Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is impossible to tell from your dishonestly edited video which rudely interrupted Obama's answer just like the vile Bishop Willard was doing. Obviously you don't want Obama's answer to be heard because it probably kills your claim or you wouldn't have dishonestly edited it out.MISinformed you mean!He denies he wants a force left behind. Time to get honest, unless you have video from that time period of Obama saying he wanted to leave a force behind. You don't because he never said it. I'm informed.
From the Right-wing Weekly SubStandard no less!
Obama Claims to Have Ended 'Decade of War,' But Wanted Troops to Stay in Iraq Longer | The Weekly Standard
Obama Claims to Have Ended 'Decade of War,' But Wanted Troops to Stay in Iraq Longer
7:59 PM, Oct 22, 2012
BY DANIEL HALPER
But the truth is, Obama himself wanted troops to stay longer in Iraq. It was, in fact, the Iraqis who would not allow American troops to stay.
Then we both agree Obama's lying in the debate video.
That is impossible to tell from your dishonestly edited video which rudely interrupted Obama's answer just like the vile Bishop Willard was doing. Obviously you don't want Obama's answer to be heard because it probably kills your claim or you wouldn't have dishonestly edited it out.MISinformed you mean!
From the Right-wing Weekly SubStandard no less!
Obama Claims to Have Ended 'Decade of War,' But Wanted Troops to Stay in Iraq Longer | The Weekly Standard
Obama Claims to Have Ended 'Decade of War,' But Wanted Troops to Stay in Iraq Longer
7:59 PM, Oct 22, 2012
BY DANIEL HALPER
But the truth is, Obama himself wanted troops to stay longer in Iraq. It was, in fact, the Iraqis who would not allow American troops to stay.
Then we both agree Obama's lying in the debate video.
Post the whole answer and then I'll decide tho is lying.
It was not the main issue for most. People were told the Republicans, Bush mostly, destroyed the economy and Obama would fix it. But you didn't answer the question.I doubt most people knew what "the plank" was. What was the McCain and Romney's position, without looking it up? If it wasn't worth it then why is it worth it now? Or is it?
Really? You do not think the war was on people's mind when they choose a candidate?
How many times on these threads have USMB right wingers said "Obama's decision to leave blah blah blah......"?
How many times have we posted links with Maliki telling us keeping troops in Iraq was NOT an option????
What is it that Right wingers don't get?
We couldn't stay.
That was the agreement.
And why couldn't we agree to stay? Because Maliki wanted US troops under Iraqi law. US troops could be prosecuted on a whim. That would never happen. Think about the disaster that would cause our soldiers.
They wouldn't back down because they wanted us gone.
Iraq wanted us gone.
Iraq didn't want us there.
We couldn't stay past the agreement they made with Bush.
Is this so hard to understand? Seriously?
And by a few you mean 10,000 and the Iraqis would only approve trainers, which Iraq believed they still needed.MISinformed you mean!He denies he wants a force left behind. Time to get honest, unless you have video from that time period of Obama saying he wanted to leave a force behind. You don't because he never said it. I'm informed.
From the Right-wing Weekly SubStandard no less!
Obama Claims to Have Ended 'Decade of War,' But Wanted Troops to Stay in Iraq Longer | The Weekly Standard
Obama Claims to Have Ended 'Decade of War,' But Wanted Troops to Stay in Iraq Longer
7:59 PM, Oct 22, 2012
BY DANIEL HALPER
But the truth is, Obama himself wanted troops to stay longer in Iraq. It was, in fact, the Iraqis who would not allow American troops to stay.
He only wanted a few thousand for training. That what is said in the article. It also said this: It was, in fact, the Iraqis who would not allow American troops to stay.
Your video is obviously edited cutting off Obama's answer just as the moderator tells the rude Bishop Willard to let Obama answer. Logic dictates the answer was good or the Right would not have cut it off. I need nothing more than that. If you believe differently, the burden is on YOU to post the unedited video, not me.That is impossible to tell from your dishonestly edited video which rudely interrupted Obama's answer just like the vile Bishop Willard was doing. Obviously you don't want Obama's answer to be heard because it probably kills your claim or you wouldn't have dishonestly edited it out.Then we both agree Obama's lying in the debate video.
Post the whole answer and then I'll decide tho is lying.
Then show us the unedited video. You claim my video is dishonestly edited. You made the charge. Back it up. Go.
Obama doesn't mention that. Did you watch the video? Obama clearly says leaving troops behind will bogg us down. What is your response to that?
Yes I did...he hardly got a chance for a full explanation over Romney's hectoring, did he?
He denies he wants a force left behind. Time to get honest, unless you have video from that time period of Obama saying he wanted to leave a force behind. You don't because he never said it. I'm informed.
Several Iraq experts and former defense officials, including people who were involved in the formulation of the original 2008 agreement that permitted American troops to remain in Iraq, said the administration appears to be wary of the consequences of leaving Iraq in full, or with too few troops left in place – and is in the process of seeking a new pact with the Iraqi government.
"At the time of the negotiations it was made clear that it would not be the last agreement, it would be the first," said a former defense official with knowledge of the talks over the 2008 pact, known as the Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA).
"Subject to conditions on the ground in 2011 there might be revisiting of the agreement -- if not as a SOFA then as part of the Strategic Framework. But there was never a contemplation that we would walk out of Iraq at end of 2011 like we did at the end of Vietnam. The SOFA was a bridge document to get us to end of 2011."
Maliki, refusing to appoint either a defense or an interior minister since the formation of his second government in 2010, has effectively held both portfolios ever since. His Iraq ranks No. 171 out of 177 nations in a world corruption index. It possesses possibly the largest oil wealth on the planet, but independent oil companies such as Exxon, Occidental Petroleum, and Statoil are either pulling out or selling down.
Most importantly, after eight years of increasingly sectarian rule despite a parliamentary coalition system that twice put him in power with a broad electoral base (and heavy U.S. backing), the arch-Shia chauvinist Maliki is hopelessly, terminally divisive.
Which is it Obama???? you fucking liar....
yabut Republicans like [MENTION=19448]CrusaderFrank[/MENTION] & [MENTION=37219]Quantumwindbag[/MENTION] say another decade or two and another $5TRILLION of borrowed taxpayer money & they'll learn to love us infidels as brothersRepub-voters
deficit hawks too
Keep it up. The more you write the more we see how little you know about Iraq.
Were "we" invited guests to begin with?
^ not one link in either of your posts
OBAMA Declares The End of Iraq War FULL UNCUT SPE…: OBAMA Declares The End of Iraq War FULL UNCUT SPEECH 12/14/2011 (HD) - YouTube
Your video is obviously edited cutting off Obama's answer just as the moderator tells the rude Bishop Willard to let Obama answer. Logic dictates the answer was good or the Right would not have cut it off. I need nothing more than that. If you believe differently, the burden is on YOU to post the unedited video, not me.That is impossible to tell from your dishonestly edited video which rudely interrupted Obama's answer just like the vile Bishop Willard was doing. Obviously you don't want Obama's answer to be heard because it probably kills your claim or you wouldn't have dishonestly edited it out.
Post the whole answer and then I'll decide tho is lying.
Then show us the unedited video. You claim my video is dishonestly edited. You made the charge. Back it up. Go.
