Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Iran has threatened Israel.
Israel has never declared to wipe Iranians off the map.
But Khomeini and Ahmadinejad have said that the occupying regime (Israel) must be wiped off the map because they can't compromise over the issues of Palestine.
Israel has every right to protect it's people.
Have you considered that Iran isn't so much anti-Israel as much as that Israel is a democracy?
You don't get to call yourself a "Democracy" when only one group gets to vote.
If Israel were a democracy, it vote itself out of existance because half the population doesn't want to be "Israel".
Uh, yeah. It was Arab land. Sorry, learn to deal.
The "Palestinians" never had their own country. The Arabs lost it. Sorry, learn to deal.
The number of Palestinians will be more than the number of Israelis at some point. When that happens, bye-bye Israel... and good riddance.
Learn to deal.
Israel is a fascist, apartheid state; masquerading as a democracy, much like the old South Africa.Israel isn't a democracy? What is it?
Israel is a fascist, apartheid state; masquerading as a democracy, much like the old South Africa.Israel isn't a democracy? What is it?
Now lets prove Israel is not apartheid:apartheid
apart·heid noun \ə-ˈpär-ˌtāt, -ˌtīt\
Definition of APARTHEID
1
: racial segregation; specifically : a former policy of segregation and political and economic discrimination against non-European groups in the Republic of South Africa
2
: separation, segregation <cultural apartheid> <gender apartheid>
Go ahead and play all of the cartoons you want to prove your point; but here is the reality of apartheid Israel.
Palestinian man convicted of rape after having consensual sex with a woman who had believed him to be a fellow Jew.
Sabbar Kashur, 30, was sentenced to 18 months in prison on Monday after the court ruled that he was guilty of rape by deception. According to the complaint filed by the woman with the Jerusalem district court, the two met in downtown Jerusalem in September 2008 where Kashur, an Arab from East Jerusalem, introduced himself as a Jewish bachelor seeking a serious relationship. The two then had consensual sex in a nearby building before Kashur left.
When she later found out that he was not Jewish but an Arab, she filed a criminal complaint for rape and indecent assault.
Handing down the verdict, Tzvi Segal, one of three judges on the case, acknowledged that sex had been consensual but said that although not "a classical rape by force," the woman would not have consented if she had not believed Kashur was Jewish.
The sex therefore was obtained under false pretences, the judges said. "If she hadn't thought the accused was a Jewish bachelor interested in a serious romantic relationship, she would not have cooperated," they added.
The court ruled that Kashur should receive a jail term and rejected the option of a six-month community service order. He was said to be seeking to appeal.
Arab guilty of rape after consensual sex with Jew | World news | The Guardian
First from the dentition we see that that apartheid means racial segregation. As it is well known Israel does not differentiate people by race. Arabs and Jews are equal and the law does not segregate Arabs from Jews (As it were in south Africa).
It's a known fact that there are Arab members of parliament in Israel. There are Arab political parties and Arabs vote. This alone disproves your claim that Israel is apartheid , but lets proceed there are Arab Judges Arab Officers in the military further proof Israel is not apartheid.
The most prestigious university in Israel the 'Techniyon' has above 30% of Arab students each year.
Each year there is a new wave of Arab doctors,layers,engineers,etc who graduate and become integrated in Israeli society.
This is not how an apartheid state behaves per definition.
My friend your argument about Israel being an apartheid state was proven false beyond all doubt.
On the Soviet Union dime. The crime of trying to ward off hordes of wild-eyed "afro-africans", drawn in by dreams of free shit-everything.An apartheid state, like South Africa. Happy to clear that up for you.
Iran has threatened Israel.
Israel has never declared to wipe Iranians off the map.
But Khomeini and Ahmadinejad have said that the occupying regime (Israel) must be wiped off the map because they can't compromise over the issues of Palestine.
Israel has every right to protect it's people.
Yeah! If shariah isn't allowed - it's apartheid! Funny.Go ahead and play all of the cartoons you want to prove your point; but here is the reality of apartheid Israel.
