If "walls won't work": Why did China, Vatican & Israel build one? Why do jails have them?

[bucs90]

Liberals and no-border enthusiasts say "Walls don't work".

Oh.

Well....

China's Great Wall worked.
Israels wall to keep Palestinian savages out works.
The Vatican built a wall to fend off Muslim hordes. It worked.

Jails have walls. They work.


Walls don't work???

 

[aris2chat]

How 65 countries have erected security walls on their borders

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Walls work. Only an idiot would think they don't.

 

[Publius1787]

Liberals and no-border enthusiasts say "Walls don't work".

Oh.

Well....

China's Great Wall worked.
Israels wall to keep Palestinian savages out works.
The Vatican built a wall to fend off Muslim hordes. It worked.

Jails have walls. They work.


Walls don't work???

I think we should fly the illegals to the Vatican and let them claim asylum there. Certainly the Pope would set the example for the rest of the world.

 

[Never3ndr]

Liberals and no-border enthusiasts say "Walls don't work".

Oh.

Well....

China's Great Wall worked.
Israels wall to keep Palestinian savages out works.
The Vatican built a wall to fend off Muslim hordes. It worked.

Jails have walls. They work.


Walls don't work???

Link?

Personally, I haven't heard anybody (rational) question the fact that better walls will work (to better prevent illegal traffic). I'm pretty sure that the debate has been more about whether or not we need better walls (being okay with the amount of illegal traffic happening or focusing on other issues, like policy, to better deter illegal traffic) or how to properly fund and erect said walls (since blanket stating that Mexico will pay for it is pretty absurd at this point).

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Liberals and no-border enthusiasts say "Walls don't work".

Oh.

Well....

China's Great Wall worked.
Israels wall to keep Palestinian savages out works.
The Vatican built a wall to fend off Muslim hordes. It worked.

Jails have walls. They work.


Walls don't work???

I think we should fly the illegals to the Vatican and let them claim asylum there. Certainly the Pope would set the example for the rest of the world.

Every time I see one I say,

"Canadá no tiene la inmigración ilegal",

maybe I can start a trend.

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Liberals and no-border enthusiasts say "Walls don't work".

Oh.

Well....

China's Great Wall worked.
Israels wall to keep Palestinian savages out works.
The Vatican built a wall to fend off Muslim hordes. It worked.

Jails have walls. They work.


Walls don't work???

Link?

Personally, I haven't heard anybody (rational) question the fact that better walls will work (to better prevent illegal traffic). I'm pretty sure that the debate has been more about whether or not we need better walls (being okay with the amount of illegal traffic happening or focusing on other issues, like policy, to better deter illegal traffic) or how to properly fund and erect said walls (since blanket stating that Mexico will pay for it is pretty absurd at this point).

We give Mexico four-hundred-million dollars a year. We can use that money to build the the wall.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Liberals and no-border enthusiasts say "Walls don't work".

Who said that? Oh right, no one, but then again, you're the type that says laws won't work...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Liberals and no-border enthusiasts say "Walls don't work".

Oh.

Well....

China's Great Wall worked.
Israels wall to keep Palestinian savages out works.
The Vatican built a wall to fend off Muslim hordes. It worked.

Jails have walls. They work.


Walls don't work???

Link?

Personally, I haven't heard anybody (rational) question the fact that better walls will work (to better prevent illegal traffic). I'm pretty sure that the debate has been more about whether or not we need better walls (being okay with the amount of illegal traffic happening or focusing on other issues, like policy, to better deter illegal traffic) or how to properly fund and erect said walls (since blanket stating that Mexico will pay for it is pretty absurd at this point).

We give Mexico four-hundred-million dollars a year. We can use that money to build the the wall.

Well, that will get you 300 miles, maybe, but how about the other 1,950 - 700 - 300?

BTW, much of it is Private Property, and not for sale. Planning to just take it, my good little Nazi?

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Liberals and no-border enthusiasts say "Walls don't work".

Oh.

Well....

China's Great Wall worked.
Israels wall to keep Palestinian savages out works.
The Vatican built a wall to fend off Muslim hordes. It worked.

