It's easier to condemn homosexuality

[Faun]

He's talking about degrees and you're talking gender.

Nice epic fail, perv23.

No, not sure you get it nanny goat guy.

Simply put, Iowa law prohibits all forms of affinity marriage, but allows certain kinds of blood marriages, regardless of degree, because bonehead justices changed one part of Iowa 595 while remaining silent on 595.19.

Found a legal expert to back your silly notions yet?

I have

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

And backed that up with:

From Cpaatlaw.com:

The state of Iowa chose to remain silent on this question; its statute declares as void any marriage between "a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter" (and vice versa) in Iowa Code Ann. § 595.19. The court in Varnum v. Brien did not mention 595.19 or consanguinity and the legislature has not updated the statute since. As such, Iowa has seen fit to allow close same-sex relatives to marry; accordingly, an unmarried woman can marry her daughter and pass wealth to her tax free.

Two attorneys against one troll.

Glad I could, once again.........

KICK YOUR TROLL ASS!

Oh, I get it alright.

You think an attorney who's discussing degrees of consanguinity and not gender is corroborating your insanity that two family members of the same gender can marry each other.

You think the state of Iowa prohibits a man from marrying his brother-in-law but not his biological brother.

You think a law which describes who is ineligible to marry is the same law which describes which marriages are void.

You think family members would marry each other to avoid paying taxes but can't find a single couple who did so.

And lastly, for you to swallow all of the above idiocy, you have to ignore Iowa law which bans ALL marriages within degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

See? I get it exactly.

Now show the refernced degrees

Do you not understand what your talking about? Or why iowa chose to add definition. The attorneys do.

But who are they to argue with a dipshit Internet troll such as you?

Degrees of consanguinity have nothing at all to do with gender.
Now ya know.

yippee skippy!

Now, care to provide any evidence that conflict with the 5 legal experts and two web resources I've supplied dozens of times indicating that same sex closely related family members can Marry in Iowa?

Or are you going to continue this charade?

Charade continues is 3.....2.....1

As you've been shown, 5 attorneys don't agree with you. Hell, one of them wasn't even addressing your lunatic claims.

And again, no attorney's opinion dismisses Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

 

[Pop23]

No, not sure you get it nanny goat guy.

Simply put, Iowa law prohibits all forms of affinity marriage, but allows certain kinds of blood marriages, regardless of degree, because bonehead justices changed one part of Iowa 595 while remaining silent on 595.19.

Found a legal expert to back your silly notions yet?

I have

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

And backed that up with:

From Cpaatlaw.com:

The state of Iowa chose to remain silent on this question; its statute declares as void any marriage between "a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter" (and vice versa) in Iowa Code Ann. § 595.19. The court in Varnum v. Brien did not mention 595.19 or consanguinity and the legislature has not updated the statute since. As such, Iowa has seen fit to allow close same-sex relatives to marry; accordingly, an unmarried woman can marry her daughter and pass wealth to her tax free.

Two attorneys against one troll.

Glad I could, once again.........

KICK YOUR TROLL ASS!

Oh, I get it alright.

You think an attorney who's discussing degrees of consanguinity and not gender is corroborating your insanity that two family members of the same gender can marry each other.

You think the state of Iowa prohibits a man from marrying his brother-in-law but not his biological brother.

You think a law which describes who is ineligible to marry is the same law which describes which marriages are void.

You think family members would marry each other to avoid paying taxes but can't find a single couple who did so.

And lastly, for you to swallow all of the above idiocy, you have to ignore Iowa law which bans ALL marriages within degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

See? I get it exactly.

Now show the refernced degrees

Do you not understand what your talking about? Or why iowa chose to add definition. The attorneys do.

But who are they to argue with a dipshit Internet troll such as you?

Degrees of consanguinity have nothing at all to do with gender.
Now ya know.

yippee skippy!

Now, care to provide any evidence that conflict with the 5 legal experts and two web resources I've supplied dozens of times indicating that same sex closely related family members can Marry in Iowa?

Or are you going to continue this charade?

Charade continues is 3.....2.....1

As you've been shown, 5 attorneys don't agree with you. Hell, one of them wasn't even addressing your lunatic claims.

And again, no attorney's opinion dismisses Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

Key words are " in which prohibited by law"

Iowa 595.19 is the list of those prohibited by law.

Again you lose.

 

[Faun]

Oh, I get it alright.

You think an attorney who's discussing degrees of consanguinity and not gender is corroborating your insanity that two family members of the same gender can marry each other.