Israel is a fascist, apartheid state; masquerading as a democracy, much like the old South Africa.Israel isn't a democracy? What is it?
How many blacks could vote in apartheid South Africa?
How many Arabs can vote in Israel?
Israel is a fascist, apartheid state; masquerading as a democracy, much like the old South Africa.
How many blacks could vote in apartheid South Africa?
How many Arabs can vote in Israel?
Actually, both states maintained the illusion of democracy. South Africa had a whole scheme of "homelands" for the blacks where they were allowed to vote for the approved house candidates.
They weren't allowed to vote for the ANC, which most of thems supported.
Same thing in Israel. Until they let Hamas and Fatah send delegates to the Knesset, it isn't "Democracy".
Israel is a fascist, apartheid state; masquerading as a democracy, much like the old South Africa.
How many blacks could vote in apartheid South Africa?
How many Arabs can vote in Israel?
Actually, both states maintained the illusion of democracy. South Africa had a whole scheme of "homelands" for the blacks where they were allowed to vote for the approved house candidates.
They weren't allowed to vote for the ANC, which most of thems supported.
Same thing in Israel. Until they let Hamas and Fatah send delegates to the Knesset, it isn't "Democracy".
So now you want to control the discussion based on your definition of a word.Your argument is void as per definition of 'apartheid'.
So now you want to control the discussion based on your definition of a word.Your argument is void as per definition of 'apartheid'.
Typical zionist tactics and double talk.
What you did now is called, An ad hominem in philosophy.So now you want to control the discussion based on your definition of a word.
Typical zionist tactics and double talk.
Iran has threatened Israel.
Israel has never declared to wipe Iranians off the map.
But Khomeini and Ahmadinejad have said that the occupying regime (Israel) must be wiped off the map because they can't compromise over the issues of Palestine.
Israel has every right to protect it's people.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mScWWtRfGQ"]Ahmadinejad DID NOT threaten to "wipe Israel off the map." - YouTube[/ame]
You are a perfect example of why trying to deal with the Zionists who rule Israel is futile.So now you want to control the discussion based on your definition of a word.Your argument is void as per definition of 'apartheid'.
Typical zionist tactics and double talk.
My definition ? Well it's mine definition and the online dictionary's
apartheid - definition of apartheid by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
Do you disagree with the definition?
What you did now is called, An ad hominem in philosophy.So now you want to control the discussion based on your definition of a word.
Typical zionist tactics and double talk.
It means that you are attempting to negate the truth of a claim by pointing out a negative characteristic or belief of the person supporting it.
Ad hominem reasoning is normally described as a logical fallacy.
Basically it is a logic fail because your statement has nothing to do with the claim i made and nothing to do with the definition of the word 'apartheid'.
You are claiming that I'm wrong because i employ 'Zionist tactics' which is irrelevant.
How many blacks could vote in apartheid South Africa?
How many Arabs can vote in Israel?
Actually, both states maintained the illusion of democracy. South Africa had a whole scheme of "homelands" for the blacks where they were allowed to vote for the approved house candidates.
They weren't allowed to vote for the ANC, which most of thems supported.
Same thing in Israel. Until they let Hamas and Fatah send delegates to the Knesset, it isn't "Democracy".
Why not answer my questions?
What you are saying is simply false.
By half of the population i presume you talk about the Palestinians.
Palestinians are not citizens of Israel, nor they want to be.
There is no conceivable reason why people who are not citizens of the country should have a say in how the country is governed.
Your logic may apply to any democratic country , one can say France is not a democratic country because people from Zimbabwe are not allowed to vote in France.
Actually, both states maintained the illusion of democracy. South Africa had a whole scheme of "homelands" for the blacks where they were allowed to vote for the approved house candidates.
They weren't allowed to vote for the ANC, which most of thems supported.
Same thing in Israel. Until they let Hamas and Fatah send delegates to the Knesset, it isn't "Democracy".
Why not answer my questions?
I did. Have someone help you with the big words.
