If Anyone Is "Aiding and Abetting" the Terrorists, It Is Liberals

[Clementine]

the problem with the liberal. is they want to be so PC correct they refuse to see the bad in anyone or anything. they think that makes and shows them as "compassionate" and that's alright when it's not costing people their lives.

but then again in certain TIMES, it makes them just as dangerous to us.
It beats the hell out of me WHY they won't see things as they are

The left only sees bad in political foes.

When it comes to radicals, whether Muslims or leftwing kooks, they defend them before, during and after they attack.

Obama's DOJ just declared that hateful language towards Muslims will not be tolerated and she will prosecute those she believes incites any violence towards Muslims. She said nothing about BLM rhetoric that incited violence towards police and whites. They came out and directly called for the murder of people and they got results, as evidenced by the deaths that followed. Somehow, the left doesn't see that as hate speech or inciting violence.

Even as the San Bernardino attack unfolded, the left quickly spread the word that it had to be white racists. They shamelessly made up a story to fit their narrative and never apologized after grossly misinforming people. Even as evidence came in, they refused to call the attackers what they were and kept spinning things. Sad part is that there are people who still trust these hacks.

They continued to defend Islam after it was clear that radical Muslim terrorists carried out the attack. The lib media desperately tried looking for other excuses for their behavior and ended up going with their favorite tactic of blaming guns.

It's amazing that anyone would still listen to the lib media after seeing their outright lies and bold attempt to shape peoples' opinions rather than inform the public. They use their job to manipulate, not to report.

 

[sealybobo]

Now we see how easy an American can become a nazi

Once again you conflate Americans, with those who reject the Principles that define America... but who reside within the borders of the United States.


The way that THEY become Nazis is that they just Register with the Democrat Party. This because the Democrats feign loyalty to nation and hatred of capitalism, while rejecting all traits common to loyalty to nation and sponging off of the capitalist, therein, embodying all of the elements common to National Socialism.

Huh? I don't speak nazi. Sorry we aren't Americans enough for you.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Sorry we aren't Americans enough for you.

LOL! Sis... Because Nature precludes the means for one to simultaneously adhere to both the thesis and the antithesis... You're not American at all.

 

[sealybobo]

Sorry we aren't Americans enough for you.

LOL! Sis... Because Nature precludes the means for one to simultaneously adhere to both the thesis and the antithesis... You're not American at all.

You lost me at lol

 

[depotoo]

Quit using Fox as the reason for differences in opinions. It is just stupid.

Humm, it turns out that Tashfeen Malik (Farook's wife) passed her "extensive" State Department vetting and her Homeland Security vetting, which included two face-to-face interviews! Yes, and a short time later she helped murder 14 Americans just after proclaiming her allegiance to the Islamic State on Facebook.

So, liberals, are you still gonna tell us that we can properly vet the 170,000 Syrian Muslims whom Obama wants to let into the country?

EXACTLY.

AGAIN , BACKGROUND CHECKS ARE USELESS.

 

[Dr Grump]

Vern, here in our neck of the woods we use google, how about you guys?
LINK

Cletus, in our neck of the woods the person making the assertion provides the link to back it up, which you still haven't done. I asked for a link to the study not to the website.

 

[Dr Grump]

The US hasn't started any wars... ever.

But we have finished quite a few.

Let's review:

Progs start wars...

Americans finish wars.

Iraq 2003 - US started
Afghanistan - US started

I wouldn't call Hitler a progressive by any stretch of the imagination, nor the Empire of Japan...

 

[Dr Grump]

First, your country separates murder from manslaughter in their stats. Murder is murder, premeditated or not. Secondly, when you hear US news reports on murder, they include manslaughter in their reporting. In 2011, 37% of murders in Australia were by stabbing, 35% by beating.

So 16% of murders, according to your gov in 2007 were with firearms. What were the weapons used in the other 84%?
From your govt website-

I
Personally? If I am going to be killed, I believe I would prefer bullet to stabbing. And I have a chance if I also have a gun.
With a knife, the longest arms and strongest have the advantage, which will leave most women the most vunerable.

Murder is not manslaughter, even you guys have manslaughter, so they are distinct. Manslaughter is somebody dying but the person who killed them did it accidentally. Murder is premeditated and the outcome a foregone conclusion.

As to the rest of your point, I'm not too sure what it is. My whole point has always been, that since certain guns were banned and other restrictions were brought in in Australia, the chances of me walking down the street and being randomly killed in a mass shooting by somebody using a powerful automatic/semi-automatic weapon because they're pissed off at the world - is zero.

