Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again, citing a poll from April doesn't trump a poll July
...A poll citing"belief" in climate change is alot.............ALOT different than a poll which identifies "concern" about climate change ( the poll cited by SKOOKS, of course)...
If government and capital are too corrupted, to react to increasing disaster proliferation, how will any recovery be effected?
When we notice, how tipping points toward disaster are ignored, the likelihood of some recovery is minimized, so more government participation seems likely, over time.
The only thing I know is we'll all be dead by the time anything would be under water. So it's kinda hard to worry about it.
Again, citing a poll from April doesn't trump a poll July
...A poll citing"belief" in climate change is alot.............ALOT different than a poll which identifies "concern" about climate change ( the poll cited by SKOOKS, of course
Demonstrate a group of individuals who belive in current climate change who are unconcerned about current climate change.
)
...A poll citing"belief" in climate change is alot.............ALOT different than a poll which identifies "concern" about climate change ( the poll cited by SKOOKS, of course
Demonstrate a group of individuals who belive in current climate change who are unconcerned about current climate change.
Ahhh............a typical response from an intellectual liberal = no interest in answering the question, "As compared to what?" ( the operative word being "concern".....see above )
Insurance industry may be confronted with rising sea levels - Insurance industry may be confronted with rising sea levels
Report shows sea levels rising in the east coast
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has published a new report that documents the rate at which the sea level along the Atlantic Coast is rising. The report shows that the sea level in this region is rising three-to-four times faster than it is in other parts of the world. The report suggests that climate change could be playing a factor, as warming temperatures are having an effect in the far north. What higher sea levels could mean for the U.S. insurance industry is a complicated issue.
Climate change begins to see a major advocate in the insurance industry
Insurers have long been attuned to the risks posed by climate change. Many of begun campaigning for more serious action to be taken to mitigate the effects of the phenomenon, while others have been avoiding the issue entirely due to its controversial nature. The data from the USGS report suggests that insurers will have plenty to worry about whether they believe in climate change or not.
(...)
Insurance industry continues to prepare for possibility of future disasters
While much of the U.S. has been divided by the issue of climate change, the insurance industry is less inclined to leave the issue as nothing more than a possibility. Many insurance companies have begun preparing for the impact of stronger storms and rising sea levels spurred by climate change.
It must be divine irony, I truely despise the US Insurance industry, it rankles me that they may indeed become one of the main US industries to begin strongly pushing for effective climate change policies. So sad, but this issue is bigger than my dislike of the way they choose to turn profits.
Demonstrate a group of individuals who belive in current climate change who are unconcerned about current climate change.
Ahhh............a typical response from an intellectual liberal = no interest in answering the question, "As compared to what?" ( the operative word being "concern".....see above )
Unfortunately, an all too common response from those who think they should be held to no standard. They make wild unsupported assertions and statements and then when questioned about their statements and shown the flaws in their assertions, they simply change the subject and resort to name calling. It is indeed a pitiful state of affairs.
Again, citing a poll from April doesn't trump a poll July
...A poll citing"belief" in climate change is alot.............ALOT different than a poll which identifies "concern" about climate change ( the poll cited by SKOOKS, of course
Demonstrate a group of individuals who belive in current climate change who are unconcerned about current climate change.
Again, citing a poll from April doesn't trump a poll July
...A poll citing"belief" in climate change is alot.............ALOT different than a poll which identifies "concern" about climate change ( the poll cited by SKOOKS, of course
Demonstrate a group of individuals who belive in current climate change who are unconcerned about current climate change.
Insurance industry may be confronted with rising sea levels - Insurance industry may be confronted with rising sea levels
Report shows sea levels rising in the east coast
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has published a new report that documents the rate at which the sea level along the Atlantic Coast is rising. The report shows that the sea level in this region is rising three-to-four times faster than it is in other parts of the world. The report suggests that climate change could be playing a factor, as warming temperatures are having an effect in the far north. What higher sea levels could mean for the U.S. insurance industry is a complicated issue.
Climate change begins to see a major advocate in the insurance industry
Insurers have long been attuned to the risks posed by climate change. Many of begun campaigning for more serious action to be taken to mitigate the effects of the phenomenon, while others have been avoiding the issue entirely due to its controversial nature. The data from the USGS report suggests that insurers will have plenty to worry about whether they believe in climate change or not.
(...)
Insurance industry continues to prepare for possibility of future disasters
While much of the U.S. has been divided by the issue of climate change, the insurance industry is less inclined to leave the issue as nothing more than a possibility. Many insurance companies have begun preparing for the impact of stronger storms and rising sea levels spurred by climate change.
It must be divine irony, I truely despise the US Insurance industry, it rankles me that they may indeed become one of the main US industries to begin strongly pushing for effective climate change policies. So sad, but this issue is bigger than my dislike of the way they choose to turn profits.
Ahhhh yes that wonderful word of the charlatan rears it's head yet again....The world MAY also be hit by an asteroid (far more likely and far more destructive to civilisation than global warming could ever hope to be), it MAY be hit by a massive radiation blast from a super nova, it MAY be invaded by aliens, a lot of things MAY happen in the future.
None of them will alter the fact that AGW "science" is a fraud.