Jails have walls. They work.


Walls don't work???

Link?

Personally, I haven't heard anybody (rational) question the fact that better walls will work (to better prevent illegal traffic). I'm pretty sure that the debate has been more about whether or not we need better walls (being okay with the amount of illegal traffic happening or focusing on other issues, like policy, to better deter illegal traffic) or how to properly fund and erect said walls (since blanket stating that Mexico will pay for it is pretty absurd at this point).

We give Mexico four-hundred-million dollars a year. We can use that money to build the the wall.

Well, that will get you 300 miles, maybe, but how about the other 1,950 - 700 - 300?

BTW, much of it is Private Property, and not for sale. Planning to just take it, my good little Nazi?

The international border isn't private property, for one. Two, some parts of the border won't need a wall, because they're impassible, like this...

If you spent as much time learning a few tracts as you doing calling people names, you wouldn't look stupid.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Liberals and no-border enthusiasts say "Walls don't work".

Oh.

Well....

China's Great Wall worked.
Israels wall to keep Palestinian savages out works.
The Vatican built a wall to fend off Muslim hordes. It worked.

Jails have walls. They work.


Walls don't work???

Link?

Personally, I haven't heard anybody (rational) question the fact that better walls will work (to better prevent illegal traffic). I'm pretty sure that the debate has been more about whether or not we need better walls (being okay with the amount of illegal traffic happening or focusing on other issues, like policy, to better deter illegal traffic) or how to properly fund and erect said walls (since blanket stating that Mexico will pay for it is pretty absurd at this point).

We give Mexico four-hundred-million dollars a year. We can use that money to build the the wall.

Well, that will get you 300 miles, maybe, but how about the other 1,950 - 700 - 300?

BTW, much of it is Private Property, and not for sale. Planning to just take it, my good little Nazi?

The international border isn't private property, for one. Two, some parts of the border won't need a wall, because they're impassible, like this...

View attachment 68208

If you spent as much time learning a few tracts as you doing calling people names, you wouldn't look stupid.

Hey, dumbfuck, our "border" is often Private Property.

Border Fence Would Slice Through Private Land

Take your own advice, fuckhead...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Man I hate you ultra dumbfucks here: Completing border wall is daunting task in Texas, where most land is privately owned

 

[bucs90]

Liberals and no-border enthusiasts say "Walls don't work".

Oh.

Well....

China's Great Wall worked.
Israels wall to keep Palestinian savages out works.
The Vatican built a wall to fend off Muslim hordes. It worked.

Jails have walls. They work.


Walls don't work???

Link?

Personally, I haven't heard anybody (rational) question the fact that better walls will work (to better prevent illegal traffic). I'm pretty sure that the debate has been more about whether or not we need better walls (being okay with the amount of illegal traffic happening or focusing on other issues, like policy, to better deter illegal traffic) or how to properly fund and erect said walls (since blanket stating that Mexico will pay for it is pretty absurd at this point).

We give Mexico four-hundred-million dollars a year. We can use that money to build the the wall.

Well, that will get you 300 miles, maybe, but how about the other 1,950 - 700 - 300?

BTW, much of it is Private Property, and not for sale. Planning to just take it, my good little Nazi?

The international border isn't private property, for one. Two, some parts of the border won't need a wall, because they're impassible, like this...

View attachment 68208

If you spent as much time learning a few tracts as you doing calling people names, you wouldn't look stupid.

Hey, dumbfuck, our "border" is often Private Property.

Border Fence Would Slice Through Private Land

Take your own advice, fuckhead...

So you're saying if the nation wants to defend it's border...it can't if a landowner tells them no???

100% untrue.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Link?

Personally, I haven't heard anybody (rational) question the fact that better walls will work (to better prevent illegal traffic). I'm pretty sure that the debate has been more about whether or not we need better walls (being okay with the amount of illegal traffic happening or focusing on other issues, like policy, to better deter illegal traffic) or how to properly fund and erect said walls (since blanket stating that Mexico will pay for it is pretty absurd at this point).

We give Mexico four-hundred-million dollars a year. We can use that money to build the the wall.

