Impeachable offense? Try Bribery

[Claudette]

Personal gain? What would that personal gain be?

Forcing Ukraine to manufacture dirt on his political opponent ...that's personal gain

Asking the Ukraine to investigate a former Vice President for alleged corruption when that Vice President's son was getting compensated handsomely for a no show job isn't "manufacturing" anything! "Manufacturing dirt" is what you Democrats DID to Donald Trump in the last election!

No show? Stop talking out of your ass, Biden was flying out to Ukraine, so certainly there was some showing up and you have no idea what Biden was working on for Burisma, remotely or on-site.

And what is the actual evidence of wrong doing?

There has been NONE so far, except circumstantial speculations.

Gee, a Vice President's son is appointed to the board of a Ukrainian energy company being investigated for corruption at the very same time that his father has been tasked with overseeing the Ukraine for the Obama Administration? The son has no background whatsoever in the energy field...attends no board meetings while pulling down a sweet monthly paycheck...and then the Vice President tells the Ukraine to either fire a prosecutor, who was looking into corruption at the energy company, in the next 6 hours or he'll withhold a billion dollars in US aid? But you don't see any evidence of "wrong doing"? It's all just "circumstantial speculation"?

That's funny stuff, Anton...

You will notice none of the left loons on this board have addressed what Biden did nor the threats he made.

They also haven't addressed that the dummy outed himself on National television.

I find the whole thing amusing as hell.

 

[rightwinger]

Personal gain? What would that personal gain be?

Forcing Ukraine to manufacture dirt on his political opponent ...that's personal gain

Asking the Ukraine to investigate a former Vice President for alleged corruption when that Vice President's son was getting compensated handsomely for a no show job isn't "manufacturing" anything! "Manufacturing dirt" is what you Democrats DID to Donald Trump in the last election!

No show? Stop talking out of your ass, Biden was flying out to Ukraine, so certainly there was some showing up and you have no idea what Biden was working on for Burisma, remotely or on-site.

And what is the actual evidence of wrong doing?

There has been NONE so far, except circumstantial speculations.

Gee, a Vice President's son is appointed to the board of a Ukrainian energy company being investigated for corruption at the very same time that his father has been tasked with overseeing the Ukraine for the Obama Administration? The son has no background whatsoever in the energy field...attends no board meetings while pulling down a sweet monthly paycheck...and then the Vice President tells the Ukraine to either fire a prosecutor, who was looking into corruption at the energy company, in the next 6 hours or he'll withhold a billion dollars in US aid? But you don't see any evidence of "wrong doing"? It's all just "circumstantial speculation"?

That's funny stuff, Anton...

You will notice none of the left loons on this board have addressed what Biden did nor the threats he made.

They also haven't addressed that the dummy outed himself on National television.

I find the whole thing amusing as hell.

Trump is being impeached

Biden is no defense. Why aren’t Republicans defending Trumps actions?

 

[AntonToo]

Personal gain? What would that personal gain be?

Forcing Ukraine to manufacture dirt on his political opponent ...that's personal gain

Asking the Ukraine to investigate a former Vice President for alleged corruption when that Vice President's son was getting compensated handsomely for a no show job isn't "manufacturing" anything! "Manufacturing dirt" is what you Democrats DID to Donald Trump in the last election!

No show? Stop talking out of your ass, Biden was flying out to Ukraine, so certainly there was some showing up and you have no idea what Biden was working on for Burisma, remotely or on-site.

And what is the actual evidence of wrong doing?

There has been NONE so far, except circumstantial speculations.

Gee, a Vice President's son is appointed to the board of a Ukrainian energy company being investigated for corruption at the very same time that his father has been tasked with overseeing the Ukraine for the Obama Administration? The son has no background whatsoever in the energy field...attends no board meetings while pulling down a sweet monthly paycheck...and then the Vice President tells the Ukraine to either fire a prosecutor, who was looking into corruption at the energy company, in the next 6 hours or he'll withhold a billion dollars in US aid? But you don't see any evidence of "wrong doing"? It's all just "circumstantial speculation"?

That's funny stuff, Anton...

