It looks like Trump fired Preet Barrarah because Veselnitskaya asked him to

You hang on to that thought as long as you can. Unless Trump can come up with a valid reason for firing him, it's gonna be hard not to believe it was just to please his Russian overlords.
Bharara got fired along with all the other Obama hold-overs. Trump doesn't need an excuse to fire him. No president ever has.

Just admit that you're an idiot and your life will be a lot easier.
Trump's Personal Lawyer Bragged That He Got US Attorney Preet Bharara Fired
Preet was fired at the same time as every other Obama holdover was fired.
Preet WAS ALREADY TOLD, he would be kept on by the Trump administration as prosecutor in the southern district of NY by both President Trump and Jeff Sessions, in person, just a month or so before he was fired.
Trump was advised that keeping him around wasn't a good idea, so he changed his mind. Keeping any lying, backstabbing Obama-appointed piece of shit is a mistake.
Bad timing, it was also about him?
 
It's standard for settlements to include a clause stating no admission of guilt. Without that, the plaintiff can pursue further legal action.

It's standard for people who know nothing about law to shut the F up.
 
I don't get why the lawyer wanted to talk to Don Jr. and gang about adoption laws in the first place when they were in no position to do anything about it.

This is where the background comes in handy.
Russian lawyer sergei magnitsky was exposing Russian money laundering, and wound up dead.
Congress blamed Putin, and passed the magnitsky act

Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012, is a bipartisan bill passed by the U.S. Congress and signed by President Obama in November–December 2012, intending to punish Russian officials responsible for the death of Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitsky in a Moscow prison in 2009.

In response to the sanctions the act imposed, Vladimir Putin stopped the adoption of Russian babies by US citizens.

The Russian lawyer has been trying to get the Magnitsky act repealed, or it's effects nullified by executive order.
seems more like, political, "tit for tat".

by prohibiting their entrance to the United States and their use of its banking system

How can that be much of a problem for Persons with money?
 
What difference could it possibly make what a former disgruntled employee has to say?

You hang on to that thought as long as you can. Unless Trump can come up with a valid reason for firing him, it's gonna be hard not to believe it was just to please his Russian overlords.
Bharara got fired along with all the other Obama hold-overs. Trump doesn't need an excuse to fire him. No president ever has.

Just admit that you're an idiot and your life will be a lot easier.
Trump's Personal Lawyer Bragged That He Got US Attorney Preet Bharara Fired
Preet was fired at the same time as every other Obama holdover was fired.
Preet WAS ALREADY TOLD, he would be kept on by the Trump administration as prosecutor in the southern district of NY by both President Trump and Jeff Sessions, in person, just a month or so before he was fired.
------------------------------------------- so what , TRUMP changed his mind and fired mrobamas boy , whats the big deal Care4 ??
 
The Russian lawyer who met Donald Trump Jr. in the Trump Tower represents a firm that was being prosecuted by Preet Barrarah for fraud.

Then Trump becomes President, he fires Barrarah and suddenly (2 months into his presidency) the lawsuit gets settled without Veselnitskaya's client having to admit guilt.

Wall Street Journal (7-15-2017): In 2014, Preet Bharara, the U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, alleged that Prevezon laundered defrauded money from Mr. Browder’s fund into U.S. bank accounts and Manhattan real estate. Earlier this year, U.S. authorities and Prevezon reached a $5.9 million civil settlement. The company didn’t admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement.

Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee this week asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions whether the Trump Tower meeting was in any way connected to the settlement, which came two months after President Trump fired Mr. Bharara.

The plot thickens.


Here's a better analysis of the plot.

Clue: the Obabble Admin, Clinton Family Crime Syndicate, and the Dems were the ones who were actually colluding witht the Russians

Articles: The Russian Collusion Story: The Acme of Fake News
Collusion is the more political aspect; conflicts of interest are the capital aspect.


Capital Aspect? Link to where meeting with a source to get Oppostition Reserach during a Political Campaign qualifies as a conflict of interest for someone who is not even an elected official?
 
