If the yearbook claim wasn't dead before

Excuse me fagot, there's no claim of rape or murder. Everyone keeps talking about underage girls, underage in AL is 15. You may not like it, but that's the law and there's not a damn thing you, I or the senate can do about it. You might want to concentrate on the 1 allegation of illegality and what evidence there is to prove that claim.


.

Those words have been thrown around, and Roy Moores supporters have acknowledge, they'd rather be represented by a pedophile than a democrat.


You might want to learn the definition of a pedophile before you throw the term around.


.
 
But but but we all know a man who hangs around the mall asking teen girls out on dates, even asking their mothers for permission, and meets other teenage girls at high school events would never ever sign a high school girl's yearbook. That has to be a hoax. Couldn't happen, not in a million years.

Moore even telephoned a high school girl, who had to be taken out of math class, to ask her for a date. Moore didn't say if he called the girls mother first for permission.
 
Excuse me fagot, there's no claim of rape or murder. Everyone keeps talking about underage girls, underage in AL is 15. You may not like it, but that's the law and there's not a damn thing you, I or the senate can do about it. You might want to concentrate on the 1 allegation of illegality and what evidence there is to prove that claim.


.

Those words have been thrown around, and Roy Moores supporters have acknowledge, they'd rather be represented by a pedophile than a democrat.


You might want to learn the definition of a pedophile before you throw the term around.


.
Child is defined as below the age of puberty or the age of majority which is 18 or 21, so you are wrong as always...
 
But but but we all know a man who hangs around the mall asking teen girls out on dates, even asking their mothers for permission, and meets other teenage girls at high school events would never ever sign a high school girl's yearbook. That has to be a hoax. Couldn't happen, not in a million years.

Moore even telephoned a high school girl, who had to be taken out of math class, to ask her for a date. Moore didn't say if he called the girls mother first for permission.
Maybe he wanted to know if 9 against 1 were good odds?
 
you should probably just say you don't care how many underage women roy boy pawed....

And you should say that the accused should not be allowed a defense and all accused should immediately be jailed.

Thanks for playing.

is there a criminal action pending?

I do adore how the psychos who believe every lie Donald says don't give credence to allegations made by more than a dozen women.

I expect nothing less from trumploons.


The number was reported today at 9, not more than a dozen. Exaggerate much? BTW how many claims anything that would have been illegal, I only know of 1..
So the perp molested, raped, killed, turned into rugs 9 instead of 12 women?


Excuse me fagot, there's no claim of rape or murder. Everyone keeps talking about underage girls, underage in AL is 15. You may not like it, but that's the law and there's not a damn thing you, I or the senate can do about it. You might want to concentrate on the 1 allegation of illegality and what evidence there is to prove that claim..

Be polite, you miscreant. That you don't understand the irony that revealed your Fallacy of False Equivalency as a bunch of nonsense is your problem.

NIne have accused him in the Court of Public Opinion, and the Jury are the AL voters. Your silliness of "it was only nine" is going to hurt him.
 
Those words have been thrown around, and Roy Moores supporters have acknowledge, they'd rather be represented by a pedophile than a democrat.

You might want to learn the definition of a pedophile before you throw the term around.

.

Actually the people of alabama need to learn that definition. They said they would vote for a pedophile before they would vote for a democrat. Even the governor said she believes the women, yet she would vote for the person that molested them.
 
A lot of people here and elsewhere are not being careful with their words. They are calling him a pedophile and saying he raped his accusers. Neither of those are true, and most of the women who have "come forward" didn't have "sexual misconduct" to report--just creepy, sniffing around type shit.
So yes, his opponents are exaggerating what he is supposed to have done.

And his supporters are saying they don't care if he did rape young girls, they're voting for the next supreme court justice, which requires senate confirmation
Well no one is accusing him of rape. Wow just fking wow
 
And you should say that the accused should not be allowed a defense and all accused should immediately be jailed.

Thanks for playing.

is there a criminal action pending?

