Is it Time to Change the Rule of Law in America?

[Tilly]

I kinda was hoping for a poster with opposing views, seems they don't want to touch this thread. oh darn

I've touched this thread & shown just how big an asshole you are.

Nope. But you are clearly suffering from delusions of grandeur.

 

[boedicca]

I kinda was hoping for a poster with opposing views, seems they don't want to touch this thread. oh darn

I've touched this thread & shown just how big an asshole you are.

Nope. But you are clearly suffering from delusions of grandeur.

In his case, more like delusions of mere adequacy.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?

They better hope this standard isn't adopted as normal or the black prison population will triple.

 

[Nova78]

Is it Time to Change the Rule of Law in America?

No, it just time to get rid of Demorats,

View attachment 220917

I am sure you fucking assholes believe that. But I have news. You moronic ignorant fuck Trumpettes don't represent America at all. You worship a POS orange lying fuck who has been stealing AmericabBlind for over decade & you love him for it.

If a Hispsanic woman got an extra $10 in food stamps you froth at the mouth. Trump steals tens of millions in fraudulent tax returns & you are too fucking stupid to care.

Yea, as long as it does not come out of your pocket ,or is not in your back yard ,your so worried about Hispanics.,take in a few ,or start handing out 10 dollar bills. Wake up ,its an invasion.

 

[Toro]

We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?

Notwithstanding whether or not one believed Kavanaugh or Ford, a judicial appointment is not about the rule of law. It is a political process based on the suitability of the individual being appointed. There is no "innocent until proven guilty" standard in the political process.

 

[bodecea]

We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?

I didn’t see Kavanaugh convicted of anything......did you?

He wasn't even indicted for anything....nor is there any indictment coming up.

 

[Meister]

We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?

Notwithstanding whether or not one believed Kavanaugh or Ford, a judicial appointment is not about the rule of law. It is a political process based on the suitability of the individual being appointed. There is no "innocent until proven guilty" standard in the political process.

Agreed, that isn't the point of the OP. The point is the participants such as MSM, senators, and the protesters reacted in a way that seemed
to be willing to change the rule of law for political expediency. I just threw it out there chumming the waters to see what I would get.
You would have to admit that this went beyond a generic political process. The political process would have had it come out in the Sept. hearings
or before if they were sincere.

 

[bodecea]

We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?

I didn’t see Kavanaugh convicted of anything......did you?

-------------------------------- [youse guys] --- er , they were on their way of DENYING and Destroying KAV in a Kangaroo Court . Criminal Conviction might have happened at a later date after evidence and here say from the Kangaroo Court had been gathered . Plus if 'guilty till proved innocent' if it had been established as some kind of 'Kangaroo precedent' even in a non Court or Legal case we would never hear the end of it RWinger .

Wasn't a court...it was a job interview.

 

[Meister]

We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?

I didn’t see Kavanaugh convicted of anything......did you?

He wasn't even indicted for anything....nor is there any indictment coming up.

Yet, if the dems take over the senate, they want to impeach him.

 

[Meister]

We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?

I didn’t see Kavanaugh convicted of anything......did you?

-------------------------------- [youse guys] --- er , they were on their way of DENYING and Destroying KAV in a Kangaroo Court . Criminal Conviction might have happened at a later date after evidence and here say from the Kangaroo Court had been gathered . Plus if 'guilty till proved innocent' if it had been established as some kind of 'Kangaroo precedent' even in a non Court or Legal case we would never hear the end of it RWinger .

Wasn't a court...it was a job interview.

Job interview was in Sept.
The character assassination was in Oct.

 

[pismoe]

and it should be time to charge these women with slander or some legal sanction that fits .

 

[miketx]

We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?

No it's time to be rid of insane democrats and loser politicians who refuse to follow rule of law. Innocent until proven guilty. They have to PROVE guilt. Not the other way around. That's a sure fire path to fascism and civil war. The Kavanaugh hearing has proven beyond any doubt what the democrats and media have become.

 

[eagle1462010]

The laws are not the problem. The enforcement and abuse of the laws are the problem.

No changes in the laws...........just need to fire the unethical hacks in politics.

 

[eagle1462010]

Never make changes in a time of anger and faction...........The very reason we have a gov't that we have.

Heed the warnings of Founding Fathers..............and then rid the problem of unethical politicians.

 

[Meister]

Never make changes in a time of anger and faction...........The very reason we have a gov't that we have.

Heed the warnings of Founding Fathers..............and then rid the problem of unethical politicians.

Be careful, we might not have anything but crickets on the Hill. lol

 

[Vel]

We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?

Nope. Just time to vote out all democrats.

 

[Vel]

We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?

I didn’t see Kavanaugh convicted of anything......did you?

So tell us why he had to withdraw from his summer teaching position at Harvard. You know, since he wasn't convicted of anything.

 

[Yarddog]

We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?

I didn’t see Kavanaugh convicted of anything......did you?

If he wasnt convicted of anything, then why are people calling him a rapist? one would almost think he had been convicted in a court of law

 

[Montrovant]

We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?

I didn’t see Kavanaugh convicted of anything......did you?

He wasn't even indicted for anything....nor is there any indictment coming up.

Yet, if the dems take over the senate, they want to impeach him.

I don't know what the rules and procedures are for impeaching a USSC justice, but that would be much more like criminal charges than what we had in the confirmation process, I imagine. I doubt it will happen, though. Apparently, it's only ever happened once, and the justice was acquitted. Has a U.S. Supreme Court justice ever been impeached?

 

[Montrovant]

We need a discussion on whether a person now should have to prove his innocence
than having an accuser having to prove the person's guilt.
During the Kavanaugh hearings, one party seemed to demand proof of innocence from
Kavanaugh. This same party did not demand the accuser to prove Kavanaugh's guilt.
This went so far as to have the MSM be complicit in their covering of the hearings.
This went so far as to have the 'grassroot gatherings' be complicit in the covering of
the hearings.
All three entities, the democrat party, the MSM, and the 'grassroot gatherers' all abandoned
what made the United States great with it's judicial system. They all demanded that an accused had to
prove his innocence, even when the evidence did not back the accuser.
Is it time to change our judicial system?
What say you?

I didn’t see Kavanaugh convicted of anything......did you?

So tell us why he had to withdraw from his summer teaching position at Harvard. You know, since he wasn't convicted of anything.

How does his withdrawal equal a criminal conviction?