- Nov 17, 2009
- 70,464
- 38,287
I find it astonishing, though not surprising, that the people who lead a party who call themselves Democrats don't seem to have much affinity for democracy. The leadership has all but anointed their next presidential candidate without caring much for their party's base, who are certainly not in agreement with their selection, and limiting the exposure of other potential candidates.
Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz's autocratic ways in limiting the number of primary debates, insiders say, alienated many of her colleagues. And the problem may get worse.
Before things went awry, Democratic Representative Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii had been planning to be in Las Vegas for her party’s first presidential debate. Gabbard is one of five vice chairs of the Democratic National Committee; of course she would be there. But instead of talking up her party’s prospects on the Strip earlier this week, Gabbard was in Honolulu. Her presence in Sin City was strictly virtual, and anything but boosterish: She spent debate day giving cable-news interviews via satellite, claiming that, as retribution for loudly calling for more Democratic debates than the DNC currently envisions, she was deemed unwelcome in Vegas by the committee’s chairwoman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz—who Gabbard suggested is an enemy of free speech, as well as a liar.
Insurrection Erupts at the Democratic National Committee