What is the actual evidence?

Just because Biden's son worked for Burisima DOES NOT actually show any wrong doing.

Biden insisted that the official was corrupt, was getting rich by not investigating companies like Burisma and other rich people, and needed to go. DoS, IMF, EU, anti-corruption watch groups, and even inspector's own deputy were 100% behind that push.

If you have ANYTHING that suggests that Joe Biden's actions were somehow motivated by his son's employment rather than simple fact that the official was deeply corrupt LETS HAVE IT.

 

[AntonToo]

Personal gain? What would that personal gain be?

Forcing Ukraine to manufacture dirt on his political opponent ...that's personal gain

Asking the Ukraine to investigate a former Vice President for alleged corruption when that Vice President's son was getting compensated handsomely for a no show job isn't "manufacturing" anything! "Manufacturing dirt" is what you Democrats DID to Donald Trump in the last election!

No show? Stop talking out of your ass, Biden was flying out to Ukraine, so certainly there was some showing up and you have no idea what Biden was working on for Burisma, remotely or on-site.

And what is the actual evidence of wrong doing?

There has been NONE so far, except circumstantial speculations.

Gee, a Vice President's son is appointed to the board of a Ukrainian energy company being investigated for corruption at the very same time that his father has been tasked with overseeing the Ukraine for the Obama Administration? The son has no background whatsoever in the energy field...attends no board meetings while pulling down a sweet monthly paycheck...and then the Vice President tells the Ukraine to either fire a prosecutor, who was looking into corruption at the energy company, in the next 6 hours or he'll withhold a billion dollars in US aid? But you don't see any evidence of "wrong doing"? It's all just "circumstantial speculation"?

That's funny stuff, Anton...

You will notice none of the left loons on this board have addressed what Biden did nor the threats he made.

PURE BULLSHIT.
It's been addressed time and time and time and time again.

 

[Claudette]

Forcing Ukraine to manufacture dirt on his political opponent ...that's personal gain

Asking the Ukraine to investigate a former Vice President for alleged corruption when that Vice President's son was getting compensated handsomely for a no show job isn't "manufacturing" anything! "Manufacturing dirt" is what you Democrats DID to Donald Trump in the last election!

No show? Stop talking out of your ass, Biden was flying out to Ukraine, so certainly there was some showing up and you have no idea what Biden was working on for Burisma, remotely or on-site.

And what is the actual evidence of wrong doing?

There has been NONE so far, except circumstantial speculations.

Gee, a Vice President's son is appointed to the board of a Ukrainian energy company being investigated for corruption at the very same time that his father has been tasked with overseeing the Ukraine for the Obama Administration? The son has no background whatsoever in the energy field...attends no board meetings while pulling down a sweet monthly paycheck...and then the Vice President tells the Ukraine to either fire a prosecutor, who was looking into corruption at the energy company, in the next 6 hours or he'll withhold a billion dollars in US aid? But you don't see any evidence of "wrong doing"? It's all just "circumstantial speculation"?

That's funny stuff, Anton...

You will notice none of the left loons on this board have addressed what Biden did nor the threats he made.

They also haven't addressed that the dummy outed himself on National television.

I find the whole thing amusing as hell.

Trump is being impeached

Biden is no defense. Why aren’t Republicans defending Trumps actions?

Nah. Trump won't be impeached and only a fool like you would think so.

As for the Reps?? Who know. They are politicians. They act like politicians.

Oh and if those fools in the House do vote to impeach it will never make it out of the Senate.

Enjoy. I sure as hell will.

 

[Claudette]

Forcing Ukraine to manufacture dirt on his political opponent ...that's personal gain

Asking the Ukraine to investigate a former Vice President for alleged corruption when that Vice President's son was getting compensated handsomely for a no show job isn't "manufacturing" anything! "Manufacturing dirt" is what you Democrats DID to Donald Trump in the last election!

No show? Stop talking out of your ass, Biden was flying out to Ukraine, so certainly there was some showing up and you have no idea what Biden was working on for Burisma, remotely or on-site.

And what is the actual evidence of wrong doing?