Well, that will get you 300 miles, maybe, but how about the other 1,950 - 700 - 300?

BTW, much of it is Private Property, and not for sale. Planning to just take it, my good little Nazi?

The international border isn't private property, for one. Two, some parts of the border won't need a wall, because they're impassible, like this...

View attachment 68208

If you spent as much time learning a few tracts as you doing calling people names, you wouldn't look stupid.

Hey, dumbfuck, our "border" is often Private Property.

Border Fence Would Slice Through Private Land

Take your own advice, fuckhead...

So you're saying if the nation wants to defend it's border...it can't if a landowner tells them no???

100% untrue.

No, I'm saying your kind supposedly respects Private Property? I guess not.

Fuckin' Nazis.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Liberals and no-border enthusiasts say "Walls don't work".

Oh.

Well....

China's Great Wall worked.
Israels wall to keep Palestinian savages out works.
The Vatican built a wall to fend off Muslim hordes. It worked.

Jails have walls. They work.


Walls don't work???

Link?

Personally, I haven't heard anybody (rational) question the fact that better walls will work (to better prevent illegal traffic). I'm pretty sure that the debate has been more about whether or not we need better walls (being okay with the amount of illegal traffic happening or focusing on other issues, like policy, to better deter illegal traffic) or how to properly fund and erect said walls (since blanket stating that Mexico will pay for it is pretty absurd at this point).

We give Mexico four-hundred-million dollars a year. We can use that money to build the the wall.

Well, that will get you 300 miles, maybe, but how about the other 1,950 - 700 - 300?

BTW, much of it is Private Property, and not for sale. Planning to just take it, my good little Nazi?

The international border isn't private property, for one. Two, some parts of the border won't need a wall, because they're impassible, like this...

View attachment 68208

If you spent as much time learning a few tracts as you doing calling people names, you wouldn't look stupid.

Hey, dumbfuck, our "border" is often Private Property.

Border Fence Would Slice Through Private Land

Take your own advice, fuckhead...

Do you have any idea how much land was repurposed via Eminent Domain for the Eisenhower Interstate? By comparison this will be a walk in the park.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

We give Mexico four-hundred-million dollars a year. We can use that money to build the the wall.

Well, that will get you 300 miles, maybe, but how about the other 1,950 - 700 - 300?

BTW, much of it is Private Property, and not for sale. Planning to just take it, my good little Nazi?

The international border isn't private property, for one. Two, some parts of the border won't need a wall, because they're impassible, like this...

View attachment 68208

If you spent as much time learning a few tracts as you doing calling people names, you wouldn't look stupid.

Hey, dumbfuck, our "border" is often Private Property.

Border Fence Would Slice Through Private Land

Take your own advice, fuckhead...

So you're saying if the nation wants to defend it's border...it can't if a landowner tells them no???

100% untrue.

No, I'm saying your kind supposedly respects Private Property? I guess not.

Fuckin' Nazis.

It may come as a shock to you Leftwacks when many landowners willingly offer tracts of land for the wall. They hate illegals more than anyone.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Link?

Personally, I haven't heard anybody (rational) question the fact that better walls will work (to better prevent illegal traffic). I'm pretty sure that the debate has been more about whether or not we need better walls (being okay with the amount of illegal traffic happening or focusing on other issues, like policy, to better deter illegal traffic) or how to properly fund and erect said walls (since blanket stating that Mexico will pay for it is pretty absurd at this point).

We give Mexico four-hundred-million dollars a year. We can use that money to build the the wall.

Well, that will get you 300 miles, maybe, but how about the other 1,950 - 700 - 300?

BTW, much of it is Private Property, and not for sale. Planning to just take it, my good little Nazi?

The international border isn't private property, for one. Two, some parts of the border won't need a wall, because they're impassible, like this...

View attachment 68208

If you spent as much time learning a few tracts as you doing calling people names, you wouldn't look stupid.

Hey, dumbfuck, our "border" is often Private Property.

Border Fence Would Slice Through Private Land

Take your own advice, fuckhead...

