If banning rifles is a winner for democrats, why do they want to hide it from voters?

[Daryl Hunt]

Sorry..... the AR-15 is a specifically protected rifle, as are all semi automatic rifles.......you guys don't get to ban them.

Federal judge upholds Massachusetts ban on AR-15, large capacity magazines
Oh, really. Last time I checked, not only were there many municipalities but also entire states like California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Washington, D.C that specifically ban or highly regulate the AR-15 specifically by name. The Ban has been upheld him Federal Court. Here is the ruling in the Boston Federal Court.

"The AR-15 and its analogs, along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional right to ‘bear arms,’" U.S. District Judge William Young, a Reagan appointee, wrote in a decision Thursday in Boston, dismissing a lawsuit over the state law.


Just stop making shit up.

And they are unConstitutional.... they ignored Heller, and now, if Kavanaugh gets confirmed it will be overturned... considering that that circuit ignored D.C. v Heller, Caetano v Massachusetts, Friedman v Highland Park, Miller v United States...... Those judges are ignoring Supreme Court decisions..

You are wrong.

This is Scalia, telling the Court why they should have taken that case and told the circuit they were wrong.....Scalia wrote the opinion in D.C. v Heller and here he explains to that judge how he is wrong....

If Kavanaugh get seated on the court....look for that illegal decision to be overturned.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf

That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense. Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629.

And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625. The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.

Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

But they didn't rule on it, did they. Oh, they heard it but elected to kick it back to the lower court. Meaning, the ruling at the Supreme Court would be the same as the lower court so why take the time. A dissent is a losing argument not a winning argument. It means nothing.

Heller only says that the government can't ban traditional Handguns nor can they force them to be rendered inoperative in the homes. That's it. It didn't deal with anything else. It can be taken a step further if you wish and include other traditional firearms like hunting rifles and shotguns. But the AR has been proven in Federal Court that it's NOT considered a traditional Rifle. it's been specifically singled out by name as a non traditional firearm and can be banned and heavily regulated at the state and local levels.

And there aren't 5 million people out there with the AR-15. There has been about 5 million manufactured by various companies but most are owned by just a few people. You need to stop making up shit.

Lol
The future supreme court will rule that and Ar15 is just a sporting rifle just like any other semi automatic. And there’s a lot more than 5 million Ar15’s out there where do you get your information from?

Actually, they already did, in Staples v United States...

Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994).

The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire.

You cut and pasted. Here is the entire part. You will note that it was called an Assault Rifle by the ATF.

Upon executing a search warrant at petitioner's home, local police and agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) recovered, among other things, an AR-15 assault rifle. The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire. Many M-16 parts are interchangeable with those in the AR-15 and can be used to convert the AR-15 into an automatic weapon. No doubt to inhibit such conversions, the AR-15 is manufactured with a metal stop on its receiver that will prevent an M-16 selector switch, if installed, from rotating to the fully automatic position. The metal stop on petitioner's rifle, however, had been filed away, and the rifle had been assembled with an M 16 selector switch and several other M-16 internal parts, including a hammer, disconnector, and trigger. Suspecting that the AR-15 had been modified to be capable of fully automatic fire, BATF agents seized the weapon. Petitioner subsequently was indicted for unlawful possession of an unregistered machinegun in violation of § 5861(d).


At no place did they call the civilian version of the AR-15 a sporting rifle. In fact, the AR-15s that they seized had been modified to fire full auto so they were considered machine guns. This ruling had nothing to do with the standard civilian AR-15 at all. And, even so, it didn't call them a sporting gun like you do. What it did do is prove that a Civilian AR-15 can be modified to fire fully automatic. Thank you for weakening your case even further. I just love it when your own cites sink your battleship.

 

[Rustic]

Federal judge upholds Massachusetts ban on AR-15, large capacity magazines
Oh, really. Last time I checked, not only were there many municipalities but also entire states like California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Washington, D.C that specifically ban or highly regulate the AR-15 specifically by name. The Ban has been upheld him Federal Court. Here is the ruling in the Boston Federal Court.

"The AR-15 and its analogs, along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional right to ‘bear arms,’" U.S. District Judge William Young, a Reagan appointee, wrote in a decision Thursday in Boston, dismissing a lawsuit over the state law.


Just stop making shit up.

And they are unConstitutional.... they ignored Heller, and now, if Kavanaugh gets confirmed it will be overturned... considering that that circuit ignored D.C. v Heller, Caetano v Massachusetts, Friedman v Highland Park, Miller v United States...... Those judges are ignoring Supreme Court decisions..

You are wrong.

This is Scalia, telling the Court why they should have taken that case and told the circuit they were wrong.....Scalia wrote the opinion in D.C. v Heller and here he explains to that judge how he is wrong....

If Kavanaugh get seated on the court....look for that illegal decision to be overturned.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf

That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense. Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629.

And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625. The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.

Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

But they didn't rule on it, did they. Oh, they heard it but elected to kick it back to the lower court. Meaning, the ruling at the Supreme Court would be the same as the lower court so why take the time. A dissent is a losing argument not a winning argument. It means nothing.

Heller only says that the government can't ban traditional Handguns nor can they force them to be rendered inoperative in the homes. That's it. It didn't deal with anything else. It can be taken a step further if you wish and include other traditional firearms like hunting rifles and shotguns. But the AR has been proven in Federal Court that it's NOT considered a traditional Rifle. it's been specifically singled out by name as a non traditional firearm and can be banned and heavily regulated at the state and local levels.

And there aren't 5 million people out there with the AR-15. There has been about 5 million manufactured by various companies but most are owned by just a few people. You need to stop making up shit.

Lol
The future supreme court will rule that and Ar15 is just a sporting rifle just like any other semi automatic. And there’s a lot more than 5 million Ar15’s out there where do you get your information from?

Actually, they already did, in Staples v United States...

Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994).

The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire.

You cut and pasted. Here is the entire part. You will note that it was called an Assault Rifle by the ATF.

Upon executing a search warrant at petitioner's home, local police and agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) recovered, among other things, an AR-15 assault rifle. The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire. Many M-16 parts are interchangeable with those in the AR-15 and can be used to convert the AR-15 into an automatic weapon. No doubt to inhibit such conversions, the AR-15 is manufactured with a metal stop on its receiver that will prevent an M-16 selector switch, if installed, from rotating to the fully automatic position. The metal stop on petitioner's rifle, however, had been filed away, and the rifle had been assembled with an M 16 selector switch and several other M-16 internal parts, including a hammer, disconnector, and trigger. Suspecting that the AR-15 had been modified to be capable of fully automatic fire, BATF agents seized the weapon. Petitioner subsequently was indicted for unlawful possession of an unregistered machinegun in violation of § 5861(d).


At no place did they call the civilian version of the AR-15 a sporting rifle. In fact, the AR-15s that they seized had been modified to fire full auto so they were considered machine guns. This ruling had nothing to do with the standard civilian AR-15 at all. And, even so, it didn't call them a sporting gun like you do. What it did do is prove that a Civilian AR-15 can be modified to fire fully automatic. Thank you for weakening your case even further. I just love it when your own cites sink your battleship.

...and still an ar15 is nothing more, nothing less than a sporting rifle

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Federal judge upholds Massachusetts ban on AR-15, large capacity magazines
Oh, really. Last time I checked, not only were there many municipalities but also entire states like California, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Washington, D.C that specifically ban or highly regulate the AR-15 specifically by name. The Ban has been upheld him Federal Court. Here is the ruling in the Boston Federal Court.

