Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well look who he's gathered around him hon, same as it ever was. That's why you got Wall Street bailouts across both "conservative" and "liberal" administrations despite 90% of the population being dead set against it.I can think of far worse people to have running the WH.Goldman Sachs runs the white house either way.
Though I can't say that Goldman is running the WH, I am fairly certain Trump is trying to build bridges with that group of bankers. I'm not surprised that he is, after all, he'd surely like not to have to resume his reliance on Russians closely aligned with Putin for financing his business pursuits.
Goldman Sachs runs the white house either way.
How, precisely, does Goldman Sachs run the White House? Do they set the President's agenda? Do they attend state functions? Do they guide tours of the White House?
When you say Goldman Sachs, so you mean just that investment firm or a 'cabal' of like-minded investment firms? Do you imagine they have some sort of 'protocol' which guides this international conspiracy of bankers?
Your theory sounds very similar to another that briefly enjoyed popularity in Europe a few decades back. Is that where you get your inspiration?
GM will never sell another vehicle to me. EVERobama was ceo of gm for a short time ford never took bailout dough.bill.... it could have been real nice, another 4 or eight years of obama's chicago...
what would hillary do ? who would she pick to surround her. what would she do about vladimir and kim jung 3
which generals would she pick, that very telling....
"
which generals would she pick, that very telling.... "
General Electric
General Motors
General Dynamics
General Hospital
General Mills
We would have wound up with a Golman Sachs white house either way, Hil sure wasn't going to show anyone of them a door. Obama, Bush, Clinton, .... they're always there.I can think of far worse people to have running the WH.Goldman Sachs runs the white house either way.
Though I can't say that Goldman is running the WH, I am fairly certain Trump is trying to build bridges with that group of bankers. I'm not surprised that he is, after all, he'd surely like not to have to resume his reliance on Russians closely aligned with Putin for financing his business pursuits.
AMAZING!
Considering that before Trump stuffed his cabinet full of Goldman execs, he ran on populist wallstreet hate:
"I know the guys at Goldman Sachs. They have total, total control over (Ted Cruz). Just like they have total control over Hillary Clinton,"
Just another round of lies from Donald the king of swamp.
I can think of far worse people to have running the WH.Goldman Sachs runs the white house either way.
Though I can't say that Goldman is running the WH, I am fairly certain Trump is trying to build bridges with that group of bankers. I'm not surprised that he is, after all, he'd surely like not to have to resume his reliance on Russians closely aligned with Putin for financing his business pursuits.
AMAZING!
Considering that before Trump stuffed his cabinet full of Goldman execs, he ran on populist wallstreet hate:
"I know the guys at Goldman Sachs. They have total, total control over (Ted Cruz). Just like they have total control over Hillary Clinton,"
Just another round of lies from Donald the king of swamp.
Don't you just hate people like that? You know, like candidates who complain about the 1% in our country, and they are the 1%?
Goldman Sachs runs the white house either way.
How, precisely, does Goldman Sachs run the White House? Do they set the President's agenda? Do they attend state functions? Do they guide tours of the White House?
When you say Goldman Sachs, so you mean just that investment firm or a 'cabal' of like-minded investment firms? Do you imagine they have some sort of 'protocol' which guides this international conspiracy of bankers?
Your theory sounds very similar to another that briefly enjoyed popularity in Europe a few decades back. Is that where you get your inspiration?
Essentially what I am saying is that the economic system is completely detached from any representation of, by, or for "the people". It's pretty straight forward. The american economic system got rerigged beginning about a half century ago as a direct result of policies lobbied for, and at the behest of the "job creator" class. There indeed has been a vast redistribution of societal wealth, just not in the direction some blather on endlessly about. Ignore it all, fine with me, the longer we try to do that, the greater the perturbation to the power structurewill be when it erupts. As our declining empire leverages its military to economically colonize other lands, the violence will be brought home to quell any questioning here, it has already come home as we’ve seen with corporate for profit prisons and militarized police departments. The power structure knows full well it has lost all semblance of legitimacy, even if that escapes you.
