If Hillary left a baby in a hot car and it died...would "lack of intent" be the excuse???

Yes, that is usually how it works

If a parent accidentally leaves a child in a car they are not prosecuted for murder because there is no intent
Father accused of leaving child in car charged with murder; Bond denied
A father has been charged with murder in the death of his 2-year-old child after he allegedly left the toddler in a hot car for eight hours.

Police said Justin Ross Harris, 34, was supposed to drop the child off at daycare, but forgot. He then drove to work at Home Depot around 9 a.m. Wednesday and left the toddler in the car. It wasn't until Harris left work and started driving home that he looked in the backseat and saw the child still strapped in the car seat and unresponsive.

Just for the record, how many of you are aware that Hillary Clinton did not kill a baby with a hot car?

Seriously?

We are however, painfully aware of your room temp IQ and the festering case of liberal ignorance it causes....:lol:
 
That fact that Clinton is considered an acceptable candidate out out of a hundred + million people who could run is disturbing. Not sure she would crack the top 80 million in a legit election.
It's not 100+ million. Under 66 million voted for Obama in 2012. Less than 126 million voted at all in 2012. I expect the turn out in 2016 to be even less.

well I'm just considering those who are eligible to run (not sure the number) , not those who actually vote.
yeah one would think we could do better as a nation then to run hillary

indeed that much is true
 
Yes, that is usually how it works

If a parent accidentally leaves a child in a car they are not prosecuted for murder because there is no intent
Father accused of leaving child in car charged with murder; Bond denied
A father has been charged with murder in the death of his 2-year-old child after he allegedly left the toddler in a hot car for eight hours.

Police said Justin Ross Harris, 34, was supposed to drop the child off at daycare, but forgot. He then drove to work at Home Depot around 9 a.m. Wednesday and left the toddler in the car. It wasn't until Harris left work and started driving home that he looked in the backseat and saw the child still strapped in the car seat and unresponsive.

Just for the record, how many of you are aware that Hillary Clinton did not kill a baby with a hot car?

Seriously?

We are however, painfully aware of your room temp IQ and the festering case of liberal ignorance it causes....:lol:

Still hurting I see.
 
That fact that Clinton is considered an acceptable candidate out out of a hundred + million people who could run is disturbing. Not sure she would crack the top 80 million in a legit election.
It's not 100+ million. Under 66 million voted for Obama in 2012. Less than 126 million voted at all in 2012. I expect the turn out in 2016 to be even less.

well I'm just considering those who are eligible to run (not sure the number) , not those who actually vote.
yeah one would think we could do better as a nation then to run hillary

indeed that much is true

Or try to beat her with Donald Trump.
 
image.jpeg
Yes, that is usually how it works

If a parent accidentally leaves a child in a car they are not prosecuted for murder because there is no intent
Father accused of leaving child in car charged with murder; Bond denied
A father has been charged with murder in the death of his 2-year-old child after he allegedly left the toddler in a hot car for eight hours.

Police said Justin Ross Harris, 34, was supposed to drop the child off at daycare, but forgot. He then drove to work at Home Depot around 9 a.m. Wednesday and left the toddler in the car. It wasn't until Harris left work and started driving home that he looked in the backseat and saw the child still strapped in the car seat and unresponsive.

Just for the record, how many of you are aware that Hillary Clinton did not kill a baby with a hot car?

Seriously?

We are however, painfully aware of your room temp IQ and the festering case of liberal ignorance it causes....:lol:

Still hurting I see.
 
She did remove it asshole...she put it on a server outside of the State Department ......that is a felony....all by itself. And she destroyed material as well....

Uh, no, she didn't remove it, other people sent her stuff that was clearly NOT marked as classified and much of it wouldn't have been obviously so. You know, like drone strikes in Pakistan the government is calling classified even though everyone knows we are doing it.
She sent classified and top secret information on a private server. Which is treason and you support that. Kinda makes you a traitor also.
 