"The AR-15 and its analogs, along with large capacity magazines, are simply not weapons within the original meaning of the individual constitutional right to ‘bear arms,’" U.S. District Judge William Young, a Reagan appointee, wrote in a decision Thursday in Boston, dismissing a lawsuit over the state law.


Just stop making shit up.

And they are unConstitutional.... they ignored Heller, and now, if Kavanaugh gets confirmed it will be overturned... considering that that circuit ignored D.C. v Heller, Caetano v Massachusetts, Friedman v Highland Park, Miller v United States...... Those judges are ignoring Supreme Court decisions..

You are wrong.

This is Scalia, telling the Court why they should have taken that case and told the circuit they were wrong.....Scalia wrote the opinion in D.C. v Heller and here he explains to that judge how he is wrong....

If Kavanaugh get seated on the court....look for that illegal decision to be overturned.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf

That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense. Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629.

And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625. The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.

Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

But they didn't rule on it, did they. Oh, they heard it but elected to kick it back to the lower court. Meaning, the ruling at the Supreme Court would be the same as the lower court so why take the time. A dissent is a losing argument not a winning argument. It means nothing.

Heller only says that the government can't ban traditional Handguns nor can they force them to be rendered inoperative in the homes. That's it. It didn't deal with anything else. It can be taken a step further if you wish and include other traditional firearms like hunting rifles and shotguns. But the AR has been proven in Federal Court that it's NOT considered a traditional Rifle. it's been specifically singled out by name as a non traditional firearm and can be banned and heavily regulated at the state and local levels.

And there aren't 5 million people out there with the AR-15. There has been about 5 million manufactured by various companies but most are owned by just a few people. You need to stop making up shit.

Lol
The future supreme court will rule that and Ar15 is just a sporting rifle just like any other semi automatic. And there’s a lot more than 5 million Ar15’s out there where do you get your information from?

From the FBI. And you are betting that the Future Supreme Court will try and change the Constitution of the United States. That's not their job. Their job is to rule what is and what isn't constitutional as per the Constitution. Not make new laws. This is why they don't usually overturn their own rulings. I hear the same argument for Roe V Wade.

They will rule on the fact that the ar15 is just a sem-auto sporting rifle... Just like most firearms sold in this country.
Most likely Trump will be able to nominate two/maybe three more supreme court justices... And he will nominate pro second amendment ones unlike Obama...

Then the Supreme Court will be ruling against the Constitution themselves. It's not the Federal Government that makes that determination. It's the States. If the Supreme Court starts doing things like that get ready for a gathering of the States to drastically change the Federal Government to protect the rights of the states. We need to do a bit of that anyway. Maybe that would be a good thing to force that. The Feds are getting too powerful these days and need to be checked. I think a term limit on the Supreme Court Justices might be in order. Maybe a 20 year term limit or something like that. Be careful what you wish for. You may just get it.

 

[deanrd]

This is the thing you anti gunners don't realize about the teenagers from Parkland..... teenagers eat tidepods, play Fortnight, and snort condoms.... Those of us who understand the history of mankind and human nature, want to protect the Bill of Rights... So, while teenagers forget, we remember....and we are going to remember in November what you want to do to our gun Rights....

This is why the gun control extremist groups are telling the gun control extremist democrats to not say they want to ban Assault rifles.......

Dem Candidate Tedra Cobb Tells Supporters She Wants ‘Assault Rifle’ Ban But ‘Cannot Say That’ in Public

Tedra Cobb, the Democratic candidate in New York's 21st Congressional District, told a group of teenage supporters that she supports a ban on certain firearms but won't say so publicly for fear of losing her election.

"When I was at this thing today, it was the first table I was at, a woman said, ‘How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb can be heard saying in the video recorded by one of the attendees. "And I said, you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet, and I just said to her, I want you to know Cindy, I cannot say that."

When the woman pushed back on Cobb keeping quiet on how she feels about banning certain firearms, Cobb said coming out in favor of a gun ban would lead to her losing her bid against Republican incumbent Elise Stefanik.

"And she said, ‘Well, I want you to' and I said, ‘I won't win,'" Cobb said. "I said Moms Demand [Action] says, and Tricia Pleau said, ‘Do not say that you want an assault rifle ban because you will not win.'"

Tricia Pleau is a member of the New York chapter of the gun-control group Moms Demand Action.

Cobb's campaign website features a page on "Addressing Gun Violence" detailing her support for a number of gun-control measures but does not feature any language supporting a specific ban on any firearms.

Chris Martin, regional press secretary of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Cobb's comments are disqualifying.

"Tedra Cobb knows that she's wildly out of touch with the district, so she's desperately trying to hide her liberal agenda from voters," Martin said. "First, she was forced to admit that she raised taxes over 20 times, and now she's being exposed for lying to voters about her support for an assault weapons ban and taking guns away from law-abiding citizens."

The Cobb campaign did not respond to a request for comment from the Free Beacon but did issue a statement to The Post Star.

Banning rifles?

I bet you believe Obama was born in Kenya?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

And they are unConstitutional.... they ignored Heller, and now, if Kavanaugh gets confirmed it will be overturned... considering that that circuit ignored D.C. v Heller, Caetano v Massachusetts, Friedman v Highland Park, Miller v United States...... Those judges are ignoring Supreme Court decisions..

You are wrong.

This is Scalia, telling the Court why they should have taken that case and told the circuit they were wrong.....Scalia wrote the opinion in D.C. v Heller and here he explains to that judge how he is wrong....

If Kavanaugh get seated on the court....look for that illegal decision to be overturned.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-133_7l48.pdf

That analysis misreads Heller. The question under Heller is not whether citizens have adequate alternatives available for self-defense. Rather, Heller asks whether the law bans types of firearms commonly used for a lawful purpose—regardless of whether alternatives exist. 554 U. S., at 627–629.

And Heller draws a distinction between such firearms and weapons specially adapted to unlawful uses and not in common use, such as sawed-off shotguns. Id., at 624–625. The City’s ban is thus highly suspect because it broadly prohibits common semiautomatic firearms used for lawful purposes.

Roughly five million Americans own AR-style semiautomatic rifles. See 784 F. 3d, at 415, n. 3. The overwhelming majority of citizens who own and use such rifles do so for lawful purposes, including self-defense and target shooting. See ibid. Under our precedents, that is all that is needed for citizens to have a right under the Second Amendment to keep such weapons. See McDonald, 561 U. S., at 767–768; Heller, supra, at 628–629.

But they didn't rule on it, did they. Oh, they heard it but elected to kick it back to the lower court. Meaning, the ruling at the Supreme Court would be the same as the lower court so why take the time. A dissent is a losing argument not a winning argument. It means nothing.

Heller only says that the government can't ban traditional Handguns nor can they force them to be rendered inoperative in the homes. That's it. It didn't deal with anything else. It can be taken a step further if you wish and include other traditional firearms like hunting rifles and shotguns. But the AR has been proven in Federal Court that it's NOT considered a traditional Rifle. it's been specifically singled out by name as a non traditional firearm and can be banned and heavily regulated at the state and local levels.

And there aren't 5 million people out there with the AR-15. There has been about 5 million manufactured by various companies but most are owned by just a few people. You need to stop making up shit.

Lol
The future supreme court will rule that and Ar15 is just a sporting rifle just like any other semi automatic. And there’s a lot more than 5 million Ar15’s out there where do you get your information from?

Actually, they already did, in Staples v United States...

Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994).

The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire.

You cut and pasted. Here is the entire part. You will note that it was called an Assault Rifle by the ATF.

