I'm freezing Cold!! .... Global Warming or Climate Change??

[MindWars]

Just when you thought the Big Freeze couldn’t get any worse, here’s Al Gore to twist the knife.

This 'Bitter Cold' Is What Global Warming Looks Like, Explains Al Gore

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LMFAO, you just can't make this bs up....................... and the libtards believe this bastard over and over.

 

[MarathonMike]

Do you realize how close we came to having Al Jazeera Gore as President? Thank God for the hanging chads of Florida.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

While I absolutely hate Michigan winters, I can't believe the libs think subzero temps in January and February is something strange.

Ill make a prediction. It'll be in the 90s in July and August. MAYBE even higher!

 

[Billy_Bob]

 

[beagle9]

While I absolutely hate Michigan winters, I can't believe the libs think subzero temps in January and February is something strange.

Ill make a prediction. It'll be in the 90s in July and August. MAYBE even higher!

. You ole global warming activist you. LOL

 

[MindWars]

This is what the video is lol

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Not about control? Yes it is, every bit of it.

Oh, and life is what we individually make of it.

Oh, please. You are preaching to the choir.
That is how this mumbo jumbo started! A money scheme to redistribute wealth and make those at the top of it even wealthier. A power scheme, which does nothing to help change the climate.
Whatshould have been done is planning for how to survive when actual climate change, which always changes, does happen.

The audacity anyone has to try to sell to people we can stop climate from changing with carbon credits, is criminal.

Carbon credits may or may not be a good solution. Im not prepared to argue that and I have not stake in it.

Let's take a step back and look at your misguided assumption of what it is the concerned steward of planet earth wants.

"We can stop climate from changing."

Is this what you actually think? What or who is telling you this?

Here's the more accurate take. We understand that the climate changes on its own and it can do so in multiple combined and complex ways. Changing salination of the ocean, changing populations of plants and animals, changing surface composition like reflective vs. Absorbative substances, deforestation, change in atmospheric composition, and probably more things that we don't know about yet, are all playing into it to different degrees. The earth itself is the biggest complex system we know. If these things changed climate enough to jeopardize our survival wouldn't we be compelled to do something about it? We require some ideal sweet spot conditions to thrive. While we have quickly improving technology, it would probably be wiser to maintain rather than neglectfully change it And adapt to the result. And if optional or preventable human activity played a big role in accelerating this change, wouldn't we be compelled to do something about it? Like, if methane from grass fed livestock farms was found to be impactful in the change of atmospheric composition, should we take that into consideration separately from whatever the fk the business wants? We should give a rip what They want. Their duty is not to our society, it's to their sustained profit only and rightfully so. We would be INCREDIBLY STUPID in relinquishing our advantages to simply say "whoops the businesses want to do this so I guess we are hands off and have to live with it because socialism is bad." How fkin stupid would that be?

It's more complicated than your everyday right wing oversimplified slogan.

And here's the bottom line. Business will find a way to thrive in whatever reasonable legal framework we give it. Just make sure the delta isn't too high. We as a society through our governments pick the laws based on what we know now, not what they knew 300 years ago.

You are advocating for the reckless unfair approach. Eg. let businesses do whatever they want, and the rest of society will just have to deal with it and pay for dealing with it. Yeah, No. I will argue against that at every step. And it's not about control. I don't want to control what they are doing. I want to protect myself and the rest of us from financial and physical harm due to these reckless and neglectful companies choosing not to pay the real costs of responsibly operating.

I want to protect myself from the negligent and reckless business practices of big oil and coal. Why? Because they poison us, they poison our world, they are evidenced to be impacting climate. I don't want to wake up 30 years from now with cancer because they successfully lobbied for lower standards. It's not about control. It's about protection. It's about those businesses paying the real costs of operating responsibly.

If you have an argument to make, do so. Another slogan is a pile of dung.

You're confusing pollution with life-sustaining CO2.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

You're confusing pollution with life-sustaining CO2

Plant OXYGEN.

Why to GW scammers hate trees?

 

[grainbely]

Not about control? Yes it is, every bit of it.

Oh, and life is what we individually make of it.

Oh, please. You are preaching to the choir.
That is how this mumbo jumbo started! A money scheme to redistribute wealth and make those at the top of it even wealthier. A power scheme, which does nothing to help change the climate.
Whatshould have been done is planning for how to survive when actual climate change, which always changes, does happen.

Carbon credits may or may not be a good solution. Im not prepared to argue that and I have not stake in it.