I do adore how the psychos who believe every lie Donald says don't give credence to allegations made by more than a dozen women.

I expect nothing less from trumploons.


The number was reported today at 9, not more than a dozen. Exaggerate much? BTW how many claims anything that would have been illegal, I only know of 1.


.
Only nine? Thank God, I thought there might be a pattern here. That won't happen until ten.


Exaggeration of more than 133% indicates how weak the argument is. There's only one allegation that anything illegal occurred. Tell me, how do you go about proving that one? I know that old innocent until proven guilty thingy is so antiquated for you regressives, but it's still how our system is supposed to work.


.
There are two and he's not in a court of law, yet.

You underestimated but 100%. I guess your argument is weak. And the math is 33% not 133%. 9 versus 12, 33% more.


Excuse me dip, 12 is 133% of 9, and she claimed more than 12.


.
 
well let's investigate. i'm good with it. let's put the reporter under investigation. what did she have to bring the women out in the open.
Why would that be necessary? You think everyone who answers a reporter's questions gets a check? It doesn't work that way. And reports of sexual abuse often come out decades later. We have a whole Catholic church of said things that have cost them hundreds of millions to pay off for.
So ROY is like the Catholic Church? Holy fk
 
And his supporters are saying they don't care if he did rape young girls, they're voting for the next supreme court justice, which requires senate confirmation
Well no one is accusing him of rape. Wow just fking wow

Moores supporters are defending voting for him, even if he did rape young girls. They are defending against things beyond the actual accusations. It's like when they ask the NRA which weapons they would defend the ownership of.
 
I think Moore should just vow to do some 'Reflecting' like Franken, and it'll be over. According to Democrats, that's all it takes to make everything go away.
What Democrat said that? Right, no one.

Franken thinks so. That's one Democrat.
No one is saying that what Franken did is a crime, dumbass.

Defending that weird little pervert? Yikes! A new low for even you. :eek-52:
 
WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook

It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.

No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.

Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed

Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.

Certainly you would think the accuser would want the signature verified?

If she is sure it is real, no reason not to let an expert check it out.
There are dozens of other examples of how Moore preyed on children even without the signature.
It was a well known fact Alabamians knew about for 40 years but looked the other away because he draped himself in Jesus and the flag.


Holy shit, the regressive exaggeration never ends, first it was more than a dozen, now it dozens, how did Moore ever get any work done?


.
 
they want Moore to swear under oath that he did not do it and they can catch him lying in a criminal manner
Exactly would congress get the jurisdiction to look into anything before the election?
.

Hence in a he said - she said, let them say it before congress, under oath, under penalty of perjury.

If you want the TRUTH to come out.
What country do you live in? Here in America an accuser goes under oath first. So let’s get there.
 
WATCH: Allred Admits She Does Not Know If Moore Signed Accuser's Yearbook

It's certainly dead now. Allred admits she doesn't know if Moore actually signed the yearbook.

No attorney would admit this if there was any chance it was true.

Certainly explains why she won't let it be analyzed

Sounds like she is trying to make an out for a defamation suit.

Certainly you would think the accuser would want the signature verified?

If she is sure it is real, no reason not to let an expert check it out.
There are dozens of other examples of how Moore preyed on children even without the signature.
It was a well known fact Alabamians knew about for 40 years but looked the other away because he draped himself in Jesus and the flag.


Holy shit, the regressive exaggeration never ends, first it was more than a dozen, now it dozens, how did Moore ever get any work done?


.

I blame Russia. :rofl:
 
they want Moore to swear under oath that he did not do it and they can catch him lying in a criminal manner
Exactly would congress get the jurisdiction to look into anything before the election?
.

Hence in a he said - she said, let them say it before congress, under oath, under penalty of perjury.

If you want the TRUTH to come out.


Congress has no authority to do a thing before the election, and the ethics committees are for examining misconduct by their members. None of this happened after the election, and that's assuming he wins, so their jurisdiction even then would be questionable.


.
 

Forum List

Back
Top