Upon executing a search warrant at petitioner's home, local police and agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) recovered, among other things, an AR-15 assault rifle. The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire. Many M-16 parts are interchangeable with those in the AR-15 and can be used to convert the AR-15 into an automatic weapon. No doubt to inhibit such conversions, the AR-15 is manufactured with a metal stop on its receiver that will prevent an M-16 selector switch, if installed, from rotating to the fully automatic position. The metal stop on petitioner's rifle, however, had been filed away, and the rifle had been assembled with an M 16 selector switch and several other M-16 internal parts, including a hammer, disconnector, and trigger. Suspecting that the AR-15 had been modified to be capable of fully automatic fire, BATF agents seized the weapon. Petitioner subsequently was indicted for unlawful possession of an unregistered machinegun in violation of § 5861(d).


At no place did they call the civilian version of the AR-15 a sporting rifle. In fact, the AR-15s that they seized had been modified to fire full auto so they were considered machine guns. This ruling had nothing to do with the standard civilian AR-15 at all. And, even so, it didn't call them a sporting gun like you do. What it did do is prove that a Civilian AR-15 can be modified to fire fully automatic. Thank you for weakening your case even further. I just love it when your own cites sink your battleship.

...and still an ar15 is nothing more, nothing less than a sporting rifle

Which was originally designed to be the most lethal and deadly personal war killing tool ever devised. And there is nothing better even today.

 

[RealDave]

This is the thing you anti gunners don't realize about the teenagers from Parkland..... teenagers eat tidepods, play Fortnight, and snort condoms.... Those of us who understand the history of mankind and human nature, want to protect the Bill of Rights... So, while teenagers forget, we remember....and we are going to remember in November what you want to do to our gun Rights....

This is why the gun control extremist groups are telling the gun control extremist democrats to not say they want to ban Assault rifles.......

Dem Candidate Tedra Cobb Tells Supporters She Wants ‘Assault Rifle’ Ban But ‘Cannot Say That’ in Public

Tedra Cobb, the Democratic candidate in New York's 21st Congressional District, told a group of teenage supporters that she supports a ban on certain firearms but won't say so publicly for fear of losing her election.

"When I was at this thing today, it was the first table I was at, a woman said, ‘How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb can be heard saying in the video recorded by one of the attendees. "And I said, you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet, and I just said to her, I want you to know Cindy, I cannot say that."

When the woman pushed back on Cobb keeping quiet on how she feels about banning certain firearms, Cobb said coming out in favor of a gun ban would lead to her losing her bid against Republican incumbent Elise Stefanik.

"And she said, ‘Well, I want you to' and I said, ‘I won't win,'" Cobb said. "I said Moms Demand [Action] says, and Tricia Pleau said, ‘Do not say that you want an assault rifle ban because you will not win.'"

Tricia Pleau is a member of the New York chapter of the gun-control group Moms Demand Action.

Cobb's campaign website features a page on "Addressing Gun Violence" detailing her support for a number of gun-control measures but does not feature any language supporting a specific ban on any firearms.

Chris Martin, regional press secretary of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Cobb's comments are disqualifying.

"Tedra Cobb knows that she's wildly out of touch with the district, so she's desperately trying to hide her liberal agenda from voters," Martin said. "First, she was forced to admit that she raised taxes over 20 times, and now she's being exposed for lying to voters about her support for an assault weapons ban and taking guns away from law-abiding citizens."

The Cobb campaign did not respond to a request for comment from the Free Beacon but did issue a statement to The Post Star.

I have a pile of guns. So being for a ban on assault type rifles does not make me an anti-gunner. Quit being such a NRA fed dick.

 

[2aguy]

This is the thing you anti gunners don't realize about the teenagers from Parkland..... teenagers eat tidepods, play Fortnight, and snort condoms.... Those of us who understand the history of mankind and human nature, want to protect the Bill of Rights... So, while teenagers forget, we remember....and we are going to remember in November what you want to do to our gun Rights....

This is why the gun control extremist groups are telling the gun control extremist democrats to not say they want to ban Assault rifles.......

Dem Candidate Tedra Cobb Tells Supporters She Wants ‘Assault Rifle’ Ban But ‘Cannot Say That’ in Public

Tedra Cobb, the Democratic candidate in New York's 21st Congressional District, told a group of teenage supporters that she supports a ban on certain firearms but won't say so publicly for fear of losing her election.

"When I was at this thing today, it was the first table I was at, a woman said, ‘How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb can be heard saying in the video recorded by one of the attendees. "And I said, you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet, and I just said to her, I want you to know Cindy, I cannot say that."

When the woman pushed back on Cobb keeping quiet on how she feels about banning certain firearms, Cobb said coming out in favor of a gun ban would lead to her losing her bid against Republican incumbent Elise Stefanik.

"And she said, ‘Well, I want you to' and I said, ‘I won't win,'" Cobb said. "I said Moms Demand [Action] says, and Tricia Pleau said, ‘Do not say that you want an assault rifle ban because you will not win.'"

Tricia Pleau is a member of the New York chapter of the gun-control group Moms Demand Action.

Cobb's campaign website features a page on "Addressing Gun Violence" detailing her support for a number of gun-control measures but does not feature any language supporting a specific ban on any firearms.

Chris Martin, regional press secretary of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Cobb's comments are disqualifying.

"Tedra Cobb knows that she's wildly out of touch with the district, so she's desperately trying to hide her liberal agenda from voters," Martin said. "First, she was forced to admit that she raised taxes over 20 times, and now she's being exposed for lying to voters about her support for an assault weapons ban and taking guns away from law-abiding citizens."

The Cobb campaign did not respond to a request for comment from the Free Beacon but did issue a statement to The Post Star.

I have a pile of guns. So being for a ban on assault type rifles does not make me an anti-gunner. Quit being such a NRA fed dick.

Yes, it does......the only reason to ban the AR-15 rifle is because it is a semi auto rifle.... if they can ban it on those grounds they can ban all semi auto weapons, which is what they called for at the CNN Townhall, at the school walkouts and at the various rallies....

 

[2aguy]

But they didn't rule on it, did they. Oh, they heard it but elected to kick it back to the lower court. Meaning, the ruling at the Supreme Court would be the same as the lower court so why take the time. A dissent is a losing argument not a winning argument. It means nothing.

Heller only says that the government can't ban traditional Handguns nor can they force them to be rendered inoperative in the homes. That's it. It didn't deal with anything else. It can be taken a step further if you wish and include other traditional firearms like hunting rifles and shotguns. But the AR has been proven in Federal Court that it's NOT considered a traditional Rifle. it's been specifically singled out by name as a non traditional firearm and can be banned and heavily regulated at the state and local levels.

And there aren't 5 million people out there with the AR-15. There has been about 5 million manufactured by various companies but most are owned by just a few people. You need to stop making up shit.

Lol
The future supreme court will rule that and Ar15 is just a sporting rifle just like any other semi automatic. And there’s a lot more than 5 million Ar15’s out there where do you get your information from?

Actually, they already did, in Staples v United States...

Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994).

The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire.

You cut and pasted. Here is the entire part. You will note that it was called an Assault Rifle by the ATF.

Upon executing a search warrant at petitioner's home, local police and agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) recovered, among other things, an AR-15 assault rifle. The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire. Many M-16 parts are interchangeable with those in the AR-15 and can be used to convert the AR-15 into an automatic weapon. No doubt to inhibit such conversions, the AR-15 is manufactured with a metal stop on its receiver that will prevent an M-16 selector switch, if installed, from rotating to the fully automatic position. The metal stop on petitioner's rifle, however, had been filed away, and the rifle had been assembled with an M 16 selector switch and several other M-16 internal parts, including a hammer, disconnector, and trigger. Suspecting that the AR-15 had been modified to be capable of fully automatic fire, BATF agents seized the weapon. Petitioner subsequently was indicted for unlawful possession of an unregistered machinegun in violation of § 5861(d).