And fentoon, well fentoon just runs his mouth....bill.... it could have been real nice, another 4 or eight years of obama's chicago...
what would hillary do ? who would she pick to surround her. what would she do about vladimir and kim jung 3
which generals would she pick, that very telling....
"
which generals would she pick, that very telling.... "
General Electric
General Motors
General Dynamics
General Hospital
General Mills
Same as Don, funny how that always works out, Goldman Sachs runs the white house either way.
You'll never get a straight answer from any of them.Goldman Sachs runs the white house either way.
How, precisely, does Goldman Sachs run the White House? Do they set the President's agenda? Do they attend state functions? Do they guide tours of the White House?
When you say Goldman Sachs, so you mean just that investment firm or a 'cabal' of like-minded investment firms? Do you imagine they have some sort of 'protocol' which guides this international conspiracy of bankers?
Your theory sounds very similar to another that briefly enjoyed popularity in Europe a few decades back. Is that where you get your inspiration?
Essentially what I am saying is that the economic system is completely detached from any representation of, by, or for "the people". It's pretty straight forward. The american economic system got rerigged beginning about a half century ago as a direct result of policies lobbied for, and at the behest of the "job creator" class. There indeed has been a vast redistribution of societal wealth, just not in the direction some blather on endlessly about. Ignore it all, fine with me, the longer we try to do that, the greater the perturbation to the power structurewill be when it erupts. As our declining empire leverages its military to economically colonize other lands, the violence will be brought home to quell any questioning here, it has already come home as we’ve seen with corporate for profit prisons and militarized police departments. The power structure knows full well it has lost all semblance of legitimacy, even if that escapes you.
But, you still didn't answer the question. How, precisely, does the company Goldman Sachs run the White House?
Goldman Sachs runs the white house either way.
How, precisely, does Goldman Sachs run the White House? Do they set the President's agenda? Do they attend state functions? Do they guide tours of the White House?
When you say Goldman Sachs, so you mean just that investment firm or a 'cabal' of like-minded investment firms? Do you imagine they have some sort of 'protocol' which guides this international conspiracy of bankers?
Your theory sounds very similar to another that briefly enjoyed popularity in Europe a few decades back. Is that where you get your inspiration?
Essentially what I am saying is that the economic system is completely detached from any representation of, by, or for "the people". It's pretty straight forward. The american economic system got rerigged beginning about a half century ago as a direct result of policies lobbied for, and at the behest of the "job creator" class. There indeed has been a vast redistribution of societal wealth, just not in the direction some blather on endlessly about. Ignore it all, fine with me, the longer we try to do that, the greater the perturbation to the power structurewill be when it erupts. As our declining empire leverages its military to economically colonize other lands, the violence will be brought home to quell any questioning here, it has already come home as we’ve seen with corporate for profit prisons and militarized police departments. The power structure knows full well it has lost all semblance of legitimacy, even if that escapes you.
But, you still didn't answer the question. How, precisely, does the company Goldman Sachs run the White House?
You'll never get a straight answer from any of them.Goldman Sachs runs the white house either way.
How, precisely, does Goldman Sachs run the White House? Do they set the President's agenda? Do they attend state functions? Do they guide tours of the White House?
When you say Goldman Sachs, so you mean just that investment firm or a 'cabal' of like-minded investment firms? Do you imagine they have some sort of 'protocol' which guides this international conspiracy of bankers?
Your theory sounds very similar to another that briefly enjoyed popularity in Europe a few decades back. Is that where you get your inspiration?
