If Anyone Is "Aiding and Abetting" the Terrorists, It Is Liberals

[Theowl32]

Yes many far left drones say such things to ignore that they supported Obama and his illegal wars..

They say the same thing about Saddam as well..

Putin says the same thing about Assad even though Obama has said he needs to be gone.

I supported no wars that the US has started in the past 12 years.

Better the devil you know

Putin needs to be gone.

You are a truther? Holy shit.

Look everyone! A truther!

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

* Insisted that we leave no residual force in Iraq, which led to the creation of the Islamic State in the first place.

Point of order Mike: The fact that we were in Iraq in the first place caused all this fucking mess with ISIS so "no residual force" is an after the fact consideration to the root cause of the problem.

Gee thanks President George W. "Gunslinger" Bush... hate to say I told ya so, but I fucking told ya so ..... DICK.

Oh... So you're looking at cause and effect?

Therefore, given that Islam, in the form of 9-11-01 altered the paradigm of acceptable risk, and given that at that time Saddam Hussein had devolved well below the threshold of acceptable risk, there was no alternative except to invade Iraq.

So let's review:

Islam attacked the US.

Islam caused the Invasion of Iraq.

Islam caused the deaths and injury of tens of thousands of people.

Islam is causing more death and injury... much worse than they were capable of causing 7 years ago.

And obama caused THAT.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

I supported no wars that the US has started in the past 12 years.

The US hasn't started any wars... ever.

But we have finished quite a few.

Let's review:

Progs start wars...

Americans finish wars.

 

[Stephanie]

the problem with the liberal. is they want to be so PC correct they refuse to see the bad in anyone or anything. they think that makes and shows them as "compassionate" and that's alright when it's not costing people their lives.

but then again in certain TIMES, it makes them just as dangerous to us.
It beats the hell out of me WHY they won't see things as they are

 

[mudwhistle]

Much to my genuine disbelief, we have liberals on this board arguing, in the immediate aftermath of the Muslim terrorist attack in San Bernardino no less, that Republicans are guilty of "aiding and abetting" and even "arming" the terrorists. If anyone is guilty of "aiding and abetting" the terrorists, it is American liberals. The same American liberals who:

* Refuse to seal our borders.

* Refuse to toughen our visa tracking program to stop potential bad guys from coming here on a visa and then over-staying.

* Refuse to support sane tough internal security policies (such as NSA's metadata program and the larger TSP).

* Insisted that we leave no residual force in Iraq, which led to the creation of the Islamic State in the first place.

* Refuse to acknowledge the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a Western/pro-Western nation has, the greater its chances of being attacked at some point.

* Not only refuse to acknowledge the above reality but now want to allow over 100,000 more Muslims into the country, even though several of our intel officials, including the FBI Director and the assistant director in charge of such screening, have said we cannot properly screen them. (By the way, Farook's wife passed her "vetting." In fact, she passed her Homeland Security "vetting." Yeah, liberals, tell me how we should feel safe that we can screen tens of thousands of Syrian refugees.)

* Refuse to admit that France's very strict gun laws, which include absolute bans on automatic weapons, did NOTHING to prevent the two recent horrendous terrorist attacks in Paris. Instead, they have gone to the sick extreme of mocking Republicans for praying for the victims' families and claim that Republicans have no business praying for the families until they support tougher gun laws. That's just sick.

* Have defended the disastrous, misguided decision of two potential life-saving witnesses who opted not to contact authorities about their suspicions regarding Farook and his wife because they did not want to engage in "profiling" (racial or otherwise). As Rudy Giuliani pointed out in a recent interview, he was personally involved with two cases where attacks were prevented because witnesses chose to say something rather than stay silent.

* Refuse to even call Muslim/Islamic terrorism by name, and their choice for president has gone to the idiotic extreme of saying that Muslims have "nothing whatsoever" to do with jihad.

So if anyone is aiding and abetting the terrorists, it is American liberals.

The Obama Administration has been busy charging Americans with hate crimes specifically against Muslims. This is either designed or has resulted in a fear to prevent possible reporting of terrorist activity.

