If FOX Authored The Mythos Of Trump's "Achievements", What Are Their Viewers Going To Cite Now In The Wake Of Tucker's Frank Admission?

[The5thHorseman]

Unlike the simple-minded & brain damaged dufus currently infesting the White House, President Trump had placed some firm requirements on the withdrawal he scheduled. Any violation could have terminated the agreement and Trump would have likely used those violations to our advantage.

It is unlikely in the extreme that Trump wouldn’t have gotten our people and the Afghans interpreters we relied upon and who deserves our protection to be simply and hideously left behind before the withdrawal.

Potato isn’t fit for Office.

President Trump had placed some firm requirements on the withdrawal he scheduled. Any violation could have terminated the agreement and Trump would have likely used those violations to our advantage

Sure....would you expect to be told to believe anything else?

How was he gonna do this in LESS time under the original agreement, and even less than that under his whim?

President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss, but senior officials never followed through on the plan, according to testimony released by the congressional January 6 committee on Thursday.


Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss

 

[BackAgain]

Sure....would you expect to be told to believe anything else?

How was he gonna do this in LESS time under the original agreement, and even less than that under his whim?

President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss, but senior officials never followed through on the plan, according to testimony released by the congressional January 6 committee on Thursday.


Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss

He would have just done it. Potato could have done it too. And should have.

But morons like Potato are too limited in their “thinking” to do what’s right.

 

[The5thHorseman]

He would have just done it. Potato could have done it too. And should have.

But morons like Potato are too limited in their “thinking” to do what’s right.

He was stopped from doing it in a fit...

You have absolutely nothing informing your confidence.

 

[BackAgain]

He was stopped from doing it in a fit...

You have absolutely nothing informing your confidence.

Yes I do. I saw his Presidency. Unlike Potato, President Trump didn’t sit by and watch Putin march up to a neighbor’s sovereign border, engage in war drum banging and then launch a war without just cause and commit that war in a massively criminal manner. Putin wouldn’t have dared try that with Trump. And didn’t.

Your faith in the Potato is what’s baseless.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Yes I do. I saw his Presidency. Unlike Potato, President Trump didn’t sit by and watch Putin march up to a neighbor’s sovereign border, engage in war drum banging and then launch a war without just cause and commit that war in a massively criminal manner. Putin wouldn’t have dared try that with Trump. And didn’t.

Your faith in the Potato is what’s baseless.

That's puerile twaddle.

Grifty was so supine with Pootie he was publicly mocked and considered a security threat. His relationship with military leadership was terrible.

He wouldn't have done fuck all, nor would he have been able to help direct a broad coalition in response, because he was loathed abroad as well.

 

[BackAgain]

That's puerile twaddle.

This describes your always futile form of argumentation, as seen in the paunkum puke you then immediately proceeded to post:

Grifty was so supine with Pootie he was publicly mocked and considered a security threat.

False. Being mocked in and of itself means nothing. For example, you try to mock me but your efforts emanate from a moron. So they are of no value. The better questions would be “mocked” by whom and “considered” a risk by whom? And of course, the answer is by other partisan hacks like you, but for reasons which never add up.

His relationship with military leadership was terrible.

In some cases that may be true. In other instances, it’s simply false. At best you overgeneralize and always fail to employ proper modifiers. Plus which, we have a civilian leadership over our military for a reason. Whether the military likes it or not, too bad.

He wouldn't have done fuck all, nor would he have been able to help direct a broad coalition in response, because he was loathed abroad as well.

More mere speculation of a specific nature. Ah yes. I have the perfect word for it: puerile. See? What you’ve done is assert and then reassert and use other assertions and opinions as a substitute for support.

The more in thine own eye clearly blinds you, Horseyshit.

 

[The5thHorseman]

This describes your always futile form of argumentation, as seen in the paunkum puke you then immediately proceeded to post:

False. Being mocked in and of itself means nothing. For example, you try to mock me but your efforts emanate from a moron. So they are of no value. The better questions would be “mocked” by whom and “considered” a risk by whom? And of course, the answer is by other partisan hacks like you, but for reasons which never add up.