Essentially what I am saying is that the economic system is completely detached from any representation of, by, or for "the people". It's pretty straight forward. The american economic system got rerigged beginning about a half century ago as a direct result of policies lobbied for, and at the behest of the "job creator" class. There indeed has been a vast redistribution of societal wealth, just not in the direction some blather on endlessly about. Ignore it all, fine with me, the longer we try to do that, the greater the perturbation to the power structurewill be when it erupts. As our declining empire leverages its military to economically colonize other lands, the violence will be brought home to quell any questioning here, it has already come home as we’ve seen with corporate for profit prisons and militarized police departments. The power structure knows full well it has lost all semblance of legitimacy, even if that escapes you.
But, you still didn't answer the question. How, precisely, does the company Goldman Sachs run the White House?
How many Goldman Sachs higher ups have been in the last 5 administrations regardless of party?
What you will not get is latant militant homosexual and/or beastiality erotica mike.
Miketx knows exactly what this is about, and you don't.What you will not get is latant militant homosexual and/or beastiality erotica mike.
Homophobia? Really? You've starting to sound like another poster who rants about how certain ethnicities control the world.
Tillerson is another good example.How many Goldman Sachs higher ups have been in the last 5 administrations regardless of party?
How many ex-employees of Ford, or Boeing, or IBM have worked in the previous administrations? Would you prefer they hire ex-employees of Enron? Or Worldcom? The fact that the various administrations hire persons from successful companies is this a good thing and goes no further towards any explanation on how Goldman Sachs runs the White House.
How many Goldman Sachs higher ups have been in the last 5 administrations regardless of party?
How many ex-employees of Ford, or Boeing, or IBM have worked in the previous administrations? Would you prefer they hire ex-employees of Enron? Or Worldcom? The fact that the various administrations hire persons from successful companies is this a good thing and goes no further towards any explanation on how Goldman Sachs runs the White House.
How many Goldman Sachs higher ups have been in the last 5 administrations regardless of party?
How many ex-employees of Ford, or Boeing, or IBM have worked in the previous administrations? Would you prefer they hire ex-employees of Enron? Or Worldcom? The fact that the various administrations hire persons from successful companies is this a good thing and goes no further towards any explanation on how Goldman Sachs runs the White House.
Guess Don was full of shit about "the swamp", and "successful" substantial people are "the people" in american society. Gee, wonder how all that shit happened to the middle/working/under class over the past half century.
Trump’s Watered-Down Ethics Rules Let a Lobbyist Help Run an Agency He Lobbied
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/...s-now-theyre-on-his-transition-team.html?_r=0
Is Donald Trump Draining the Swamp?
Donors and lobbyists already shaping Trump’s ‘drain the swamp’ administration
Trump Names Mortgage Industry Lobbyist to HUD Transition Team
Donald Trump Puts Coal Lobbyist in Charge of Prosecuting Environmental Crimes
Only Lobbyists Can Help Trump ‘Drain the Swamp’
Same as it ever was.
I can think of far worse people to have running the WH.Goldman Sachs runs the white house either way.
Though I can't say that Goldman is running the WH, I am fairly certain Trump is trying to build bridges with that group of bankers. I'm not surprised that he is, after all, he'd surely like not to have to resume his reliance on Russians closely aligned with Putin for financing his business pursuits.
AMAZING!
Considering that before Trump stuffed his cabinet full of Goldman execs, he ran on populist wallstreet hate:
"I know the guys at Goldman Sachs. They have total, total control over (Ted Cruz). Just like they have total control over Hillary Clinton,"
Just another round of lies from Donald the king of swamp.
Well look who he's gathered around him hon, same as it ever was. That's why you got Wall Street bailouts across both "conservative" and "liberal" administrations despite 90% of the population being dead set against it.I can think of far worse people to have running the WH.Goldman Sachs runs the white house either way.
Though I can't say that Goldman is running the WH, I am fairly certain Trump is trying to build bridges with that group of bankers. I'm not surprised that he is, after all, he'd surely like not to have to resume his reliance on Russians closely aligned with Putin for financing his business pursuits.
That's why you got Wall Street bailouts across both "conservative" and "liberal" administrations despite 90% of the population being dead set against it.