You think the state of Iowa prohibits a man from marrying his brother-in-law but not his biological brother.

You think a law which describes who is ineligible to marry is the same law which describes which marriages are void.

You think family members would marry each other to avoid paying taxes but can't find a single couple who did so.

And lastly, for you to swallow all of the above idiocy, you have to ignore Iowa law which bans ALL marriages within degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

See? I get it exactly.

Now show the refernced degrees

Do you not understand what your talking about? Or why iowa chose to add definition. The attorneys do.

But who are they to argue with a dipshit Internet troll such as you?

Degrees of consanguinity have nothing at all to do with gender.
Now ya know.

yippee skippy!

Now, care to provide any evidence that conflict with the 5 legal experts and two web resources I've supplied dozens of times indicating that same sex closely related family members can Marry in Iowa?

Or are you going to continue this charade?

Charade continues is 3.....2.....1

As you've been shown, 5 attorneys don't agree with you. Hell, one of them wasn't even addressing your lunatic claims.

And again, no attorney's opinion dismisses Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

Key words are " in which prohibited by law"

Iowa 595.19 is the list of those prohibited by law.

Again you lose.

Now you've really fucked yourself, perv...

Show the law you think 595.3 references when it reads, "... affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law."

 

[Pop23]

Now show the refernced degrees

Do you not understand what your talking about? Or why iowa chose to add definition. The attorneys do.

But who are they to argue with a dipshit Internet troll such as you?

Degrees of consanguinity have nothing at all to do with gender.
Now ya know.

yippee skippy!

Now, care to provide any evidence that conflict with the 5 legal experts and two web resources I've supplied dozens of times indicating that same sex closely related family members can Marry in Iowa?

Or are you going to continue this charade?

Charade continues is 3.....2.....1

As you've been shown, 5 attorneys don't agree with you. Hell, one of them wasn't even addressing your lunatic claims.

And again, no attorney's opinion dismisses Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

Key words are " in which prohibited by law"

Iowa 595.19 is the list of those prohibited by law.

Again you lose.

Now you've really fucked yourself, perv...

Show the law you think 595.3 references when it reads, "... affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law."

Try to get that knot you're twisted in straightened out.

1. Affinity marriage is prohibited period. The state made that clear in your own link. It is prohibited in ALL DEGREES.

2. Iowa 595.19 ONLY DEFINES THE BLOOD RELATED (not affinity) MARRIAGES THAT ARE PROHIBITED

Get it dunce.

Dudes so delusional he thinks his opinion outranks 5 legal experts.

Seek mental help soon!

 

[Faun]

Degrees of consanguinity have nothing at all to do with gender.
Now ya know.

yippee skippy!

Now, care to provide any evidence that conflict with the 5 legal experts and two web resources I've supplied dozens of times indicating that same sex closely related family members can Marry in Iowa?

Or are you going to continue this charade?

Charade continues is 3.....2.....1

As you've been shown, 5 attorneys don't agree with you. Hell, one of them wasn't even addressing your lunatic claims.

And again, no attorney's opinion dismisses Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

Key words are " in which prohibited by law"

Iowa 595.19 is the list of those prohibited by law.

Again you lose.

Now you've really fucked yourself, perv...

Show the law you think 595.3 references when it reads, "... affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law."

Try to get that knot you're twisted in straightened out.

1. Affinity marriage is prohibited period. The state made that clear in your own link. It is prohibited in ALL DEGREES.

2. Iowa 595.19 ONLY DEFINES THE BLOOD RELATED (not affinity) MARRIAGES THAT ARE PROHIBITED

Get it dunce.

Dudes so delusional he thinks his opinion outranks 5 legal experts.

Seek mental help soon!

Hisses the forum pervert who thinks Iowa allows biological brothers to marry but not brothers-in-law.

Dumbfuck, you don't even know what those lawyers are saying. Like the one who's talking about degrees of consanguinity but you moronically think he's confirming your idiocy about gender.

And as always, we have Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

Bonus points if you can answer this with even a modicum of sanity... what do you think, in any case, means?

 

[Pop23]

yippee skippy!

Now, care to provide any evidence that conflict with the 5 legal experts and two web resources I've supplied dozens of times indicating that same sex closely related family members can Marry in Iowa?

Or are you going to continue this charade?

Charade continues is 3.....2.....1

As you've been shown, 5 attorneys don't agree with you. Hell, one of them wasn't even addressing your lunatic claims.