There has been NONE so far, except circumstantial speculations.

Gee, a Vice President's son is appointed to the board of a Ukrainian energy company being investigated for corruption at the very same time that his father has been tasked with overseeing the Ukraine for the Obama Administration? The son has no background whatsoever in the energy field...attends no board meetings while pulling down a sweet monthly paycheck...and then the Vice President tells the Ukraine to either fire a prosecutor, who was looking into corruption at the energy company, in the next 6 hours or he'll withhold a billion dollars in US aid? But you don't see any evidence of "wrong doing"? It's all just "circumstantial speculation"?

That's funny stuff, Anton...

You will notice none of the left loons on this board have addressed what Biden did nor the threats he made.

PURE BULLSHIT.
It's been addressed time and time and time and time again.

Excuse me while I stand over here and LMFAO.

Bullshit indeed.

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

The Constitution is generally vague on what constitutes an impeachable offense
One of the crimes it specifically identifies as impeachable is.....Bribery

The Constitution Says ‘Bribery’ Is Impeachable. What Does That Mean?

In fact, the Founders had a broader conception of bribery than what’s in the criminal code. Their understanding was derived from English law, under which bribery was understood as an officeholder’s abuse of the power of an office to obtain a private benefit rather than for the public interest. This definition not only encompasses Trump’s conduct—it practically defines it.

You better contact shitt immediately! You are needed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Who?

Adam Shitt. He needs more ammunition.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[AntonToo]

Asking the Ukraine to investigate a former Vice President for alleged corruption when that Vice President's son was getting compensated handsomely for a no show job isn't "manufacturing" anything! "Manufacturing dirt" is what you Democrats DID to Donald Trump in the last election!

No show? Stop talking out of your ass, Biden was flying out to Ukraine, so certainly there was some showing up and you have no idea what Biden was working on for Burisma, remotely or on-site.

And what is the actual evidence of wrong doing?

There has been NONE so far, except circumstantial speculations.

Gee, a Vice President's son is appointed to the board of a Ukrainian energy company being investigated for corruption at the very same time that his father has been tasked with overseeing the Ukraine for the Obama Administration? The son has no background whatsoever in the energy field...attends no board meetings while pulling down a sweet monthly paycheck...and then the Vice President tells the Ukraine to either fire a prosecutor, who was looking into corruption at the energy company, in the next 6 hours or he'll withhold a billion dollars in US aid? But you don't see any evidence of "wrong doing"? It's all just "circumstantial speculation"?

That's funny stuff, Anton...

You will notice none of the left loons on this board have addressed what Biden did nor the threats he made.

They also haven't addressed that the dummy outed himself on National television.

I find the whole thing amusing as hell.

Trump is being impeached

Biden is no defense. Why aren’t Republicans defending Trumps actions?

Nah. Trump won't be impeached.

...Wow, clueless.

He is ABSOLUTELY getting impeached in the House, the only question is if he would actually get convicted and removed in the Republican Senate.

 

[Claudette]

No show? Stop talking out of your ass, Biden was flying out to Ukraine, so certainly there was some showing up and you have no idea what Biden was working on for Burisma, remotely or on-site.

And what is the actual evidence of wrong doing?

There has been NONE so far, except circumstantial speculations.

Gee, a Vice President's son is appointed to the board of a Ukrainian energy company being investigated for corruption at the very same time that his father has been tasked with overseeing the Ukraine for the Obama Administration? The son has no background whatsoever in the energy field...attends no board meetings while pulling down a sweet monthly paycheck...and then the Vice President tells the Ukraine to either fire a prosecutor, who was looking into corruption at the energy company, in the next 6 hours or he'll withhold a billion dollars in US aid? But you don't see any evidence of "wrong doing"? It's all just "circumstantial speculation"?

That's funny stuff, Anton...

You will notice none of the left loons on this board have addressed what Biden did nor the threats he made.

They also haven't addressed that the dummy outed himself on National television.

I find the whole thing amusing as hell.

Trump is being impeached

Biden is no defense. Why aren’t Republicans defending Trumps actions?

Nah. Trump won't be impeached.

