Really? Care to share which statute(s) that were violated there that "...shows a level of bias that is WAY outside the law." Where did the IG make the necessary referrals for prosecution for these items outside the law? I'm trying to locate all of those referrals for my own quick source reference!
The IG referred McCabe for prosecution and in today's report he referred 5 people at the FBI and DOJ for investigation....three of those people have left the FBI already but will still face prosecution if warranted...
So where is that in the bloody report? McCabe was referred back in the middle of April for "lack of candor"; old news. I've already located the others who MAY have violated Dept. guidelines and were recommended for in-house review by the IG. What I'm trying to locate are those who have been singled out, if any, for infractions of Federal Statutory LAW which may have been violated in the opinion of the IG and referred for possible prosecution!
 
I'm thinking NOT. That IG report comes out and they will be running for cover. Give it 2 or 3 days and the finger pointing will begin. Give it a week and the rats will be jumping ship. There is simply NO WAY that report is bad for the GOP because it's NOT a report on them.

But Shit Stain, Comey and Clinton? Could be VERY VERY bad news. And given the IG WAS a Shit Stain pick? Kind of hard to spin that crap eh Libtardo's? A short bus full of lying bickering finger pointing rats headed for a cliff.

Just another gift from the people who brought you MAGA.

Fury

Opinions are like assholes everybody has one.

That doesn’t mean that selected sentences from this report aren’t going to be central to Trump’s tweets, Nunes’s memos, and Sean Hannity’s blather from this point on. But it does mean that what’s absolutely not in the report is any evidence that Comey acted to protect Hillary Clinton, or that there was any conspiracy against Trump—deep, shallow, or in between. Findings include:

  • There was no evidence former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton “engaged in inappropriate discussion.”
  • Comey’s July critique of Hillary Clinton was “inconsistent with Department policy and violated long-standing Department practice” in that Comey shouldn’t have been talking about an investigation that didn’t lead to charges.
  • There was no sign that anyone in the FBI tried to hide or delay the release of evidence.
  • Comey’s October 28 announcement that he was reopening the investigation was “extraordinary,” and Comey’s arguments that transparency demanded this announcement were “unpersuasive”—especially as the same consideration wasn’t given other investigations, like connections between Trump and Russia.
  • A total of five FBI employees, including Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, engaged in sending personal text messages, or inappropriate political message, but there was no evidence of any impact on FBI actions.
  • Several agents used personal email accounts for non-public information about their investigation into Hillary Clinton for using a personal email account—including Comey.
Inspector general report doesn't give Trump what he wants, but cherry-picking will make it all good
IG report on Russia investigation has yet to be released. Why did Hillary set up a private server? Why did she scrub that server? Why did she smash cell phones? Report says her server was compromised by foreign governments. Most likely Russia because Podesta’s little bro had business dealings with Russians.
Most likely international Jews. And the blacks.
 
All of this investigating and FBI agents are being fired and exposed for wrong doing...the FBI chief is speaking about learning lessons the Deep State has been exposed for spying on Trump and today Trump is still president and getting it done......

Gotta love it!
 
If Hillary had nothing to hide...why did she destroy evidence? Why did FBI and DoJ drag their feet on snatching this evidence? They gave her time to destroy it.
 
I'm thinking NOT. That IG report comes out and they will be running for cover. Give it 2 or 3 days and the finger pointing will begin. Give it a week and the rats will be jumping ship. There is simply NO WAY that report is bad for the GOP because it's NOT a report on them.

But Shit Stain, Comey and Clinton? Could be VERY VERY bad news. And given the IG WAS a Shit Stain pick? Kind of hard to spin that crap eh Libtardo's? A short bus full of lying bickering finger pointing rats headed for a cliff.

Just another gift from the people who brought you MAGA.

Fury

Opinions are like assholes everybody has one.

That doesn’t mean that selected sentences from this report aren’t going to be central to Trump’s tweets, Nunes’s memos, and Sean Hannity’s blather from this point on. But it does mean that what’s absolutely not in the report is any evidence that Comey acted to protect Hillary Clinton, or that there was any conspiracy against Trump—deep, shallow, or in between. Findings include:

  • There was no evidence former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton “engaged in inappropriate discussion.”
  • Comey’s July critique of Hillary Clinton was “inconsistent with Department policy and violated long-standing Department practice” in that Comey shouldn’t have been talking about an investigation that didn’t lead to charges.
  • There was no sign that anyone in the FBI tried to hide or delay the release of evidence.
  • Comey’s October 28 announcement that he was reopening the investigation was “extraordinary,” and Comey’s arguments that transparency demanded this announcement were “unpersuasive”—especially as the same consideration wasn’t given other investigations, like connections between Trump and Russia.
  • A total of five FBI employees, including Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, engaged in sending personal text messages, or inappropriate political message, but there was no evidence of any impact on FBI actions.
  • Several agents used personal email accounts for non-public information about their investigation into Hillary Clinton for using a personal email account—including Comey.
Inspector general report doesn't give Trump what he wants, but cherry-picking will make it all good
IG report on Russia investigation has yet to be released. Why did Hillary set up a private server? Why did she scrub that server? Why did she smash cell phones? Report says her server was compromised by foreign governments. Most likely Russia because Podesta’s little bro had business dealings with Russians.
Most likely international Jews. And the blacks.
Nope...just Democrats.
 