And again, no attorney's opinion dismisses Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

Key words are " in which prohibited by law"

Iowa 595.19 is the list of those prohibited by law.

Again you lose.

Now you've really fucked yourself, perv...

Show the law you think 595.3 references when it reads, "... affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law."

Try to get that knot you're twisted in straightened out.

1. Affinity marriage is prohibited period. The state made that clear in your own link. It is prohibited in ALL DEGREES.

2. Iowa 595.19 ONLY DEFINES THE BLOOD RELATED (not affinity) MARRIAGES THAT ARE PROHIBITED

Get it dunce.

Dudes so delusional he thinks his opinion outranks 5 legal experts.

Seek mental help soon!

Hisses the forum pervert who thinks Iowa allows biological brothers to marry but not brothers-in-law.

Dumbfuck, you don't even know what those lawyers are saying. Like the one who's talking about degrees of consanguinity but you moronically think he's confirming your idiocy about gender.

And as always, we have Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

Bonus points if you can answer this with even a modicum of sanity... what do you think, in any case, means?

You're problems are your own. If we use you're rationalization, 595.19 need not exist as it would have no purpose.

Why, if not true, would a liberal Iowa Senator promote a bill to change it? It has no purpose right?

Go for it Skippy.

And for bonus points, clue me in on where the degrees on consanguinity end? Wow! Maybe some definition is in order? LMAO.

Iowa set that in 595.19 with specific pairing. You see that, right?

Or you still gonna try to twist it into something it's not?

Still, I have one attorney that specifically states that if the relationship is not on 595.19 then you are free to marry, and a second confirming the first, being even more specific in his response.

And you, making shit up again.

Again, are you an attorney?

No, then your interpretation of their opinion is worthless

As are you.

 

[Faun]

As you've been shown, 5 attorneys don't agree with you. Hell, one of them wasn't even addressing your lunatic claims.

And again, no attorney's opinion dismisses Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

Key words are " in which prohibited by law"

Iowa 595.19 is the list of those prohibited by law.

Again you lose.

Now you've really fucked yourself, perv...

Show the law you think 595.3 references when it reads, "... affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law."

Try to get that knot you're twisted in straightened out.

1. Affinity marriage is prohibited period. The state made that clear in your own link. It is prohibited in ALL DEGREES.

2. Iowa 595.19 ONLY DEFINES THE BLOOD RELATED (not affinity) MARRIAGES THAT ARE PROHIBITED

Get it dunce.

Dudes so delusional he thinks his opinion outranks 5 legal experts.

Seek mental help soon!

Hisses the forum pervert who thinks Iowa allows biological brothers to marry but not brothers-in-law.

Dumbfuck, you don't even know what those lawyers are saying. Like the one who's talking about degrees of consanguinity but you moronically think he's confirming your idiocy about gender.

And as always, we have Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

Bonus points if you can answer this with even a modicum of sanity... what do you think, in any case, means?

You're problems are your own. If we use you're rationalization, 595.19 need not exist as it would have no purpose.

Why, if not true, would a liberal Iowa Senator promote a bill to change it? It has no purpose right?

Go for it Skippy.

And for bonus points, clue me in on where the degrees on consanguinity end? Wow! Maybe some definition is in order? LMAO.

Iowa set that in 595.19 with specific pairing. You see that, right?

Or you still gonna try to twist it into something it's not?

Still, I have one attorney that specifically states that if the relationship is not on 595.19 then you are free to marry, and a second confirming the first, being even more specific in his response.

And you, making shit up again.

Again, are you an attorney?

No, then your interpretation of their opinion is worthless

As are you.

Figures. Well, no bonus points for you. "In any case," means exactly what it states, in any case. Not "in any case" but consanguineous couples. Not "in any case" but unless they're the same sex.

And again, you're conflating laws. 595.3 doesn't reference 595.19. If it did, it would specify 595.19 just as it specifies 595.2 in subsection (2). And again, 595.3 is about who can legally marry. 595.19 is about which existing marriages are void. And again, the intent of 595.19 is to disolve any consanguineous marriages. The intent of that law doesn't change because a Supreme Court ruling changed the allowable gender makeup of marriages.

And again, this is all echoed by Iowa, which pretty much puts the attorney you found, to shame.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

 

[Pop23]

Key words are " in which prohibited by law"

Iowa 595.19 is the list of those prohibited by law.

Again you lose.

Now you've really fucked yourself, perv...

Show the law you think 595.3 references when it reads, "... affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law."

Try to get that knot you're twisted in straightened out.

