Meathead
Diamond Member
You have no idea of what you're talking about, do you?You've never been accused of clear thinking, have you? If I did I could find reason to blame Obola for the Iraqi invasion but that would be ludicrous.You really think a president isn't responsible for things that happened in the past eh?
I have no idea what your thinking, but I certainly do not believe presidents are responsible for things that happened before their term in office, unless they, as politicians, were deeply involved in the decision making.
I think presidents are responsible for things that occur during their presidency after a reasonable amount of time. Obola has certainly been in power long enough to assume responsibility for things like ISIS and a dizzying array of scandals and clusterfucks which have effect the heart and soul of the country.
That's not what I mean. I mean, Bush is a president, still. He's not THE president of the United States, but he still gets called Mr President.
Ie, Bush is responsible for things that happened in the past, ie, Bush is still responsible for what happened in 2003 and onwards.
Obama is the US president, who didn't invade Iraq or Syria or other places. How is ISIS his fault? Maybe there were things he could have done to avoid ISIS, however ISIS exists because of what BUSH did, that's indisputable.
You said that presidents were responsible for things that happen before their presidency. WTF are you carrying on about?