If Clinton wins PA & VA, its all over.......

[candycorn]

My Prediction:

 

[owebo]

And yet RCP moved Connecticut from likely Clinton to leans Clinton.

If you actually think there is any chance of Clinton losing Connecticut I'd like to have some of what you're smoking.

Kasich could have won Connecticut. He was actually polling ahead of Clinton.

Kasich was also running ahead of Trump in the polls, but he lost to Trump. It is not at all certain he would have campaigned well against Clinton.

Toomuch time, he lost to the crazy right wing of the party, which Trump is busily getting ready to divorce after the election. Yeah, it is pretty certain he would have campaigned far ahead of Clinton, TooMuchTime.

Kasich lost because he did not address the issues voters were concerned about in a way that satisfied them. Trump won because he did.

Trump was funny.
Kasich was serious.
The GOP voters were in a mood to be entertained.
The laughing stops in November.

Kasich was a GOP fucktard....we sent him back to you, where he came from.....

Enjoy.....

 

[JakeStarkey]

Trump could win FL and NV and still lose.

If VA and PA go Dem, the election is over.

 

[toomuchtime_]

And yet RCP moved Connecticut from likely Clinton to leans Clinton.

If you actually think there is any chance of Clinton losing Connecticut I'd like to have some of what you're smoking.

Kasich could have won Connecticut. He was actually polling ahead of Clinton.

Kasich was also running ahead of Trump in the polls, but he lost to Trump. It is not at all certain he would have campaigned well against Clinton.

Toomuch time, he lost to the crazy right wing of the party, which Trump is busily getting ready to divorce after the election. Yeah, it is pretty certain he would have campaigned far ahead of Clinton, TooMuchTime.

Kasich lost because he did not address the issues voters were concerned about in a way that satisfied them. Trump won because he did.

Trump was funny.
Kasich was serious.
The GOP voters were in a mood to be entertained.
The laughing stops in November.

Everyone was serious but Trump was and is the only candidate who is not locked into the same old ideologies voters have been hearing about for years and years and in which a great many of them no longer believe.

Trump was and is the only candidate who is optimistic about America's future.

The final three in the Republican primaries were Trump, Kasich and Cruz, the three who proposed the most dramatic changes, but only Trump proposed changes based on issues rather than on ideology.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Trump is pragmatic, not ideological. He has no intention of satisfying his far right or Alt Right bases if he can do better elsewhere.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Trump is pragmatic, not ideological. He has no intention of satisfying his far right or Alt Right bases if he can do better elsewhere.

Exactly, and not being bound by any ideology he can take a fresh look at everything. Clinton can't and neither Kasich nor Cruz could.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Trump is pragmatic, not ideological. He has no intention of satisfying his far right or Alt Right bases if he can do better elsewhere.

Exactly, and not being bound by any ideology he can take a fresh look at everything. Clinton can't and neither Kasich nor Cruz could.

But he will never control his megalomania is the point. He will betray everybody, so the Dems and Pubs will work to rein him in. If they can force him to sign an immigration reform bill and improve border security and hardcore e-verify, well, OK.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Trump is pragmatic, not ideological. He has no intention of satisfying his far right or Alt Right bases if he can do better elsewhere.

Exactly, and not being bound by any ideology he can take a fresh look at everything. Clinton can't and neither Kasich nor Cruz could.

But he will never control his megalomania is the point. He will betray everybody, so the Dems and Pubs will work to rein him in. If they can force him to sign an immigration reform bill and improve border security and hardcore e-verify, well, OK.

It is always nice to hear you fantasies about Trump, but if he wins the election, it will mean he has the support of most Americans and especially of most Republican voters, the same voters who elect Republicans to Congress, so there will be no bipartisan movement against Trump. Keep in mind, Trump's position on illegal immigration is exactly the same as President Clinton's was and Senator Clinton's was.





And Clinton agrees with Trump on NAFTA now.



In fact, Trump's proposals on Illegal immigration, Islamic terrorism, trade, education have wide support across the electorate, so it nonsense to think politicians will conspire to block them.