1. Affinity marriage is prohibited period. The state made that clear in your own link. It is prohibited in ALL DEGREES.

2. Iowa 595.19 ONLY DEFINES THE BLOOD RELATED (not affinity) MARRIAGES THAT ARE PROHIBITED

Get it dunce.

Dudes so delusional he thinks his opinion outranks 5 legal experts.

Seek mental help soon!

Hisses the forum pervert who thinks Iowa allows biological brothers to marry but not brothers-in-law.

Dumbfuck, you don't even know what those lawyers are saying. Like the one who's talking about degrees of consanguinity but you moronically think he's confirming your idiocy about gender.

And as always, we have Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

Bonus points if you can answer this with even a modicum of sanity... what do you think, in any case, means?

You're problems are your own. If we use you're rationalization, 595.19 need not exist as it would have no purpose.

Why, if not true, would a liberal Iowa Senator promote a bill to change it? It has no purpose right?

Go for it Skippy.

And for bonus points, clue me in on where the degrees on consanguinity end? Wow! Maybe some definition is in order? LMAO.

Iowa set that in 595.19 with specific pairing. You see that, right?

Or you still gonna try to twist it into something it's not?

Still, I have one attorney that specifically states that if the relationship is not on 595.19 then you are free to marry, and a second confirming the first, being even more specific in his response.

And you, making shit up again.

Again, are you an attorney?

No, then your interpretation of their opinion is worthless

As are you.

Figures. Well, no bonus points for you. "In any case," means exactly what it states, in any case. Not "in any case" but consanguineous couples. Not "in any case" but unless they're the same sex.

And again, you're conflating laws. 595.3 doesn't reference 595.19. If it did, it would specify 595.19 just as it specifies 595.2 in subsection (2). And again, 595.3 is about who can legally marry. 595.19 is about which existing marriages are void. And again, the intent of 595.19 is to disolve any consanguineous marriages. The intent of that law doesn't change because a Supreme Court ruling changed the allowable gender makeup of marriages.

And again, this is all echoed by Iowa, which pretty much puts the attorney you found, to shame.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Intent of the law? Tradition? Seriously?

You have failed to reveal the degrees of consanguinity that you claim exists in Iowa law.

What? 1st, 3rd, 6th?

Are we to just guess?

Why?

With blood relatives it goes on and on and on. Biologist would say that we all come from a single blood relative pair, so using an objective veiw, it must have limitations. Plus it applies to bloodlines (the reason blood relatives were punished for sexual intercourse throughout history). With same sex their relationships, sexual or not, does no long term societal damage to the species, and that may be why Iowa kept the controlling list of prohibited pairs as is. We got that messy 14th amendment problem afterall, to deal with.

My question now is, since you have failed to provide any legal expertise to back your foolishness up........

Why do you call the Iowa Supreme Court perverts when they approved Same Sex Marriage, and never ordered changed in 595.19?

 

[Faun]

Now you've really fucked yourself, perv...

Show the law you think 595.3 references when it reads, "... affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law."

Try to get that knot you're twisted in straightened out.

1. Affinity marriage is prohibited period. The state made that clear in your own link. It is prohibited in ALL DEGREES.

2. Iowa 595.19 ONLY DEFINES THE BLOOD RELATED (not affinity) MARRIAGES THAT ARE PROHIBITED

Get it dunce.

Dudes so delusional he thinks his opinion outranks 5 legal experts.

Seek mental help soon!

Hisses the forum pervert who thinks Iowa allows biological brothers to marry but not brothers-in-law.

Dumbfuck, you don't even know what those lawyers are saying. Like the one who's talking about degrees of consanguinity but you moronically think he's confirming your idiocy about gender.

And as always, we have Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

Bonus points if you can answer this with even a modicum of sanity... what do you think, in any case, means?

You're problems are your own. If we use you're rationalization, 595.19 need not exist as it would have no purpose.

Why, if not true, would a liberal Iowa Senator promote a bill to change it? It has no purpose right?

Go for it Skippy.

And for bonus points, clue me in on where the degrees on consanguinity end? Wow! Maybe some definition is in order? LMAO.

Iowa set that in 595.19 with specific pairing. You see that, right?

Or you still gonna try to twist it into something it's not?

Still, I have one attorney that specifically states that if the relationship is not on 595.19 then you are free to marry, and a second confirming the first, being even more specific in his response.

And you, making shit up again.

Again, are you an attorney?

No, then your interpretation of their opinion is worthless

As are you.