...A poll citing"belief" in climate change is alot.............ALOT different than a poll which identifies "concern" about climate change ( the poll cited by SKOOKS, of course
Demonstrate a group of individuals who belive in current climate change who are unconcerned about current climate change.
Demonstrate to us climate change that is different from that which has occured before.
Demonstrate a group of individuals who belive in current climate change who are unconcerned about current climate change.
Demonstrate to us climate change that is different from that which has occured before.
Irrelevent to the issue being discussed, but I will be happy to accomodate this as an additional issue.
The first issue was a claim stating that there was a difference between people who acknowledged current climate change in a specific poll and people who are concerned about climate change. I say that the people who acknowledge and openly support that we are in a current climate change episode, are overwhelmingly concerned about climate change (regardless of whether or not they accurately understand the underlying science).
Your issue is of a different nature; what types of evidence would you find persuasive?
Demonstrate to us climate change that is different from that which has occured before.
Irrelevent to the issue being discussed, but I will be happy to accomodate this as an additional issue.
The first issue was a claim stating that there was a difference between people who acknowledged current climate change in a specific poll and people who are concerned about climate change. I say that the people who acknowledge and openly support that we are in a current climate change episode, are overwhelmingly concerned about climate change (regardless of whether or not they accurately understand the underlying science).
Your issue is of a different nature; what types of evidence would you find persuasive?
In fact it is not irrelevant. You have made claims about the climate.
The climate now is no different than in the past and that is a bit of a problem for your claims.
Uniformitarianism states that things that happened in the past will happen again in the future. Show us anything that is happening now that is somehow different than what has occured allready.
Irrelevent to the issue being discussed, but I will be happy to accomodate this as an additional issue.
The first issue was a claim stating that there was a difference between people who acknowledged current climate change in a specific poll and people who are concerned about climate change. I say that the people who acknowledge and openly support that we are in a current climate change episode, are overwhelmingly concerned about climate change (regardless of whether or not they accurately understand the underlying science).
Your issue is of a different nature; what types of evidence would you find persuasive?
In fact it is not irrelevant. You have made claims about the climate.
What I think about the climate, is entirely irrelevent to whether or not affirmative respondants to a poll asking people if they think we are experiencing climate change are concerned about climate change.
as I stated, however, I am willing to discuss your issue as well.
The climate now is no different than in the past and that is a bit of a problem for your claims.
No problem at all. Once we identify the type of evidence sufficient for you to accept that climate change is occurring, then I'll see what I can do to meet those standards. Without that, we are chasing an undefined and unachievable solution.
Uniformitarianism states that things that happened in the past will happen again in the future. Show us anything that is happening now that is somehow different than what has occured allready.
Uniformitarianism is a belief system that is poor reflection of reality. Nothing, not even the basic forces within the extent of our perception and understanding has ever persisted in a steady or unchanged state.
Do you want me to demonstrate the level of changes we are seeing now versus the level of changes we understand in earlier epochs of our planet's history and then compare them to changes we've seen since when; the history of our species, modern global civilization,...?
As I said, put out some criteria you would feel neccessary for you to acknowledge AGW, we'll work out the details and I'll see what I can turn up.
In fact it is not irrelevant. You have made claims about the climate.
What I think about the climate, is entirely irrelevent to whether or not affirmative respondants to a poll asking people if they think we are experiencing climate change are concerned about climate change.
as I stated, however, I am willing to discuss your issue as well.
No problem at all. Once we identify the type of evidence sufficient for you to accept that climate change is occurring, then I'll see what I can do to meet those standards. Without that, we are chasing an undefined and unachievable solution.
Uniformitarianism states that things that happened in the past will happen again in the future. Show us anything that is happening now that is somehow different than what has occured allready.
Uniformitarianism is a belief system that is poor reflection of reality. Nothing, not even the basic forces within the extent of our perception and understanding has ever persisted in a steady or unchanged state.
Do you want me to demonstrate the level of changes we are seeing now versus the level of changes we understand in earlier epochs of our planet's history and then compare them to changes we've seen since when; the history of our species, modern global civilization,...?
As I said, put out some criteria you would feel neccessary for you to acknowledge AGW, we'll work out the details and I'll see what I can turn up.
Uniformitarianism is a fundamental underpinning of geology and is the foundational observation of the physical world, it is by no means a "belief system". When a geologist makes a prediction based on the PRINCIPLE of uniformitarianism he will tell you what will happen, what it will look like, and what the result of it will be. The cult of AGW on the other hand tells us if "X" occurs...something MAY happen, or it COULD happen. That is the very essence of a "belief system". Your blissfully ignorant comment reveals how far removed from science you truly are.
Demonstrate to us climate change that is different from that which has occured before.
Irrelevent to the issue being discussed, but I will be happy to accomodate this as an additional issue.
The first issue was a claim stating that there was a difference between people who acknowledged current climate change in a specific poll and people who are concerned about climate change. I say that the people who acknowledge and openly support that we are in a current climate change episode, are overwhelmingly concerned about climate change (regardless of whether or not they accurately understand the underlying science).
Your issue is of a different nature; what types of evidence would you find persuasive?
In fact it is not irrelevant. You have made claims about the climate. The climate now is no different than in the past and that is a bit of a problem for your claims. Uniformitarianism states that things that happened in the past will happen again in the future. Show us anything that is happening now that is somehow different than what has occured allready.
You made the claim now back it up.