It's standard for settlements to include a clause stating no admission of guilt. Without that, the plaintiff can pursue further legal action.

It's standard for people who know nothing about law to shut the F up.
I'm not the one claiming that not admitting guilt is something unusual, you fucking douche bag snow flake. I also never claimed to be a legal expert, as the one I just described above did. You should start worrying about the idiots in your own camp before they make complete asses of themselves.
 
Why don't your speculative wheels turn when it involves a Democrat? Like for instance the shocking number of 'suicides' of people with damaging evidence against the Clintons? If you are going to play the connect the dots game, do it for both sides.
 
seems more like, political, "tit for tat".

by prohibiting their entrance to the United States and their use of its banking system

How can that be much of a problem for Persons with money?

Sanctions can be a real burden. Such as how do you get top dollar for conflict "aka blood" diamonds, or dirty money? If you can funnel it through a legitimate source, they become clean enough to sell at face value.
 
The Russian lawyer who met Donald Trump Jr. in the Trump Tower represents a firm that was being prosecuted by Preet Barrarah for fraud.

Then Trump becomes President, he fires Barrarah and suddenly (2 months into his presidency) the lawsuit gets settled without Veselnitskaya's client having to admit guilt.

Wall Street Journal (7-15-2017): In 2014, Preet Bharara, the U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, alleged that Prevezon laundered defrauded money from Mr. Browder’s fund into U.S. bank accounts and Manhattan real estate. Earlier this year, U.S. authorities and Prevezon reached a $5.9 million civil settlement. The company didn’t admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement.

Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee this week asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions whether the Trump Tower meeting was in any way connected to the settlement, which came two months after President Trump fired Mr. Bharara.

The plot thickens.


Here's a better analysis of the plot.

Clue: the Obabble Admin, Clinton Family Crime Syndicate, and the Dems were the ones who were actually colluding witht the Russians

Articles: The Russian Collusion Story: The Acme of Fake News
Collusion is the more political aspect; conflicts of interest are the capital aspect.


Capital Aspect? Link to where meeting with a source to get Oppostition Reserach during a Political Campaign qualifies as a conflict of interest for someone who is not even an elected official?
It is about conflicts of interest. Mr. Trump has no problem making himself richer and the poor, poorer, by Institutional means.
 
seems more like, political, "tit for tat".

by prohibiting their entrance to the United States and their use of its banking system

How can that be much of a problem for Persons with money?

Sanctions can be a real burden. Such as how do you get top dollar for conflict "aka blood" diamonds, or dirty money? If you can funnel it through a legitimate source, they become clean enough to sell at face value.
Is this a trick question? Attorneys know about powers of attorney.
 
Yeah a dime store fantasy of lies and conjecture, YOU HAVE NOTHING WHATSOEVER BUT FANTASY!! The LAST CHAPTER IS MUCH CLOSER THAN YOU KNOW!!

I have a $224 million windfall, or what I might call payoff to the company represented by the same lawyer, who offered Russian government help to elect Donald Trump. Carried out by the folks at DOJ that Trump put in place to get Prett Bharara out of the way, making the deal possible.

Whether it's a "windfall" depends on the strength of the case. Your assumption that everyone Obama prosecuted was guilty is so beautifully liberal, but hardly in keeping with American notions of justice.
 
The Russian lawyer who met Donald Trump Jr. in the Trump Tower represents a firm that was being prosecuted by Preet Barrarah for fraud.

Then Trump becomes President, he fires Barrarah and suddenly (2 months into his presidency) the lawsuit gets settled without Veselnitskaya's client having to admit guilt.

Wall Street Journal (7-15-2017): In 2014, Preet Bharara, the U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, alleged that Prevezon laundered defrauded money from Mr. Browder’s fund into U.S. bank accounts and Manhattan real estate. Earlier this year, U.S. authorities and Prevezon reached a $5.9 million civil settlement. The company didn’t admit wrongdoing as part of the settlement.

Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee this week asked Attorney General Jeff Sessions whether the Trump Tower meeting was in any way connected to the settlement, which came two months after President Trump fired Mr. Bharara.

The plot thickens.


Here's a better analysis of the plot.

Clue: the Obabble Admin, Clinton Family Crime Syndicate, and the Dems were the ones who were actually colluding witht the Russians

Articles: The Russian Collusion Story: The Acme of Fake News
Collusion is the more political aspect; conflicts of interest are the capital aspect.


Capital Aspect? Link to where meeting with a source to get Oppostition Reserach during a Political Campaign qualifies as a conflict of interest for someone who is not even an elected official?
It is about conflicts of interest. Mr. Trump has no problem making himself richer and the poor, poorer, by Institutional means.


Just because you have the FEELZ about something doesn't make it true.
 
More stupid shit, you liberals do not know a damn thing about any of these things, yet you make predictions and runoff at the keyboard like little children pissing on each other, HAHAHAHAHAHHA. comedy is going good today with all of the dumbest jesters showing their foolishness. Keep the laughs coming. before you hit the dirt.
 
It's standard for settlements to include a clause stating no admission of guilt. Without that, the plaintiff can pursue further legal action.


I'm not the one claiming that not admitting guilt is something unusual, you fucking douche bag snow flake. .

It's not about it being usual or not, but you said that it's done to prevent being sued for the same thing a second time.

That's stupid on so many levels. Your complete legal ignorance is bound by stare decisis
 
You hang on to that thought as long as you can. Unless Trump can come up with a valid reason for firing him, it's gonna be hard not to believe it was just to please his Russian overlords.
Bharara got fired along with all the other Obama hold-overs. Trump doesn't need an excuse to fire him. No president ever has.

Just admit that you're an idiot and your life will be a lot easier.
Trump's Personal Lawyer Bragged That He Got US Attorney Preet Bharara Fired
Preet was fired at the same time as every other Obama holdover was fired.
Preet WAS ALREADY TOLD, he would be kept on by the Trump administration as prosecutor in the southern district of NY by both President Trump and Jeff Sessions, in person, just a month or so before he was fired.
------------------------------------------- so what , TRUMP changed his mind and fired mrobamas boy , whats the big deal Care4 ??
the connection between hiring him, then finding out the Russian government Lady Lawyer that Junior, Manafort, and Kushner met with for dirt on Hillary or the DNC ...

needed the money laundering Russian firm she was defending in court with Preet Bhahara overseeing prosecution, settled out of court so not to bring bad publicity against the Russians and ultimately President Trump....

AND Trump obliged, by firing Preet and then getting Sessions to make the NYC Russian case trial go away! dirty dirty dirty!

This lady Russian govt lawyer, after finding out they were able to settle for only 6 million vs the nearly 250 million, said IT WAS A HUGE MONETARY GIFT for her clients!!!!
 
needed the money laundering Russian firm she was defending in court with Preet Bhahara overseeing prosecution, settled out of court so not to bring bad publicity against the Russians and ultimately President Trump....

It may not be about embarrassment, but a payoff, or quid pro quo for the Russian release of the hacked emails.

Russian government help to get Trump elected is what was offered for the meeting with Trump Jr.

Soon after getting into office, Trump fires the only one standing in the way, and puts Sessions in charge of cutting the $230 million dollar fine, down to $6 million

That's like giving the Russian government $224 million. Easily more than enough to pay back what the release of the emails was worth.
 
Why don't your speculative wheels turn when it involves a Democrat? Like for instance the shocking number of 'suicides' of people with damaging evidence against the Clintons? If you are going to play the connect the dots game, do it for both sides.
Mr. Trump is President of our Republic. It is more Important.
You may recall Bill Clinton was also POTUS and his wife was Secretary of State.
 
seems to me that what needs to happen is that TRUMP needs to be charged and then tried , otherwise everything is just speculation . Until something illegal is PROVEN after going to court it seems to me that TRUMP has the RIGHT to fire this mrobama appointed guy Care4 .
 

Forum List

Back
Top