Figures. Well, no bonus points for you. "In any case," means exactly what it states, in any case. Not "in any case" but consanguineous couples. Not "in any case" but unless they're the same sex.

And again, you're conflating laws. 595.3 doesn't reference 595.19. If it did, it would specify 595.19 just as it specifies 595.2 in subsection (2). And again, 595.3 is about who can legally marry. 595.19 is about which existing marriages are void. And again, the intent of 595.19 is to disolve any consanguineous marriages. The intent of that law doesn't change because a Supreme Court ruling changed the allowable gender makeup of marriages.

And again, this is all echoed by Iowa, which pretty much puts the attorney you found, to shame.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Intent of the law? Tradition? Seriously?

You have failed to reveal the degrees of consanguinity that you claim exists in Iowa law.

What? 1st, 3rd, 6th?

Are we to just guess?

Why?

With blood relatives it goes on and on and on. Biologist would say that we all come from a single blood relative pair, so using an objective veiw, it must have limitations. Plus it applies to bloodlines (the reason blood relatives were punished for sexual intercourse throughout history). With same sex their relationships, sexual or not, does no long term societal damage to the species, and that may be why Iowa kept the controlling list of prohibited pairs as is. We got that messy 14th amendment problem afterall, to deal with.

My question now is, since you have failed to provide any legal expertise to back your foolishness up........

Why do you call the Iowa Supreme Court perverts when they approved Same Sex Marriage, and never ordered changed in 595.19?

Who said anything about tradition? I'm talking about the spirit of the law. Iowa never allowed close-family marriages and they still don't.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

 

[Pop23]

Try to get that knot you're twisted in straightened out.

1. Affinity marriage is prohibited period. The state made that clear in your own link. It is prohibited in ALL DEGREES.

2. Iowa 595.19 ONLY DEFINES THE BLOOD RELATED (not affinity) MARRIAGES THAT ARE PROHIBITED

Get it dunce.

Dudes so delusional he thinks his opinion outranks 5 legal experts.

Seek mental help soon!

Hisses the forum pervert who thinks Iowa allows biological brothers to marry but not brothers-in-law.

Dumbfuck, you don't even know what those lawyers are saying. Like the one who's talking about degrees of consanguinity but you moronically think he's confirming your idiocy about gender.

And as always, we have Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

Bonus points if you can answer this with even a modicum of sanity... what do you think, in any case, means?

You're problems are your own. If we use you're rationalization, 595.19 need not exist as it would have no purpose.

Why, if not true, would a liberal Iowa Senator promote a bill to change it? It has no purpose right?

Go for it Skippy.

And for bonus points, clue me in on where the degrees on consanguinity end? Wow! Maybe some definition is in order? LMAO.

Iowa set that in 595.19 with specific pairing. You see that, right?

Or you still gonna try to twist it into something it's not?

Still, I have one attorney that specifically states that if the relationship is not on 595.19 then you are free to marry, and a second confirming the first, being even more specific in his response.

And you, making shit up again.

Again, are you an attorney?

No, then your interpretation of their opinion is worthless

As are you.

Figures. Well, no bonus points for you. "In any case," means exactly what it states, in any case. Not "in any case" but consanguineous couples. Not "in any case" but unless they're the same sex.

And again, you're conflating laws. 595.3 doesn't reference 595.19. If it did, it would specify 595.19 just as it specifies 595.2 in subsection (2). And again, 595.3 is about who can legally marry. 595.19 is about which existing marriages are void. And again, the intent of 595.19 is to disolve any consanguineous marriages. The intent of that law doesn't change because a Supreme Court ruling changed the allowable gender makeup of marriages.

And again, this is all echoed by Iowa, which pretty much puts the attorney you found, to shame.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Intent of the law? Tradition? Seriously?

You have failed to reveal the degrees of consanguinity that you claim exists in Iowa law.

What? 1st, 3rd, 6th?

Are we to just guess?

Why?

With blood relatives it goes on and on and on. Biologist would say that we all come from a single blood relative pair, so using an objective veiw, it must have limitations. Plus it applies to bloodlines (the reason blood relatives were punished for sexual intercourse throughout history). With same sex their relationships, sexual or not, does no long term societal damage to the species, and that may be why Iowa kept the controlling list of prohibited pairs as is. We got that messy 14th amendment problem afterall, to deal with.

My question now is, since you have failed to provide any legal expertise to back your foolishness up........

Why do you call the Iowa Supreme Court perverts when they approved Same Sex Marriage, and never ordered changed in 595.19?