By:
James Barrett
December 4, 2015
10659 Comments 376967
The day after a horrific shooting spree by what appears to be a radicalized Muslim man and his partner in San Bernardino, California, Attorney General Loretta Lynch pledged to a Muslim advocacy and lobbying group that she would take aggressive action against anyone who used "anti-Muslim rhetoric" that "edges toward violence."

Speaking to the audience at the Muslim Advocates' 10th anniversary dinner Thursday, Lynch said her "greatest fear" is the "incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric" in America and vowed to prosecute any guilty of what she deemed violence-inspiring speech.

"The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence," she said.

"Now obviously this is a country that is based on free speech, but when it edges towards violence, when we see the potential for someone lifting that mantle of anti-Muslim rhetoric—or, as we saw after 9/11, violence directed at individuals who may not even be Muslims but perceived to be Muslims, and they will suffer just as much—when we see that we will take action," said Lynch.

After touting the numbers of "investigations into acts of anti-Muslim hatred" and "bigoted actions" against Muslims launched by her DOJ, Lynch suggested the Constitution does not protect "actions predicated on violent talk" and pledged to prosecute those responsible for such actions.

Loretta Lynch Vows to Prosecute Those Who Use 'Anti-Muslim' Speech That 'Edges Toward Violence'

​

Also, the Obama Administration has streamlined the K-1 Visa process, which allowed Sayeed Raghead to bring his Muslim wife into the United States even though she gave an address that doesn't exist in Saudi Arabia. Only a short time after she arrived, they murdered 14 people in San Bernadino CA.

 

[Obiwan]

 

[imawhosure]

The left is losing the debate terribly. All polls show that Americas view is polar opposite of theirs; and yet they continue on telling all of us we are wrong.

This is why it dangerous to listen to anything they have to say, at least those with thousands of posts. It is more than obvious their job is to obfuscate the issues. America is finally becoming aware of their over the top propaganda, and that puts them in an untenable position. To bad for them, isn't it-)

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Much to my genuine disbelief, we have liberals on this board arguing, in the immediate aftermath of the Muslim terrorist attack in San Bernardino no less, that Republicans are guilty of "aiding and abetting" and even "arming" the terrorists. If anyone is guilty of "aiding and abetting" the terrorists, it is American liberals. The same American liberals who:

* Refuse to seal our borders.

* Refuse to toughen our visa tracking program to stop potential bad guys from coming here on a visa and then over-staying.

* Refuse to support sane tough internal security policies (such as NSA's metadata program and the larger TSP).

* Insisted that we leave no residual force in Iraq, which led to the creation of the Islamic State in the first place.

* Refuse to acknowledge the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a Western/pro-Western nation has, the greater its chances of being attacked at some point.

* Not only refuse to acknowledge the above reality but now want to allow over 100,000 more Muslims into the country, even though several of our intel officials, including the FBI Director and the assistant director in charge of such screening, have said we cannot properly screen them. (By the way, Farook's wife passed her "vetting." In fact, she passed her Homeland Security "vetting." Yeah, liberals, tell me how we should feel safe that we can screen tens of thousands of Syrian refugees.)

* Refuse to admit that France's very strict gun laws, which include absolute bans on automatic weapons, did NOTHING to prevent the two recent horrendous terrorist attacks in Paris. Instead, they have gone to the sick extreme of mocking Republicans for praying for the victims' families and claim that Republicans have no business praying for the families until they support tougher gun laws. That's just sick.

* Have defended the disastrous, misguided decision of two potential life-saving witnesses who opted not to contact authorities about their suspicions regarding Farook and his wife because they did not want to engage in "profiling" (racial or otherwise). As Rudy Giuliani pointed out in a recent interview, he was personally involved with two cases where attacks were prevented because witnesses chose to say something rather than stay silent.

* Refuse to even call Muslim/Islamic terrorism by name, and their choice for president has gone to the idiotic extreme of saying that Muslims have "nothing whatsoever" to do with jihad.

