Is it ethical for the Democratic party to keep blacks on the plantation needing government handouts

[danielpalos]

it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

It does not reflect a progressive tax rate

If I pay 25 cents on every dollar and I need my paycheck to support a family, pay for healthcare and put a roof over my head
You pay 25 cents on every dollar and are a multimillionaire

We should not pay the same rate

Then the multimillionaire pays more in absolute dollars because he earns more.

$40,000 x 0.25 = $10,000

$1,000,000 x 0.25 = $250,000

see?

they pay more, with progressive taxation. see.

I agree, but then the others have less skin in the game and no motivation to care how nanny spends our money.

how much sweat do the rich have in the game; especially with an alleged work ethic from the Age of Iron?

they should have to dig ditches in front of car washers in the summer; for their bailouts.

 

[ding]

Sure, when you produce the same you can earn the same.

capitalism needs Perfect information for that; we already know, the right wing is mostly full of fallacy.

why not fix the Goalposts at a simple minimum deemed appropriate for market participation.

Nope, the free market is Darwinian and needs no direction.

the "free market" died in 1929; socialism has been hard at work bailing out Capitalism, ever since.

Not exactly. We have managed markets. That's not socialism. Socialism sucks big green donkey dicks.

yes, it is socialism; Government intervention, is social-ism. Only the right wing is Always, that full of fallacy.

You wish.

 

[ding]

If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

It does not reflect a progressive tax rate

If I pay 25 cents on every dollar and I need my paycheck to support a family, pay for healthcare and put a roof over my head
You pay 25 cents on every dollar and are a multimillionaire

We should not pay the same rate

Then the multimillionaire pays more in absolute dollars because he earns more.

$40,000 x 0.25 = $10,000

$1,000,000 x 0.25 = $250,000

see?

they pay more, with progressive taxation. see.

I agree, but then the others have less skin in the game and no motivation to care how nanny spends our money.

how much sweat do the rich have in the game; especially with an alleged work ethic from the Age of Iron?

they should have to dig ditches in front of car washers in the summer; for their bailouts.

They would have a lot more if they enacted my plan of a 25% flat tax with no deductions other than a 25k personal deduction for singles and 50k for joint filers.

And you probably wouldn't have to pay a dime.

 

[rightwinger]

• X
  

  equality is a social concept not a capital concept. how socialist of you.

  Equality is a mathematical concept. And since wages are measured in numbers that is the measure of equality. Proportionality is equality.

  it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

  If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

  It does not reflect a progressive tax rate
  
  If I pay 25 cents on every dollar and I need my paycheck to support a family, pay for healthcare and put a roof over my head
  You pay 25 cents on every dollar and are a multimillionaire
  
  We should not pay the same rate

  Then the multimillionaire pays more in absolute dollars because he earns more.
  
  $40,000 x 0.25 = $10,000
  
  $1,000,000 x 0.25 = $250,000
  
  see?

  
  He is not taxed at a different rate today....his dollars are

 

[ding]

• X
  

  Equality is a mathematical concept. And since wages are measured in numbers that is the measure of equality. Proportionality is equality.

  it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

  If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

  It does not reflect a progressive tax rate
  
  If I pay 25 cents on every dollar and I need my paycheck to support a family, pay for healthcare and put a roof over my head
  You pay 25 cents on every dollar and are a multimillionaire
  
  We should not pay the same rate

  Then the multimillionaire pays more in absolute dollars because he earns more.
  
  $40,000 x 0.25 = $10,000
  
  $1,000,000 x 0.25 = $250,000
  
  see?

  
  He is not taxed at a different rate today....his dollars are

I doubt very seriously you are taxed at 25% today.

 

[rightwinger]

It does not reflect a progressive tax rate

If I pay 25 cents on every dollar and I need my paycheck to support a family, pay for healthcare and put a roof over my head
You pay 25 cents on every dollar and are a multimillionaire

We should not pay the same rate

Then the multimillionaire pays more in absolute dollars because he earns more.