Who said anything about tradition? I'm talking about the spirit of the law. Iowa never allowed close-family marriages and they still don't.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

And again, iowa defines closely related by blood as:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

It sure appears they allow same sex immediate family to marry.

Unless you can find another definition of closely related by blood. You lose.

 

[Faun]

Hisses the forum pervert who thinks Iowa allows biological brothers to marry but not brothers-in-law.

Dumbfuck, you don't even know what those lawyers are saying. Like the one who's talking about degrees of consanguinity but you moronically think he's confirming your idiocy about gender.

And as always, we have Iowa law...

595.3 The license must not be granted in any case ... Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

Bonus points if you can answer this with even a modicum of sanity... what do you think, in any case, means?

You're problems are your own. If we use you're rationalization, 595.19 need not exist as it would have no purpose.

Why, if not true, would a liberal Iowa Senator promote a bill to change it? It has no purpose right?

Go for it Skippy.

And for bonus points, clue me in on where the degrees on consanguinity end? Wow! Maybe some definition is in order? LMAO.

Iowa set that in 595.19 with specific pairing. You see that, right?

Or you still gonna try to twist it into something it's not?

Still, I have one attorney that specifically states that if the relationship is not on 595.19 then you are free to marry, and a second confirming the first, being even more specific in his response.

And you, making shit up again.

Again, are you an attorney?

No, then your interpretation of their opinion is worthless

As are you.

Figures. Well, no bonus points for you. "In any case," means exactly what it states, in any case. Not "in any case" but consanguineous couples. Not "in any case" but unless they're the same sex.

And again, you're conflating laws. 595.3 doesn't reference 595.19. If it did, it would specify 595.19 just as it specifies 595.2 in subsection (2). And again, 595.3 is about who can legally marry. 595.19 is about which existing marriages are void. And again, the intent of 595.19 is to disolve any consanguineous marriages. The intent of that law doesn't change because a Supreme Court ruling changed the allowable gender makeup of marriages.

And again, this is all echoed by Iowa, which pretty much puts the attorney you found, to shame.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Intent of the law? Tradition? Seriously?

You have failed to reveal the degrees of consanguinity that you claim exists in Iowa law.

What? 1st, 3rd, 6th?

Are we to just guess?

Why?

With blood relatives it goes on and on and on. Biologist would say that we all come from a single blood relative pair, so using an objective veiw, it must have limitations. Plus it applies to bloodlines (the reason blood relatives were punished for sexual intercourse throughout history). With same sex their relationships, sexual or not, does no long term societal damage to the species, and that may be why Iowa kept the controlling list of prohibited pairs as is. We got that messy 14th amendment problem afterall, to deal with.

My question now is, since you have failed to provide any legal expertise to back your foolishness up........

Why do you call the Iowa Supreme Court perverts when they approved Same Sex Marriage, and never ordered changed in 595.19?

Who said anything about tradition? I'm talking about the spirit of the law. Iowa never allowed close-family marriages and they still don't.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

And again, iowa defines closely related by blood as:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

It sure appears they allow same sex immediate family to marry.

Unless you can find another definition of closely related by blood. You lose.

Even Iowa laughs at you.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

 

[Pop23]

You're problems are your own. If we use you're rationalization, 595.19 need not exist as it would have no purpose.

Why, if not true, would a liberal Iowa Senator promote a bill to change it? It has no purpose right?

Go for it Skippy.

And for bonus points, clue me in on where the degrees on consanguinity end? Wow! Maybe some definition is in order? LMAO.

Iowa set that in 595.19 with specific pairing. You see that, right?

Or you still gonna try to twist it into something it's not?

Still, I have one attorney that specifically states that if the relationship is not on 595.19 then you are free to marry, and a second confirming the first, being even more specific in his response.

And you, making shit up again.

Again, are you an attorney?

No, then your interpretation of their opinion is worthless

As are you.

Figures. Well, no bonus points for you. "In any case," means exactly what it states, in any case. Not "in any case" but consanguineous couples. Not "in any case" but unless they're the same sex.

And again, you're conflating laws. 595.3 doesn't reference 595.19. If it did, it would specify 595.19 just as it specifies 595.2 in subsection (2). And again, 595.3 is about who can legally marry. 595.19 is about which existing marriages are void. And again, the intent of 595.19 is to disolve any consanguineous marriages. The intent of that law doesn't change because a Supreme Court ruling changed the allowable gender makeup of marriages.