She did remove it asshole...she put it on a server outside of the State Department ......that is a felony....all by itself. And she destroyed material as well....

Uh, no, she didn't remove it, other people sent her stuff that was clearly NOT marked as classified and much of it wouldn't have been obviously so. You know, like drone strikes in Pakistan the government is calling classified even though everyone knows we are doing it.
She sent classified and top secret information on a private server. Which is treason and you support that. Kinda makes you a traitor also.

Ummmmm....

Do you understand what treason is?
 
She did remove it asshole...she put it on a server outside of the State Department ......that is a felony....all by itself. And she destroyed material as well....

Uh, no, she didn't remove it, other people sent her stuff that was clearly NOT marked as classified and much of it wouldn't have been obviously so. You know, like drone strikes in Pakistan the government is calling classified even though everyone knows we are doing it.
She sent classified and top secret information on a private server. Which is treason and you support that. Kinda makes you a traitor also.

Ummmmm....

Do you understand what treason is?
When you offer your enemies classified and top secret information effortlessly. Just because you don't want your actions recorded. That's treason and she did that, now move along.
 
That fact that Clinton is considered an acceptable candidate out out of a hundred + million people who could run is disturbing. Not sure she would crack the top 80 million in a legit election.
It's not 100+ million. Under 66 million voted for Obama in 2012. Less than 126 million voted at all in 2012. I expect the turn out in 2016 to be even less.

well I'm just considering those who are eligible to run (not sure the number) , not those who actually vote.
yeah one would think we could do better as a nation then to run hillary

indeed that much is true

Or try to beat her with Donald Trump.


only a tard like you would believe that this helps hillary

--LOL
 
She did remove it asshole...she put it on a server outside of the State Department ......that is a felony....all by itself. And she destroyed material as well....

Uh, no, she didn't remove it, other people sent her stuff that was clearly NOT marked as classified and much of it wouldn't have been obviously so. You know, like drone strikes in Pakistan the government is calling classified even though everyone knows we are doing it.
She sent classified and top secret information on a private server. Which is treason and you support that. Kinda makes you a traitor also.

Ummmmm....

Do you understand what treason is?
When you offer your enemies classified and top secret information effortlessly. Just because you don't want your actions recorded. That's treason and she did that, now move along.

OK you are getting close

So you have to have an intentional offer of classified information to be treason
 
Do you understand what "intent" means?
Yes.

Do you understand what "extremely careless" means? How about "classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level"? Any "reasonable person...should have known" or "evidence of potential violations"?


Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System

Extremely careless in leaving your baby in a hot car is not intent
 
OK you are getting close

So you have to have an intentional offer of classified information to be treason
Still, do we really want a person who is so careless and negligent, not to mention paranoid, in the White House? Well, unless it's Trump. ;)
 
She did remove it asshole...she put it on a server outside of the State Department ......that is a felony....all by itself. And she destroyed material as well....

Uh, no, she didn't remove it, other people sent her stuff that was clearly NOT marked as classified and much of it wouldn't have been obviously so. You know, like drone strikes in Pakistan the government is calling classified even though everyone knows we are doing it.
She sent classified and top secret information on a private server. Which is treason and you support that. Kinda makes you a traitor also.

Ummmmm....

Do you understand what treason is?
When you offer your enemies classified and top secret information effortlessly. Just because you don't want your actions recorded. That's treason and she did that, now move along.

OK you are getting close

So you have to have an intentional offer of classified information to be treason
She knowingly let it out there unsecured, so she could hide her dealings. A treasonous bitch. You do realize after this she couldn't pass a security clearance? But being part of the elite she will if elected. If me or you we would be in jail, I see you can care less.
 
OK you are getting close

So you have to have an intentional offer of classified information to be treason
Still, do we really want a person who is so careless and negligent, not to mention paranoid, in the White House? Well, unless it's Trump. ;)

Once Hillary becomes President, we can make sure she doesn't use a private server

Makes you sleep better doesn't it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top