Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 53,766
- 16,194
The Constitution doesn't mention marriage- yet marriage is a constitutional right.
You know this- because the court decisions have been pointed out to you again and again- but you choose to pretend they don't exist(or like Kaz pretend that the courts don't matter).
The decision before the Supreme Court right now is whether or not that constitutional right applies to gay couples just as it applies to straight couples.
What you are relying on is an "interpretation" of the constitution by a few left wing judges with an agenda.
If you really want this settled, you need a constitutional amendment ratified by 38 states saying that marriage consists of two unrelated people who are above the age of majority. Get that and its over.
Scared of that little 38 states thingy, aren't you?
LOL.....I love how wingnuts like you always call judges that disagree with you 'left wing judges with agenda's'...while applauding when you agree with them.
The issue is before the Supreme Court- just as marriage rights have been before the Supreme Court at least 3 other times.
And just like in Zablocki- we don't need a Constitutional Amendment so fathers who owe child support can still enjoy their constitutional right to marry. And just like in Loving- we don't need a Constitutional Amendment so that a mixed race couple can enjoy their constitutional right to marry.
The courts are here to protect all of our constitutional rights- not just the ones you approve of, for people you approve of.
LOL, thats really funny, you post a bunch of bullshit about courts protecting rights, but you limit it to rights that YOU approve of. You are a hypocrit of the highest degree
Show me where I have called the courts 'activists' just because I disagree with their rulings and we can talk. I think that the court was wrong in Citizen's United- but I don't therefore call the court 'right wing judges with an agenda' like you wingnuts on the far right do to judges you disagree with.
You are fine with judges when they rule how you want them to rule- and you call them tyrants when they don't- pure hypocrites.
lower court judges who make unconstitutional rulings will be overturned by the next higher court.
Are you really so naive that you think some federal court districts do not lean left?
44 out of 46 times? Really?