Ingraham: A first lady double standard?

[rightwinger]

Lt Colonel Vindman - who was tasked in transcribing & was instructed not to appear b4 congress - brought up under oath that the 'transcript' donny tried to peddle was inaccurate. hmmmmm...... funny dat.

Yeah, Vindmean, who is a renown Trump hater. So believe him instead of the transcript? Not to testify? It's likely he was the leaker.

Who cares who the leaker was?
They provided a very valuable service to the nation

Many people care who the leaker was, because it's likely he had an agenda working for the deep state. And thanks to this "valuable service" no other leader of a country will ever discuss important information with a US President over the phone again.

Deep State.....what conspiracy nonsense

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

They swear to defend the Constitution not to defend Trump

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

Plotting to overthrow the duly elected president is not psrt of their job description

Which is what the unelected Deep State was engaged in

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

What about my comments imply she cares what I think? Your response is bizarre. Look at what trump has done to your brain.

That you ASSume she avoids the spotlight because of shame. I mean, because you know her so well and all. And since when do you believe that Trump has mind-altering powers? Your X15KZ foil helmet is on too tight.

Forget trying to avoid the spot light...

Why do you think she avoids living in the same building as her husband???

I don't have an opinion on that, because I don't know either one of them. Neither do you, and any reason you dream up is just an unsupported opinion.

But, since we're just playing in make believe land, maybe she just doesn't like the irrational hatred or the noxious atmosphere in Washington. Maybe she just prefers being away from professional haters who would comment on her every movement. Maybe she doesn't want to have idiots hollering questions at her every time she walks out of the White House. There are any number of reasons we can dream up why she doesn't live in the White House.

No, she lives in Washington....she lives at the White House...she just doesn't share the same space Trump lives in....she actually lives in the bed room Obama's mother in law lives in -- Remember when republicans were outraged over the mother in law living in the White House??

Just imagine if Michelle lived in a separate home from her husband during the beginning on his presidency and then refused to share the same bedroom that her husband shared when she finally decided to move to DC....would you be making excuses for her? Would you be saying "Oh, she doesn't want to be in the noxious atmosphere or Washington? Nope..

Because not knowing the Obamas well didn't stop trumpers like yourself from claiming that Obama is gay, his wife is a man and their kids are not really their kids, but paid actors...

Imagine. Key word there. I don't have to imagine because I know myself, and I know I never said Obama is gay, his wife is a man and their kids are not really their kids, but paid actors, so there's that. I really don't care about the relationship a politician has with his/her spouse, that's their business. I do, however, care when an unelected and unaccountable First Lady tries to take over the American healthcare system, like Hillary tried to do.

"Quick, pivot to Hillary!!!" which is custom for Trumpers…..

I very much would have liked Trump to come up with a healthcare plan that would be better than Obamacare but he failed almost as bad as Hillary did to improve healthcare...and he was president....she wasn't.....which makes him a bigger failure, because she wasn't expected to fix it, he was tho...


Now back to the point you keep deflecting from.....what does that say about your circle jerk team-mates?? that they would completely make up BS about Obama being gay, wife being a man, and kids being actors?? --- how depraved does your party have to be for that belief to be mainstream among you Trumpers??

And you saying "no, not me...I never said that..." only means you are in the minority among a party of depraved sycophants....

 

[LaDairis]

Melania is a beautiful First Lady.
Hillary was an UGLY dyke First Lady.

Michelle Obama is a MAN.....

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Melania is a beautiful First Lady.
Hillary was an UGLY dyke First Lady.

Michelle Obama is a MAN.....

I rest my case....

and not one trumper will disagree.....except privately....as to no upset the racist herd....

 

[LaDairis]

Apparently it is "racist" to notice that Barack Obama is a homosexual and Michelle Obama is really Michael Robinson, a MAN....

so nobody watch this one....

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yeah, Vindmean, who is a renown Trump hater. So believe him instead of the transcript? Not to testify? It's likely he was the leaker.

Who cares who the leaker was?
They provided a very valuable service to the nation

Many people care who the leaker was, because it's likely he had an agenda working for the deep state. And thanks to this "valuable service" no other leader of a country will ever discuss important information with a US President over the phone again.

Deep State.....what conspiracy nonsense

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

They swear to defend the Constitution not to defend Trump

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

Plotting to overthrow the duly elected president is not psrt of their job description

Which is what the unelected Deep State was engaged in

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

 

[rightwinger]

Melania is a beautiful First Lady.
Hillary was an UGLY dyke First Lady.

Michelle Obama is a MAN.....

Most Conservatives agree with you

 

[rightwinger]

Who cares who the leaker was?
They provided a very valuable service to the nation

Many people care who the leaker was, because it's likely he had an agenda working for the deep state. And thanks to this "valuable service" no other leader of a country will ever discuss important information with a US President over the phone again.

Deep State.....what conspiracy nonsense

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

They swear to defend the Constitution not to defend Trump

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

Plotting to overthrow the duly elected president is not psrt of their job description

Which is what the unelected Deep State was engaged in

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office. Bribery is a high crime and specifically mentioned
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

 

[LaDairis]

Most Conservatives agree with you

Everyone who is honest and does some basic homework sees it....

Many truth tellers on this subject are dead.

Time for yet another INVESTIGATION regarding


Don Young
Paul Horner
Joan Rivers

and many others dead for knowing Obama is gay and getting offed for knowing....


Democrat Presidents = all having a TRAIL of DEAD BODIES in the wake of the course to power

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Many people care who the leaker was, because it's likely he had an agenda working for the deep state. And thanks to this "valuable service" no other leader of a country will ever discuss important information with a US President over the phone again.