Couple of other things - 1) I can outrun a knife, have yet to meet the person who can outrun a bullet
2) Look at our homicide rate in your link - it's negligible compared to the US

 

[Dr Grump]

First, your country separates murder from manslaughter in their stats. Murder is murder, premeditated or not. Secondly, when you hear US news reports on murder, they include manslaughter in their reporting. In 2011, 37% of murders in Australia were by stabbing, 35% by beating.

So 16% of murders, according to your gov in 2007 were with firearms. What were the weapons used in the other 84%?
From your govt website-

I
Personally? If I am going to be killed, I believe I would prefer bullet to stabbing. And I have a chance if I also have a gun.
With a knife, the longest arms and strongest have the advantage, which will leave most women the most vunerable.

Murder is not manslaughter, even you guys have manslaughter, so they are distinct. Manslaughter is somebody dying but the person responsible had no intention of doing so. Murder is premeditated and the outcome a foregone conclusion. I mean you guys actually have degrees of murder. Murder is murder, or it's not.

As to the rest of your point, I'm not too sure what it is. My whole point has always been, that since certain guns were banned and other restrictions were brought in in Australia, the chances of me walking down the street and being randomly killed in a mass shooting by somebody using a powerful automatic/semi-automatic weapon because they're pissed off at the world - is zero.

Couple of other things - 1) I can outrun a knife, have yet to meet the person who can outrun a bullet
2) Look at our homicide rate in your link - it's negligible compared to the US.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Much to my genuine disbelief, we have liberals on this board arguing, in the immediate aftermath of the Muslim terrorist attack in San Bernardino no less, that Republicans are guilty of "aiding and abetting" and even "arming" the terrorists. If anyone is guilty of "aiding and abetting" the terrorists, it is American liberals. The same American liberals who:

* Refuse to seal our borders.

* Refuse to toughen our visa tracking program to stop potential bad guys from coming here on a visa and then over-staying.

* Refuse to support sane tough internal security policies (such as NSA's metadata program and the larger TSP).

* Insisted that we leave no residual force in Iraq, which led to the creation of the Islamic State in the first place.

* Refuse to acknowledge the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a Western/pro-Western nation has, the greater its chances of being attacked at some point.

* Not only refuse to acknowledge the above reality but now want to allow 10,000 more Muslims into the country, even though several of our intel officials, including the FBI Director and the assistant director in charge of such screening, have said we cannot properly screen them. (By the way, Farook's wife passed her "vetting." In fact, she passed her Homeland Security "vetting." Yeah, liberals, tell me how we should feel safe that we can screen tens of thousands of Syrian refugees.)

* Refuse to admit that France's very strict gun laws, which include absolute bans on automatic weapons, did NOTHING to prevent the two recent horrendous terrorist attacks in Paris. Instead, they have gone to the sick extreme of mocking Republicans for praying for the victims' families and claim that Republicans have no business praying for the families until they support tougher gun laws. That's just sick.

* Have defended the disastrous, misguided decision of two potential life-saving witnesses who opted not to contact authorities about their suspicions regarding Farook and his wife because they did not want to engage in "profiling" (racial or otherwise). As Rudy Giuliani pointed out in a recent interview, he was personally involved with two cases where attacks were prevented because witnesses chose to say something rather than stay silent.

* Refuse to even call Muslim/Islamic terrorism by name, and their choice for president has gone to the idiotic extreme of saying that Muslims have "nothing whatsoever" to do with jihad.

So if anyone is aiding and abetting the terrorists, it is American liberals.

Farook was an American citizen.

Actually, he was also a second-generation Muslim immigrant by definition, because his parents were Muslims who immigrated here from Pakistan.

He was "an American citizen" who was yet another Muslim who became radicalized, and he then helped murder 14 Americans in a jihadist terrorist attack, an attack that escaped detection because of the PC nonsense preached by you and your fellow lefties. Incredibly, you guys still refuse to take any responsibility for the neighbors' failure to report their suspicions about the Farooks to the authorities. We now know that those neighbors decided against reporting their suspicions for fear of engaging in "racial profiling" or "discrimination."

And one of your "solutions" is to let 10,000 more Muslims enter the country! Yeah, what a brilliant idea: Allow in 10,000 more of the one and only demographic group that has provided all of the recruits for jihadist terrorism. Can we at least settle them only in sanctuary cities?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Much to my genuine disbelief, we have liberals on this board arguing, in the immediate aftermath of the Muslim terrorist attack in San Bernardino no less, that Republicans are guilty of "aiding and abetting" and even "arming" the terrorists. If anyone is guilty of "aiding and abetting" the terrorists, it is American liberals. The same American liberals who:

* Refuse to seal our borders.

