Indictment Handed Down in J6 Investigation

[Lisa558]

What heck does that mean?

Get a brain, and you will not only understand what that means, but you’ll see how weaponized the FBI has become against Republicans.

 

[Curried Goats]

That sward cuts both ways. Mr. Smith is engaged is all kinds of fuckery

Problem is your sword is as dull as a butter knife. Good luck cutting anything with that piece of shit.

 

[Stann]

Is that what you read out of my statement? If so then what you're experiencing is projection. What I was saying is that she's likely not to entertain any nonsense.

Once again, not a matter of free speech. A matter of a public officials misusing that right and causing devastating consequences. There's no excuse for what trump did.

 

[Curried Goats]

OK, then she is quite full of herself.

Well she's a federal judge who oversees cases of great importance to the American people, she should be but feel free to feel jealous Soy Boy.

 

[Curried Goats]

Once again, not a matter of free speech. A matter of a public officials misusing that right and causing devastating consequences. There's no excuse for what trump did.

?

 

[multivita-man]

If they don't, the bad name the DOJ is trying to erase will need a broom to sweep all that rubber. They having to engage in justice is blind traditional beliefs woule just get too messy for any further dialog on my part. So, I'm sayin' yeah. They have to behave or Americans on both sides will defund the existing DOJ. I'm glad to see Mr. Jonathan Turley (who I always thought of as a liberal) stick up for the Constitution. And he's cute, too.

They're not going to stop the Department of Justice or the criminal courts from functioning. You do realize that, right? They can de-fund Jack Smith. The DOJ will just take the case right over. There's going to be a criminal trial. Deal with it.

 

[Faun]

If you are able to read all the Trump indictments, my hat is off to you. They come off the presses pretty fast and furious.

What was this one about?

Read it and find out. But save room -- there's another one coming.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

white trash high-school performance of Oceans 11

That's perfect.

 

[skews13]

Once again, not a matter of free speech. A matter of a public officials misusing that right and causing devastating consequences. There's no excuse for what trump did.

Read the indictment

Read the indictment against Donald Trump in the 2020 Election investigation

apnews.com

 

[Stann]

Yeah, peacefully protest is sure reckless.

Perhaps you didn't notice the footage of paramilitary in unison winding through the crowds, egging them on and making the disaster happen.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

OK, then she is quite full of herself.

Like you.

 

[ElmerMudd]

That's not a rational response. Less I know it means you cannot provide one. Here it is again, have fun.

The most radical strategy proposed by Trump’s allies during the weeks after the election was a proposal to use the military to seize ballots or voting machines in an effort to prove fraud and then conduct a do-over of the election. The proposal was included in several planning documents that reached Trump or members of his inner circle. For instance, Trump was briefed on a version of the idea by Powell, Flynn and businessman Patrick Byrne in an Oval Office meeting on Dec. 18. Drafts of never-signed executive orders that would have implemented the strategy have been found in White House records and turned over to the congressional committee investigation the Jan. 6 attacks. A version was also outlined in a PowerPoint presentation that was emailed to Meadows on Jan. 5. Even after the violence of Jan. 6, Lindell was photographed on Jan. 15 after a meeting with Trump in the White House carrying papers that referenced martial law. Another memo circulated among Trump allies advocated using National Security Agency communications data to try to prove foreign interference in the election. Trump apparently did not embrace the extreme proposal of a military coup. But it is still not fully known how seriously he might have considered it.

It is not what Trump didn't do, it is what he did do. Trump was advised by his best advisers to not do what he did that was outlined in the indictment. He chose to listen to a group of "clowns" who told him what he wanted to hear. Those advisers are unindicted co-conspirators in the current indictment.

 

[Lastamender]

Like you.

Am I a judge?

 

[Stann]

?

In a list of traitors to our nation I would put trump above Benedict Arnold on that list. At least when Benedict betrayed our country 30% of the colonists were Tories loyal to the British. trump did this all because of his ego.

 

[ElmerMudd]

Get a brain, and you will not only understand what that means, but you’ll see how weaponized the FBI has become against Republicans.

The words of someone who does not use their brain if they have one.

Watch out. The FBI is after you. Hide before it is too late.

 

[Curried Goats]

In a list of traitors to our nation I would put trump above Benedict Arnold on that list. At least when Benedict betrayed our country 30% of the colonists were Tories loyal to the British. trump did this all because of his ego.

OK but who's contesting that? I'm not.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Get a brain, and you will not only understand what that means, but you’ll see how weaponized the FBI has become against Republicans.

Bitchy little magaturd perpetual victims aren't republicans. They are just a loud minority of reprobates and bigots.

 

[Stann]

Like you.

But it's not warranted in the least in his case.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Am I a judge?

Do you judge people? Then sure, douche. You're a judge.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Hmm? One day(!) after the Archer testimony.

Jack Smith, getting ready to make his personal appearance, and attempt to make us believe this isn't completely political

But yeah, again, an indictment immediately following bad news for Biden a day earlier.

Link

Many people are groaning over the coordination.