Deep State.....what conspiracy nonsense

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

They swear to defend the Constitution not to defend Trump

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

Plotting to overthrow the duly elected president is not psrt of their job description

Which is what the unelected Deep State was engaged in

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

 

[LaDairis]

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

How is it UNETHICAL to demand ACCOUNTABILITY from a country with its hand out for US foreign aid???


We have a RIGHT to KNOW WHERE the money went, and whether it went into Hunter Biden's pocket.... which it clearly DID....

 

[rightwinger]

Deep State.....what conspiracy nonsense

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

They swear to defend the Constitution not to defend Trump

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

Plotting to overthrow the duly elected president is not psrt of their job description

Which is what the unelected Deep State was engaged in

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

That is what the investigation will decide

Unfortunately, you will not be consulted

 

[LaDairis]

That is what the investigation will decide

HYPOCRITE!!!!


The original Ukrainian investigation was on to it.

Low IQ Joe used a Quid Pro Quo to get that prosecutor fired....

and then you tell us over and over that Hunter and Low IQ Joe "did nothing wrong...."


If Trump had fired Mueller, I don't think you would have had the "same take..."

 

[Mac-7]

Yeah, Vindmean, who is a renown Trump hater. So believe him instead of the transcript? Not to testify? It's likely he was the leaker.

Who cares who the leaker was?
They provided a very valuable service to the nation

Many people care who the leaker was, because it's likely he had an agenda working for the deep state. And thanks to this "valuable service" no other leader of a country will ever discuss important information with a US President over the phone again.

Deep State.....what conspiracy nonsense

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

They swear to defend the Constitution not to defend Trump

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

Plotting to overthrow the duly elected president is not psrt of their job description

Which is what the unelected Deep State was engaged in

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President?

Let the Durham investigation proceed and we may have the answer to your question

We know about comey, mccabe, struck, page rosenstein and many others

But the facts have yet to be presented in a court of law

 

[Mac-7]

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

Plotting to overthrow the duly elected president is not psrt of their job description

Which is what the unelected Deep State was engaged in

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

That is what the investigation will decide

Unfortunately, you will not be consulted

There are two investigations

Durham is on the trail of the Deep State

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

Plotting to overthrow the duly elected president is not psrt of their job description

Which is what the unelected Deep State was engaged in

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

So where in the Constitution does it say for rats to report the President on anything? Unethical? Show me a law against unethical and how it's defined. How is that defending the Constitution when the word ethical is not even in the document.

Impeachment is for violations of high crimes and misdemeanors, neither of which Trump is guilty of. Furthermore the leaker is part of the deep state given the weak case he made for reporting this call. Trump did nothing wrong. He didn't demand a quid pro quo. He has every right to ask another leader to "look into" possible corruption by the past administration, even if one of them is currently running for the nomination of his party.

The President was violating the Constitution and it was reported. Demanding a bribe while in public office is against the oath of office.
It was reported, investigated by the IG and found to be a valid concern
It is now in the hands of Congress

That is not Deep State, that is the way our Constitutional Government is supposed to work

And this is where the lies are. Trump never demanded anything.

That is what the investigation will decide

Unfortunately, you will not be consulted

There shouldn't be any investigation because there was nothing to investigate. That's the point. It was more or less the deep state told all their members to look for something......anything they could possibly use to frame an impeachment, even if it was something they could lie about.

 

[Faun]

Apparently it is "racist" to notice that Barack Obama is a homosexual and Michelle Obama is really Michael Robinson, a MAN....

so nobody watch this one....

LOLOLOL

You dumbfucking putz, Obama is referencing LT Michael Edward Mullen, not his wife, Michelle

Obama never called his wife, "Michael," you brain-dead cultist. He was naming members of the Mullen family, acknowledging their service. Admiral Mullen and his wife, Deborah, and their two sons, LT John Stewart Mullen and LT Michael Edward Mullen...

Most of all, Admiral Mullen, Deborah, Michael, and I also want to also acknowledge your son Jack, who’s deployed today. All of you have performed extraordinary service to our country.​

 

[Faun]

Melania is a beautiful First Lady.
Hillary was an UGLY dyke First Lady.

Michelle Obama is a MAN.....

Most Conservatives agree with you

Proof that most conservatives are crazy.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

Apparently it is "racist" to notice that Barack Obama is a homosexual and Michelle Obama is really Michael Robinson, a MAN....

so nobody watch this one....

Speaking of faggety……

Any man who is as obsessed with a black woman having a dick like you are...most likely lays like this when he is typing dumb shit on message boards.....

 

[rightwinger]

Who cares who the leaker was?
They provided a very valuable service to the nation

Many people care who the leaker was, because it's likely he had an agenda working for the deep state. And thanks to this "valuable service" no other leader of a country will ever discuss important information with a US President over the phone again.

Deep State.....what conspiracy nonsense

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

They swear to defend the Constitution not to defend Trump

People doing their jobs and reporting unethical behavior is not Deep State.

Plotting to overthrow the duly elected president is not psrt of their job description

Which is what the unelected Deep State was engaged in

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President

Your job description is to defend the Constitution. Every employee takes that oath. They are also briefed yearly on whistle blower responsibilities and protections

How is reporting unethical behavior plotting to overthrow a President?

Let the Durham investigation proceed and we may have the answer to your question

We know about comey, mccabe, struck, page rosenstein and many others

But the facts have yet to be presented in a court of law

Let’s see where he investigation of Trump goes

Anyway you look at it, it does not reflect well on our President