* Refuse to toughen our visa tracking program to stop potential bad guys from coming here on a visa and then over-staying.

* Refuse to support sane tough internal security policies (such as NSA's metadata program and the larger TSP).

* Insisted that we leave no residual force in Iraq, which led to the creation of the Islamic State in the first place.

* Refuse to acknowledge the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a Western/pro-Western nation has, the greater its chances of being attacked at some point.

* Not only refuse to acknowledge the above reality but now want to allow 10,000 more Muslims into the country, even though several of our intel officials, including the FBI Director and the assistant director in charge of such screening, have said we cannot properly screen them. (By the way, Farook's wife passed her "vetting." In fact, she passed her Homeland Security "vetting." Yeah, liberals, tell me how we should feel safe that we can screen tens of thousands of Syrian refugees.)

* Refuse to admit that France's very strict gun laws, which include absolute bans on automatic weapons, did NOTHING to prevent the two recent horrendous terrorist attacks in Paris. Instead, they have gone to the sick extreme of mocking Republicans for praying for the victims' families and claim that Republicans have no business praying for the families until they support tougher gun laws. That's just sick.

* Have defended the disastrous, misguided decision of two potential life-saving witnesses who opted not to contact authorities about their suspicions regarding Farook and his wife because they did not want to engage in "profiling" (racial or otherwise). As Rudy Giuliani pointed out in a recent interview, he was personally involved with two cases where attacks were prevented because witnesses chose to say something rather than stay silent.

* Refuse to even call Muslim/Islamic terrorism by name, and their choice for president has gone to the idiotic extreme of saying that Muslims have "nothing whatsoever" to do with jihad.

So if anyone is aiding and abetting the terrorists, it is American liberals.

Farook was an American citizen.

Actually, he was also a second-generation Muslim immigrant by definition, because his parents were Muslims who immigrated here from Pakistan.

He was "an American citizen" who was yet another Muslim who became radicalized, and he then helped murder 14 Americans in a jihadist terrorist attack, an attack that escaped detection because of the PC nonsense preached by you and your fellow lefties. Incredibly, you guys still refuse to take any responsibility for the neighbors' failure to report their suspicions about the Farooks to the authorities. We now know that those neighbors decided against reporting their suspicions for fear of engaging in "racial profiling" or "discrimination."

And one of your "solutions" is to let 10,000 more Muslims enter the country! Yeah, what a brilliant idea: Allow in 10,000 more of the one and only demographic group that has provided all of the recruits for jihadist terrorism. Can we at least settle them only in sanctuary cities?

Don't lie about me. Find some other way to be an asshole.

 

[jillian]

Much to my genuine disbelief, we have liberals on this board arguing, in the immediate aftermath of the Muslim terrorist attack in San Bernardino no less, that Republicans are guilty of "aiding and abetting" and even "arming" the terrorists. If anyone is guilty of "aiding and abetting" the terrorists, it is American liberals. The same American liberals who:

* Refuse to seal our borders.

* Refuse to toughen our visa tracking program to stop potential bad guys from coming here on a visa and then over-staying.

* Refuse to support sane tough internal security policies (such as NSA's metadata program and the larger TSP).

* Insisted that we leave no residual force in Iraq, which led to the creation of the Islamic State in the first place.

* Refuse to acknowledge the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a Western/pro-Western nation has, the greater its chances of being attacked at some point.

* Not only refuse to acknowledge the above reality but now want to allow 10,000 more Muslims into the country, even though several of our intel officials, including the FBI Director and the assistant director in charge of such screening, have said we cannot properly screen them. (By the way, Farook's wife passed her "vetting." In fact, she passed her Homeland Security "vetting." Yeah, liberals, tell me how we should feel safe that we can screen tens of thousands of Syrian refugees.)

* Refuse to admit that France's very strict gun laws, which include absolute bans on automatic weapons, did NOTHING to prevent the two recent horrendous terrorist attacks in Paris. Instead, they have gone to the sick extreme of mocking Republicans for praying for the victims' families and claim that Republicans have no business praying for the families until they support tougher gun laws. That's just sick.

* Have defended the disastrous, misguided decision of two potential life-saving witnesses who opted not to contact authorities about their suspicions regarding Farook and his wife because they did not want to engage in "profiling" (racial or otherwise). As Rudy Giuliani pointed out in a recent interview, he was personally involved with two cases where attacks were prevented because witnesses chose to say something rather than stay silent.