At no place did they call the civilian version of the AR-15 a sporting rifle. In fact, the AR-15s that they seized had been modified to fire full auto so they were considered machine guns. This ruling had nothing to do with the standard civilian AR-15 at all. And, even so, it didn't call them a sporting gun like you do. What it did do is prove that a Civilian AR-15 can be modified to fire fully automatic. Thank you for weakening your case even further. I just love it when your own cites sink your battleship.

...and still an ar15 is nothing more, nothing less than a sporting rifle

Which was originally designed to be the most lethal and deadly personal war killing tool ever devised. And there is nothing better even today.

You are an idiot.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This is the thing you anti gunners don't realize about the teenagers from Parkland..... teenagers eat tidepods, play Fortnight, and snort condoms.... Those of us who understand the history of mankind and human nature, want to protect the Bill of Rights... So, while teenagers forget, we remember....and we are going to remember in November what you want to do to our gun Rights....

This is why the gun control extremist groups are telling the gun control extremist democrats to not say they want to ban Assault rifles.......

Dem Candidate Tedra Cobb Tells Supporters She Wants ‘Assault Rifle’ Ban But ‘Cannot Say That’ in Public

Tedra Cobb, the Democratic candidate in New York's 21st Congressional District, told a group of teenage supporters that she supports a ban on certain firearms but won't say so publicly for fear of losing her election.

"When I was at this thing today, it was the first table I was at, a woman said, ‘How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb can be heard saying in the video recorded by one of the attendees. "And I said, you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet, and I just said to her, I want you to know Cindy, I cannot say that."

When the woman pushed back on Cobb keeping quiet on how she feels about banning certain firearms, Cobb said coming out in favor of a gun ban would lead to her losing her bid against Republican incumbent Elise Stefanik.

"And she said, ‘Well, I want you to' and I said, ‘I won't win,'" Cobb said. "I said Moms Demand [Action] says, and Tricia Pleau said, ‘Do not say that you want an assault rifle ban because you will not win.'"

Tricia Pleau is a member of the New York chapter of the gun-control group Moms Demand Action.

Cobb's campaign website features a page on "Addressing Gun Violence" detailing her support for a number of gun-control measures but does not feature any language supporting a specific ban on any firearms.

Chris Martin, regional press secretary of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Cobb's comments are disqualifying.

"Tedra Cobb knows that she's wildly out of touch with the district, so she's desperately trying to hide her liberal agenda from voters," Martin said. "First, she was forced to admit that she raised taxes over 20 times, and now she's being exposed for lying to voters about her support for an assault weapons ban and taking guns away from law-abiding citizens."

The Cobb campaign did not respond to a request for comment from the Free Beacon but did issue a statement to The Post Star.

I have a pile of guns. So being for a ban on assault type rifles does not make me an anti-gunner. Quit being such a NRA fed dick.

Yes, it does......the only reason to ban the AR-15 rifle is because it is a semi auto rifle.... if they can ban it on those grounds they can ban all semi auto weapons, which is what they called for at the CNN Townhall, at the school walkouts and at the various rallies....

Wrong. They ban it because it's designed to be the most effective and deadly personal killing tool for mankind in the world and has been from the day it was first introduced in whatever creation it is introduced as, full auto, 3 shot burst or even single trigger pull. It makes everyone that can use it a potential one many mass killing machine. Most won't ever reach that potential. But enough have and more will in the future. IT's become a Mass Murder Cult Killer Weapon. Forget that it can also be used to hunt varmints with. It's original purpose was to mass kill and it's a very good tool for that if it's used that way. More and more people are seeing it that way. 4 states have already banned the AR-15 and it's variants. Many more states have banned the large capacity Mags as well. School Children had Mothers that Vote. Seniors that have just Graduated are now of voting age. And you are hoping that everyone forgets by November. There are a whole bunch of people that won't let that happen and people will vote. Now, it that don't scare the hell out of you, it should.

You had your turn. You blew it.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Lol
The future supreme court will rule that and Ar15 is just a sporting rifle just like any other semi automatic. And there’s a lot more than 5 million Ar15’s out there where do you get your information from?

Actually, they already did, in Staples v United States...

Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994).

The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire.

You cut and pasted. Here is the entire part. You will note that it was called an Assault Rifle by the ATF.

Upon executing a search warrant at petitioner's home, local police and agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) recovered, among other things, an AR-15 assault rifle. The AR-15 is the civilian version of the military's M-16 rifle, and is, unless modified, a semiautomatic weapon. The M-16, in contrast, is a selective fire rifle that allows the operator, by rotating a selector switch, to choose semiautomatic or automatic fire. Many M-16 parts are interchangeable with those in the AR-15 and can be used to convert the AR-15 into an automatic weapon. No doubt to inhibit such conversions, the AR-15 is manufactured with a metal stop on its receiver that will prevent an M-16 selector switch, if installed, from rotating to the fully automatic position. The metal stop on petitioner's rifle, however, had been filed away, and the rifle had been assembled with an M 16 selector switch and several other M-16 internal parts, including a hammer, disconnector, and trigger. Suspecting that the AR-15 had been modified to be capable of fully automatic fire, BATF agents seized the weapon. Petitioner subsequently was indicted for unlawful possession of an unregistered machinegun in violation of § 5861(d).


At no place did they call the civilian version of the AR-15 a sporting rifle. In fact, the AR-15s that they seized had been modified to fire full auto so they were considered machine guns. This ruling had nothing to do with the standard civilian AR-15 at all. And, even so, it didn't call them a sporting gun like you do. What it did do is prove that a Civilian AR-15 can be modified to fire fully automatic. Thank you for weakening your case even further. I just love it when your own cites sink your battleship.

...and still an ar15 is nothing more, nothing less than a sporting rifle

Which was originally designed to be the most lethal and deadly personal war killing tool ever devised. And there is nothing better even today.

You are an idiot.

Yes, I might be, but unlike the idjit you are, I am a well educated idiot.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This is the thing you anti gunners don't realize about the teenagers from Parkland..... teenagers eat tidepods, play Fortnight, and snort condoms.... Those of us who understand the history of mankind and human nature, want to protect the Bill of Rights... So, while teenagers forget, we remember....and we are going to remember in November what you want to do to our gun Rights....

This is why the gun control extremist groups are telling the gun control extremist democrats to not say they want to ban Assault rifles.......

Dem Candidate Tedra Cobb Tells Supporters She Wants ‘Assault Rifle’ Ban But ‘Cannot Say That’ in Public

Tedra Cobb, the Democratic candidate in New York's 21st Congressional District, told a group of teenage supporters that she supports a ban on certain firearms but won't say so publicly for fear of losing her election.

"When I was at this thing today, it was the first table I was at, a woman said, ‘How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb can be heard saying in the video recorded by one of the attendees. "And I said, you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet, and I just said to her, I want you to know Cindy, I cannot say that."

When the woman pushed back on Cobb keeping quiet on how she feels about banning certain firearms, Cobb said coming out in favor of a gun ban would lead to her losing her bid against Republican incumbent Elise Stefanik.

"And she said, ‘Well, I want you to' and I said, ‘I won't win,'" Cobb said. "I said Moms Demand [Action] says, and Tricia Pleau said, ‘Do not say that you want an assault rifle ban because you will not win.'"

Tricia Pleau is a member of the New York chapter of the gun-control group Moms Demand Action.

Cobb's campaign website features a page on "Addressing Gun Violence" detailing her support for a number of gun-control measures but does not feature any language supporting a specific ban on any firearms.

