It's easier to condemn homosexuality

[Faun]

You're too fucking retarded.

You're argument is now reduced to ... Iowa doesn't allow close-family marriage but if such couples can trick the government into not knowing they're related, then they can marry each other even though the law forbids such marriages.

Dumbfuck.... that has always been the case in every state since the birth of this nation. It certainly has nothing to do with same-sex marriages becoming legal.

I've said it before, frame you're own debate, you're lousy at framing mine.

Iowa law allows the legal marriage of blood related immediate family members.

I've backed my opinion with at least 5 legal experts.

That debate has been won by me.

You lose again

Keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, Iowa states otherwise...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Yet your discredited pamphlet can lead to the truth, which is:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

All means same sex family can marry.

Iowa's marriage application instructions are not "discredited" simply because you believe them to be. In fact, Iowa still uses them and urges all applicants to read them.

And look... such marriages, in accordance with Iowa law, are banned...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Then step parents can Marry the stepdaughter because your pamphlet doesn't mention affinity marriage.

The law ACTUALLY a does reference blood marriage, like such:
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

AND, I've posted 5 (count em 5) legal experts that back me up. That same sex blood related family members can Marry in Iowa.

You, well we can expect Skylar to show up with his stupid ass crap again.....

But sadly, you won't supply a single legal expert to back up you're argument.

Nope, you're still wrong as Iowa law also prohibits marriage to couples too close through affinity...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   
   
2. Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   
   
3. Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   
   
4. Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   
   
5. Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

​

 

[Pop23]

I've said it before, frame you're own debate, you're lousy at framing mine.

Iowa law allows the legal marriage of blood related immediate family members.

I've backed my opinion with at least 5 legal experts.

That debate has been won by me.

You lose again

Keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, Iowa states otherwise...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Yet your discredited pamphlet can lead to the truth, which is:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

All means same sex family can marry.

Iowa's marriage application instructions are not "discredited" simply because you believe them to be. In fact, Iowa still uses them and urges all applicants to read them.

And look... such marriages, in accordance with Iowa law, are banned...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Then step parents can Marry the stepdaughter because your pamphlet doesn't mention affinity marriage.

The law ACTUALLY a does reference blood marriage, like such:
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

AND, I've posted 5 (count em 5) legal experts that back me up. That same sex blood related family members can Marry in Iowa.

You, well we can expect Skylar to show up with his stupid ass crap again.....

But sadly, you won't supply a single legal expert to back up you're argument.

Nope, you're still wrong as Iowa law also prohibits marriage to couples too close through affinity...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

"In which marriage is prohibited by law" which is defined in Iowa 595.19, as such:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage shall be valid.

Notice: no same sex blood related immediate family couples listed. And #1 only related to blood, not affinity, so all affines are prohibited.

And............

5 legal experts say so as well.

And you?

A big goose egg

But that's to be expected.

 

[Faun]

Keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, Iowa states otherwise...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Yet your discredited pamphlet can lead to the truth, which is:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

All means same sex family can marry.

Iowa's marriage application instructions are not "discredited" simply because you believe them to be. In fact, Iowa still uses them and urges all applicants to read them.

And look... such marriages, in accordance with Iowa law, are banned...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Then step parents can Marry the stepdaughter because your pamphlet doesn't mention affinity marriage.

The law ACTUALLY a does reference blood marriage, like such:
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

AND, I've posted 5 (count em 5) legal experts that back me up. That same sex blood related family members can Marry in Iowa.

You, well we can expect Skylar to show up with his stupid ass crap again.....

But sadly, you won't supply a single legal expert to back up you're argument.

Nope, you're still wrong as Iowa law also prohibits marriage to couples too close through affinity...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

"In which marriage is prohibited by law" which is defined in Iowa 595.19, as such:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage shall be valid.

Notice: no same sex blood related immediate family couples listed. And #1 only related to blood, not affinity, so all affines are prohibited.

And............

5 legal experts say so as well.

And you?

A big goose egg

But that's to be expected.

My, my, your ignorance knows no boundaries, does it?

If 595.3 (4) was talking about 595.19, it would have referenced it. Just as 595.3 (2) referenced 595.2. Furthermore, and also to highlight your ineptitude, 595.3 and 595.19 have nothing to do with each other.

Why on Earth did you think they did?? (I actually know the answer )

595.3 identifies who is eligible to get married; whereas 595.19 identifies which marriages are void.

Funniest part? You're almost stupid enough to argue this nonsense as you are not to stop. <SMH>

 

[Pop23]

Yet your discredited pamphlet can lead to the truth, which is:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

All means same sex family can marry.

Iowa's marriage application instructions are not "discredited" simply because you believe them to be. In fact, Iowa still uses them and urges all applicants to read them.