And again, this is all echoed by Iowa, which pretty much puts the attorney you found, to shame.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Intent of the law? Tradition? Seriously?

You have failed to reveal the degrees of consanguinity that you claim exists in Iowa law.

What? 1st, 3rd, 6th?

Are we to just guess?

Why?

With blood relatives it goes on and on and on. Biologist would say that we all come from a single blood relative pair, so using an objective veiw, it must have limitations. Plus it applies to bloodlines (the reason blood relatives were punished for sexual intercourse throughout history). With same sex their relationships, sexual or not, does no long term societal damage to the species, and that may be why Iowa kept the controlling list of prohibited pairs as is. We got that messy 14th amendment problem afterall, to deal with.

My question now is, since you have failed to provide any legal expertise to back your foolishness up........

Why do you call the Iowa Supreme Court perverts when they approved Same Sex Marriage, and never ordered changed in 595.19?

Who said anything about tradition? I'm talking about the spirit of the law. Iowa never allowed close-family marriages and they still don't.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

And again, iowa defines closely related by blood as:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

It sure appears they allow same sex immediate family to marry.

Unless you can find another definition of closely related by blood. You lose.

Even Iowa laughs at you.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

No, Iowa and 5 legal experts, that back me up, laughs at you.

To sad for you

 

[Faun]

Figures. Well, no bonus points for you. "In any case," means exactly what it states, in any case. Not "in any case" but consanguineous couples. Not "in any case" but unless they're the same sex.

And again, you're conflating laws. 595.3 doesn't reference 595.19. If it did, it would specify 595.19 just as it specifies 595.2 in subsection (2). And again, 595.3 is about who can legally marry. 595.19 is about which existing marriages are void. And again, the intent of 595.19 is to disolve any consanguineous marriages. The intent of that law doesn't change because a Supreme Court ruling changed the allowable gender makeup of marriages.

And again, this is all echoed by Iowa, which pretty much puts the attorney you found, to shame.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Intent of the law? Tradition? Seriously?

You have failed to reveal the degrees of consanguinity that you claim exists in Iowa law.

What? 1st, 3rd, 6th?

Are we to just guess?

Why?

With blood relatives it goes on and on and on. Biologist would say that we all come from a single blood relative pair, so using an objective veiw, it must have limitations. Plus it applies to bloodlines (the reason blood relatives were punished for sexual intercourse throughout history). With same sex their relationships, sexual or not, does no long term societal damage to the species, and that may be why Iowa kept the controlling list of prohibited pairs as is. We got that messy 14th amendment problem afterall, to deal with.

My question now is, since you have failed to provide any legal expertise to back your foolishness up........

Why do you call the Iowa Supreme Court perverts when they approved Same Sex Marriage, and never ordered changed in 595.19?

Who said anything about tradition? I'm talking about the spirit of the law. Iowa never allowed close-family marriages and they still don't.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

And again, iowa defines closely related by blood as:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

It sure appears they allow same sex immediate family to marry.

Unless you can find another definition of closely related by blood. You lose.

Even Iowa laughs at you.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

No, Iowa and 5 legal experts, that back me up, laughs at you.

To sad for you

Iowa laughs at those 5 purported lawyers too. Except maybe the one who's not even talking about gender.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

 

[Pop23]

Intent of the law? Tradition? Seriously?

You have failed to reveal the degrees of consanguinity that you claim exists in Iowa law.

What? 1st, 3rd, 6th?

Are we to just guess?

Why?

With blood relatives it goes on and on and on. Biologist would say that we all come from a single blood relative pair, so using an objective veiw, it must have limitations. Plus it applies to bloodlines (the reason blood relatives were punished for sexual intercourse throughout history). With same sex their relationships, sexual or not, does no long term societal damage to the species, and that may be why Iowa kept the controlling list of prohibited pairs as is. We got that messy 14th amendment problem afterall, to deal with.

My question now is, since you have failed to provide any legal expertise to back your foolishness up........

Why do you call the Iowa Supreme Court perverts when they approved Same Sex Marriage, and never ordered changed in 595.19?

Who said anything about tradition? I'm talking about the spirit of the law. Iowa never allowed close-family marriages and they still don't.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

And again, iowa defines closely related by blood as:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

It sure appears they allow same sex immediate family to marry.

Unless you can find another definition of closely related by blood. You lose.

Even Iowa laughs at you.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

No, Iowa and 5 legal experts, that back me up, laughs at you.

