It is the forced expulsion of legal residents of Jerusalem, who most likely resided there prior to Israel's occupation and who committed no crime.How are you going to transfer a large group of people without concentrating them in one place? This is a forced transfer of people not voluntary migration.
It is not a concentration camp.
They are not held anywhere, prevented from working, traveling, getting food, and they are not being killed.
The issue is: is it right to punish innocent people simply because they are related to one who committed a crime.
More likely to be recent migrants from elsewhere living in Jewish owned property stolen in 1949, or do you deny the truth when it shows that the Jews were the victims.
To answer your question was it right to punish the 1 million or so Jews who were illegally expelled from their homelands and property because the Jews in Israel beat the crap out of the invading arab muslim arab league armies and ended up with more land that they expected. If you think that it was right to do this then it must also be right for Israel to deport the terrorists, pro terrorists and terrorist enablers to safeguard the Children in Israel
I've repeatedly said forced expulsions are not right. Now, can you actually address the topic at hand - is it right to expel innocent people?
I did by showing that in 1949 the Palestinians were instrumental in forcibly evicting 1 million Jews or so from their lands and properties because other Jews had given the arab league a bloody nose. It wasn't a case of handing over a legal edict to move from your house, it was done with force of arms and many people were murdered in the process. Girls raped by the arab muslim hordes and the men beaten. Any possessions of value stolen by the muslims.
Now was it right to expel these people from their homes in Jerusalem and the west bank because of the war started by the arab muslims. Is it right to expel people believed to be engaged in the planning of terrorist attacks on the Isreali people, or of having information and not disclosing it. Hardly what you would call innocents
I'll ask it again - is it right to expel innocent people? IE - the families, including children, of someone who committed a crime?
If they are truly innocent NO, but if they knew then they are not innocent and moving them away from where they are not a danger is better than arresting them and giving them custodial sentences.
So is it wrong to reclaim your property from the scum that stole it in 1949 if it means they suffer slightly in the process ?