I'm Starting To Change My Mind About Trump

[Rawley]

I never liked Trump. Didn't vote for him in 2016 (didn't vote for Hillary either). Only voted for him in 2020 because I didn't want socialism. Didn't want him to be president or win the nomination in 2024. I truly believed that if he won in 2024 he would be consumed and obsessed with revenge and that with all the other problems facing us, him being elected would not be best for the country. I felt we needed to get past revenge and concentrate on the things which are best for our country and I sincerely believe Trump would be unable to do that so I had no intention of voting for Trump in the primaries or in the general.

BUT

That has all changed with the DOJ's recent nonsense indictments (in addition to all of the other abuses of power by Democrats over the last six years). It has become abundantly clear that the greatest threat to our country is not inflation, it is not a looming recession, it is not our national debt, and it is not us being on the brink of WWIII. The greatest threat facing our country right now is the total and complete abuse of power and weaponization of government agencies including the DOJ, the FBI, and even the CIA by the Democrats, who also want to take away our first amendment rights, our second amendment rights, and are indoctrinating our children as the Nazi's did in Germany. These people need purging and revenge is needed to purge these anti-Americans from our government and our government agencies. We are facing the greatest threat this country has ever faced and revenge is the only way for us to turn it around. We need to begin our own Nuremberg trials of the Democrats and give them the justice they deserve.

Kudos.

THe lengths to which they are going to take him out tells you how much of an existential threat he is to their rice bowls.

 

[mak2]

and so did others, particularly Hillary. Where is her indictment?

Ask the Donald.

 

[Faun]

Of course he mishandled government documents, just like Pence, Biden, Hillary, Obama, and several others. But they weren't indicted for it, only Trump.

And you really don't know the difference?

Really???

 

[hjmick]

Why? Because you think that I can't possibly be an Independent thinker unless I think the same as you?

No, because you are obviously not an "independent thinker." You have in your OP, and frequently elsewhere on the board, parroted the Trump cult talking points. You have tasted the Flavor Aid... and you like it.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

So? Hillary didn't give her deleted 30,000 emails back!

Hmmm...well, it seems the DOJ had them....so I guess, yes. She had to turn them over to the DOJ at some point.
I mean, those same emails found on a laptop were used to sink her Presidential ambitions two weeks before the election.

"At Hillary Clinton's request, the State Department released the first set of emails sent on her private account in May 2015, with many relating to the 2012 attack on the US consulate in Benghazi".

Hillary Clinton emails - what's it all about?

Hillary Clinton has been cleared for a second time by the FBI over allegations about her emails - how did we get here?

www.bbc.com

 

[Independent thinker]

Ask the Donald.

When Trump became president he clearly said that we should not go after Hillary and to let it be. Goes to show that one side has more morals than the other side does.

 

[Faun]

Who cares.

Biden did the same thing

So did Obama.

So did Hillary.

*EQUAL* application of the law.

Anything else is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE.

Do you understand?

Not fucking around here. Tired of the leftard bullshit.

You WILL prosecute equally, or we will ride you sorry asses out of town on the biggest and most painful rail we can find.

Do you really think shaking your cane at the sky and stomping your feet is going to make that happen?

 

[mak2]

When Trump became president he clearly said that we should not go after Hillary and to let it be. Goes to show that one side has more morals than the other side does.

Ok, so how is not going after Hillary moral?

 

[Independent thinker]

No, because you are obviously not an "independent thinker." You have in your OP, and frequently elsewhere on the board, parroted the Trump cult talking points. You have tasted the Flavor Aid... and you like it.

LOL. Yes, you ARE saying that I can't possibly be an independent thinker unless I think the same as you.

 

[multivita-man]

Well, Hillary did worse than Trump and she wasn't indicted. Comey said that even though she was very careless and reckless and knowingly set up a sever in her basement against the law and then deleted 30,000 emails against a subpoena, no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute. So, here, with Trump, apparently we have an unreasonable prosecution.

Except for Comey's comment that she was careless, none of that is factually correct. You're entitled to your own opinions but not your own facts.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

and so did others, particularly Hillary. Where is her indictment?

Whataboutism is what you have? Talk to DOJ.

Trump is going to trial.

PS: Trump had four years to bring her to trial. Why did he not? She would have been acquitted. Trump will not be acquitted.

 

[Faun]

Whataboutism is what you have? Talk to DOJ.

Trump is going to trial.

PS: Trump had four years to bring her to trial. Why did he not? She would have been acquitted. Trump will not be acquitted.

Trump should argue the but Hillary defense.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You're trying to uproot basic justice which even children understand. IOW if two children are caught stealing candy bars at the store, but only ONE is called to the manager's office, only ONE is made to talk to the police--that is injustice. It remains true that the child unequally treated did commit a crime. But justice is destroyed when the outcomes are so different.

No one is going to escape this. And it's not "whataboutism".

Your analogy is a bit off....to make it more accurate the 2nd child would have to lie about taking the candy bar, show the candy bar off to this friends and then claim it was his and he was going to keep it no matter what.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

When Trump became president he clearly said that we should not go after Hillary and to let it be. Goes to show that one side has more morals than the other side does.

Hmmm...I seem to vividly remember him carrying on his fawning pep rallies after he was elected and stating "lock her up!!" more than once.

Did I hear wrong?

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Trump should argue the but Hillary defense.

...Isn't he?

 

[mak2]

...Isn't he?

He won't in court.

 

[DudleySmith]

Well, Hillary did worse than Trump and she wasn't indicted. Comey said that even though she was very careless and reckless and knowingly set up a sever in her basement against the law and then deleted 30,000 emails against a subpoena, no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute. So, here, with Trump, apparently we have an unreasonable prosecution.

The FBI made sure she destroyed a lot of the evidence, and even helped her with the hard drives. Comey was an accomplice in that criminal behavior.

 

[Faun]

Hmmm...I seem to vividly remember him carrying on his fawning pep rallies after he was elected and stating "lock her up!!" more than once.

Did I hear wrong?

Look at the pleasure he got from that...

 

[DudleySmith]

Jack Smith is mind fucking MAGA to the nth degree. The Docs Indictment will be tried in Trump Red Florida, Getting a conviction is a slam dunk because even MAGA jurists will experience something they may never have experienced in their perpetually aggrieved white straight overburdened and oppressed and victimized lives .. . . They will examine under a code of honor written laws and facts and explanations and visual and audio evidence with eleven others being more intelligent and articulate than them while being expected to make a judgement based on truth. it won’t be like watching Tucker and pounding a fist going yeah Yeah It’s the Goddam truth.

LIKE I say slam dunk in Florida.

While Trump is trying to make a shit show fund raiser out of the Florida venue, Jack Smith has a bigger case and indictment brewing in DC where the crime of insurrection seditious conspiracy, obstruction of the Jan6 proceeding, incitement to violence while Trump’s lawyers are busy defending Trumo’s stupidity for just not giving the top secret highly sensitive classified documents back.

Smith is going after the meat and potatoes of Trump’s crimes. Florida is just jello and the shiny object to keep the MAGA mob lawyers from focusing on Trumo’s most deplorable and harmful to the sanctity of law and order by a president never before imagined.

lol you Fever Swamp deviants are absolutely terrified of Trump. It's hilarious how inhinged you TDS victims are.

 

[SweetSue92]

Your analogy is a bit off....to make it more accurate the 2nd child would have to lie about taking the candy bar, show the candy bar off to this friends and then claim it was his and he was going to keep it no matter what.

Having the documents is not the crime, as we see in the cases of Pence and Biden. The crime might be waving it around to people without clearance.