...Wow, clueless.

He is ABSOLUTELY getting impeached in the House, the only question is if he would actually get convicted and removed in the Republican Senate.

If you say so. But I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.

Wow clueless.

 

[Rambunctious]

The Constitution is generally vague on what constitutes an impeachable offense
One of the crimes it specifically identifies as impeachable is.....Bribery

The Constitution Says ‘Bribery’ Is Impeachable. What Does That Mean?

In fact, the Founders had a broader conception of bribery than what’s in the criminal code. Their understanding was derived from English law, under which bribery was understood as an officeholder’s abuse of the power of an office to obtain a private benefit rather than for the public interest. This definition not only encompasses Trump’s conduct—it practically defines it.

Who did he bribe?....this is the 4th time I've asked you this question and you have yet to answer....

 

[AntonToo]

The Constitution is generally vague on what constitutes an impeachable offense
One of the crimes it specifically identifies as impeachable is.....Bribery

The Constitution Says ‘Bribery’ Is Impeachable. What Does That Mean?

In fact, the Founders had a broader conception of bribery than what’s in the criminal code. Their understanding was derived from English law, under which bribery was understood as an officeholder’s abuse of the power of an office to obtain a private benefit rather than for the public interest. This definition not only encompasses Trump’s conduct—it practically defines it.

Who did he bribe?....this is the 4th time I've asked you this question and you have yet to answer....

The government of Ukraine. DUH?

 

[Rambunctious]

The Constitution is generally vague on what constitutes an impeachable offense
One of the crimes it specifically identifies as impeachable is.....Bribery

The Constitution Says ‘Bribery’ Is Impeachable. What Does That Mean?

In fact, the Founders had a broader conception of bribery than what’s in the criminal code. Their understanding was derived from English law, under which bribery was understood as an officeholder’s abuse of the power of an office to obtain a private benefit rather than for the public interest. This definition not only encompasses Trump’s conduct—it practically defines it.

Who did he bribe?....this is the 4th time I've asked you this question and you have yet to answer....

The government of Ukraine. DUH?

No he didn't....at least not in the infamous phone call...I read the full transcript....no one was bribed....maybe you should read it too....

 

[AntonToo]

Gee, a Vice President's son is appointed to the board of a Ukrainian energy company being investigated for corruption at the very same time that his father has been tasked with overseeing the Ukraine for the Obama Administration? The son has no background whatsoever in the energy field...attends no board meetings while pulling down a sweet monthly paycheck...and then the Vice President tells the Ukraine to either fire a prosecutor, who was looking into corruption at the energy company, in the next 6 hours or he'll withhold a billion dollars in US aid? But you don't see any evidence of "wrong doing"? It's all just "circumstantial speculation"?

That's funny stuff, Anton...

You will notice none of the left loons on this board have addressed what Biden did nor the threats he made.

They also haven't addressed that the dummy outed himself on National television.

I find the whole thing amusing as hell.

Trump is being impeached

Biden is no defense. Why aren’t Republicans defending Trumps actions?

Nah. Trump won't be impeached.

...Wow, clueless.

He is ABSOLUTELY getting impeached in the House, the only question is if he would actually get convicted and removed in the Republican Senate.

If you say so. But I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.

Wow clueless.

Ok moron, go get some popcorn and watch your detachment from reality proven.

 

[AntonToo]

The Constitution is generally vague on what constitutes an impeachable offense
One of the crimes it specifically identifies as impeachable is.....Bribery

The Constitution Says ‘Bribery’ Is Impeachable. What Does That Mean?

In fact, the Founders had a broader conception of bribery than what’s in the criminal code. Their understanding was derived from English law, under which bribery was understood as an officeholder’s abuse of the power of an office to obtain a private benefit rather than for the public interest. This definition not only encompasses Trump’s conduct—it practically defines it.

Who did he bribe?....this is the 4th time I've asked you this question and you have yet to answer....

The government of Ukraine. DUH?

No he didn't....at least not in the infamous phone call...I read the full transcript....no one was bribed....maybe you should read it too....