* Refuse to even call Muslim/Islamic terrorism by name, and their choice for president has gone to the idiotic extreme of saying that Muslims have "nothing whatsoever" to do with jihad.

So if anyone is aiding and abetting the terrorists, it is American liberals.

Farook was an American citizen.

Actually, he was also a second-generation Muslim immigrant by definition, because his parents were Muslims who immigrated here from Pakistan.

He was "an American citizen" who was yet another Muslim who became radicalized, and he then helped murder 14 Americans in a jihadist terrorist attack, an attack that escaped detection because of the PC nonsense preached by you and your fellow lefties. Incredibly, you guys still refuse to take any responsibility for the neighbors' failure to report their suspicions about the Farooks to the authorities. We now know that those neighbors decided against reporting their suspicions for fear of engaging in "racial profiling" or "discrimination."

And one of your "solutions" is to let 10,000 more Muslims enter the country! Yeah, what a brilliant idea: Allow in 10,000 more of the one and only demographic group that has provided all of the recruits for jihadist terrorism. Can we at least settle them only in sanctuary cities?

why are you putting "american citizen" in quotes? no matter how much of a bigot you are, if someone is born here they are a citizen. i don't know when your family came here, but unless you're native american, you're descended from immigrants, too. and luckily, we have a first amendment that protects freedom of religion and it's not just your religion that's protected . to me, i see very little difference between a christian terrorist like the trash who shot up planned parenthood the white christian supremacist scum on this board who said hd like to put a bullet in the back of everyone's head who voted for this president (52% of the voting public) e'd the guy who shot up san bernadine.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

When it becomes this obvious liberals are at fault they freak out and start blaming everyone else, this is not the first time.

Yes because that's what the Leftist Politburo Brainwashing HQ instructs them to do.

Leftists are devoid of any semblance of personal responsibility, as such nothing is ever their fault, thus we have the blame somebody else syndrome that they frequently exhibit.

The Leftist mind is actually incredibly infantile, it's growth has been stunted as soon as the Cultural Marxism garbage begins to take control of it.

Siege heil, care to go goosestepping in the nude?

Is this your fantasy? Watching me goosestepping sans clothing?

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Much to my genuine disbelief, we have liberals on this board arguing, in the immediate aftermath of the Muslim terrorist attack in San Bernardino no less, that Republicans are guilty of "aiding and abetting" and even "arming" the terrorists. If anyone is guilty of "aiding and abetting" the terrorists, it is American liberals. The same American liberals who:

* Refuse to seal our borders.

* Refuse to toughen our visa tracking program to stop potential bad guys from coming here on a visa and then over-staying.

* Refuse to support sane tough internal security policies (such as NSA's metadata program and the larger TSP).

* Insisted that we leave no residual force in Iraq, which led to the creation of the Islamic State in the first place.

* Refuse to acknowledge the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a Western/pro-Western nation has, the greater its chances of being attacked at some point.

* Not only refuse to acknowledge the above reality but now want to allow over 100,000 more Muslims into the country, even though several of our intel officials, including the FBI Director and the assistant director in charge of such screening, have said we cannot properly screen them. (By the way, Farook's wife passed her "vetting." In fact, she passed her Homeland Security "vetting." Yeah, liberals, tell me how we should feel safe that we can screen tens of thousands of Syrian refugees.)

* Refuse to admit that France's very strict gun laws, which include absolute bans on automatic weapons, did NOTHING to prevent the two recent horrendous terrorist attacks in Paris. Instead, they have gone to the sick extreme of mocking Republicans for praying for the victims' families and claim that Republicans have no business praying for the families until they support tougher gun laws. That's just sick.

* Have defended the disastrous, misguided decision of two potential life-saving witnesses who opted not to contact authorities about their suspicions regarding Farook and his wife because they did not want to engage in "profiling" (racial or otherwise). As Rudy Giuliani pointed out in a recent interview, he was personally involved with two cases where attacks were prevented because witnesses chose to say something rather than stay silent.

* Refuse to even call Muslim/Islamic terrorism by name, and their choice for president has gone to the idiotic extreme of saying that Muslims have "nothing whatsoever" to do with jihad.

So if anyone is aiding and abetting the terrorists, it is American liberals.

Farook was an American citizen.

He became a traitor. ANY citizen of ANY nation, if they turn against their OWN fellow citizens with the intent, in this case, of harming them, they become a traitor.

