If There Was No Fraud, Why?

[August West]

Because Americans don't support this:


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

We don`t support rioters and the man who incited those riots is in prison. Chauvin will be there for the next 22 years.

 

[Lastamender]

We don`t support rioters and the man who incited those riots is in prison. Chauvin will be there for the next 22 years.

Chauvin did not incite the riots, the media and politicians did.

 

[August West]

Chauvin did not incite the riots, the media and politicians did.

The media and politicians created the 9 minute video of torture and murder? That`s pretty clever.

 

[PoliticalChic]

We don`t support rioters and the man who incited those riots is in prison. Chauvin will be there for the next 22 years.

"We don`t support rioters..."

Another scummy low-life lying Democrat.....


Watch me prove it, liar.


“Charges against hundreds of NYC rioters, looters have been dropped

Hundreds of alleged looters and rioters busted last year in protests over George Floyd’s murder by police have had their charges dropped, according to NYPD data — figures ripped as “disgusting” by a local business owner.

In The Bronx — which saw fires in the street and mass looting in June 2020 — more than 60 percent of arrestees have had charges dropped, according to the investigation by NBC New York.

Seventy-three of the 118 people arrested in the borough had their cases shelved altogether, another 19 were convicted on lesser counts like trespassing, which carries no jail time, the report said.” Charges against hundreds of NYC rioters, looters have been dropped





“The Biden Administration Drops Dozens of Charges Against Violent Protesters in Portland The Justice Department are dropping 58 of the 97 criminal charges brought after the Portland riots, including assaults on officers….cities like Atlanta have dropped charges against protesters. Most of the charges brought for violent protests in the wake of the killing of George Floyd were dismissed.

One of those defendants who saw their charges dropped in Portland was David Bouchard who admitted that he put a Customs and Border Protection officer in a chokehold. Likewise, the Justice Department dismissed the charge against Charles Comfort who was indicted by a grand jury of civil disorder for twice charging at Portland Police Bureau officers and hitting them with a makeshift shield and kicking a third officer.” https://jonathanturley.org/2021/05/04/the-biden-administration-drops-dozens-of-charges-against-violent-protesters-in-portland/





‘We Will Not Prosecute’: Left-Wing Prosecutors, Many Backed By Soros Cash, Implement Soft-On-Crime Policies Across America




'We Will Not Prosecute': Left-Wing Prosecutors, Many Backed ...

https://dailycaller.com › 2020/08/10 › district-attorneys-so...



Aug 10, 2020 — Left-wing prosecutors have implemented soft-on-crime approaches to ... Backed By Soros Cash, Implement Soft-On-Crime Policies Across America.

• Left-wing prosecutors overseeing Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Philadelphia and San Francisco have embraced soft-on-crime approaches, a Daily Caller News Foundation review found.
• Several top district attorneys vowed not to prosecute specific crimes as a matter of policy.
• Multiple analyses have shown left-wing prosecutors dropping or diverting more charges than their predecessors.
• Super PACs backed by billionaire George Soros are major funders for several left-wing prosecutors taking soft-on-crime approaches.

‘We Will Not Prosecute’: Left-Wing Prosecutors, Many Backed By Soros Cash, Implement Soft-On-Crime Policies Across America
Left-wing prosecutors have implemented soft-on-crime approaches to criminal justice across America, in some instances making it a matter of policy not to prosecute specific crimes.
dailycaller.com



"Oregon State Police pull out of Portland after prosecutors refuse to prosecute Antifa criminals
What's the point of law enforcement arresting people for committing crimes if county prosecutors are going to give them unlimited get-out-of-jail cards?


The “woke” Democrat-filled government of the city and state have done everything they can to advance the rioting by Antifa and Black Lives Matter “activists” who are committing constant acts of wanton violence and destruction."


"Chicago police worried that prosecutors will drop all charges against vandals, rioters and those who attacked cops

“Criminals took to the street with confidence there would be no consequences. We have to have consequences for the arrests Chicago police officers make.”

Brown continued:

“Not many of those cases [past protests] were prosecuted to the full extent. These looters, these thieves, these criminals being emboldened by (the last of) consequences…emboldened to do more.”




Chicago police worried prosecutors will drop all charges against vandals, rioters and those who attacked cops
Prosecutors in the city have a track record of dropping charges against vandals, and now Chicago police are afraid it's about to happen en masse.
www.lawenforcementtoday.com




In your face, boooooyyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Lastamender]

The media and politicians created the 9 minute video of torture and murder? That`s pretty clever.

It was neither of those things. It made a career criminal and drug addict a hero. You fell for it. Involuntary manslaughter is what happened, nothing more than that.