In some cases that may be true. In other instances, it’s simply false. At best you overgeneralize and always fail to employ proper modifiers. Plus which, we have a civilian leadership over our military for a reason. Whether the military likes it or not, too bad.

More mere speculation of a specific nature. Ah yes. I have the perfect word for it: puerile. See? What you’ve done is assert and then reassert and use other assertions and opinions as a substitute for support.

The more in thine own eye clearly blinds you, Horseyshit.

Do you actually want to challenge any of that?

 

[BackAgain]

Do you actually want to challenge any of that?

No ma’am. I agree with my entire post.

 

[The5thHorseman]

No ma’am. I agree with my entire post.

You know you're a fraud, right?

 

[Mac1958]

You know you're a fraud, right?

They're so deep into this now that they can't turn back. This isn't politics for them, it's a lifestyle. It's who they are. Just this side of a religion. If they had the inner strength to get out, they wouldn't have fallen for it in the first place.

 

[BackAgain]

You know you're a fraud, right?

No ma’am. I know I’m not. But you certainly seem to be a fraud. Do you admit it or are you going to lie some more?

 

[HaShev]

“That’s the last four years. We’re all pretending we’ve got a lot to show for it, because admitting what a disaster it’s been is too tough to digest. But come on. There isn’t really an upside to Trump.”
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/08/media/fox-news-dominion-filings-reliable-sources/index.html


the whole time, they were just lip synching it...

FOX is, like, the Milli Vanilli of news...

Hit it, lads!

Your OP is a double negative thus =
A positive about Trump.
You called his achievements a Myth,
You are calling the many "impossible" peace treaties a myth while supporting the socialist leaning party that created WWlll with Russia, China,& Iran by proxy (for now).=double negative

 

[The5thHorseman]

No ma’am. I know I’m not. But you certainly seem to be a fraud. Do you admit it or are you going to lie some more?

Let's try again...

Do you challenge the idea that Grifty didn't possess the currency, either in the US or elsewhere, to lead an effort against Putin?

 

[BackAgain]

Let's try again...

Do you challenge the idea that Grifty didn't possess the currency, either in the US or elsewhere, to lead an effort against Putin?

Oh. Is that what you were trying to ask? Clarity of expression ain’t your strong suit.

I once again assume that you erroneously refer to President Trump in the above question, rather than to the senile old “10% for the big guy” scumbag, Potato, as “Grifty.” Of course, you’re free to be stupid.

And I respond to your silly question with a simple fact: Putin didn’t try that invasion shit on Trump’s watch.

The world knows how we that Potato is a joke.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Oh. Is that what you were trying to ask? Clarity of expression ain’t your strong suit.

I once again assume that you erroneously refer to President Trump in the above question, rather than to the senile old “10% for the big guy” scumbag, Potato, as “Grifty.” Of course, you’re free to be stupid.

And I respond to your silly question with a simple fact: Putin didn’t try that invasion shit on Trump’s watch.

The world knows how we that Potato is a joke.

Clarity of expression ain’t your strong suit.

The world knows how we that Potato is a joke.

Not that it's worth deciphering.

 

[blackhawk]

The lack of self awareness from the left is truly something to behold.

 

[The5thHorseman]

The lack of self awareness from the left is truly something to behold.

Are you still watching FOX?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

“That’s the last four years. We’re all pretending we’ve got a lot to show for it, because admitting what a disaster it’s been is too tough to digest. But come on. There isn’t really an upside to Trump.”
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/08/media/fox-news-dominion-filings-reliable-sources/index.html


the whole time, they were just lip synching it...

FOX is, like, the Milli Vanilli of news...

Hit it, lads!

Magaturds still won't care.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Magaturds still won't care.

Good.

Then I can continue to taunt them.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Good.

Then I can continue to taunt them.

Yep. Carry on.