To sad for you

Iowa laughs at those 5 purported lawyers too. Except maybe the one who's not even talking about gender.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Purported?

Three of the five have their credentials posted on line. If you are suggesting that they are practicing law without a license, I suggest you contact the State Bar.

And your credentials?

 

[Faun]

Who said anything about tradition? I'm talking about the spirit of the law. Iowa never allowed close-family marriages and they still don't.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

And again, iowa defines closely related by blood as:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

It sure appears they allow same sex immediate family to marry.

Unless you can find another definition of closely related by blood. You lose.

Even Iowa laughs at you.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

No, Iowa and 5 legal experts, that back me up, laughs at you.

To sad for you

Iowa laughs at those 5 purported lawyers too. Except maybe the one who's not even talking about gender.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Purported?

Three of the five have their credentials posted on line. If you are suggesting that they are practicing law without a license, I suggest you contact the State Bar.

And your credentials?

My credentials are my ability to read and comprehend. Putting my comprehension level at about 12 grades plus four years of college ahead of yours.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

 

[Pop23]

And again, iowa defines closely related by blood as:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

It sure appears they allow same sex immediate family to marry.

Unless you can find another definition of closely related by blood. You lose.

Even Iowa laughs at you.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

No, Iowa and 5 legal experts, that back me up, laughs at you.

To sad for you

Iowa laughs at those 5 purported lawyers too. Except maybe the one who's not even talking about gender.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Purported?

Three of the five have their credentials posted on line. If you are suggesting that they are practicing law without a license, I suggest you contact the State Bar.

And your credentials?

My credentials are my ability to read and comprehend. Putting my comprehension level at about 12 grades plus four years of college ahead of yours.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

And yet you're running continues.

5 legal experts disagree with you.

Your idiocy is showing.

 

[Faun]

Even Iowa laughs at you.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

No, Iowa and 5 legal experts, that back me up, laughs at you.

To sad for you

Iowa laughs at those 5 purported lawyers too. Except maybe the one who's not even talking about gender.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Purported?

Three of the five have their credentials posted on line. If you are suggesting that they are practicing law without a license, I suggest you contact the State Bar.

And your credentials?

My credentials are my ability to read and comprehend. Putting my comprehension level at about 12 grades plus four years of college ahead of yours.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

And yet you're running continues.

5 legal experts disagree with you.

Your idiocy is showing.

And Iowa disagrees with them.

 

[Pop23]

No, Iowa and 5 legal experts, that back me up, laughs at you.

To sad for you

Iowa laughs at those 5 purported lawyers too. Except maybe the one who's not even talking about gender.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Purported?

Three of the five have their credentials posted on line. If you are suggesting that they are practicing law without a license, I suggest you contact the State Bar.

And your credentials?

My credentials are my ability to read and comprehend. Putting my comprehension level at about 12 grades plus four years of college ahead of yours.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

And yet you're running continues.

5 legal experts disagree with you.

Your idiocy is showing.

And Iowa disagrees with them.

Seems not. I'll take the opinion of 5 legal experts over 1 imbecile on an Internet forum any day.

 

[Faun]

Iowa laughs at those 5 purported lawyers too. Except maybe the one who's not even talking about gender.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Purported?

Three of the five have their credentials posted on line. If you are suggesting that they are practicing law without a license, I suggest you contact the State Bar.

And your credentials?

My credentials are my ability to read and comprehend. Putting my comprehension level at about 12 grades plus four years of college ahead of yours.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

And yet you're running continues.

5 legal experts disagree with you.

Your idiocy is showing.

And Iowa disagrees with them.

Seems not. I'll take the opinion of 5 legal experts over 1 imbecile on an Internet forum any day.

Of course you would, because you're that stupid. Iowa gives out marriage licenses, those attornies do not. So I choose to believe Iowa.

 

[Pop23]

Purported?

Three of the five have their credentials posted on line. If you are suggesting that they are practicing law without a license, I suggest you contact the State Bar.

And your credentials?

My credentials are my ability to read and comprehend. Putting my comprehension level at about 12 grades plus four years of college ahead of yours.

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

And yet you're running continues.

5 legal experts disagree with you.

Your idiocy is showing.

And Iowa disagrees with them.

Seems not. I'll take the opinion of 5 legal experts over 1 imbecile on an Internet forum any day.

Of course you would, because you're that stupid. Iowa gives that marriage licenses, those attornies do not. So I choose to believe Iowa.

YOU can choose whatever you wish to. That's obvious.

5 legal experts disagree with you're choice.