So if anyone is aiding and abetting the terrorists, it is American liberals.

The Obama Administration has been busy charging Americans with hate crimes specifically against Muslims. This is either designed or has resulted in a fear to prevent possible reporting of terrorist activity.

By:
James Barrett
December 4, 2015
10659 Comments 376967
The day after a horrific shooting spree by what appears to be a radicalized Muslim man and his partner in San Bernardino, California, Attorney General Loretta Lynch pledged to a Muslim advocacy and lobbying group that she would take aggressive action against anyone who used "anti-Muslim rhetoric" that "edges toward violence."

Speaking to the audience at the Muslim Advocates' 10th anniversary dinner Thursday, Lynch said her "greatest fear" is the "incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric" in America and vowed to prosecute any guilty of what she deemed violence-inspiring speech.

"The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence," she said.

"Now obviously this is a country that is based on free speech, but when it edges towards violence, when we see the potential for someone lifting that mantle of anti-Muslim rhetoric—or, as we saw after 9/11, violence directed at individuals who may not even be Muslims but perceived to be Muslims, and they will suffer just as much—when we see that we will take action," said Lynch.

After touting the numbers of "investigations into acts of anti-Muslim hatred" and "bigoted actions" against Muslims launched by her DOJ, Lynch suggested the Constitution does not protect "actions predicated on violent talk" and pledged to prosecute those responsible for such actions.

Loretta Lynch Vows to Prosecute Those Who Use 'Anti-Muslim' Speech That 'Edges Toward Violence'

​

Also, the Obama Administration has streamlined the K-1 Visa process, which allowed Sayeed Raghead to bring his Muslim wife into the United States even though she gave an address that doesn't exist in Saudi Arabia. Only a short time after she arrived, they murdered 14 people in San Bernadino CA.

Yeah... what you're witnessing there, is the down the middle demonstration of TREASON against the United States.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The left is losing the debate terribly. All polls show that Americas view is polar opposite of theirs; and yet they continue on telling all of us we are wrong.

This is why it dangerous to listen to anything they have to say, at least those with thousands of posts. It is more than obvious their job is to obfuscate the issues. America is finally becoming aware of their over the top propaganda, and that puts them in an untenable position. To bad for them, isn't it-)

The Majority of the Leftist on this site, are NOT US Citizens, but Euro-Peons posing as US Citizens.

Which is to say that they are literal 'Foreigners', promoting Foreign Ideas that are Hostile to American Principle...

Now... that's a clue in solving the riddle which defines: THE PROBLEM.

 

[BluesLegend]

the problem with the liberal. is they want to be so PC correct they refuse to see the bad in anyone or anything. they think that makes and shows them as "compassionate" and that's alright when it's not costing people their lives.

but then again in certain TIMES, it makes them just as dangerous to us.
It beats the hell out of me WHY they won't see things as they are

No the problem with liberals is they will go to any lengths to paint the stupid moron in the oval office a success when he's been a colossal failure. Obamatard no sooner proclaims ISIS no threat to America at home, while mocking anyone who disagrees, then ISIS kills 14 Americans in California. Then liberals and the liberal media freak out trying to somehow spin that. And its been total crickets from the White House.

 

[imawhosure]

The left is losing the debate terribly. All polls show that Americas view is polar opposite of theirs; and yet they continue on telling all of us we are wrong.

This is why it dangerous to listen to anything they have to say, at least those with thousands of posts. It is more than obvious their job is to obfuscate the issues. America is finally becoming aware of their over the top propaganda, and that puts them in an untenable position. To bad for them, isn't it-)

The Majority of the Leftist on this site, are NOT US Citizens, but Euro-Peons posing as US Citizens.

Which is the say that they are literal 'Foreigners', promoting Foreign Ideas that are Hostile to American Principle...

Now... that's a clue in solving the riddle which defines: THE PROBLEM.

And you know this to be true how? I am just asking, because if it is true, I find it fascinating.