 

[dudmuck]

Just because a series of corrupt courts.....including the 'supreme' one.....wouldn't hear the evidence doesn't mean there wasn't clear and dispositive evidence.



I can provide it.



The Constitution is known as ‘the law of the land.’

The U.S. Constitution calls itself the "supreme law of the land." This clause is taken to mean that when state constitutions or laws passed by state legislatures or the national Congress are found to conflict with the federal Constitution, they have no force.

The Constitution as Supreme Law

http://www.let.rug.nl › usa › outlines › government-1991




The fact is that the only document that Americans have agreed to be governed by is the Constitution. It is written in English….no ‘interpretation’ is required.



Wherein we find this:
Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

​

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

supreme.justia.com



But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes

Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.






Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Supremacy Clause | Wex | US Law

corrupt courts? Then the lawyers could have appealed

but instead they didnt provide evidence

Trump Lawyer to Pennsylvania Judge: Nope, I've Got No Evidence of Voter Fraud

President Donald J Trump has been aggressively pursuing voter fraud in the courts - but in Montgomery County, even his own lawyers admit there's no grand conspiracy afoot.

www.phillymag.com

Trump Campaign Knew Dominion Fraud Claims Were False, Memo Reportedly Shows—But Giuliani Still Pushed Them

The campaign debunked claims about the voting machines being used for fraud in an internal memo.

www.forbes.com

 

[PoliticalChic]

corrupt courts? Then the lawyers could have appealed

but instead they didnt provide evidence

Trump Lawyer to Pennsylvania Judge: Nope, I've Got No Evidence of Voter Fraud

President Donald J Trump has been aggressively pursuing voter fraud in the courts - but in Montgomery County, even his own lawyers admit there's no grand conspiracy afoot.

www.phillymag.com

Trump Campaign Knew Dominion Fraud Claims Were False, Memo Reportedly Shows—But Giuliani Still Pushed Them

The campaign debunked claims about the voting machines being used for fraud in an internal memo.

www.forbes.com

No court would all the evidence in.


Sen. Rand Paul Joins ABC's "This Week" - January 24, 2021 describing what we know of the election



SENATOR RAND PAUL, (R-KY): Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question.

There were several states in which the law was changed by the secretary of state and not the state legislature. To me, those are clearly unconstitutional…



Were there people who voted twice? Were there dead people who voted? Were there illegal aliens who voted? Yes, and we should get to the bottom of it.



I’ll give you an example. In my state, when we had a Democrat secretary of state, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the roles of illegal voters.





In Wisconsin, tens of thousands of absentee votes had only the name on them and no address. Historically those were thrown out, this time they weren't. They made special accommodations because they said, oh, it’s a pandemic and people forgot what their address was.

So they changed the law after the fact. That is wrong, that's unconstitutional…. I won’t be cowed by liberals in the media who say, there's no evidence here and you're a liar if you talk about election fraud.

I believe in Pennsylvania, they broke the law, and I believe if that ever will get a real hearing in the Supreme Court, it was denied for standing. It wasn’t actually taken up. If it were taken up, I do believe that the Supreme Court would overrule and say that they did break the law illegally.



It was never studied.

Should we investigate the fact that tens of thousands of absentee ballots did not have addresses on them and normally were disqualified, but this time, they were counted? Should we examine that?



I think there was great deal of evidence of fraud and changing of the election laws illegally. And I think a thorough investigation is warranted.”

… I want to look at election fraud and I want to look at secretaries of state who illegally changed the voter laws without the permission of their state legislatures. That is incontrovertible, it happened.

And you can't just sweep it under the rug and say, oh, nothing to see here, and everybody is a liar and you're a fool if you bring this up.”

'This Week' Transcript 1-24-21: Amy Klobuchar, Rand Paul, Vivek Murthy

Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Vivek Murthy were on "This Week" Sunday, January 24. This is a rush transcript and may be updated.

abcnews.go.com

 

[Slade3200]

Did you admit yesterday that the Constitution is the law of the land?

Does the Constitution give exclusive right to decide election rules to the legislature?


I'm never wrong.

You are a liar.

But.....a Democrat in good standing.

Wasn’t anything admit that’s just common knowledge. The constitution is the law of the land. The legislature makes elections laws. If the election laws are not followed then the courts adjudicate and determine the course of action. That’s what the constitutions outlines. That’s what happened. You are wrong

 

[dudmuck]

No court would all the evidence in.