I've read the call many times over and showed to other nay sayers like you many times the exact parts were Trump tells Ukraine they are not earning their held up aid and the favors they ought to grant him.

...Did you actually read the call?

 

[Rambunctious]

The Constitution is generally vague on what constitutes an impeachable offense
One of the crimes it specifically identifies as impeachable is.....Bribery

The Constitution Says ‘Bribery’ Is Impeachable. What Does That Mean?

In fact, the Founders had a broader conception of bribery than what’s in the criminal code. Their understanding was derived from English law, under which bribery was understood as an officeholder’s abuse of the power of an office to obtain a private benefit rather than for the public interest. This definition not only encompasses Trump’s conduct—it practically defines it.

Who did he bribe?....this is the 4th time I've asked you this question and you have yet to answer....

The government of Ukraine. DUH?

No he didn't....at least not in the infamous phone call...I read the full transcript....no one was bribed....maybe you should read it too....

I've read the call many times over. Did you actually read the call?

Yes I have...maybe you could copy and paste the bribe for me....should take you only 10 seconds....

 

[Claudette]

You will notice none of the left loons on this board have addressed what Biden did nor the threats he made.

They also haven't addressed that the dummy outed himself on National television.

I find the whole thing amusing as hell.

Trump is being impeached

Biden is no defense. Why aren’t Republicans defending Trumps actions?

Nah. Trump won't be impeached.

...Wow, clueless.

He is ABSOLUTELY getting impeached in the House, the only question is if he would actually get convicted and removed in the Republican Senate.

If you say so. But I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you.

Wow clueless.

Ok moron, go get some popcorn and watch your detachment from reality proven.

Why thank you I guess I will. I love popcorn with real butter. LOL

 

[AntonToo]

The Constitution is generally vague on what constitutes an impeachable offense
One of the crimes it specifically identifies as impeachable is.....Bribery

The Constitution Says ‘Bribery’ Is Impeachable. What Does That Mean?

In fact, the Founders had a broader conception of bribery than what’s in the criminal code. Their understanding was derived from English law, under which bribery was understood as an officeholder’s abuse of the power of an office to obtain a private benefit rather than for the public interest. This definition not only encompasses Trump’s conduct—it practically defines it.

Who did he bribe?....this is the 4th time I've asked you this question and you have yet to answer....

The government of Ukraine. DUH?

No he didn't....at least not in the infamous phone call...I read the full transcript....no one was bribed....maybe you should read it too....

I've read the call many times over. Did you actually read the call?

Yes I have...maybe you could copy and paste the bribe for me....should take you only 10 seconds....

You got it bum:

So What Exactly Is the Crime Trump is Guilty Of?

Help up aid was the context for the call.

In the conversation (which dupes like you should read for yourself instead of relying on Trump's propaganda) Trump specifically talks about how Ukraine is not reciprocating the generous aid United States is providing and then proceeds to tell Ukranian President who Trump wants investigated.

Direct text from transcript:

Trump: United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn't say that it's reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very good to Ukraine.

Zelenskyy: I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps specifically we are almost. ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.

Trump: I would like you to do us a favor...I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it.

Zelenskyy: Yes it is very important for me and everything that you just mentioned earlier. For me as a President, it is very important and we are open for any future cooperation.

Trump: Good because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that's really unfair....Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man...and I would like him to call you. If you could speak to him that would be great. The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news and the people she was dealing with in the Ukraine were bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that.

Read the transcript of Trump's conversation with Volodymyr Zelensky - CNNPolitics

 

[rightwinger]

Asking the Ukraine to investigate a former Vice President for alleged corruption when that Vice President's son was getting compensated handsomely for a no show job isn't "manufacturing" anything! "Manufacturing dirt" is what you Democrats DID to Donald Trump in the last election!

No show? Stop talking out of your ass, Biden was flying out to Ukraine, so certainly there was some showing up and you have no idea what Biden was working on for Burisma, remotely or on-site.

And what is the actual evidence of wrong doing?

There has been NONE so far, except circumstantial speculations.