 

[Stephanie]

You think she'll THREATEN to prosecute this? this is hate directed at all of US in this country.

snip:
CAIR LA Leader: Terrorism Is Global Problem Not a Muslim Problem… It’s America’s Fault (Video)

Jim Hoft Dec 4th, 2015 10:13 pm 39 Comments

CAIR LA spokesman Hussam Ayloush blamed American foreign policy for Islamic terrorism today in a CNN interview.
all of it here:
CAIR LA Leader: Terrorism Is Global Problem Not a Muslim Problem... It's America's Fault (Video) - The Gateway Pundit

IT TIME to wake up people. this administration is NOT GOING to protect us evidently. vote out these people come 2016 and no more Hillary, Bernie, any Progressive/Democrats

 

[sealybobo]

Much to my genuine disbelief, we have liberals on this board arguing, in the immediate aftermath of the Muslim terrorist attack in San Bernardino no less, that Republicans are guilty of "aiding and abetting" and even "arming" the terrorists. If anyone is guilty of "aiding and abetting" the terrorists, it is American liberals. The same American liberals who:

* Refuse to seal our borders.

* Refuse to toughen our visa tracking program to stop potential bad guys from coming here on a visa and then over-staying.

* Refuse to support sane tough internal security policies (such as NSA's metadata program and the larger TSP).

* Insisted that we leave no residual force in Iraq, which led to the creation of the Islamic State in the first place.

* Refuse to acknowledge the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a Western/pro-Western nation has, the greater its chances of being attacked at some point.

* Not only refuse to acknowledge the above reality but now want to allow over 100,000 more Muslims into the country, even though several of our intel officials, including the FBI Director and the assistant director in charge of such screening, have said we cannot properly screen them. (By the way, Farook's wife passed her "vetting." In fact, she passed her Homeland Security "vetting." Yeah, liberals, tell me how we should feel safe that we can screen tens of thousands of Syrian refugees.)

* Refuse to admit that France's very strict gun laws, which include absolute bans on automatic weapons, did NOTHING to prevent the two recent horrendous terrorist attacks in Paris. Instead, they have gone to the sick extreme of mocking Republicans for praying for the victims' families and claim that Republicans have no business praying for the families until they support tougher gun laws. That's just sick.

* Have defended the disastrous, misguided decision of two potential life-saving witnesses who opted not to contact authorities about their suspicions regarding Farook and his wife because they did not want to engage in "profiling" (racial or otherwise). As Rudy Giuliani pointed out in a recent interview, he was personally involved with two cases where attacks were prevented because witnesses chose to say something rather than stay silent.

* Refuse to even call Muslim/Islamic terrorism by name, and their choice for president has gone to the idiotic extreme of saying that Muslims have "nothing whatsoever" to do with jihad.

So if anyone is aiding and abetting the terrorists, it is American liberals.

I know a guy I'm suspicious of. What am I or the cops gonna do?

Let's make it so they can't buy guys before a background check.

 

[sealybobo]

The left is losing the debate terribly. All polls show that Americas view is polar opposite of theirs; and yet they continue on telling all of us we are wrong.

This is why it dangerous to listen to anything they have to say, at least those with thousands of posts. It is more than obvious their job is to obfuscate the issues. America is finally becoming aware of their over the top propaganda, and that puts them in an untenable position. To bad for them, isn't it-)

The Majority of the Leftist on this site, are NOT US Citizens, but Euro-Peons posing as US Citizens.

Which is the say that they are literal 'Foreigners', promoting Foreign Ideas that are Hostile to American Principle...

Now... that's a clue in solving the riddle which defines: THE PROBLEM.

No one is as American as you

 

[Obiwan]

Much to my genuine disbelief, we have liberals on this board arguing, in the immediate aftermath of the Muslim terrorist attack in San Bernardino no less, that Republicans are guilty of "aiding and abetting" and even "arming" the terrorists. If anyone is guilty of "aiding and abetting" the terrorists, it is American liberals. The same American liberals who:

* Refuse to seal our borders.

* Refuse to toughen our visa tracking program to stop potential bad guys from coming here on a visa and then over-staying.

* Refuse to support sane tough internal security policies (such as NSA's metadata program and the larger TSP).