$40,000 x 0.25 = $10,000

$1,000,000 x 0.25 = $250,000

see?

they pay more, with progressive taxation. see.

I agree, but then the others have less skin in the game and no motivation to care how nanny spends our money.

how much sweat do the rich have in the game; especially with an alleged work ethic from the Age of Iron?

they should have to dig ditches in front of car washers in the summer; for their bailouts.

They would have a lot more if they enacted my plan of a 25% flat tax with no deductions other than a 25k personal deduction for singles and 50k for joint filers.

And you probably wouldn't have to pay a dime.

How would you make up for the lost revenue of billionaires paying just 25 percent?

 

[rightwinger]

• X
  

  it is Not a Capital concept regardless of any mathematical computations required for the sake of accuracy, nothing more.

  If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

  It does not reflect a progressive tax rate
  
  If I pay 25 cents on every dollar and I need my paycheck to support a family, pay for healthcare and put a roof over my head
  You pay 25 cents on every dollar and are a multimillionaire
  
  We should not pay the same rate

  Then the multimillionaire pays more in absolute dollars because he earns more.
  
  $40,000 x 0.25 = $10,000
  
  $1,000,000 x 0.25 = $250,000
  
  see?

  
  He is not taxed at a different rate today....his dollars are

I doubt very seriously you are taxed at 25% today.

Wanna bet?

 

[ding]

Then the multimillionaire pays more in absolute dollars because he earns more.

$40,000 x 0.25 = $10,000

$1,000,000 x 0.25 = $250,000

see?

they pay more, with progressive taxation. see.

I agree, but then the others have less skin in the game and no motivation to care how nanny spends our money.

how much sweat do the rich have in the game; especially with an alleged work ethic from the Age of Iron?

they should have to dig ditches in front of car washers in the summer; for their bailouts.

They would have a lot more if they enacted my plan of a 25% flat tax with no deductions other than a 25k personal deduction for singles and 50k for joint filers.

And you probably wouldn't have to pay a dime.

How would you make up for the lost revenue of billionaires paying just 25 percent?

I doubt they are paying that now with all of their deductions and loopholes.

 

[danielpalos]

capitalism needs Perfect information for that; we already know, the right wing is mostly full of fallacy.

why not fix the Goalposts at a simple minimum deemed appropriate for market participation.

Nope, the free market is Darwinian and needs no direction.

the "free market" died in 1929; socialism has been hard at work bailing out Capitalism, ever since.

Not exactly. We have managed markets. That's not socialism. Socialism sucks big green donkey dicks.

yes, it is socialism; Government intervention, is social-ism. Only the right wing is Always, that full of fallacy.

You wish.

i don't have to; i am not arguing right wing fantasy.

 

[ding]

• X
  

  If you pay 25 cents for every dollar earned and I pay 25 cents for every dollar earned how is that not equal?

  It does not reflect a progressive tax rate
  
  If I pay 25 cents on every dollar and I need my paycheck to support a family, pay for healthcare and put a roof over my head
  You pay 25 cents on every dollar and are a multimillionaire
  
  We should not pay the same rate

  Then the multimillionaire pays more in absolute dollars because he earns more.
  
  $40,000 x 0.25 = $10,000
  
  $1,000,000 x 0.25 = $250,000
  
  see?

  
  He is not taxed at a different rate today....his dollars are

I doubt very seriously you are taxed at 25% today.

Wanna bet?

Yes. I do. Take your total tax bill that was actually paid and divide it by your total income.

 

[ding]

Nope, the free market is Darwinian and needs no direction.

the "free market" died in 1929; socialism has been hard at work bailing out Capitalism, ever since.

Not exactly. We have managed markets. That's not socialism. Socialism sucks big green donkey dicks.

yes, it is socialism; Government intervention, is social-ism. Only the right wing is Always, that full of fallacy.

You wish.

i don't have to; i am not arguing right wing fantasy.

You're just fucking nuts is all.