Do you have any idea how much land was repurposed via Eminent Domain for the Eisenhower Interstate? By comparison this will be a walk in the park.

I see, so you don't respect Private Property either. Got it.

Enjoy paying that bill, and the lawyers of course.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Well, that will get you 300 miles, maybe, but how about the other 1,950 - 700 - 300?

BTW, much of it is Private Property, and not for sale. Planning to just take it, my good little Nazi?

The international border isn't private property, for one. Two, some parts of the border won't need a wall, because they're impassible, like this...

View attachment 68208

If you spent as much time learning a few tracts as you doing calling people names, you wouldn't look stupid.

Hey, dumbfuck, our "border" is often Private Property.

Border Fence Would Slice Through Private Land

Take your own advice, fuckhead...

So you're saying if the nation wants to defend it's border...it can't if a landowner tells them no???

100% untrue.

No, I'm saying your kind supposedly respects Private Property? I guess not.

Fuckin' Nazis.

It may come as a shock to you Leftwacks when many landowners willingly offer tracts of land for the wall. They hate illegals more than anyone.

BS, read the links. And it doesn't change a fuck thing, the land is Private my little Nazis...

 

[WildBillKelsoe]

Liberals and no-border enthusiasts say "Walls don't work".

Oh.

Well....

China's Great Wall worked.
Israels wall to keep Palestinian savages out works.
The Vatican built a wall to fend off Muslim hordes. It worked.

Jails have walls. They work.


Walls don't work???

Link?

Personally, I haven't heard anybody (rational) question the fact that better walls will work (to better prevent illegal traffic). I'm pretty sure that the debate has been more about whether or not we need better walls (being okay with the amount of illegal traffic happening or focusing on other issues, like policy, to better deter illegal traffic) or how to properly fund and erect said walls (since blanket stating that Mexico will pay for it is pretty absurd at this point).

We give Mexico four-hundred-million dollars a year. We can use that money to build the the wall.

Well, that will get you 300 miles, maybe, but how about the other 1,950 - 700 - 300?

BTW, much of it is Private Property, and not for sale. Planning to just take it, my good little Nazi?

The international border isn't private property, for one. Two, some parts of the border won't need a wall, because they're impassible, like this...

View attachment 68208

If you spent as much time learning a few tracts as you doing calling people names, you wouldn't look stupid.

Hey, dumbfuck, our "border" is often Private Property.

Border Fence Would Slice Through Private Land

Take your own advice, fuckhead...

The border isn't private property.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Link?

Personally, I haven't heard anybody (rational) question the fact that better walls will work (to better prevent illegal traffic). I'm pretty sure that the debate has been more about whether or not we need better walls (being okay with the amount of illegal traffic happening or focusing on other issues, like policy, to better deter illegal traffic) or how to properly fund and erect said walls (since blanket stating that Mexico will pay for it is pretty absurd at this point).

We give Mexico four-hundred-million dollars a year. We can use that money to build the the wall.

Well, that will get you 300 miles, maybe, but how about the other 1,950 - 700 - 300?

BTW, much of it is Private Property, and not for sale. Planning to just take it, my good little Nazi?

The international border isn't private property, for one. Two, some parts of the border won't need a wall, because they're impassible, like this...

View attachment 68208

If you spent as much time learning a few tracts as you doing calling people names, you wouldn't look stupid.

Hey, dumbfuck, our "border" is often Private Property.

Border Fence Would Slice Through Private Land

Take your own advice, fuckhead...

The border isn't private property.

Bitch, the articles show that you are dead wrong. The Feds have to sue to get at this property. It's Private Land in many cases, dumbfuck.

What the fuck does this mean to you, you dumbfuck?

"Hundreds of property owners were sued just to build the existing chunks of wall. Some 400 relinquished properties ranging in size from a driveway to commercial lots and farms, costing the government at least $15 million, according to an AP review of land cases in 2012.

Among them was Eloisa Tamez, who refused to cede her three acres in San Benito, land that had been in her family for generations. A federal judge ruled in the government's favor, and Tamez was compensated $56,000, with which she funded a scholarship at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley where she works as a professor."