It says they couldn’t find any documentary or testimonial evidence. Nowhere, as you suggest, did they say it didn’t happen.

:lol:

They found no evidence to suggest that it happened. They reviewed all of the official decisions made in the course of the investigation, and found no issues with any of them.
:laugh:

It's all in the report.
A report that wouldn’t be necessary if Hillary hadn’t used a private server for personal gain. :)
All this shit is her fault.
It’s good that we’re looking at what happened. It’s the only way we’ll learn how to stop people like her from reaching important positions within our government.
 
All of this investigating and FBI agents are being fired and exposed for wrong doing...the FBI chief is speaking about learning lessons the Deep State has been exposed for spying on Trump and today Trump is still president and getting it done......

Gotta love it!
Which page of the IG report discusses the Deep State's™ spying on Trump?

Thanks ahead of time.
 
All of this investigating and FBI agents are being fired and exposed for wrong doing...the FBI chief is speaking about learning lessons the Deep State has been exposed for spying on Trump and today Trump is still president and getting it done......

Gotta love it!
Which page of the IG report discusses the Deep State's™ spying on Trump?

Thanks ahead of time.
Russia IG report has yet to be released. This is only one half of IG investigation.
 
:lol:

You haven't been paying attention, have you?

The report determined that neither Strozk or Page were biased in terms of their handling of the investigation.
Link. I don’t recall it said that. I thought it said it cast a “cloud of doubt” over their integrity.

The report has already been linked. Here's the important section:

There were clearly tensions and disagreements in a number of important areas between Midyear agents and prosecutors. However, we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative decisions discussed below, or that the justifications offered for these decisions were pretextual. We recognize that these text and instant messages cast a cloud over the FBI’s handling of the Midyear investigation and the investigation’s credibility. But our review did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that these political views directly affected the specific investigative decisions that we reviewed in this chapter. The broader impact of these text and instant messages, including on such matters as the public perception of the FBI and the Midyear investigation, are discussed in ChapterTwelve
Go back and read the parts you bolded. Pay close attention to the words ‘directly affected’.
It doesn’t say there was no bias. lol

Yes. The report says that while Page and Strozk may have been personally "biased" against Trump, those personal biases did not affect any official or investigative decisions.

No, it says they found no evidence that their biases affected any official decisions, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen. IOW, the IG can't prove it, but when I see what these people were saying, well it's kinda hard to assume they never actually did anything they shouldn't have. Hard to believe IMHO, I would bet serious money that whatever evidence that did exist got cloroxed. Lib dems are experienced int hat stuff.

The report examined every single step in the investigation.

At no point were Strozk or Page in a position to make any decisions that would have changed the investigation. At no point was there any evidence of bad faith on the part of any of the team.

It's very in-depth. For reference, I'm discussing Chapters 3, 4, and 5 of the report (p.37-160).
 
All of this investigating and FBI agents are being fired and exposed for wrong doing...the FBI chief is speaking about learning lessons the Deep State has been exposed for spying on Trump and today Trump is still president and getting it done......

Gotta love it!
Which page of the IG report discusses the Deep State's™ spying on Trump?

Thanks ahead of time.
Russia IG report has yet to be released. This is only one half of IG investigation.
So...the answer is "I made it up".
 
Read the report. It's not redacted
Congress just requested that the IG send them the unredacted version and he has agreed to do so.....Rosenstein has had the document for two weeks and he whitewashed the shit out of it...

You are a monumental dupe.

The report is unredacted.

Do you really think the report that came out today has not been thoroughly whitewashed? What the hell do you think they've been doing with it for the past 2 weeks?
 
Christopher Wray just commented how they are going to discipline a number of people identified in inappropriate and potentially illegal conduct.. DAMN! A whole lot of information was withheld!
 
Last edited:
Read the report. It's not redacted
Congress just requested that the IG send them the unredacted version and he has agreed to do so.....Rosenstein has had the document for two weeks and he whitewashed the shit out of it...

You are a monumental dupe.

The report is unredacted.

Do you really think the report that came out today has not been thoroughly whitewashed? What the hell do you think they've been doing with it for the past 2 weeks?
Yep. It doesn't prove Hillary was the second shooter on the grassy knoll. Clearly a whitewash job. Noooooo doubt about it!
 

Forum List

Back
Top