Gee, a Vice President's son is appointed to the board of a Ukrainian energy company being investigated for corruption at the very same time that his father has been tasked with overseeing the Ukraine for the Obama Administration? The son has no background whatsoever in the energy field...attends no board meetings while pulling down a sweet monthly paycheck...and then the Vice President tells the Ukraine to either fire a prosecutor, who was looking into corruption at the energy company, in the next 6 hours or he'll withhold a billion dollars in US aid? But you don't see any evidence of "wrong doing"? It's all just "circumstantial speculation"?

That's funny stuff, Anton...

You will notice none of the left loons on this board have addressed what Biden did nor the threats he made.

They also haven't addressed that the dummy outed himself on National television.

I find the whole thing amusing as hell.

Trump is being impeached

Biden is no defense. Why aren’t Republicans defending Trumps actions?

Nah. Trump won't be impeached and only a fool like you would think so.

As for the Reps?? Who know. They are politicians. They act like politicians.

Oh and if those fools in the House do vote to impeach it will never make it out of the Senate.

Enjoy. I sure as hell will.

Trump will be impeached in the House

The Democrats will present a solid case in the Senate to show where Trump acted immorally, unethically and illegally.

Republicans will ignore all evidence and vote in their parties best interest.
A Majority of both the House and Senate will vote to remove him from office.

Two thirds is not obtainable, Republicans are too partisan

It will be up to the voters to evaluate the evidence against Trump and decide whether to take it out on Trump and those who ignored the law to protect him

 

[Claudette]

No show? Stop talking out of your ass, Biden was flying out to Ukraine, so certainly there was some showing up and you have no idea what Biden was working on for Burisma, remotely or on-site.

And what is the actual evidence of wrong doing?

There has been NONE so far, except circumstantial speculations.

Gee, a Vice President's son is appointed to the board of a Ukrainian energy company being investigated for corruption at the very same time that his father has been tasked with overseeing the Ukraine for the Obama Administration? The son has no background whatsoever in the energy field...attends no board meetings while pulling down a sweet monthly paycheck...and then the Vice President tells the Ukraine to either fire a prosecutor, who was looking into corruption at the energy company, in the next 6 hours or he'll withhold a billion dollars in US aid? But you don't see any evidence of "wrong doing"? It's all just "circumstantial speculation"?

That's funny stuff, Anton...

You will notice none of the left loons on this board have addressed what Biden did nor the threats he made.

They also haven't addressed that the dummy outed himself on National television.

I find the whole thing amusing as hell.

Trump is being impeached

Biden is no defense. Why aren’t Republicans defending Trumps actions?

Nah. Trump won't be impeached and only a fool like you would think so.

As for the Reps?? Who know. They are politicians. They act like politicians.

Oh and if those fools in the House do vote to impeach it will never make it out of the Senate.

Enjoy. I sure as hell will.

Trump will be impeached in the House

The Democrats will present a solid case in the Senate to show where Trump acted immorally, unethically and illegally.

Republicans will ignore all evidence and vote in their parties best interest.
A Majority of both the House and Senate will vote to remove him from office.

Two thirds is not obtainable, Republicans are too partisan

It will be up to the voters to evaluate the evidence against Trump and decide whether to take it out on Trump and those who ignored the law to protect him

If you say so. Just remember. Politicians are politicians and they look out for number one.

Trump will win in 2020 and you will have four more years to moan, groan complain and try to pin something else on the man.

Enjoy. I sure as hell will.

 

[rightwinger]

The Constitution is generally vague on what constitutes an impeachable offense
One of the crimes it specifically identifies as impeachable is.....Bribery

The Constitution Says ‘Bribery’ Is Impeachable. What Does That Mean?

In fact, the Founders had a broader conception of bribery than what’s in the criminal code. Their understanding was derived from English law, under which bribery was understood as an officeholder’s abuse of the power of an office to obtain a private benefit rather than for the public interest. This definition not only encompasses Trump’s conduct—it practically defines it.

Who did he bribe?....this is the 4th time I've asked you this question and you have yet to answer....

For the fourth time.......Zelensky and the Ukraine

You want military aid? You must provide information I can use against my opponents.