His she-b-tch, she was full-on Pakistani, when he got married to her, he should have been forced to go and live in Pakistan with her.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

95 to 99% of all of the gun talk is aimed squarely at red states, which the left wants to be able to control.

How do we know this?

Because lefty bastions are big cities run by lefties with gun control, and blue states that also have massive gun control. (Just think Chicago, New York, Washington DC, and for states California) Virtually all of these cities and blue states have tremendous amounts of gun control, and yet they are the most violent places with gun abuse, usually by people wielding illegal fire arms.

And so, every thinking individual knows that the government can NOT legislate gun violence away, unless they make guns illegal and start forced confiscation. Even at that, the criminals will have them, looooooong after law abiding citizens turn them in, leaving the law abiders defenseless, and basically making it open season on them.

I do not think it is to much to ask the left to show us one or two laws that would have stopped most of the mass shootings, and we can all then discuss them like intelligent human beings! If they can't produce them, then they are doing no more than trying through the backdoor to repeal the 2nd amendment.

Now for you reasonable Democrats, (and I honestly hope there are some left) with Obama basically over riding the law of the land on illegal immigration and everything else, why would you believe that we should trust his promise on ANYTHING? I am sorry, but he has consistently lied to all of us; the American citizenry, so to believe anything the man says now is akin to going back to a car dealer that charged you double for the last car you purchased. It ain't going to happen!!!!!!

The Second Amendment reads:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

So messing around in ANY way with this Amendment would certainly be an infringement.

My goodness, I'm apparently more of a Patriotic American standing up for The Constitution than any of the Leftists are....and I'm not even American, I'm European as you know.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Much to my genuine disbelief, we have liberals on this board arguing, in the immediate aftermath of the Muslim terrorist attack in San Bernardino no less, that Republicans are guilty of "aiding and abetting" and even "arming" the terrorists. If anyone is guilty of "aiding and abetting" the terrorists, it is American liberals. The same American liberals who:

* Refuse to seal our borders.

* Refuse to toughen our visa tracking program to stop potential bad guys from coming here on a visa and then over-staying.

* Refuse to support sane tough internal security policies (such as NSA's metadata program and the larger TSP).

* Insisted that we leave no residual force in Iraq, which led to the creation of the Islamic State in the first place.

* Refuse to acknowledge the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a Western/pro-Western nation has, the greater its chances of being attacked at some point.

* Not only refuse to acknowledge the above reality but now want to allow over 100,000 more Muslims into the country, even though several of our intel officials, including the FBI Director and the assistant director in charge of such screening, have said we cannot properly screen them. (By the way, Farook's wife passed her "vetting." In fact, she passed her Homeland Security "vetting." Yeah, liberals, tell me how we should feel safe that we can screen tens of thousands of Syrian refugees.)

* Refuse to admit that France's very strict gun laws, which include absolute bans on automatic weapons, did NOTHING to prevent the two recent horrendous terrorist attacks in Paris. Instead, they have gone to the sick extreme of mocking Republicans for praying for the victims' families and claim that Republicans have no business praying for the families until they support tougher gun laws. That's just sick.

* Have defended the disastrous, misguided decision of two potential life-saving witnesses who opted not to contact authorities about their suspicions regarding Farook and his wife because they did not want to engage in "profiling" (racial or otherwise). As Rudy Giuliani pointed out in a recent interview, he was personally involved with two cases where attacks were prevented because witnesses chose to say something rather than stay silent.

* Refuse to even call Muslim/Islamic terrorism by name, and their choice for president has gone to the idiotic extreme of saying that Muslims have "nothing whatsoever" to do with jihad.

So if anyone is aiding and abetting the terrorists, it is American liberals.

Farook was an American citizen.

He became a traitor. ANY citizen of ANY nation, if they turn against their OWN fellow citizens with the intent, in this case, of harming them, they become a traitor.

His she-b-tch, she was full-on Pakistani, when he got married to her, he should have been forced to go and live in Pakistan with her.

My doctor of years ago was a 'full-on' Pakistani. Why was he here?

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Much to my genuine disbelief, we have liberals on this board arguing, in the immediate aftermath of the Muslim terrorist attack in San Bernardino no less, that Republicans are guilty of "aiding and abetting" and even "arming" the terrorists. If anyone is guilty of "aiding and abetting" the terrorists, it is American liberals. The same American liberals who:

* Refuse to seal our borders.

* Refuse to toughen our visa tracking program to stop potential bad guys from coming here on a visa and then over-staying.

