berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 16,621
- 13,915
All throughout the battle over whether Congress has the right to compel witness testimony and document production by the WH pertaining to the impeachment inquiry Trumpists have maintained it is a matter for the courts to decide. So.............WTF?
DOJ On McGahn: Courts Have No Role In Fights Between Congress, White House
DOJ On McGahn: Courts Have No Role In Fights Between Congress, White House
"Federal courts should not rule on separation-of-powers disputes between Congress and the White House, the Justice Department argued Friday.
The oral arguments came in D.C. federal appeals court as the House Judiciary Committee seeks to enforce a subpoena it issued in April for testimony from former White House counsel Don McGahn.
“We have two branches at loggerheads here, and the question is, is there no proper role for the court?” asked Judge Judith Rogers at one point.
Hashim Mooppan, arguing for the DOJ, contended that Congress needs to rely on “political remedies, political tools” to resolve the dispute, and repeatedly warned that were the court to decide on the merits of the case, “there would be case after case” like this."
What political remedy? It seems to me that if Team Trump was confident it their legal argument they would want the courts to decide the matter.
DOJ On McGahn: Courts Have No Role In Fights Between Congress, White House
DOJ On McGahn: Courts Have No Role In Fights Between Congress, White House
"Federal courts should not rule on separation-of-powers disputes between Congress and the White House, the Justice Department argued Friday.
The oral arguments came in D.C. federal appeals court as the House Judiciary Committee seeks to enforce a subpoena it issued in April for testimony from former White House counsel Don McGahn.
“We have two branches at loggerheads here, and the question is, is there no proper role for the court?” asked Judge Judith Rogers at one point.
Hashim Mooppan, arguing for the DOJ, contended that Congress needs to rely on “political remedies, political tools” to resolve the dispute, and repeatedly warned that were the court to decide on the merits of the case, “there would be case after case” like this."
What political remedy? It seems to me that if Team Trump was confident it their legal argument they would want the courts to decide the matter.