It’s a good day for babies

Lefties think that anything that benefits children who should be dead is a waste of resources.

Your motto should be "die already; nobody wants you."

Maybe instead of discussing what you think "lefties" think, you should actually talk about what they say.

Frankly, I'd love to see no abortions. Most of them are unnecessary.

But until people having sex get smarter about who they have sex with and we as a society fairly compensate working people for their labor, you are going to have abortion... period.

Instead of trying to ban abortion - which never, ever works- you should try to encourage alternatives.

Sure it works. It worked for a really long time. We're where we are now because of "alternative" lifestyles. That certainly worked out well for everyone, didn't it?
 

So those women will drive a couple hours to get to Minnesota and have their abortions there...

Or doctors will just keep performing them, and write something else down on the chart.

The problem with an abortion ban is that with HIPPA in place, it becomes a practical impossibility.

It would be nice if WIngnuts spent as much time worrying about the babies that are already here that they do worrying about fetuses.

Sooooo.... Poodle, since you are all for babies, you won't whine about expanding Medicaid to make sure the poor ones are covered, right?

Conservatives are against welfare spending for the poor, even though most of the money goes to the kids of those welfare recipients. It's like they want to see these kids without a roof over their head or without any food to eat.
 

So those women will drive a couple hours to get to Minnesota and have their abortions there...

Or doctors will just keep performing them, and write something else down on the chart.

The problem with an abortion ban is that with HIPPA in place, it becomes a practical impossibility.

It would be nice if WIngnuts spent as much time worrying about the babies that are already here that they do worrying about fetuses.

Sooooo.... Poodle, since you are all for babies, you won't whine about expanding Medicaid to make sure the poor ones are covered, right?

Conservatives are against welfare spending for the poor, even though most of the money goes to the kids of those welfare recipients. It's like they want to see these kids without a roof over their head or without any food to eat.

You know your just an asshole.
 
It'll be overturned. You cannot force a woman to give birth to a baby which has a genetic illness, like Down's. Unless you want to give her a portion of your wages so she can pay for the medical treatments, special schooling etc for that child?
That is why we have OBAMA Care! Or should we just let women with breast cancer die for the very same reason you wish to dump a baby with a medical problem?
 
So those women will drive a couple hours to get to Minnesota and have their abortions there...

Or doctors will just keep performing them, and write something else down on the chart.

The problem with an abortion ban is that with HIPPA in place, it becomes a practical impossibility.

It would be nice if WIngnuts spent as much time worrying about the babies that are already here that they do worrying about fetuses.

Sooooo.... Poodle, since you are all for babies, you won't whine about expanding Medicaid to make sure the poor ones are covered, right?

Conservatives are against welfare spending for the poor, even though most of the money goes to the kids of those welfare recipients. It's like they want to see these kids without a roof over their head or without any food to eat.

You know your just an asshole.
My guess is that according to the Gay marrige agenda, you two should consider getting married....:razz:
 
Last edited:
[

American workers make a fuck-load of money. If anything, we desperately need to cut their salaries. It was greedy, lazy union liberals like JoeB. here who collapsed Hostess and GM and have Ford and Chrysler on the brink of collapse as well.

Unions didn't destroy Hostess.

What destroyed Hostess was the hedge funds that bought it didn't invest the profits into upgrading equipment, processes and markets. They just figured they could keep operating as they had.

Same with the Auto INdustry. It wasn't the union guy making a fair wage, it was the executive making an obscene wage for making awful decisions.

God damn, Poodle, read a few business publications.

God damn parasite, learn to read anything (guarantee you've never even seen a business publication). Once again, I expose you for the ignorant asshole that you are. Here are the facts you dumb little monkey...

We are sorry to announce that Hostess Brands, Inc. has been forced by a Bakers Union strike to shut down all operations and sell all company assets

Hostess Brands is Closed
 
[

American workers make a fuck-load of money. If anything, we desperately need to cut their salaries. It was greedy, lazy union liberals like JoeB. here who collapsed Hostess and GM and have Ford and Chrysler on the brink of collapse as well.

Unions didn't destroy Hostess.

What destroyed Hostess was the hedge funds that bought it didn't invest the profits into upgrading equipment, processes and markets. They just figured they could keep operating as they had.

Same with the Auto INdustry. It wasn't the union guy making a fair wage, it was the executive making an obscene wage for making awful decisions.

God damn, Poodle, read a few business publications.

God damn parasite, learn to read anything (guarantee you've never even seen a business publication). Once again, I expose you for the ignorant asshole that you are. Here are the facts you dumb little monkey...

We are sorry to announce that Hostess Brands, Inc. has been forced by a Bakers Union strike to shut down all operations and sell all company assets

Hostess Brands is Closed

No matter how much JoeB. lies, I'll be right here embarrassing him with the facts... :dance:
 
What about women?

Not only women, but every citizen of North Dakota will have his privacy rights undermined, and abortions will continue regardless the law.

The fundamental stupidity of those opposed to privacy rights is they jeopardize each American's civil liberties while doing nothing to actually end the practice of abortion.

Well, murder continues all over the U.S., so by your "logic" we should legalize murder... :cuckoo:

You see, this is where you are sort of stupid.

The point is, murder laws are enforceable. You put a murderer in front of a jury, and a jury will convict him if the evidence is good. Heck, sometimes we even convict people of murders they didn't commit if they are poor and their lawyers are incompetant. Which you're fine with, I guess. Fucking Poor People.

But abortion. Never, ever going to get a conviction. Not with 50 million women who've had at least one.

Again- before Roe v. Wade, how often were women arrested for having abortions? Never. Didn't happen, because they knew they couldn't get convictions. You certainly aren't going to get convictions after it's been legal for 40 years.