* Refuse to support sane tough internal security policies (such as NSA's metadata program and the larger TSP).

* Insisted that we leave no residual force in Iraq, which led to the creation of the Islamic State in the first place.

* Refuse to acknowledge the self-evident fact that the more Muslims a Western/pro-Western nation has, the greater its chances of being attacked at some point.

* Not only refuse to acknowledge the above reality but now want to allow over 100,000 more Muslims into the country, even though several of our intel officials, including the FBI Director and the assistant director in charge of such screening, have said we cannot properly screen them. (By the way, Farook's wife passed her "vetting." In fact, she passed her Homeland Security "vetting." Yeah, liberals, tell me how we should feel safe that we can screen tens of thousands of Syrian refugees.)

* Refuse to admit that France's very strict gun laws, which include absolute bans on automatic weapons, did NOTHING to prevent the two recent horrendous terrorist attacks in Paris. Instead, they have gone to the sick extreme of mocking Republicans for praying for the victims' families and claim that Republicans have no business praying for the families until they support tougher gun laws. That's just sick.

* Have defended the disastrous, misguided decision of two potential life-saving witnesses who opted not to contact authorities about their suspicions regarding Farook and his wife because they did not want to engage in "profiling" (racial or otherwise). As Rudy Giuliani pointed out in a recent interview, he was personally involved with two cases where attacks were prevented because witnesses chose to say something rather than stay silent.

* Refuse to even call Muslim/Islamic terrorism by name, and their choice for president has gone to the idiotic extreme of saying that Muslims have "nothing whatsoever" to do with jihad.

So if anyone is aiding and abetting the terrorists, it is American liberals.

Farook was an American citizen.

He became a traitor. ANY citizen of ANY nation, if they turn against their OWN fellow citizens with the intent, in this case, of harming them, they become a traitor.

His she-b-tch, she was full-on Pakistani, when he got married to her, he should have been forced to go and live in Pakistan with her.

My doctor of years ago was a 'full-on' Pakistani. Why was he here?

Yes, a few years ago, in Glasgow, Scotland. There was an Iraqi Doctor, he'd been in Glasgow for I think four years, working at the local hospital, had many new friends etc.

One day, he packed a ton of explosives in an SUV and was about to drive it into Glasgow International Airport as a suicide mission.

Thankfully his evil plan went wrong and he was apprehended.

So yes, we never really know what this crowds actual ultimate intentions are, do we?

 

[Moonglow]

When it becomes this obvious liberals are at fault they freak out and start blaming everyone else, this is not the first time.

Yes because that's what the Leftist Politburo Brainwashing HQ instructs them to do.

Leftists are devoid of any semblance of personal responsibility, as such nothing is ever their fault, thus we have the blame somebody else syndrome that they frequently exhibit.

The Leftist mind is actually incredibly infantile, it's growth has been stunted as soon as the Cultural Marxism garbage begins to take control of it.

Siege heil, care to go goosestepping in the nude?

Is this your fantasy? Watching me goosestepping sans clothing?

Oui mon ami....Come join the fascist nude party....

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

When it becomes this obvious liberals are at fault they freak out and start blaming everyone else, this is not the first time.

Yes because that's what the Leftist Politburo Brainwashing HQ instructs them to do.

Leftists are devoid of any semblance of personal responsibility, as such nothing is ever their fault, thus we have the blame somebody else syndrome that they frequently exhibit.

The Leftist mind is actually incredibly infantile, it's growth has been stunted as soon as the Cultural Marxism garbage begins to take control of it.

Siege heil, care to go goosestepping in the nude?

Is this your fantasy? Watching me goosestepping sans clothing?

Oui mon ami....Come join the fascist nude party....

Every Leftist secretly wishes deep-down to be brought to heel by a Fascist.

 

[Moonglow]

When it becomes this obvious liberals are at fault they freak out and start blaming everyone else, this is not the first time.

Yes because that's what the Leftist Politburo Brainwashing HQ instructs them to do.

Leftists are devoid of any semblance of personal responsibility, as such nothing is ever their fault, thus we have the blame somebody else syndrome that they frequently exhibit.

The Leftist mind is actually incredibly infantile, it's growth has been stunted as soon as the Cultural Marxism garbage begins to take control of it.

Siege heil, care to go goosestepping in the nude?

Is this your fantasy? Watching me goosestepping sans clothing?

Oui mon ami....Come join the fascist nude party....

Every Leftist secretly wishes deep-down to be brought to heel by a Fascist.

Even the ones that are ambidextrous...