Is the new Disinformation Governance Board constitutional? (Poll)

Is the new Disinformation Governance Board constitutional?

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 3.4%
  • No

    Votes: 57 96.6%

  • Total voters
    59
Name a campaign that gave internal polling data to a enemy spy.

Mueller could not indict a sitting President. You ignore that fact.

He couldn't indict because he himself said there was nothing to charge him with a fact YOU ignore all the time since Mueller said so in Section one of his report which I posted in detail weeks ago.
 
And turning over campaign information. I doubt that.

Mueller clearly stated that Trump was not exonerated. Justice Department guidelines state a sitting President cannot be indicted.

Now you are full of nonsense since DOJ POLICY can't override Congressional law that allows the Special Prosecutor the ability to post charges against anyone they investigate.

I posted the LAW about 20 times in the forum straight from the statutes.
 
There you go again. If you had a valid argument to make you wouldn't have to lie so frequently.

Wanting a secure border does not make us Nazis. Pointing out that we're being overrun at the border due to this administration's policies does not make us Nazis, pointing out that congressional democrats are adding to the problem doesn't make us Nazis, it simply makes us correct.

The fact is that while border crossings are up, that does not mean it is out of control. This is fascist propaganda.
 
There is no evidence that it is not.
The 2 milllion illegals that got in last year prove that it isn't, the 10,000 who got in, in a single week last month prove that it isnt. The half million, "Gotaways" on the border last year prove that it isn't.

The drugs still pouring in across our southern border prove that it isn't secure.



The BP estimates that they only can interdict about 10% of the drug trafficking at the border.

Multiply the number of lbs seized by 10 and that's what they estimate got through in 2021.

 
You really are a idiot. Misinformation is a existential threat to this country. The government has every right to put out the facts. That abuses nothing.
Would that include the "misinformation" sworn to by fifty intel officials who stated Hunter's laptop was "Russian Disinformation"?

We're still waiting on the current administration to clean that one up. When can we expect their retraction?
 
The word Republic flew over your flat head.

Maybe you are too stupid to understand that word.

There is no reason for a government to be monitoring free speech in the first place.

No one is monitoring anything. You are the one who is stupid. This is as much a democracy as it is a republic.
 
No one is monitoring anything. You are the one who is stupid. This is as much a democracy as it is a republic.
How can we have a "Disinformation Board" if they are not monitoring speech?

You can't have one without the other.
 
The gov't get's to put out it's version of "facts", it is not empowered to decide for all of us what is or isn't factual.

They have no right to counter information that is being put out. Campaigns have been doing that from the very beginning.
 
No one is monitoring anything. You are the one who is stupid. This is as much a democracy as it is a republic.
No it isn't, We are a Constitutional Republic with democratically elected representatives. We don't even vote directly for President.
 
He couldn't indict because he himself said there was nothing to charge him with a fact YOU ignore all the time since Mueller said so in Section one of his report which I posted in detail weeks ago.

Mueller was asked whether Trump had been exonerated and he empathically said "No".
 
Now you are full of nonsense since DOJ POLICY can't override Congressional law that allows the Special Prosecutor the ability to post charges against anyone they investigate.

I posted the LAW about 20 times in the forum straight from the statutes.

Mueller said that DOJ policy prevented him from indicting a sitting President.
 
Mueller said that DOJ policy prevented him from indicting a sitting President.
DOJ policy isn't law and if there were any chargeable offenses Trump could have been indicted at 12:01pm on inauguration day. That was about a year and a half ago, where are the indictments?
 
No one is monitoring anything. You are the one who is stupid. This is as much a democracy as it is a republic.

You are badly mistaken since this is what they say about it:

CNN

Biden administration defends disinformation board from fierce GOP criticism​


By Priscilla Alvarez and Sean Lyngaas, CNN

Updated 6:08 PM ET, Mon May 2, 2022

Excerpt:

(CNN)The Department of Homeland Security and the White House are defending a new initiative to help target disinformation amid fierce criticism from Republicans who cast the effort as overreach and attacked its leader.

Last week, DHS announced an interagency team, dubbed the "Disinformation Governance Board," to coordinate department activities related to disinformation aimed at the US population and infrastructure. Nina Jankowicz, a disinformation expert with experience working on Ukraine and Russia issues, was tapped to helm the board, along with two senior DHS officials, including acting Principal Deputy General Counsel Jen Daskal.

=====

How can you TARGET disinformation in there is nothing being monitored?

:oops8:

Republic and Democracy are not the same meaning which even cavemen know how come you don't?
 
Would that include the "misinformation" sworn to by fifty intel officials who stated Hunter's laptop was "Russian Disinformation"?

We're still waiting on the current administration to clean that one up. When can we expect their retraction?

It was a attempt to provide a excuse for Giuliani to have Hunter Biden's e-mails. They gave him the e-mails that they hacked. They then staged that phony operation to provide a excuse for him having the e-mails. It is also worth noting that Fox and the Wall Street Journal found no connection between Joe Biden and his son's business dealings.
 
Mueller was asked whether Trump had been exonerated and he empathically said "No".

You are ignoring the declinations Mueller posted in Section One of his report which means he found no indictable evidence of election wrongdoing from Trump and his campaign group thus they ARE EXONERATED!

He couldn't indict because he himself said there was nothing to charge him with a fact YOU ignore all the time since Mueller said so in Section one of his report which I posted in detail weeks ago.
 

Forum List

Back
Top