Sixties Fan
Diamond Member
- Mar 6, 2017
- 58,469
- 11,068
- 2,140
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
rather ... neo-natzi and neo-jew are the same blend of fanaticism. is why you hide behind simple - israel - when to convey your own humble innocence.
Get back to me when you've mastered the English language and can write beyond a kindergarten level.![]()
Islam picked up where the Nazis left off and hence Islamic Jihad and it's supporters like you can be classed as Neo-Nazi!
recently what? read the koran? ----not all the way thru----I did that more thanRecently?
Ok---you have some words by a single person-----You have set, FOR YOURSELF AND YOUR CHURCH---a silly precedent. I can to a lot more HORRIFIC coming![]()
The Palestinians and Zionism: 1897-1948 - Middle East Policy Council
Middle East Policy is fully accessible through the Wiley Online Library Click below to subscribe to the online or print edition of Middle East Policy and gain access to all journal content. Learn Moremepc.org
For instance, as early as 1905, Israel Zangwill, an organizer of Zionism in Britain and one of Zionism's top propagandists, who had coined the slogan "a land without a people for a people without a land," acknowledged in a speech in Manchester that Palestine was not a land without people.
In fact, it was filled with Arabs: "[We] must be prepared either to drive out by the sword the [Arab] tribes in possession as our forefathers did or to grapple with the problem of a large alien population, mostly Mohammedan and accustomed for centuries to despise us."6
This comment came at a time when there were around 645,000 Muslims and Christians in Palestine and only 55,000 Jews, mainly non-Zionists or anti-Zionists in the Orthodox neighborhoods of Jerusalem and other cities.7
David Ben-Gurion, the man who along with Herzl and Chaim Weizmann was one of the progenitors of Israel, explicitly acknowledged the linkage between Zionism and expulsion: "Zionism is a transfer of the Jews.
Regarding the transfer of the Arabs this is much easier than any other transfer."8 Or, as Israeli scholar Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi put it: "While the basic problem confronting Diaspora Jews was to survive as a minority, the basic problem of Zionism in Palestine was to dispossess the natives and become a majority."9
Much attention has been paid to how the early Zionists secured land in Palestine, but relatively little study has focused on the equally essential effort by Zionists to delegitimize and replace the Palestinian majority.10 Without Jewish control, the Zionists concluded they would be no better off than in Europe, where Zionism arose specifically as a way to escape antisemitism, pogroms, the ghetto and minority status.
As former defense minister Ariel Sharon, a leading spokesman of Zionism's right wing, has commented: "Our forefathers did not come here in order to build a democracy but to build a Jewish state."11 A similar view was recently expressed by Labor leader and Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin: "I don't believe that for 2,000 years Jews dreamed and prayed about the return to Zion to create a
Ok---you have some words by a single person-----You have set, FOR YOURSELF AND YOUR CHURCH---a silly precedent. I can to a lot more HORRIFIC coming
from the mouths of both your fellow episcopalians and your fellow islamo-nazis
IN MOSQUES--no less. Zangwell bore a family legacy of pogroms etc and was also a playright His plays on POLITICAL ISSUES were even more dramatic---he was
very much an IDEALIST. It seems to me that the term "JEWISH STATE" bothers
you -----but I also get the impression that the ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF SAUDI ARABIA is A-ok
ok-----and other states so DISENFRANCHIZED in your exalted priestly OPINION?perhaps, overall than your issue - they are equating it to the u s constitution ... congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.
* let the neo-jews know their state religion is not welcome in the american lexicon. period.
Can you explain why your Arafat objected to E Barak giving away 90% of disputed land?That's not the reason. In 2002 the Saudi initiative offer to guarantee their security as well as trade and diplomatic relations.
Try presenting and understanding the full Amendment, not a slice out of proportion (common tactic/flaw of many Leftists~Anti-USA, etc.)perhaps, overall than your issue - they are equating it to the u s constitution ... congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.
* let the neo-jews know their state religion is not welcome in the american lexicon. period.
Thing is the Christian version of will of God/Gawd/Allah doesn't include forcing conversion of all humanity to their religion.Christians also strive to submit to the will of God. That's why we pray thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven.
You're making this much too complicated. Why?
Read Warsaw Burning
![]()
Warsaw Burning: The German Response to the Warsaw Uprising | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans
The German response to the Warsaw Uprising was characterized by ruthless terror and unrelenting bloodshed, which caused civilian support to drastically diminish.www.nationalww2museum.org
They can't live with Hindus without terrorising them.
They can't live with Jews without terrorising them.
They can't live with Christians without terrorising them.
They can't live with Atheists without terrorising them.
They can't live with LGBT without terrorising them.
They don't like Free Speech
They don't like Religious Freedom
They don't like free Women
But they constantly want Islamophobia criminalized.
Arafart explained WHY he said NO----a YES to anything would have gotten himCan you explain why your Arafat objected to E Barak giving away 90% of disputed land?
Barak Proposes Land Deal; Arafat Rejects Offer
By ABC News
January 6, 2006
Nov. 30, 2000 -- Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak offered themost detailed description yet of his peace plan today, saying he would recognize an independent Palestinian state but would put off the explosive issue of control over Jerusalem.
In an animated speech to Israeli news editors, Barak spoke of a “phased agreement “ and said he was preparedto recognize a Palestinian state. He said theissue of sovereignty over Jerusalem and the return of Palestinian refugees should be put off for “one or two or three years.”
![]()
Barak Proposes Land Deal; Arafat Rejects Offer
abcnews.go.com
Arafat didn't negotiate - he just kept saying no
22 May 2002
The proposals included the establishment of a demilitarised Palestinian state on some 92% of the West Bank and 100% of the Gaza Strip, with some territorial compensation for the Palestinians from pre-1967 Israeli territory..
![]()
Arafat didn't negotiate - he just kept saying no
Ever since the start of the second Palestinian intifada, a row has raged over who was responsible for the breakdown of the peace process. Now, for the first time, former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak has weighed in, accusing Yasser Arafat of being a liar who talked peace while secretly...www.theguardian.com
This is really stupid.
There were no colonizing migrations of Arabs.. not like European Zionists migrating to Palestine. .. or European settlers to America.
Human migration is.a norm----Military invasions and forced imposition of language and religion is YOUR FAVEThis is really stupid.
There were no colonizing migrations of Arabs.. not like European Zionists migrating to Palestine. .. or European settlers to America.
Answering both your posts.....Wow. Are you typical for the level of hate?
and a liar who knows where her bread is OILEDAnswering both your posts.....
You must be a sucker.......No, that is not it.
You must be brainwashed....No, that is not it.
You must be a liar.....Yes, unfortunately, that is it.