Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You realize your own article addresses what I said right? lolA link to your source would have been handy.
Here is the origin of the gas stove issue:
The Health Risks of Gas Stoves Explained
Gas stoves produce emissions that can harm human health and the environment. Experts answer questions about the dangers and how to limit themwww.scientificamerican.com
Yes. Are you familiar with the term "false dichotomy"?You realize your own article addresses what I said right? lol
Are you familiar with got nailed by your own article? lolYes. Are you familiar with the term "false dichotomy"?
No study says thatThe elimination of gas stoves was a children's health issue, not global warming.
Based on archeological finds that already happened at least once maybe twiceClimate change has been going on since the earth was created. The only time the climate was stable for a long period was during the "Boring Billion" when for a billion years not much changed.
Climate change has been responsible for several mass extinctions and the demise of 99% of the species that ever lived on earth. It will probably be the demise of humans.
Archaeology is the study of human history and prehistory. The last mass extinction was the asteroid collision that wiped out the dinosaurs 65.5 million years ago.Based on archeological finds that already happened at least once maybe twice
Archaeology is the study of human history and prehistory. The last mass extinction was the asteroid collision that wiped out the dinosaurs 65.5 million years ago.
What do you mean?Marta, Giza.
Where are all the people?
And what is your point?Do an actual experiment, like bringing rain to an arid area, or, stopping a hurricane, etc. if you can’t do that, there is no scientific basis for your human caused climate change.
If you have a point state it.what was the instrument that cut the granite for the pyramids?
Global Warming had a CO2/Hockey Stick argument to support its proposition, but its successor, Climate Change, doesn't seem to have any scientific argument to explain a cause/effect relationship. Instead, it has devolved into a constantly changing series of social/political theories which do not even purport to be connected to physical weather events. Is there any scientific theory to explain why current Climate Change is different from past Climate Change?
They know exactly how a hurricane starts. No they can't replicate a hurricane just like you cannot be born but once. Just because they cannot replicate JC456 does not mean that they can replicate a smarter one.they have no idea how a hurricane starts or they could replicate it to figure out how to stop it. you're just one of those smart stupid people.
Oh don't get me wrong, I know that smart stupid demofks believe that because they were told to, but science doesn't`. Never has.
futurism.com
It has to do with proving humans can cause a chage in the climate. You know, real science.
You can’t be that stupid, man controlling weather!And what is your point?
What tool cut the granite in the pyramids?If you have a point state it.
How will they control it? How much CO2 contributes?They know exactly how a hurricane starts. No they can't replicate a hurricane just like you cannot be born but once. Just because they cannot replicate JC456 does not mean that they can replicate a smarter one.
Who cut the granite rock so smooth? What was the tool called? Is there one still around?Well then do you believe in GOD.
Just as I said!Scientific Consensus: Why Should We Accept It?
Scientific consensus isn't reached only through whipping up votes. It's actually born out of an overwhelming agreement between scientists of varying fields of study regarding a particular issue at hand.
Republicans in denial is so funny.
