Is this the "smoking gun"? Letter from Cohen stating Trump did not reimburse him for Stormy Daniels payment

[struth]

Yeah, to an unpopular tabloid which virtually nobody recalled in 2016.

haha yeah that’s it…she was paid off to not talk about a story she’s already talked about…sigh

 

[Faun]

haha sorry facts bother you.

she only came clean after losing her lawsuit and being order to pay trumps legal fees

More lies.

She came clean about 3 months after the news broke about the hush money; when she sued Trump to get out of the NDA. The case was dismissed about 6 months later. Then she appealed and lost the appeal about 5 months after that.

 

[struth]

More lies.

She came clean about 3 months after the news broke about the hush money; when she sued Trump to get out of the NDA. The case was dismissed about 6 months later. Then she appealed and lost the appeal about 5 months after that.

she came clean in Jan 2018

 

[Faun]

haha yeah that’s it…she was paid off to not talk about a story she’s already talked about…sigh

LOL

You say that as if you don't know Trump already confessed to paying her off.

Mr. Cohen, an attorney, received a monthly retainer, not from the campaign and having nothing to do with the campaign, from which he entered into, through reimbursement, a private contract between two parties, known as a non-disclosure agreement, or NDA. These agreements are very common among celebrities and people of wealth. In this case it is in full force and effect and will be used in Arbitration for damages against Ms. Clifford (Daniels). The agreement was used to stop the false and extortionist accusations made by her about an affair, despite already having signed a detailed letter admitting that there was no affair. Prior to its violation by Ms. Clifford and her attorney, this was a private agreement. Money from the campaign, or campaign contributions, played no roll in this transaction.​

So did Trump's attorney...

Having something to do with paying some Stormy Daniels woman $130,000? I mean which is going to turn out to be perfectly legal. That money was not campaign money. Sorry, I'm giving you a fact now you don't know. It's not campaign money. No campaign finance violation. Funneled through a law firm and then the president repaid it. ..... When I heard Cohen’s retainer of $35,000, when he was doing no work for the President, I said, ‘That’s how he’s repaying it, with a little profit and a little margin for paying taxes, for Michael.’​

 

[Faun]

she came clean in Jan 2018

More lies.

In 2011, she said they had sex. Then in January, 2018, when the story broke she signed an NDA, she first denied having sex with Trump, but didn't deny the hush money, to be in compliance with the NDA. A short time later, she sued Trump to get out of the NDA and has returned to her original claims that they did have sex.

 

[struth]

LOL

You say that as if you don't know Trump already confessed to paying her off.

Mr. Cohen, an attorney, received a monthly retainer, not from the campaign and having nothing to do with the campaign, from which he entered into, through reimbursement, a private contract between two parties, known as a non-disclosure agreement, or NDA. These agreements are very common among celebrities and people of wealth. In this case it is in full force and effect and will be used in Arbitration for damages against Ms. Clifford (Daniels). The agreement was used to stop the false and extortionist accusations made by her about an affair, despite already having signed a detailed letter admitting that there was no affair. Prior to its violation by Ms. Clifford and her attorney, this was a private agreement. Money from the campaign, or campaign contributions, played no roll in this transaction.​

So did Trump's attorney...

Having something to do with paying some Stormy Daniels woman $130,000? I mean which is going to turn out to be perfectly legal. That money was not campaign money. Sorry, I'm giving you a fact now you don't know. It's not campaign money. No campaign finance violation. Funneled through a law firm and then the president repaid it. ..... When I heard Cohen’s retainer of $35,000, when he was doing no work for the President, I said, ‘That’s how he’s repaying it, with a little profit and a little margin for paying taxes, for Michael.’​

yes he admitted paying his attorney legal fees…so what? Cohen apparently used some of that to pay him self back for paying Stormy

again …so what?

 

[Couchpotato]

Who would call it up if so few ever even saw it? Who knows if Trump even ever saw it?

You don’t think the DNC/Hilary campaign was aware of it? Any opposition research firm worth a dime would have found it. I kind of find it hard to believe that political campaigns who spend millions digging up dirt on their opponents would be unaware of an interview a porn star gave about sleeping with said opponent. Had Hillary fucked a male porn star and said porn star had done an interview in the same tabloid you don’t think someone would have found it? Really?

 

[struth]

More lies.

