RoccoR
Gold Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 11,936
- 3,553
georgephillip, et al,
Not to worry, my cappuccino is the most dynamic to be found anywhere in the National Security environment.
LINK --->
(IMPORTANT POINTS)
(COMMENT)
Now, one might think that the pro-ObL/Palestinian might be just a bit more appreciative of America, now that we've personally escorted him to that great meeting with his deity and maker. And we will, without question, offer the same travel arrangements to any one that want to be an ObL follower in the jihad against America.
Americans already know that whatever the troubles might be in the region, from the smallest coffee spill to the largest Arab initiated war, people like ObL will never accept any responsibility for the dilemma or catastrophe; unable to assume the consequences for their actions. ObL and the Palestinian mimic each other, parroting the same complaints and accusations. The fact that ObL is used as a reference to support the Palestinian cause, is a bit foolish and counterproductive; and for most American, reason enough to challenge any position ObL might find as just cause for attacking America.
The pro-Palestinian cause would do well to step as far away from any connection, association or causal connection they might make between ObL and the Arab/Palestinian jihadist justification against the State of Israel. It will only muddy the waters.
There is nothing that ObL stood for, no Muslim cause he promoted, that will not be despised by America; merely through association. If ObL claimed the sky was blue, Americans would have to check.
I recommend you use a different Muslim patron saint, something cleaner than ObL. His justification was beyond the limit of a reasonable man's acceptance. And just as association with al-Qaeda is problematic relative to Syria, trying to use ObL radical fundamentalism to the issue is even worse.
The mere fact that ObL supported the Palestinian cause and used it as justification to attack America is reason enough to assume the Palestinian has no just cause whatsoever.
Most Respectfully,
R
Not to worry, my cappuccino is the most dynamic to be found anywhere in the National Security environment.
(REFERENCE)
LINK --->
(IMPORTANT POINTS)
- Being able to control violence, is not the same thing as being a "purveyor."
- Being able to focus violence, is not the same as being a "purveyor."
- Being able to use focused violence to counter uncontrolled violence, is not the same as being a "purveyor."
Osama bin Laden (ObL) expressed himself as a defender against a great evil. ObL sees his movement as an instrument of his deity --- given the authority to fight the "unbeliever."
ObL fought against America because (in his words): "Because you attacked us and continue to attack us." And with that premise, ObL lists several places where America has attacked the interests he fought to protect: Somalia and Kashmir are noted.
ObL accuses the US of stealing wealth and oil; spreading military bases; starving the Muslims of Iraq (also using the victimization of children as an example). But very first issue ObL points to is Palestine.
ObL accuses the US of attacking them (meaning Muslims) in Palestine "to protect the security of the Jews and to ensure the continuity of your pillage of our treasures." THEN, the accusation goes on to point out that America is responsible for "Jewish aggression against us in Lebanon."
ObL fought against America because (in his words): "Because you attacked us and continue to attack us." And with that premise, ObL lists several places where America has attacked the interests he fought to protect: Somalia and Kashmir are noted.
ObL accuses the US of stealing wealth and oil; spreading military bases; starving the Muslims of Iraq (also using the victimization of children as an example). But very first issue ObL points to is Palestine.
ObL accuses the US of attacking them (meaning Muslims) in Palestine "to protect the security of the Jews and to ensure the continuity of your pillage of our treasures." THEN, the accusation goes on to point out that America is responsible for "Jewish aggression against us in Lebanon."
(COMMENT)
Now, one might think that the pro-ObL/Palestinian might be just a bit more appreciative of America, now that we've personally escorted him to that great meeting with his deity and maker. And we will, without question, offer the same travel arrangements to any one that want to be an ObL follower in the jihad against America.
Americans already know that whatever the troubles might be in the region, from the smallest coffee spill to the largest Arab initiated war, people like ObL will never accept any responsibility for the dilemma or catastrophe; unable to assume the consequences for their actions. ObL and the Palestinian mimic each other, parroting the same complaints and accusations. The fact that ObL is used as a reference to support the Palestinian cause, is a bit foolish and counterproductive; and for most American, reason enough to challenge any position ObL might find as just cause for attacking America.
The pro-Palestinian cause would do well to step as far away from any connection, association or causal connection they might make between ObL and the Arab/Palestinian jihadist justification against the State of Israel. It will only muddy the waters.
There is nothing that ObL stood for, no Muslim cause he promoted, that will not be despised by America; merely through association. If ObL claimed the sky was blue, Americans would have to check.
I recommend you use a different Muslim patron saint, something cleaner than ObL. His justification was beyond the limit of a reasonable man's acceptance. And just as association with al-Qaeda is problematic relative to Syria, trying to use ObL radical fundamentalism to the issue is even worse.
The mere fact that ObL supported the Palestinian cause and used it as justification to attack America is reason enough to assume the Palestinian has no just cause whatsoever.
Most Respectfully,
R