Chris Martin, regional press secretary of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Cobb's comments are disqualifying.

"Tedra Cobb knows that she's wildly out of touch with the district, so she's desperately trying to hide her liberal agenda from voters," Martin said. "First, she was forced to admit that she raised taxes over 20 times, and now she's being exposed for lying to voters about her support for an assault weapons ban and taking guns away from law-abiding citizens."

The Cobb campaign did not respond to a request for comment from the Free Beacon but did issue a statement to The Post Star.

I have a pile of guns. So being for a ban on assault type rifles does not make me an anti-gunner. Quit being such a NRA fed dick.

I own guns as well. But if you ain't fer em you must be agin em.

 

[2aguy]

This is the thing you anti gunners don't realize about the teenagers from Parkland..... teenagers eat tidepods, play Fortnight, and snort condoms.... Those of us who understand the history of mankind and human nature, want to protect the Bill of Rights... So, while teenagers forget, we remember....and we are going to remember in November what you want to do to our gun Rights....

This is why the gun control extremist groups are telling the gun control extremist democrats to not say they want to ban Assault rifles.......

Dem Candidate Tedra Cobb Tells Supporters She Wants ‘Assault Rifle’ Ban But ‘Cannot Say That’ in Public

Tedra Cobb, the Democratic candidate in New York's 21st Congressional District, told a group of teenage supporters that she supports a ban on certain firearms but won't say so publicly for fear of losing her election.

"When I was at this thing today, it was the first table I was at, a woman said, ‘How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb can be heard saying in the video recorded by one of the attendees. "And I said, you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet, and I just said to her, I want you to know Cindy, I cannot say that."

When the woman pushed back on Cobb keeping quiet on how she feels about banning certain firearms, Cobb said coming out in favor of a gun ban would lead to her losing her bid against Republican incumbent Elise Stefanik.

"And she said, ‘Well, I want you to' and I said, ‘I won't win,'" Cobb said. "I said Moms Demand [Action] says, and Tricia Pleau said, ‘Do not say that you want an assault rifle ban because you will not win.'"

Tricia Pleau is a member of the New York chapter of the gun-control group Moms Demand Action.

Cobb's campaign website features a page on "Addressing Gun Violence" detailing her support for a number of gun-control measures but does not feature any language supporting a specific ban on any firearms.

Chris Martin, regional press secretary of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Cobb's comments are disqualifying.

"Tedra Cobb knows that she's wildly out of touch with the district, so she's desperately trying to hide her liberal agenda from voters," Martin said. "First, she was forced to admit that she raised taxes over 20 times, and now she's being exposed for lying to voters about her support for an assault weapons ban and taking guns away from law-abiding citizens."

The Cobb campaign did not respond to a request for comment from the Free Beacon but did issue a statement to The Post Star.

I have a pile of guns. So being for a ban on assault type rifles does not make me an anti-gunner. Quit being such a NRA fed dick.

Yes, it does......the only reason to ban the AR-15 rifle is because it is a semi auto rifle.... if they can ban it on those grounds they can ban all semi auto weapons, which is what they called for at the CNN Townhall, at the school walkouts and at the various rallies....

Wrong. They ban it because it's designed to be the most effective and deadly personal killing tool for mankind in the world and has been from the day it was first introduced in whatever creation it is introduced as, full auto, 3 shot burst or even single trigger pull. It makes everyone that can use it a potential one many mass killing machine. Most won't ever reach that potential. But enough have and more will in the future. IT's become a Mass Murder Cult Killer Weapon. Forget that it can also be used to hunt varmints with. It's original purpose was to mass kill and it's a very good tool for that if it's used that way. More and more people are seeing it that way. 4 states have already banned the AR-15 and it's variants. Many more states have banned the large capacity Mags as well. School Children had Mothers that Vote. Seniors that have just Graduated are now of voting age. And you are hoping that everyone forgets by November. There are a whole bunch of people that won't let that happen and people will vote. Now, it that don't scare the hell out of you, it should.

You had your turn. You blew it.

Wrong again..... mass shooters use pistols over rifles....you dumb ass.

The ones who won't forget, dumb ass, are the gun owners....they don't get distracted by eating tide pods, snorting condoms and playing X-Box all day....

 

[2aguy]

This is the thing you anti gunners don't realize about the teenagers from Parkland..... teenagers eat tidepods, play Fortnight, and snort condoms.... Those of us who understand the history of mankind and human nature, want to protect the Bill of Rights... So, while teenagers forget, we remember....and we are going to remember in November what you want to do to our gun Rights....

This is why the gun control extremist groups are telling the gun control extremist democrats to not say they want to ban Assault rifles.......

Dem Candidate Tedra Cobb Tells Supporters She Wants ‘Assault Rifle’ Ban But ‘Cannot Say That’ in Public

Tedra Cobb, the Democratic candidate in New York's 21st Congressional District, told a group of teenage supporters that she supports a ban on certain firearms but won't say so publicly for fear of losing her election.

"When I was at this thing today, it was the first table I was at, a woman said, ‘How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb can be heard saying in the video recorded by one of the attendees. "And I said, you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet, and I just said to her, I want you to know Cindy, I cannot say that."

When the woman pushed back on Cobb keeping quiet on how she feels about banning certain firearms, Cobb said coming out in favor of a gun ban would lead to her losing her bid against Republican incumbent Elise Stefanik.

"And she said, ‘Well, I want you to' and I said, ‘I won't win,'" Cobb said. "I said Moms Demand [Action] says, and Tricia Pleau said, ‘Do not say that you want an assault rifle ban because you will not win.'"

Tricia Pleau is a member of the New York chapter of the gun-control group Moms Demand Action.

Cobb's campaign website features a page on "Addressing Gun Violence" detailing her support for a number of gun-control measures but does not feature any language supporting a specific ban on any firearms.

Chris Martin, regional press secretary of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Cobb's comments are disqualifying.

"Tedra Cobb knows that she's wildly out of touch with the district, so she's desperately trying to hide her liberal agenda from voters," Martin said. "First, she was forced to admit that she raised taxes over 20 times, and now she's being exposed for lying to voters about her support for an assault weapons ban and taking guns away from law-abiding citizens."

The Cobb campaign did not respond to a request for comment from the Free Beacon but did issue a statement to The Post Star.

I have a pile of guns. So being for a ban on assault type rifles does not make me an anti-gunner. Quit being such a NRA fed dick.

Yes, it does......the only reason to ban the AR-15 rifle is because it is a semi auto rifle.... if they can ban it on those grounds they can ban all semi auto weapons, which is what they called for at the CNN Townhall, at the school walkouts and at the various rallies....

Wrong. They ban it because it's designed to be the most effective and deadly personal killing tool for mankind in the world and has been from the day it was first introduced in whatever creation it is introduced as, full auto, 3 shot burst or even single trigger pull. It makes everyone that can use it a potential one many mass killing machine. Most won't ever reach that potential. But enough have and more will in the future. IT's become a Mass Murder Cult Killer Weapon. Forget that it can also be used to hunt varmints with. It's original purpose was to mass kill and it's a very good tool for that if it's used that way. More and more people are seeing it that way. 4 states have already banned the AR-15 and it's variants. Many more states have banned the large capacity Mags as well. School Children had Mothers that Vote. Seniors that have just Graduated are now of voting age. And you are hoping that everyone forgets by November. There are a whole bunch of people that won't let that happen and people will vote. Now, it that don't scare the hell out of you, it should.

You had your turn. You blew it.

Wrong.....the only reason to ban the AR-15 is so you can come back and ban all other semi auto rifles, pistols and shotguns, as well as revolvers....

