Indictment Handed Down in J6 Investigation

[Hollie]

Actually, it’s not just another indictment – this is the first time a former president has been indicted for crimes he committed while in office, as opposed to the crimes Trump committed related to the documents indictment, crimes Trump committed after leaving office

A remarkable, historic, and significant precedent has been established.

Well, yes. The remarkable, historic, (maybe hysteric), and significant precedent is a top to bottom corruption of the presidency and DOJ by the Dems / Marxists.

 

[Faun]

My hopes were that Trump would go away.

Now, he'll be a martyr.

If enough people are still behind him, this is going to get pretty crazy when it comes to the 2024 election.

Buckle up.

Who would have thought.

Not if he's tried and convicted on insurrection related charges.

 

[Care4all]

Jack Smith is heading to the podium to speak....supposedly.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Well, yes. The remarkable, historic, (maybe hysteric), and significant precedent is a top to bottom corruption of the presidency and DOJ by the Dems / Marxists.

Which part of the grand jury evidence and testimony do you think is wrong?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Patience..(young grasshopper) finally came thru....

6 other unnamed, were indicted.

John Eastman, Jeffrey Clark, pretty certain by the descriptions, likely Giuliani another,

One person not described on there is Mark Meadows, so my guess is he worked a deal....and copped a plea....

As far as I can tell, the 6 co-conspirators were not indicted.

Yet.

 

[Slade3200]

Well, yes. The remarkable, historic, (maybe hysteric), and significant precedent is a top to bottom corruption of the presidency and DOJ by the Dems / Marxists.

Explain how it is corrupt

 

[Faun]

LOL another indictment based on attacking free speech. That idiot Stacey Abrams to this day still has no conceded and also doubts the results. But yet when it's about President Trump... they go after his free speech!

Unlike Trump, Stacey Abrams didn't send fake electors to Congress.

 

[john doe 101]

Well, yes. The remarkable, historic, (maybe hysteric), and significant precedent is a top to bottom corruption of the presidency and DOJ by the Dems / Marxists.

Whats a Marxist?

 

[Zincwarrior]

View attachment 810208

Six co-conspirators. People have rolled.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Only in a true banana republic does one attempt to question the results of an election, and get indicted for supposedly trying to "overturn" it.

This Biden* regime is bullshit.

* Corrupt liar, usurper, election thief and pedophile

This is a lie.

Read the indictment.

 

[john doe 101]

It is now fair to say that Trump is the worst President ever.

 

[meaner gene]

As far as I can tell, the 6 co-conspirators were not indicted.

Yet.

Not indicted yet.

Jack smith wants this case to go to court ASAP, and multiple defendants would only slow the case down.

 

[excalibur]

Care to actually address the thing I say. Empty insults don’t mean anything. Learn how to debate

You didn't say anything worthy of anything other than what I said. Bye.

 

[Leo123]

Weak sauce. Smith can never prove what Trump was thinking. This is why Smith has a bad reputation. Disinformation is not a crime, it's part of the 1st amendment.

 

[excalibur]

If these derps transported back to the 90s as Clinton supporters they would be saying that Clinton was impeached by the radicals for being a heterosexual and liking women

 

[Clipper]

LOL another indictment based on attacking free speech. That idiot Stacey Abrams to this day still has no conceded and also doubts the results. But yet when it's about President Trump... they go after his free speech!

Abrams didn't call a mob to come to D.C. to riot & in the process get people killed & cops beaten to within an inch of their life.

Lock him up for life.

 

[meaner gene]

This is a lie.

Read the indictment.

The news media hasn't had time to read the indictment. They've been skimming parts of it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Weak sauce. Smith can never prove what Trump was thinking. This is why Smith has a bad reputation.

Haha, you know literally nothing about this indictment. Coping mechanism.

 

[john doe 101]

Weak sauce. Smith can never prove what Trump was thinking. This is why Smith has a bad reputation.

You're right he cant prove what he was thinking. But there are witnesses to what he was telling people to do. Witnesses that have already rolled....

 

[excalibur]

Weak sauce. Smith can never prove what Trump was thinking. This is why Smith has a bad reputation.

Further more, what he is alleged to have done never happened, and he was President seeing the laws were faithfully executed.