Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,443
- 81,529
- 2,635
It sure is. Paranoid?
Nope.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It sure is. Paranoid?
Still hilarious that you think asking a question somehow is a victory for you.LOL
Odd that you think I have some need to re-live that victory. There have been others before and there will be more in the future. You're the gift that keeps on givin'.
Nostra...you ask questions that have been answered a thousand timesStill hilarious that you think asking a question somehow is a victory for you.
Once again you demonstrate your zero reading comprehension skills, Simp.
A thousand times?Nostra...you ask questions that have been answered a thousand times
Still hilarious that you think asking a question somehow is a victory for you.
Once again you demonstrate your zero reading comprehension skills, Simp.
Still hilarious that you think asking a question somehow is a victory for you.It wasn't just the question, Dumbfuck ... it was that it rendered you completely unable to answer it. That exposed just how stupid your post was that led to my question. Fortunately for me, you're incapable of learning from your own mistakes.
Still hilarious that you think asking a question somehow is a victory for you.
Once again you demonstrate your zero reading comprehension skills, Simp.
You confuse inability to my not wanting to play your stupid games.Again, Dumbfuck, because you're ineducable ... it wasn't the question ... it was your utter inability to answer it. I rendered you dumbfounded.
Wrong.The Justice department holds the policy That a sitting president cannot be indicted under federal law. The most they could do was name him an unindicted co-conspirator, which they did. What that means is they had the evidence to indict him but were not legally permitted to.
That's a...what's that word?Wrong.
The feds already turned down prosecuting him, not once, not twice, but THREE times.
They could have nailed him for so called "campaign violations" at any time, the instant he left office.
The minute the leftards start doing that you'll let us know.Shouldn’t people who break the law be prosecuted regardless of their politics?
Prove it.That's a...what's that word?
Oh yea.
LIE
That's pretty rich coming from a Bragg supporter.Your loser Republican buddies don’t give a shit about the law except for when you can use it against other people.
The justice department will not prosecute a sitting president. They didn't turn it down. They literally were not allowed to because of the policies held by the justice departmentWrong.
The feds already turned down prosecuting him, not once, not twice, but THREE times.
They could have nailed him for so called "campaign violations" at any time, the instant he left office.
Gee that's funny, the Congress of the United States seems to consider it legal fees.Because the money wasn’t legal fees. It was laundering money to pay for campaign expenses.
Wrong Jerk off...YOU prove your claims made in post 969Prove it.
Steele is a British spy, foolkie.Paying Fusion GPS for opposition research is not a foreign agent
Nope. More bullshitGee that's funny, the Congress of the United States seems to consider it legal fees.
If it's legal fees for them, then it's legal fees for Trump too.
Nope. It's called equal application of the law. Something you retarded leftist fucktwits know nothing about.Nope. More bullshit
You claim something about Congress and are trying to conflate that with Trump filing fraudulent financial docsNope. It's called equal application of the law. Something you retarded leftist fucktwits know nothing about.