In 2011, she said they had sex. Then in January, 2018, when the story broke she signed an NDA, she first denied having sex with Trump, but didn't deny the hush money, to be in compliance with the NDA. A short time later, she sued Trump to get out of the NDA and has returned to her original claims that they did have sex.

haha so he paid her to be quiet about a story she already made public?? hahahab. sounds like this “ hush money” wasn’t really “hush money” since it was already public

 

[struth]

You don’t think the DNC/Hilary campaign was aware of it? Any opposition research firm worth a dime would have found it. I kind of find it hard to believe that political campaigns who spend millions digging up dirt on their opponents would be unaware of an interview a porn star gave about sleeping with said opponent. Had Hillary fucked a male porn star and said porn star had done an interview in the same tabloid you don’t think someone would have found it? Really?

the dnc and clinton were too busy illegal using campaign funds to pay for russian disinformation

they actually got hit by the FEC

 

[JoeB131]

Your ignorance of the 5th Amendment of the US Consttitition, making it legally mandatory for the prosecution to provide the defense with ALL information, is duly noted.

Really doesn't apply here.

There's an old saying, "You can get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich". They are only required to present to the grand jury evidence a crime has been committed.

That's it. Here's the violation of the law, here's the proof Trump did it.

Besides, given the 8 year panty sniffing raid that Ken Starr went on, your side really doesn't have a place to complain.

 

[JoeB131]

Lets assume that Cohen paid 2000 women 2 gazillion dollars to keep quiet about their sexual affairs with Trump. Let's also assume Trump paid Cohen back that 2 gazillion dollars and an additional gazillion for his trouble. Thats not illegal. The only misdemeanor part of this is how the transaction was recorded. If the Manhattan DA wanted to bring charges for that they should have done it 3 years ago before the statute of limitations ran out.

Except three years ago, Trump was still president and couldn't be indicted. So the clock starts running when he left office.

 

[struth]

Really doesn't apply here.

There's an old saying, "You can get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich". They are only required to present to the grand jury evidence a crime has been committed.

That's it. Here's the violation of the law, here's the proof Trump did it.

Besides, given the 8 year panty sniffing raid that Ken Starr went on, your side really doesn't have a place to complain.

and there we have it…dembot still trying to get revenge for Starr uncovering Clinton’s high crimes

 

[Couchpotato]

Except three years ago, Trump was still president and couldn't be indicted. So the clock starts running when he left office.

Says who? Where’s the statute that says you can’t indict a sitting President?

 

[Couchpotato]

Except three years ago, Trump was still president and couldn't be indicted. So the clock starts running when he left office.

I should say where is the provision in the Constitution saying a sitting President can’t be indicted?

 

[The5thHorseman]

what did i make up? Bragg who first opposed charging trump and actually faced backlash cause two DAs resigned over his views, didn’t jump start the case til nov 25 after trump announced

haha sorry facts bother you.

she only came clean after losing her lawsuit and being order to pay trumps legal fees

Bragg convened the Grand Jury in January, months after Grifty announced.

she only came clean after losing her lawsuit

You're lying.

 

[struth]

Bragg convened the Grand Jury in January, months after Grifty announced.


You're lying.

it was announced Nov 25 just after Trump announced that he was jump starting the investigation

 

[The5thHorseman]

it was announced Nov 25 just after Trump announced that he was jump starting the investigation

False.

You're lying.

 

[struth]

False.

You're lying.

haha facts you don’t like aren’t lies

Trump announced Nov 16, or maybe 15th

Bragg did a 180 after saying there wasn’t anything worth prosecuting, and announced a jump start of the investigation on Nov 25 as reported in the NY Times that day

 

[The5thHorseman]

haha facts you don’t like aren’t lies

Trump announced Nov 16, or maybe 15th

Bragg did a 180 after saying there wasn’t anything worth prosecuting, and announced a jump start of the investigation on Nov 25 as reported in the NY Times that day

You're making it up.

We know this because there are no quotation marks.

 

[struth]

You're making it up.

We know this because there are no quotation marks.

i want quoting anyone, i was simply stating a fact. Those are my words or the facts

you only need to use “” marks when you are directly quoting someone

I don’t have to use “” marks when i say the germans lost WW2…because i’m simply stating a fact, not making things up or quoting anyone

try again…or better yet get an education.