Let's take a step back and look at your misguided assumption of what it is the concerned steward of planet earth wants.

"We can stop climate from changing."

Is this what you actually think? What or who is telling you this?

Here's the more accurate take. We understand that the climate changes on its own and it can do so in multiple combined and complex ways. Changing salination of the ocean, changing populations of plants and animals, changing surface composition like reflective vs. Absorbative substances, deforestation, change in atmospheric composition, and probably more things that we don't know about yet, are all playing into it to different degrees. The earth itself is the biggest complex system we know. If these things changed climate enough to jeopardize our survival wouldn't we be compelled to do something about it? We require some ideal sweet spot conditions to thrive. While we have quickly improving technology, it would probably be wiser to maintain rather than neglectfully change it And adapt to the result. And if optional or preventable human activity played a big role in accelerating this change, wouldn't we be compelled to do something about it? Like, if methane from grass fed livestock farms was found to be impactful in the change of atmospheric composition, should we take that into consideration separately from whatever the fk the business wants? We should give a rip what They want. Their duty is not to our society, it's to their sustained profit only and rightfully so. We would be INCREDIBLY STUPID in relinquishing our advantages to simply say "whoops the businesses want to do this so I guess we are hands off and have to live with it because socialism is bad." How fkin stupid would that be?

It's more complicated than your everyday right wing oversimplified slogan.

And here's the bottom line. Business will find a way to thrive in whatever reasonable legal framework we give it. Just make sure the delta isn't too high. We as a society through our governments pick the laws based on what we know now, not what they knew 300 years ago.

You are advocating for the reckless unfair approach. Eg. let businesses do whatever they want, and the rest of society will just have to deal with it and pay for dealing with it. Yeah, No. I will argue against that at every step. And it's not about control. I don't want to control what they are doing. I want to protect myself and the rest of us from financial and physical harm due to these reckless and neglectful companies choosing not to pay the real costs of responsibly operating.

I want to protect myself from the negligent and reckless business practices of big oil and coal. Why? Because they poison us, they poison our world, they are evidenced to be impacting climate. I don't want to wake up 30 years from now with cancer because they successfully lobbied for lower standards. It's not about control. It's about protection. It's about those businesses paying the real costs of operating responsibly.

If you have an argument to make, do so. Another slogan is a pile of dung.

You're confusing pollution with life-sustaining CO2.

Co2 is one of many chemical compounds that humans are throwing out of whack. Methane is another big one in climate change.

Again, if you have an argument to make, do so, or stfu. More than 10 words. Let's go nancy.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Not about control? Yes it is, every bit of it.

Oh, and life is what we individually make of it.

Oh, please. You are preaching to the choir.
That is how this mumbo jumbo started! A money scheme to redistribute wealth and make those at the top of it even wealthier. A power scheme, which does nothing to help change the climate.
Whatshould have been done is planning for how to survive when actual climate change, which always changes, does happen.

You are advocating for the reckless unfair approach. Eg. let businesses do whatever they want, and the rest of society will just have to deal with it and pay for dealing with it. Yeah, No. I will argue against that at every step. And it's not about control. I don't want to control what they are doing. I want to protect myself and the rest of us from financial and physical harm due to these reckless and neglectful companies choosing not to pay the real costs of responsibly operating.

I want to protect myself from the negligent and reckless business practices of big oil and coal. Why? Because they poison us, they poison our world, they are evidenced to be impacting climate. I don't want to wake up 30 years from now with cancer because they successfully lobbied for lower standards. It's not about control. It's about protection. It's about those businesses paying the real costs of operating responsibly.

If you have an argument to make, do so. Another slogan is a pile of dung.

You're confusing pollution with life-sustaining CO2.

Co2 is one of many chemical compounds that humans are throwing out of whack. Methane is another big one in climate change.

Again, if you have an argument to make, do so, or stfu. More than 10 words. Let's go nancy.

Since neither you nor I are experts, 10 words or so should suffice. Demanding more unnecessarily would be democr -- I mean -- condescending.

 

[Snouter]

Record breaking cold temps in the northeast USA (where the worst air in the USA flows to) is because of global warming! Thanks! Well, actually it is global cooling in the USA. Africa and other primitive places where savages fuck and rape like animals and animals like elephants fart and shit causing major methane, don't talk about that! Save the elephants!

 

[skookerasbil]

I'm still laughing about Trumps tweet last week about global warming. And lets face it.......when 220 million people walk outside and their balls turn blue in 30 seconds, the 97% look pretty stoopid. Nobody is worried about global warming s0ns!