Oddball
Unobtanium Member
Repeating an irrelevant non sequitur doesn't suddenly turn it into sound logic.Okay lets say the entire economy is banked on the drug company.
The argument doesn't change.
It's fundamentally dishonest to argue something is safe just because you think that will make an economic argument is easier. If you are worried about the economic impact of CO2 reductions then have the balls to actually go with that and not hide behind arguing the CO2 rise will be safe.
What's fundamentally dishonest is trying to make others prove a negative.