- Moderator
- #121
Sorry that causes problems for you dude...------------------------------------------- names of WHO . I think that widdle babee womens names are already with held in 'rape' cases aren't they ?? Women are already treated like SPECIAL little flowers if i am correct Coyote .We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?
This is not the only such example of a total loss of innocent until guilty. There are many examples and they include the Republicans as well. “Lock her up”
But the ugliest are sexual assaults. Because sexual assaults ruin lives. And false accusations ruin lives.
I think we should do what other countries do...names are withheld until an investigation is complete. If enough evidence is found to merit charges then names can become public.