people don't have to show that they are aware of safe handling of guns or anything to get a permit. There's something wrong there in my opinion.
Penis replacement? WTF? You protect yourself with your penis? No one needs to compromise with you. I can open carry my 1911 cocked if I wanted but choose not tond. I do carry cocked and locked but the thumb safety only takes a second.Please understand that I do NOT care.
there is a compromise that can be made that both allows you to carry your penis replacement as safely as possible.
If you are not willing to make that compromise, you can just leave your gun at home.
Wow, this one even made the BBC 10pm news. Surprised no one here has posted this one yet, or are these stories so common that no one here bothers with them anymore? Or maybe I am on the wrong forum?
Idaho toddler shoots and kills his mother inside Walmart US news The Guardian
You may now proceed to slag me off, or educate me as to why so many American adults have a level of common sense like that of little children.
Properties of a baby/child hand: short fingers, low strength.My particular understanding? How can you add a safety device that doesn't add complexity? Instead of blowing wind out of your ass explain it.Not necessarily. It only adds complexity by your particular understanding. There is no specific reason why child proofing has to add complexity or slow you down.It adds complexity by definition. It could slow you down, you don't know that. The simple solution would be to keep your weapon on you instead of laying around in a shopping cart. Which may not even have been legal.Child proofing does not require making it hard to open for an adult.
Properties of a baby/child hand: short fingers, low strength.My particular understanding? How can you add a safety device that doesn't add complexity? Instead of blowing wind out of your ass explain it.Not necessarily. It only adds complexity by your particular understanding. There is no specific reason why child proofing has to add complexity or slow you down.It adds complexity by definition. It could slow you down, you don't know that. The simple solution would be to keep your weapon on you instead of laying around in a shopping cart. Which may not even have been legal.Child proofing does not require making it hard to open for an adult.
Solutions drawn from requirements: use an amount of force or finger length that is beyond a typical child's capability to access the device.
A purse with a magnetic clasp on a flap, use a magnet strong enough to prevent a small child from pulling the flap open. Same purse use a push button on a strong spring for the clasp, use a pull latch with a heavy force requirement, ...
A holster for the gun with a strap ... see above ways to make it just hard enough to pull off that a child can't get it off without using a lever.
Adult too weak to out pull a baby? Ok instead of putting the latch for the purse on the outside put a hole in the top of the purse big enough for a finger, and move the latch to the inside of the purse.
Not all purses.. I was talking about an opportunity for someone to sell baby proof holsters/purses.Properties of a baby/child hand: short fingers, low strength.My particular understanding? How can you add a safety device that doesn't add complexity? Instead of blowing wind out of your ass explain it.Not necessarily. It only adds complexity by your particular understanding. There is no specific reason why child proofing has to add complexity or slow you down.It adds complexity by definition. It could slow you down, you don't know that. The simple solution would be to keep your weapon on you instead of laying around in a shopping cart. Which may not even have been legal.Child proofing does not require making it hard to open for an adult.
Solutions drawn from requirements: use an amount of force or finger length that is beyond a typical child's capability to access the device.
A purse with a magnetic clasp on a flap, use a magnet strong enough to prevent a small child from pulling the flap open. Same purse use a push button on a strong spring for the clasp, use a pull latch with a heavy force requirement, ...
A holster for the gun with a strap ... see above ways to make it just hard enough to pull off that a child can't get it off without using a lever.
Adult too weak to out pull a baby? Ok instead of putting the latch for the purse on the outside put a hole in the top of the purse big enough for a finger, and move the latch to the inside of the purse.
So now the responsibility is not on the on parent, nor the gun manufacturer, but is instead on a company that makes purses.
take a look at this handgun
![]()
German-designed smart guns rerouted after cultural backlash in U.S. - The Globe and Mail
That could be on every new hand gun sold in this country.
problem solved
Not all purses.. I was talking about an opportunity for someone to sell baby proof holsters/purses.Properties of a baby/child hand: short fingers, low strength.My particular understanding? How can you add a safety device that doesn't add complexity? Instead of blowing wind out of your ass explain it.Not necessarily. It only adds complexity by your particular understanding. There is no specific reason why child proofing has to add complexity or slow you down.It adds complexity by definition. It could slow you down, you don't know that. The simple solution would be to keep your weapon on you instead of laying around in a shopping cart. Which may not even have been legal.
Solutions drawn from requirements: use an amount of force or finger length that is beyond a typical child's capability to access the device.
A purse with a magnetic clasp on a flap, use a magnet strong enough to prevent a small child from pulling the flap open. Same purse use a push button on a strong spring for the clasp, use a pull latch with a heavy force requirement, ...
A holster for the gun with a strap ... see above ways to make it just hard enough to pull off that a child can't get it off without using a lever.
Adult too weak to out pull a baby? Ok instead of putting the latch for the purse on the outside put a hole in the top of the purse big enough for a finger, and move the latch to the inside of the purse.
So now the responsibility is not on the on parent, nor the gun manufacturer, but is instead on a company that makes purses.
take a look at this handgun
![]()
German-designed smart guns rerouted after cultural backlash in U.S. - The Globe and Mail
That could be on every new hand gun sold in this country.
problem solved
I'd rather have a palm print scanner or such on the gun than a proximity/rfid device.
There's no such thing as a "responsible" gun owner. One horrible incident can change a life forever.
Toddler shoots kills mother inside Idaho Walmart Local News - Home
HAYDEN, Idaho -
2-year-old boy accidentally shot and killed his mother after he reached into her purse at a northern Idaho Wal-Mart and her concealed gun fired, authorities said Tuesday.
Kootenai County sheriff's spokesman Stu Miller told The Associated Press the woman was shopping with her son and three other children. Her family had come to the area to visit relatives, he said.
The woman, whose identity was not released, had a concealed weapons permit. Miller said the young boy was left in a shopping cart, reached into the victim's purse and grabbed a small caliber handgun, which discharged one time.
The Mom was an idiot who failed to follow a very basic set of safety rules.
The problem is - people don't have to show that they are aware of safe handling of guns or anything to get a permit. There's something wrong there in my opinion.
that is not accurate for utah and a few other states i know of....
New Applicants Utah Department of Public Safety
Gosh. Looks like something we should have federal regulations to well, regulate!There's no such thing as a "responsible" gun owner. One horrible incident can change a life forever.
Toddler shoots kills mother inside Idaho Walmart Local News - Home
HAYDEN, Idaho -
2-year-old boy accidentally shot and killed his mother after he reached into her purse at a northern Idaho Wal-Mart and her concealed gun fired, authorities said Tuesday.
Kootenai County sheriff's spokesman Stu Miller told The Associated Press the woman was shopping with her son and three other children. Her family had come to the area to visit relatives, he said.
The woman, whose identity was not released, had a concealed weapons permit. Miller said the young boy was left in a shopping cart, reached into the victim's purse and grabbed a small caliber handgun, which discharged one time.
The Mom was an idiot who failed to follow a very basic set of safety rules.
The problem is - people don't have to show that they are aware of safe handling of guns or anything to get a permit. There's something wrong there in my opinion.
that is not accurate for utah and a few other states i know of....
New Applicants Utah Department of Public Safety
I agree - the requirements vary per state, some have no requirements whatsoever. That doesn't seem good. I don't get why we have to jump through hoops for a drivers license but in some locales anyone can get a concealed or open carry permit.