 

[danielpalos]

the "free market" died in 1929; socialism has been hard at work bailing out Capitalism, ever since.

Not exactly. We have managed markets. That's not socialism. Socialism sucks big green donkey dicks.

yes, it is socialism; Government intervention, is social-ism. Only the right wing is Always, that full of fallacy.

You wish.

i don't have to; i am not arguing right wing fantasy.

Your just fucking nuts is all.

nothing but ad hominems; i really am more conservative and less full of fallacy.

 

[ding]

Not exactly. We have managed markets. That's not socialism. Socialism sucks big green donkey dicks.

yes, it is socialism; Government intervention, is social-ism. Only the right wing is Always, that full of fallacy.

You wish.

i don't have to; i am not arguing right wing fantasy.

Your just fucking nuts is all.

nothing but ad hominems; i really am more conservative and less full of fallacy.

You started it.

 

[danielpalos]

yes, it is socialism; Government intervention, is social-ism. Only the right wing is Always, that full of fallacy.

You wish.

i don't have to; i am not arguing right wing fantasy.

Your just fucking nuts is all.

nothing but ad hominems; i really am more conservative and less full of fallacy.

You started it.

nobody made you resort to fallacy and lose the point you lost along with the argument you couldn't develop to support it.

thank you for ceding the point and the argument.

 

[ding]

You wish.

i don't have to; i am not arguing right wing fantasy.

Your just fucking nuts is all.

nothing but ad hominems; i really am more conservative and less full of fallacy.

You started it.

nobody made you resort to fallacy and lose the point you lost along with the argument you couldn't develop to support it.

thank you for ceding the point and the argument.

I didn't resort to fallacy, dipshit.

Or cede anything to you.

 

[danielpalos]

i don't have to; i am not arguing right wing fantasy.

Your just fucking nuts is all.

nothing but ad hominems; i really am more conservative and less full of fallacy.

You started it.

nobody made you resort to fallacy and lose the point you lost along with the argument you couldn't develop to support it.

thank you for ceding the point and the argument.

I didn't resort to fallacy, dipshit.

Or cede anything to you.

i merely, gainsay your contention.

 

[ding]

Your just fucking nuts is all.

nothing but ad hominems; i really am more conservative and less full of fallacy.

You started it.

nobody made you resort to fallacy and lose the point you lost along with the argument you couldn't develop to support it.

thank you for ceding the point and the argument.

I didn't resort to fallacy, dipshit.

Or cede anything to you.

i merely, gainsay your contention.

But that isn’t what you did in your last post, now is it. I in the other hand have been gainsaying your contentions.

 

[danielpalos]

nothing but ad hominems; i really am more conservative and less full of fallacy.

You started it.

nobody made you resort to fallacy and lose the point you lost along with the argument you couldn't develop to support it.

thank you for ceding the point and the argument.

I didn't resort to fallacy, dipshit.

Or cede anything to you.

i merely, gainsay your contention.

But that isn’t what you did in your last post, now is it. I in the other hand have been gainsaying your contentions.

it is about equality and that form of socialism; not capitalism and market friendly morality.

 

[ding]

You started it.

nobody made you resort to fallacy and lose the point you lost along with the argument you couldn't develop to support it.

thank you for ceding the point and the argument.

I didn't resort to fallacy, dipshit.

Or cede anything to you.

i merely, gainsay your contention.

But that isn’t what you did in your last post, now is it. I in the other hand have been gainsaying your contentions.

it is about equality and that form of socialism; not capitalism and market friendly morality.

What is about that?

 

[danielpalos]

nobody made you resort to fallacy and lose the point you lost along with the argument you couldn't develop to support it.

thank you for ceding the point and the argument.

I didn't resort to fallacy, dipshit.

Or cede anything to you.

i merely, gainsay your contention.

But that isn’t what you did in your last post, now is it. I in the other hand have been gainsaying your contentions.

it is about equality and that form of socialism; not capitalism and market friendly morality.

What is about that?

specifically about my this, and not your that.