Sen. Rand Paul Joins ABC's "This Week" - January 24, 2021 describing what we know of the election



SENATOR RAND PAUL, (R-KY): Well, what I would say is that the debate over whether or not there was fraud should occur, we never had any presentation in court where we actually looked at the evidence. Most of the cases were thrown out for lack of standing, which is a procedural way of not actually hearing the question.

There were several states in which the law was changed by the secretary of state and not the state legislature. To me, those are clearly unconstitutional…



Were there people who voted twice? Were there dead people who voted? Were there illegal aliens who voted? Yes, and we should get to the bottom of it.



I’ll give you an example. In my state, when we had a Democrat secretary of state, she refused, even under federal order, to purge the roles of illegal voters.





In Wisconsin, tens of thousands of absentee votes had only the name on them and no address. Historically those were thrown out, this time they weren't. They made special accommodations because they said, oh, it’s a pandemic and people forgot what their address was.

So they changed the law after the fact. That is wrong, that's unconstitutional…. I won’t be cowed by liberals in the media who say, there's no evidence here and you're a liar if you talk about election fraud.

I believe in Pennsylvania, they broke the law, and I believe if that ever will get a real hearing in the Supreme Court, it was denied for standing. It wasn’t actually taken up. If it were taken up, I do believe that the Supreme Court would overrule and say that they did break the law illegally.



It was never studied.

Should we investigate the fact that tens of thousands of absentee ballots did not have addresses on them and normally were disqualified, but this time, they were counted? Should we examine that?



I think there was great deal of evidence of fraud and changing of the election laws illegally. And I think a thorough investigation is warranted.”

… I want to look at election fraud and I want to look at secretaries of state who illegally changed the voter laws without the permission of their state legislatures. That is incontrovertible, it happened.

And you can't just sweep it under the rug and say, oh, nothing to see here, and everybody is a liar and you're a fool if you bring this up.”

'This Week' Transcript 1-24-21: Amy Klobuchar, Rand Paul, Vivek Murthy

Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Sen. Rand Paul and Dr. Vivek Murthy were on "This Week" Sunday, January 24. This is a rush transcript and may be updated.

abcnews.go.com

that was just missing addresses of witnesses, see here

Paul Cites Distortion to Argue 'Two Sides' in Election Fraud Debate - FactCheck.org

In calling for a “thorough investigation” into “election fraud,” Republican Sen. Rand Paul distorted the facts about a Wisconsin policy that was introduced by Republicans and put in place before the 2016 general election.

www.factcheck.org

 

[PoliticalChic]

Wasn’t anything admit that’s just common knowledge. The constitution is the law of the land. The legislature makes elections laws. If the election laws are not followed then the courts adjudicate and determine the course of action. That’s what the constitutions outlines. That’s what happened. You are wrong

Liar.

Only the legislature can alter election laws.

Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”

​

McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)



Every state where state courts did so made the vote illegitimate.

 

[PoliticalChic]

that was just missing addresses of witnesses, see here

Paul Cites Distortion to Argue 'Two Sides' in Election Fraud Debate - FactCheck.org

In calling for a “thorough investigation” into “election fraud,” Republican Sen. Rand Paul distorted the facts about a Wisconsin policy that was introduced by Republicans and put in place before the 2016 general election.

www.factcheck.org

Vulgarity......the Liberal white flag.

 

[Redfish]

So post something anything other than your opinion to prove me wrong.

those are facts not opinions, wake up

 

[Redfish]

How do they prove me wrong?

blacks commit more crimes per capita than whites, thats a fact. We can debate the reasons until the cows come home, but the facts remain the same. you do know what per capita means, right?

 

[Redfish]

The media and politicians created the 9 minute video of torture and murder? That`s pretty clever.

Floyd was a lifetime criminal and druggie who was high at the time. That does not excuse Chavin but Floyd was not the saint the media and BLM made him out to be.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

those are facts not opinions, wake up

No those are your opinions.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

blacks commit more crimes per capita than whites, thats a fact. We can debate the reasons until the cows come home, but the facts remain the same. you do know what per capita means, right?

Whites commit more crimes in this country than anyone and are the least incarcerated per capita, that's a fact.

 

[Redfish]

No those are your opinions.

its not my opinion that Obozo closed keystone. its a fact

its not my opinion that he was a terrible president, its a fact

 

[Redfish]

Whites commit more crimes in this country than anyone and are the least incarcerated per capita, that's a fact.

bullshit, prove it or STFU with your lies.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

its not my opinion that Obozo closed keystone. its a fact

its not my opinion that he was a terrible president, its a fact

Yea he was so terrible he got elected twice, Trump was so great he was a ONE and DONE.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

bullshit, prove it or STFU with your lies.

I have posted the numbers several times, Google it and then you STFU.