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This is the thing you anti gunners don't realize about the teenagers from Parkland..... teenagers eat tidepods, play Fortnight, and snort condoms.... Those of us who understand the history of mankind and human nature, want to protect the Bill of Rights... So, while teenagers forget, we remember....and we are going to remember in November what you want to do to our gun Rights....

This is why the gun control extremist groups are telling the gun control extremist democrats to not say they want to ban Assault rifles.......

Dem Candidate Tedra Cobb Tells Supporters She Wants ‘Assault Rifle’ Ban But ‘Cannot Say That’ in Public

Tedra Cobb, the Democratic candidate in New York's 21st Congressional District, told a group of teenage supporters that she supports a ban on certain firearms but won't say so publicly for fear of losing her election.

"When I was at this thing today, it was the first table I was at, a woman said, ‘How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb can be heard saying in the video recorded by one of the attendees. "And I said, you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet, and I just said to her, I want you to know Cindy, I cannot say that."

When the woman pushed back on Cobb keeping quiet on how she feels about banning certain firearms, Cobb said coming out in favor of a gun ban would lead to her losing her bid against Republican incumbent Elise Stefanik.

"And she said, ‘Well, I want you to' and I said, ‘I won't win,'" Cobb said. "I said Moms Demand [Action] says, and Tricia Pleau said, ‘Do not say that you want an assault rifle ban because you will not win.'"

Tricia Pleau is a member of the New York chapter of the gun-control group Moms Demand Action.

Cobb's campaign website features a page on "Addressing Gun Violence" detailing her support for a number of gun-control measures but does not feature any language supporting a specific ban on any firearms.

Chris Martin, regional press secretary of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Cobb's comments are disqualifying.

"Tedra Cobb knows that she's wildly out of touch with the district, so she's desperately trying to hide her liberal agenda from voters," Martin said. "First, she was forced to admit that she raised taxes over 20 times, and now she's being exposed for lying to voters about her support for an assault weapons ban and taking guns away from law-abiding citizens."

The Cobb campaign did not respond to a request for comment from the Free Beacon but did issue a statement to The Post Star.

I have a pile of guns. So being for a ban on assault type rifles does not make me an anti-gunner. Quit being such a NRA fed dick.

Yes, it does......the only reason to ban the AR-15 rifle is because it is a semi auto rifle.... if they can ban it on those grounds they can ban all semi auto weapons, which is what they called for at the CNN Townhall, at the school walkouts and at the various rallies....

Wrong. They ban it because it's designed to be the most effective and deadly personal killing tool for mankind in the world and has been from the day it was first introduced in whatever creation it is introduced as, full auto, 3 shot burst or even single trigger pull. It makes everyone that can use it a potential one many mass killing machine. Most won't ever reach that potential. But enough have and more will in the future. IT's become a Mass Murder Cult Killer Weapon. Forget that it can also be used to hunt varmints with. It's original purpose was to mass kill and it's a very good tool for that if it's used that way. More and more people are seeing it that way. 4 states have already banned the AR-15 and it's variants. Many more states have banned the large capacity Mags as well. School Children had Mothers that Vote. Seniors that have just Graduated are now of voting age. And you are hoping that everyone forgets by November. There are a whole bunch of people that won't let that happen and people will vote. Now, it that don't scare the hell out of you, it should.

You had your turn. You blew it.

Wrong.....the only reason to ban the AR-15 is so you can come back and ban all other semi auto rifles, pistols and shotguns, as well as revolvers....

Then I would have to turn in 4 of my own. What's the chances of that happening. Yah, I sure am fighting to do that, cupcake. Make up some more shit, cupcake. How do you get out of bed when you are that paranoid?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

This is the thing you anti gunners don't realize about the teenagers from Parkland..... teenagers eat tidepods, play Fortnight, and snort condoms.... Those of us who understand the history of mankind and human nature, want to protect the Bill of Rights... So, while teenagers forget, we remember....and we are going to remember in November what you want to do to our gun Rights....

This is why the gun control extremist groups are telling the gun control extremist democrats to not say they want to ban Assault rifles.......

Dem Candidate Tedra Cobb Tells Supporters She Wants ‘Assault Rifle’ Ban But ‘Cannot Say That’ in Public

Tedra Cobb, the Democratic candidate in New York's 21st Congressional District, told a group of teenage supporters that she supports a ban on certain firearms but won't say so publicly for fear of losing her election.

"When I was at this thing today, it was the first table I was at, a woman said, ‘How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb can be heard saying in the video recorded by one of the attendees. "And I said, you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet, and I just said to her, I want you to know Cindy, I cannot say that."

When the woman pushed back on Cobb keeping quiet on how she feels about banning certain firearms, Cobb said coming out in favor of a gun ban would lead to her losing her bid against Republican incumbent Elise Stefanik.

"And she said, ‘Well, I want you to' and I said, ‘I won't win,'" Cobb said. "I said Moms Demand [Action] says, and Tricia Pleau said, ‘Do not say that you want an assault rifle ban because you will not win.'"

Tricia Pleau is a member of the New York chapter of the gun-control group Moms Demand Action.

Cobb's campaign website features a page on "Addressing Gun Violence" detailing her support for a number of gun-control measures but does not feature any language supporting a specific ban on any firearms.

Chris Martin, regional press secretary of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Cobb's comments are disqualifying.

"Tedra Cobb knows that she's wildly out of touch with the district, so she's desperately trying to hide her liberal agenda from voters," Martin said. "First, she was forced to admit that she raised taxes over 20 times, and now she's being exposed for lying to voters about her support for an assault weapons ban and taking guns away from law-abiding citizens."

The Cobb campaign did not respond to a request for comment from the Free Beacon but did issue a statement to The Post Star.

I have a pile of guns. So being for a ban on assault type rifles does not make me an anti-gunner. Quit being such a NRA fed dick.

Yes, it does......the only reason to ban the AR-15 rifle is because it is a semi auto rifle.... if they can ban it on those grounds they can ban all semi auto weapons, which is what they called for at the CNN Townhall, at the school walkouts and at the various rallies....

Wrong. They ban it because it's designed to be the most effective and deadly personal killing tool for mankind in the world and has been from the day it was first introduced in whatever creation it is introduced as, full auto, 3 shot burst or even single trigger pull. It makes everyone that can use it a potential one many mass killing machine. Most won't ever reach that potential. But enough have and more will in the future. IT's become a Mass Murder Cult Killer Weapon. Forget that it can also be used to hunt varmints with. It's original purpose was to mass kill and it's a very good tool for that if it's used that way. More and more people are seeing it that way. 4 states have already banned the AR-15 and it's variants. Many more states have banned the large capacity Mags as well. School Children had Mothers that Vote. Seniors that have just Graduated are now of voting age. And you are hoping that everyone forgets by November. There are a whole bunch of people that won't let that happen and people will vote. Now, it that don't scare the hell out of you, it should.

You had your turn. You blew it.

Wrong again..... mass shooters use pistols over rifles....you dumb ass.

The ones who won't forget, dumb ass, are the gun owners....they don't get distracted by eating tide pods, snorting condoms and playing X-Box all day....

In the last 20 years, the record holders all used the AR-15. That's the score to beat. The handgun shooters were light weights with no obstacles. The AR shooters have to be fast and very good. Handguns just won't cut it anymore. Too many factors against them.

Yes, us Gun Owners won't forget. We want the NRA Robots and Lackeys out of office so we can have a safer community with common sense gun regulations. Now, stop making shit up.