 

[JakeStarkey]

We are talking about Trump, toomuchtime, and remember without VA and PA, he loses.

What are their polls like right now? Run and look them up.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Oh, I am such a good guy, I will do it for you, toomuchtime.

VA 3.7 and PA 6.6 going up.

 

[toomuchtime_]

We are talking about Trump, toomuchtime, and remember without VA and PA, he loses.

What are their polls like right now? Run and look them up.

First he doesn't need them to win, and second they are both within striking distance the way the campaigns are going.

 

[JakeStarkey]

We are talking about Trump, toomuchtime, and remember without VA and PA, he loses.

What are their polls like right now? Run and look them up.

First he doesn't need them to win, and second they are both within striking distance the way the campaigns are going.

yeah, he does need them. He can take OH and FL and not win. It is what it is.

 

[candycorn]

Trump is pragmatic, not ideological. He has no intention of satisfying his far right or Alt Right bases if he can do better elsewhere.

Exactly, and not being bound by any ideology he can take a fresh look at everything. Clinton can't and neither Kasich nor Cruz could.

And by not having any core values, he can fuck over anyone who thinks he did (the reason he thinks that is because he said he had the values).

Why you’d entrust your vote to someone who is for sale to the highest bidder…its a mystery.

 

[P@triot]

Hitlery Clinton points out why she's not qualified to be president...

Backfire alert! Hillary Clinton accidentally points out why she should NOT be president

 

[toomuchtime_]

We are talking about Trump, toomuchtime, and remember without VA and PA, he loses.

What are their polls like right now? Run and look them up.

First he doesn't need them to win, and second they are both within striking distance the way the campaigns are going.

yeah, he does need them. He can take OH and FL and not win. It is what it is.

No, for example, he takes Florida, Ohio, Ga, NC, IA, CO, NV, AZ and he wins.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Trump is pragmatic, not ideological. He has no intention of satisfying his far right or Alt Right bases if he can do better elsewhere.

Exactly, and not being bound by any ideology he can take a fresh look at everything. Clinton can't and neither Kasich nor Cruz could.

And by not having any core values, he can fuck over anyone who thinks he did (the reason he thinks that is because he said he had the values).

Why you’d entrust your vote to someone who is for sale to the highest bidder…its a mystery.

So you think anyone who is not an ideologue lacks core values and is for sale to the highest bidder?

 

[candycorn]

Trump is pragmatic, not ideological. He has no intention of satisfying his far right or Alt Right bases if he can do better elsewhere.

Exactly, and not being bound by any ideology he can take a fresh look at everything. Clinton can't and neither Kasich nor Cruz could.

And by not having any core values, he can fuck over anyone who thinks he did (the reason he thinks that is because he said he had the values).

Why you’d entrust your vote to someone who is for sale to the highest bidder…its a mystery.

So you think anyone who is not an ideologue lacks core values and is for sale to the highest bidder?

No. But I do think that when you are promoting yourself as a “deal maker”, the stuff you’ll put on the table to make the deal is greater than those that, you know, have core values.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Look closely ate the electoral map and add up the electoral votes from states that are FIRMLY blue, and you will see that if the above TWO states go for Clinton, the election could be over by early evening for most of us in central and western states ...

If Deplorable Hillary wins CALIFORNIA is will be a miracle at this point...

 

[Uncensored2008]

If Clinton strokes out during a debate, it's all over.

But think of the entertainment value!

 

[toomuchtime_]

Trump is pragmatic, not ideological. He has no intention of satisfying his far right or Alt Right bases if he can do better elsewhere.

Exactly, and not being bound by any ideology he can take a fresh look at everything. Clinton can't and neither Kasich nor Cruz could.

And by not having any core values, he can fuck over anyone who thinks he did (the reason he thinks that is because he said he had the values).

Why you’d entrust your vote to someone who is for sale to the highest bidder…its a mystery.

So you think anyone who is not an ideologue lacks core values and is for sale to the highest bidder?

No. But I do think that when you are promoting yourself as a “deal maker”, the stuff you’ll put on the table to make the deal is greater than those that, you know, have core values.

I don't think either one of us knows what you are talking about.