* Insisted that we leave no residual force in Iraq, which led to the creation of the Islamic State in the first place.

* Refuse to acknowledge the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a Western/pro-Western nation has, the greater its chances of being attacked at some point.

* Not only refuse to acknowledge the above reality but now want to allow over 100,000 more Muslims into the country, even though several of our intel officials, including the FBI Director and the assistant director in charge of such screening, have said we cannot properly screen them. (By the way, Farook's wife passed her "vetting." In fact, she passed her Homeland Security "vetting." Yeah, liberals, tell me how we should feel safe that we can screen tens of thousands of Syrian refugees.)

* Refuse to admit that France's very strict gun laws, which include absolute bans on automatic weapons, did NOTHING to prevent the two recent horrendous terrorist attacks in Paris. Instead, they have gone to the sick extreme of mocking Republicans for praying for the victims' families and claim that Republicans have no business praying for the families until they support tougher gun laws. That's just sick.

* Have defended the disastrous, misguided decision of two potential life-saving witnesses who opted not to contact authorities about their suspicions regarding Farook and his wife because they did not want to engage in "profiling" (racial or otherwise). As Rudy Giuliani pointed out in a recent interview, he was personally involved with two cases where attacks were prevented because witnesses chose to say something rather than stay silent.

* Refuse to even call Muslim/Islamic terrorism by name, and their choice for president has gone to the idiotic extreme of saying that Muslims have "nothing whatsoever" to do with jihad.

So if anyone is aiding and abetting the terrorists, it is American liberals.

I know a guy I'm suspicious of. What am I or the cops gonna do?

Let's make it so they can't buy guys before a background check.

Wouldn't requiring a background check to "buy guys" piss the faggot off????

 

[Wildman]

you should go back to washing cars, lolololol!

THAT.., would take an education beyond what their ability, they are better qualified for sewer ING ......

 

[Wildman]

Here... we will destroy Islam, to the last one... and we will leave no trace that a Muslim ever set foot in the US

AMEN Bro!!!!!
and i will do my part to assist in eliminating every fucking goat fucking muslime/liberturd in my country.

 

[depotoo]

First, your country separates murder from manslaughter in their stats. Murder is murder, premeditated or not. Secondly, when you hear US news reports on murder, they include manslaughter in their reporting. In 2011, 37% of murders in Australia were by stabbing, 35% by beating.

So 16% of murders, according to your gov in 2007 were with firearms. What were the weapons used in the other 84%?
From your govt website-

I
Personally? If I am going to be killed, I believe I would prefer bullet to stabbing. And I have a chance if I also have a gun.
With a knife, the longest arms and strongest have the advantage, which will leave most women the most vunerable.

How many stabbings have they had? And you don't share borders with a drug running, gun running criminal stronghold with porous borders.

Stabbings have been about the same.

True re the porous border...

 

[Wildman]

The second is redundant and outdated.

how so, or are you implying the Second Amdt. should be strengthened to require all U.S. citizens with at least 7 generations of American heritage/citizenship to be armed at ALL times??

i am in favor of that !!

BUT!!

if you mean otherwise...., then and ... OK ??:

 

[Stephanie]

the problem with the liberal. is they want to be so PC correct they refuse to see the bad in anyone or anything. they think that makes and shows them as "compassionate" and that's alright when it's not costing people their lives.

but then again in certain TIMES, it makes them just as dangerous to us.
It beats the hell out of me WHY they won't see things as they are

No the problem with liberals is they will go to any lengths to paint the stupid moron in the oval office a success when he's been a colossal failure. Obamatard no sooner proclaims ISIS no threat to America at home, while mocking anyone who disagrees, then ISIS kills 14 Americans in California. Then liberals and the liberal media freak out trying to somehow spin that. And its been total crickets from the White House.

they won't ever admit they put a Muslim sympathize and an enemy to the rest of us in the country as President. thank goodness the MAJORITY of the people saw it soon enough to cut him down to size before he could do us anymore damage with his loyalties that were NOT WITH US