 

[2aguy]

This is the thing you anti gunners don't realize about the teenagers from Parkland..... teenagers eat tidepods, play Fortnight, and snort condoms.... Those of us who understand the history of mankind and human nature, want to protect the Bill of Rights... So, while teenagers forget, we remember....and we are going to remember in November what you want to do to our gun Rights....

This is why the gun control extremist groups are telling the gun control extremist democrats to not say they want to ban Assault rifles.......

Dem Candidate Tedra Cobb Tells Supporters She Wants ‘Assault Rifle’ Ban But ‘Cannot Say That’ in Public

Tedra Cobb, the Democratic candidate in New York's 21st Congressional District, told a group of teenage supporters that she supports a ban on certain firearms but won't say so publicly for fear of losing her election.

"When I was at this thing today, it was the first table I was at, a woman said, ‘How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb can be heard saying in the video recorded by one of the attendees. "And I said, you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet, and I just said to her, I want you to know Cindy, I cannot say that."

When the woman pushed back on Cobb keeping quiet on how she feels about banning certain firearms, Cobb said coming out in favor of a gun ban would lead to her losing her bid against Republican incumbent Elise Stefanik.

"And she said, ‘Well, I want you to' and I said, ‘I won't win,'" Cobb said. "I said Moms Demand [Action] says, and Tricia Pleau said, ‘Do not say that you want an assault rifle ban because you will not win.'"

Tricia Pleau is a member of the New York chapter of the gun-control group Moms Demand Action.

Cobb's campaign website features a page on "Addressing Gun Violence" detailing her support for a number of gun-control measures but does not feature any language supporting a specific ban on any firearms.

Chris Martin, regional press secretary of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Cobb's comments are disqualifying.

"Tedra Cobb knows that she's wildly out of touch with the district, so she's desperately trying to hide her liberal agenda from voters," Martin said. "First, she was forced to admit that she raised taxes over 20 times, and now she's being exposed for lying to voters about her support for an assault weapons ban and taking guns away from law-abiding citizens."

The Cobb campaign did not respond to a request for comment from the Free Beacon but did issue a statement to The Post Star.

I have a pile of guns. So being for a ban on assault type rifles does not make me an anti-gunner. Quit being such a NRA fed dick.

Yes, it does......the only reason to ban the AR-15 rifle is because it is a semi auto rifle.... if they can ban it on those grounds they can ban all semi auto weapons, which is what they called for at the CNN Townhall, at the school walkouts and at the various rallies....

Wrong. They ban it because it's designed to be the most effective and deadly personal killing tool for mankind in the world and has been from the day it was first introduced in whatever creation it is introduced as, full auto, 3 shot burst or even single trigger pull. It makes everyone that can use it a potential one many mass killing machine. Most won't ever reach that potential. But enough have and more will in the future. IT's become a Mass Murder Cult Killer Weapon. Forget that it can also be used to hunt varmints with. It's original purpose was to mass kill and it's a very good tool for that if it's used that way. More and more people are seeing it that way. 4 states have already banned the AR-15 and it's variants. Many more states have banned the large capacity Mags as well. School Children had Mothers that Vote. Seniors that have just Graduated are now of voting age. And you are hoping that everyone forgets by November. There are a whole bunch of people that won't let that happen and people will vote. Now, it that don't scare the hell out of you, it should.

You had your turn. You blew it.

Wrong again..... mass shooters use pistols over rifles....you dumb ass.

The ones who won't forget, dumb ass, are the gun owners....they don't get distracted by eating tide pods, snorting condoms and playing X-Box all day....

In the last 20 years, the record holders all used the AR-15. That's the score to beat. The handgun shooters were light weights with no obstacles. The AR shooters have to be fast and very good. Handguns just won't cut it anymore. Too many factors against them.

Yes, us Gun Owners won't forget. We want the NRA Robots and Lackeys out of office so we can have a safer community with common sense gun regulations. Now, stop making shit up.

The second highest murder rate was with 2 pistols at Virginia, twit. And the higher total was in France when a muslim used a rental truck to murder 86 people...beating the Vegas shooter..... you don't know what you are talking about...

 

[Skull Pilot]

There is no such thing as a civilian "assault rifle"

Tell that to the latest mass shootings that used the AR-15. A full blown M-16A-4 would have done the same job.

So would a Mini 14 or any other semiautomatic rifle that fires a 5.56 or larger round
Shit a couple handguns could have done the same thing too

The States and locals have specifically named the AR-15 and it's like variations. They are very specific. And the courts uphold that ruling. By being specific it exempts the normal traditional semi auto rifles like the mini-14 just to name one. Another mass killing by another AR type rifle and you can bet another couple of states will pass the AR ban laws. The AR type of Rifle IS listed as an Assault Rifle in some states now and is completely banned and it IS constitutional and has been ruled as such in federal courts. It's State by State and has nothing to do with the Federal Government. This is State's Rights. If you State passes it you have the option to comply with the law, move to another state or become a criminal. You sound more like the criminal type so no big loss when they bag you. Of course, you can become a closet AR owner. I know a number of AK owners around here that have full auto AKs and SKSs stashed away in their walk in Gun Safes that they never show, never take out and never fire. No sweat off my brow. But I wonder, what is the joy in owning them if you can't enjoy them? But they are good people and don't go off like you do so we leave them to their own quagmire. You, on the other hand, would piss off someone and they would turn you in. So I guess you would either have to comply or go to jail for a very long time. I vote for the Prison for you.

Hey moron I have already told you I don't own an AR 15.

The Alzheimer's must be getting worse huh?

And if you know people who have illegal fully automatic rifles why don't you drop a dime on them?

And States are not allowed to violate the rights pf the people that are guaranteed in the Constitution or didn't you know that?

Then you don't have any skin in the game, right?

Are you age bigoting once again? Bet you wouldn't want me to buy a cake either. BTW, the Cake Store went Bankrupt. Looks like there were a lot of straight people that found his action rather unsavory.

And all the Constitution affords is for you to own "Normal" firearms. Glad you keep bringing up Heller since the Court ruled what a "Normal" handgun is and where it can be legally held. And the State or District can still require you to have to have a permit to own it if it wishes according the Heller to have it in your home. The State can ban all weapons outside the home or license weapons or even ban a specific weapon. And this is within the confines of the Constitution of the United States under the 2nd and 14th Amendment. The only place the State cannot ban "Normal" weapons for home defense is in the home. And the Courts have ruled that the AR-15 is outside the definition of Normal Home Defense. And, yes, if the State decided to specifically ban the AR-15 and it's many copies, it has been upheld in Federal Court that it can do it, much to the chagrin and expense of the NRA. I have already posted that decision. You just ignore it. So stop making things up.

A semiautomatic rifle is and has been a "normal" firearm available to civilians for over 100 years.

An AR 15 is nothing but a semiautomatic rifle stop making shit up by saying it is somehow different

Where did I mention your age? We all already know you are feeble of body since a mere 60 grams worth of ammunition stops you in your tracks.

And FYI I have been saying that it's stupid to think baking a cake is a sin.

Here let me overload that plaque ridden shriveled ball of gray matter that passes for your brain.

I don't give a fuck if gay people get married or if women have abortions

Now we'll all watch your tiny head explode

 

[Skull Pilot]

Since when is any amendment in the Bill of Rights hateful? And how does protecting any and all of the Bill of Rights hateful?

Seems to me you want everyone to be subject to what YOU think their rights should be and I hate to tell you this but that ain't how it works and you're old enough that you should know this

how many times the the Supreme Court have to rule on the same subject?