In short, there's no benefit to outlawing abortion, because the laws are going to be unenforceable. People will openly break them.
 
[

God damn parasite, learn to read anything (guarantee you've never even seen a business publication). Once again, I expose you for the ignorant asshole that you are. Here are the facts you dumb little monkey...

We are sorry to announce that Hostess Brands, Inc. has been forced by a Bakers Union strike to shut down all operations and sell all company assets
]

Okay, guy.. that's what the Hedge fund said.

Here's the real story. From FORBES no less, the holy book of Corporate scumsuckers.

Who Killed Hostess Brands and Twinkies? - Forbes

More than a few observers say they know who to blame for the demise of the iconic company: the Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International union, which represents thousands of striking Hostess Brand workers who have refused to accept a new contract that would do everything from slash their salaries to their retirement benefits.

Hostess has been sold at least three times since the 1980s, racking up debt and shedding profitable assets along the way with each successive merger. The company filed for bankruptcy in 2004, and again in 2011. Little thought was given to the line of products, which, frankly, began to seem a bit dated in the age of the gourmet cupcake. ..

As if all this were not enough, Hostess Brands’ management gave themselves several raises, all the while complaining that the workers who actually produced the products that made the firm what money it did earn were grossly overpaid relative to the company’s increasingly dismal financial position.


Ooops. Corporate Greed. Hostess got "Romneyed"!
 
[

Actually, I've been covering this in another thread. No - I'm not ok with any government care. Those people (both the man and the woman) created the baby, they should be forced to care for it. If they don't do it properly, they are placed in prison for child neglect and put on a chain gang 12 hours per day, 7 days a week repairing roads, bridges, etc. The money we save on that goes to the government programs to provide for the child. Problem solved!

And a win-win. You in particular are always crying about "infrastructure". Imagine how impeccable our roads and bridges could be if we put the millions and millions of prisoners to work?

Good grief, so you want to treat women like criminals? Why do you hate women so much?

Good Question. Poodle seems full of a lot of hate.
 
Well, actually stupid - it goes FAR beyond the economics (though those can easily be met). If you make it miserable enough, people will realize that living off the system sucks horribly and will prefer working a job and providing for children themselves.

And I love your crying, baby-like "heartless" shit. Yeah, it's sooooo "heartless" to demand that people who create a child actually take care of that child :cuckoo:

You're truly a fucking imbecile, even among fucking imbeciles.... :lol:

Why is it you idiots can always find money to lock people up, but when it comes to educating them or taking care of their medical expenses, you can't be bothered?

We lock up 2 million people when most other industrialized countries- you know, the ones with socialized medicine and gun control- lock up less than 100,000. Yet we have the highest crime rate in the industrialized world.

Now, even accepting that you hate minorities, women, poor people, working people and C'Thulhu knows who else, are you really incapable of understanding problems practically?
 
BTW, noomi, ppl adopt special needs children every single day.

Given the choice between a special needs child and an able bodied child, the majority would choose the able bodied child.

You don't have children do you?

Cold water must run through you,your compassion is outstanding.
2 families with special needs kids our our best friends,they would never traded thier child for a better model,you people are some sick sick fuckers.
 

So those women will drive a couple hours to get to Minnesota and have their abortions there...

Or doctors will just keep performing them, and write something else down on the chart.

The problem with an abortion ban is that with HIPPA in place, it becomes a practical impossibility.

It would be nice if WIngnuts spent as much time worrying about the babies that are already here that they do worrying about fetuses.

Sooooo.... Poodle, since you are all for babies, you won't whine about expanding Medicaid to make sure the poor ones are covered, right?

Conservatives are against welfare spending for the poor, even though most of the money goes to the kids of those welfare recipients. It's like they want to see these kids without a roof over their head or without any food to eat.

Whereas progressives want to kill them.

Hm...self sufficiency, vs death....which would you choose?
 
Well, actually stupid - it goes FAR beyond the economics (though those can easily be met). If you make it miserable enough, people will realize that living off the system sucks horribly and will prefer working a job and providing for children themselves.

And I love your crying, baby-like "heartless" shit. Yeah, it's sooooo "heartless" to demand that people who create a child actually take care of that child :cuckoo:

You're truly a fucking imbecile, even among fucking imbeciles.... :lol:

Why is it you idiots can always find money to lock people up, but when it comes to educating them or taking care of their medical expenses, you can't be bothered?

We lock up 2 million people when most other industrialized countries- you know, the ones with socialized medicine and gun control- lock up less than 100,000. Yet we have the highest crime rate in the industrialized world.

Now, even accepting that you hate minorities, women, poor people, working people and C'Thulhu knows who else, are you really incapable of understanding problems practically?

Oh here we go..the flip side of the progressive nut agenda...
Kill babies.

Make drugs legal.

Release the criminals.

Sounds like a regular utopia.
 
It'll be overturned. You cannot force a woman to give birth to a baby which has a genetic illness, like Down's. Unless you want to give her a portion of your wages so she can pay for the medical treatments, special schooling etc for that child?
That is why we have OBAMA Care! Or should we just let women with breast cancer die for the very same reason you wish to dump a baby with a medical problem?

Is there really any difference?
 
They might as well have spent all that time and money renaming the moon new North Dakota. It's about as useful as this bill, which we all know will be struck down.

At the end of the day what did they accomplish? A nice new campagin slogan but nothig that will benifit anyone.

Really Nostradamus? I'm so glad we have you here to tell us the future.

One thing though - for some reason your crystal ball must have been in the repair shop in 2010, cause you sure as hell missed that epic ass-kicking the GOP gave liberals in the November 2010 mid-term :lol:

How did the 2012 Presidential and Congressional Elections work for you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top