okfine
Diamond Member
I wouldn't give you any credit where it comes to "claims"And none of you wimps will get behind your claims.
All bluster and nothing else.
Your worthless spew amounts to zilch.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wouldn't give you any credit where it comes to "claims"And none of you wimps will get behind your claims.
All bluster and nothing else.
There are reasons to question the 2020 election, you're just so devoted to your party that you can't even fathom it.It's anti-democratic to refuse to accept the results of an election merely because you don't like the outcome. And most of see Trump's baseless claims as just: Sore loserism and nothing more.
Tell that to Hillary who still says Trump was an illegitimate POTUS.It's anti-democratic to refuse to accept the results of an election merely because you don't like the outcome. And most of see Trump's baseless claims as just: Sore loserism and nothing more.
No, there is not. A 1-68 record says there is not.There are reasons to question the 2020 election, you're just so devoted to your party that you can't even fathom it.
I'm talking about the right to question US elections in general. It should be allowed. Your leaders say it shouldn't (but only from January 2020 until now)This is a clean topic. It is your topic, and it can be answered, 'yes, but have evidence this time.'
What "truth"? You made a prediction based on your own allegiance to your party. That's not truth.. that's boring content that nobody cares about.The truth hurts, am I right?
Yes, sir, it should be allowed. Have evidence this time, hmmm?I'm talking about the right to question US elections in general. It should be allowed. Your leaders say it shouldn't (but only from January 2020 until now)
Do you agree?
And if you do, what do you have to say for Hillary in 2016, Stacey Abrams in Georgia, and Bush in 2000?
Take a stand.
No, there aren't. You're deluded. Period.There are reasons to question the 2020 election,
Yeah, yeah, yeah. You presume I'm a Democratic because, in your stilted, idiotic view of the world, everyone who doesn't abide Trump is a Democrat.you're just so devoted to your party that you can't even fathom it.
Look in the mirror. You have provided zero proof against what I posted. If you want a biased and unfounded circle jerk you should have stated that in your OP.What "truth"? You made a prediction based on your own allegiance to your party. That's not truth.. that's boring content that nobody cares about.
I'm happy to discuss the topic, but if you're just here to whine and make baseless claims.. leave. No need to act like a child here.
If you can't demand transparency and strict rules for a federal election when CAN you demand this? You are opening up the door to a Police State, authoritarian system in which the government is above the citizens. The exact opposite incarnation of a a Republic,.I keep hearing this authoritarian narrative from Democrats (only after they took power) that it is anti-democracy to question any US election.
Now, ignoring the fact they called Trump an illegitimate president and discredited his presidency for 3+ years calling it stolen by the Russians.... that's a very stupid thing to say.
Republicans AND Democrats should challenge elections if they are shady or fraudulent. If either side abuses their power to sway an election, they should be called out on it and held responsible. If today's Democrats had their way, there would be no such thing as any abuse of power in elections.
So, yes. Challenge elections if they are objectively sketchy... that goes for everyone.
Maybe when you're not throwing a fit (like a five year old) because you lost.If you can't demand transparency and strict rules for a federal election when CAN you demand this?
Proof he doesn't know what a debate is.This is a clean topic. It is your topic, and it can be answered, 'yes, but have evidence this time.'
I wouldn't give you any credit where it comes to "claims"
Your worthless spew amounts to zilch.
You are having a hard time, bucko. Hah!Yes, we get it.
You are a coward too.
No shit! the Left still snivel and whine about the 2000 election where Al Snore lost. Hell, they probably even whined in 84 when Reagan committed the Election Day Massacre of Walter Effing Mondull.I'm talking about the right to question US elections in general. It should be allowed. Your leaders say it shouldn't (but only from January 2020 until now)
Do you agree?
And if you do, what do you have to say for Hillary in 2016, Stacey Abrams in Georgia, and Bush in 2000?
Take a stand.
No, seems you Dems are having a hard time the last several days. And yes, elections can certainly be questioned regardless of your side's hyperventilating whenever the other side does so.You are having a hard time, bucko. Hah!
You are mistaken. Not a dem and sure as fuck not a MAGAtard, like you.No, seems you Dems are having a hard time the last several days. And yes, elections can certainly be questioned regardless of your side's hyperventilating whenever the other side does so.
My OP was to both Republicans and Democrats. Reread if you need to. Your post had no substance that I can respond to. If you want chesty flaming, go to the trash forum. Stop taking up space with angry, temper tantrums.Look in the mirror. You have provided zero proof against what I posted. If you want a biased and unfounded circle jerk you should have stated that in your OP.