Once should be enough

One would think that they would only have to rule once. But it appears your bunch keeps bringing it up from different directions expecting different rulings. Yet they make the same ruling over and over. They can do no otherwise. They can only rule on the constitutionality of it. Usually, they don't bother ruling on it because it's nonsense. You just take the dissent as a victory and hound everyone with it as it it was the ruling. The fact remains that your rights to own a specific gun is NOT a given. What they have ruled on is that you have the right to own, purchase and have in your home a traditional handgun, rifle or shotgun. All others can be regulated and even banned by any state or lower government as they see fit under the 14th amendment. You keep forgetting that part of the Constitution of the United States but the Supreme Court has not. Some states and lower governments have deemed the AR-15 specifically as a danger and have either banned it or heavily regulated it and it's withstood the NRA trying to bounce it in Federal Court. How many times do they have to make the same ruling before your bunch stops this nonsense expecting a different outcome. You want a different outcome, change the Constitution of the United States 14th amendment and the various state and local laws. Now, stop making shit up.

Don't tell me what I take as a victory or what "bunch" I am in because you don't have a fucking clue as to what I think

Aren't you tired yet of having your butt handed to your yet? This reminds me of a whackamole where I can't miss.

You couldn't hand anyone's butt to anyone without a forklift feeble old man that you are

I don't have to hand you your butt. You keep handing it to yourself. So stop making shit up.

Says the feeble minded old man who thinks and AR 15 is more than a plain old ordinary semiautomatic rifle

 

[Skull Pilot]

This is the thing you anti gunners don't realize about the teenagers from Parkland..... teenagers eat tidepods, play Fortnight, and snort condoms.... Those of us who understand the history of mankind and human nature, want to protect the Bill of Rights... So, while teenagers forget, we remember....and we are going to remember in November what you want to do to our gun Rights....

This is why the gun control extremist groups are telling the gun control extremist democrats to not say they want to ban Assault rifles.......

Dem Candidate Tedra Cobb Tells Supporters She Wants ‘Assault Rifle’ Ban But ‘Cannot Say That’ in Public

Tedra Cobb, the Democratic candidate in New York's 21st Congressional District, told a group of teenage supporters that she supports a ban on certain firearms but won't say so publicly for fear of losing her election.

"When I was at this thing today, it was the first table I was at, a woman said, ‘How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb can be heard saying in the video recorded by one of the attendees. "And I said, you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet, and I just said to her, I want you to know Cindy, I cannot say that."

When the woman pushed back on Cobb keeping quiet on how she feels about banning certain firearms, Cobb said coming out in favor of a gun ban would lead to her losing her bid against Republican incumbent Elise Stefanik.

"And she said, ‘Well, I want you to' and I said, ‘I won't win,'" Cobb said. "I said Moms Demand [Action] says, and Tricia Pleau said, ‘Do not say that you want an assault rifle ban because you will not win.'"

Tricia Pleau is a member of the New York chapter of the gun-control group Moms Demand Action.

Cobb's campaign website features a page on "Addressing Gun Violence" detailing her support for a number of gun-control measures but does not feature any language supporting a specific ban on any firearms.

Chris Martin, regional press secretary of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Cobb's comments are disqualifying.

"Tedra Cobb knows that she's wildly out of touch with the district, so she's desperately trying to hide her liberal agenda from voters," Martin said. "First, she was forced to admit that she raised taxes over 20 times, and now she's being exposed for lying to voters about her support for an assault weapons ban and taking guns away from law-abiding citizens."

The Cobb campaign did not respond to a request for comment from the Free Beacon but did issue a statement to The Post Star.

I have a pile of guns. So being for a ban on assault type rifles does not make me an anti-gunner. Quit being such a NRA fed dick.

Yes, it does......the only reason to ban the AR-15 rifle is because it is a semi auto rifle.... if they can ban it on those grounds they can ban all semi auto weapons, which is what they called for at the CNN Townhall, at the school walkouts and at the various rallies....

Wrong. They ban it because it's designed to be the most effective and deadly personal killing tool for mankind in the world and has been from the day it was first introduced in whatever creation it is introduced as, full auto, 3 shot burst or even single trigger pull. It makes everyone that can use it a potential one many mass killing machine. Most won't ever reach that potential. But enough have and more will in the future. IT's become a Mass Murder Cult Killer Weapon. Forget that it can also be used to hunt varmints with. It's original purpose was to mass kill and it's a very good tool for that if it's used that way. More and more people are seeing it that way. 4 states have already banned the AR-15 and it's variants. Many more states have banned the large capacity Mags as well. School Children had Mothers that Vote. Seniors that have just Graduated are now of voting age. And you are hoping that everyone forgets by November. There are a whole bunch of people that won't let that happen and people will vote. Now, it that don't scare the hell out of you, it should.

You had your turn. You blew it.

Wrong again..... mass shooters use pistols over rifles....you dumb ass.

The ones who won't forget, dumb ass, are the gun owners....they don't get distracted by eating tide pods, snorting condoms and playing X-Box all day....

In the last 20 years, the record holders all used the AR-15. That's the score to beat. The handgun shooters were light weights with no obstacles. The AR shooters have to be fast and very good. Handguns just won't cut it anymore. Too many factors against them.

Yes, us Gun Owners won't forget. We want the NRA Robots and Lackeys out of office so we can have a safer community with common sense gun regulations. Now, stop making shit up.

Hey Moron the vast majority of murders are committed with handguns

 

[Skull Pilot]

This is the thing you anti gunners don't realize about the teenagers from Parkland..... teenagers eat tidepods, play Fortnight, and snort condoms.... Those of us who understand the history of mankind and human nature, want to protect the Bill of Rights... So, while teenagers forget, we remember....and we are going to remember in November what you want to do to our gun Rights....

This is why the gun control extremist groups are telling the gun control extremist democrats to not say they want to ban Assault rifles.......

Dem Candidate Tedra Cobb Tells Supporters She Wants ‘Assault Rifle’ Ban But ‘Cannot Say That’ in Public

Tedra Cobb, the Democratic candidate in New York's 21st Congressional District, told a group of teenage supporters that she supports a ban on certain firearms but won't say so publicly for fear of losing her election.

"When I was at this thing today, it was the first table I was at, a woman said, ‘How do you feel about assault rifles?' And I said they should be banned," Cobb can be heard saying in the video recorded by one of the attendees. "And I said, you know, people were getting up to go, to go get their lunch because it was a buffet, and I just said to her, I want you to know Cindy, I cannot say that."

When the woman pushed back on Cobb keeping quiet on how she feels about banning certain firearms, Cobb said coming out in favor of a gun ban would lead to her losing her bid against Republican incumbent Elise Stefanik.

"And she said, ‘Well, I want you to' and I said, ‘I won't win,'" Cobb said. "I said Moms Demand [Action] says, and Tricia Pleau said, ‘Do not say that you want an assault rifle ban because you will not win.'"

Tricia Pleau is a member of the New York chapter of the gun-control group Moms Demand Action.

Cobb's campaign website features a page on "Addressing Gun Violence" detailing her support for a number of gun-control measures but does not feature any language supporting a specific ban on any firearms.

Chris Martin, regional press secretary of the National Republican Congressional Committee, said Cobb's comments are disqualifying.

"Tedra Cobb knows that she's wildly out of touch with the district, so she's desperately trying to hide her liberal agenda from voters," Martin said. "First, she was forced to admit that she raised taxes over 20 times, and now she's being exposed for lying to voters about her support for an assault weapons ban and taking guns away from law-abiding citizens."

The Cobb campaign did not respond to a request for comment from the Free Beacon but did issue a statement to The Post Star.

I have a pile of guns. So being for a ban on assault type rifles does not make me an anti-gunner. Quit being such a NRA fed dick.

Squirt guns and cap guns don't count