And look... such marriages, in accordance with Iowa law, are banned...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Then step parents can Marry the stepdaughter because your pamphlet doesn't mention affinity marriage.

The law ACTUALLY a does reference blood marriage, like such:
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

AND, I've posted 5 (count em 5) legal experts that back me up. That same sex blood related family members can Marry in Iowa.

You, well we can expect Skylar to show up with his stupid ass crap again.....

But sadly, you won't supply a single legal expert to back up you're argument.

Nope, you're still wrong as Iowa law also prohibits marriage to couples too close through affinity...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

"In which marriage is prohibited by law" which is defined in Iowa 595.19, as such:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage shall be valid.

Notice: no same sex blood related immediate family couples listed. And #1 only related to blood, not affinity, so all affines are prohibited.

And............

5 legal experts say so as well.

And you?

A big goose egg

But that's to be expected.

My, my, your ignorance knows no boundaries, does it?

If 595.3 (4) was talking about 595.19, it would have referenced it. Just as 595.3 (2) referenced 595.2. Furthermore, and also to highlight your ineptitude, 595.3 and 595.19 have nothing to do with each other.

Why on Earth did you think they did?? (I actually know the answer )

595.3 identifies who is eligible to get married; whereas 595.19 identifies which marriages are void.

Funniest part? You're almost stupid enough to argue this nonsense as you are not to stop. <SMH>

And of course you have a legal expert to back up your fantasy?

Here's the opinion from a family law attorney, who specializes in family law in Iowa:


Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com


Family Law Attorney

• West Des Moines, IA
• IA licensed

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Thus indicating the part of the statute that defines who may marry.

A Family Law Attorney from Iowa backs my argument.

Makes you look the fool again.

Your turn, your expert witness to back you're story is...........

Too funny

 

[Faun]

Iowa's marriage application instructions are not "discredited" simply because you believe them to be. In fact, Iowa still uses them and urges all applicants to read them.

And look... such marriages, in accordance with Iowa law, are banned...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Then step parents can Marry the stepdaughter because your pamphlet doesn't mention affinity marriage.

The law ACTUALLY a does reference blood marriage, like such:
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

AND, I've posted 5 (count em 5) legal experts that back me up. That same sex blood related family members can Marry in Iowa.

You, well we can expect Skylar to show up with his stupid ass crap again.....

But sadly, you won't supply a single legal expert to back up you're argument.

Nope, you're still wrong as Iowa law also prohibits marriage to couples too close through affinity...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

"In which marriage is prohibited by law" which is defined in Iowa 595.19, as such:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage shall be valid.

Notice: no same sex blood related immediate family couples listed. And #1 only related to blood, not affinity, so all affines are prohibited.

And............

5 legal experts say so as well.

And you?

A big goose egg

But that's to be expected.

My, my, your ignorance knows no boundaries, does it?

If 595.3 (4) was talking about 595.19, it would have referenced it. Just as 595.3 (2) referenced 595.2. Furthermore, and also to highlight your ineptitude, 595.3 and 595.19 have nothing to do with each other.

Why on Earth did you think they did?? (I actually know the answer )

595.3 identifies who is eligible to get married; whereas 595.19 identifies which marriages are void.

Funniest part? You're almost stupid enough to argue this nonsense as you are not to stop. <SMH>

And of course you have a legal expert to back up your fantasy?

Here's the opinion from a family law attorney, who specializes in family law in Iowa:


Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com


Family Law Attorney

• West Des Moines, IA
• IA licensed

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Thus indicating the part of the statute that defines who may marry.

A Family Law Attorney from Iowa backs my argument.

Makes you look the fool again.

Your turn, your expert witness to cooperate you're story is...........

Too funny

Two separate sections in the law. One is for who is eligible to get married while the other is about which marriages are void.

And you're dumb enough to confuse the two.

Do you really think the forum needed more reason to laugh at you, perv?

 

[Pop23]

Then step parents can Marry the stepdaughter because your pamphlet doesn't mention affinity marriage.

The law ACTUALLY a does reference blood marriage, like such:
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

AND, I've posted 5 (count em 5) legal experts that back me up. That same sex blood related family members can Marry in Iowa.

You, well we can expect Skylar to show up with his stupid ass crap again.....

But sadly, you won't supply a single legal expert to back up you're argument.

Nope, you're still wrong as Iowa law also prohibits marriage to couples too close through affinity...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

"In which marriage is prohibited by law" which is defined in Iowa 595.19, as such:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage shall be valid.

Notice: no same sex blood related immediate family couples listed. And #1 only related to blood, not affinity, so all affines are prohibited.

And............

5 legal experts say so as well.

And you?

A big goose egg

But that's to be expected.

My, my, your ignorance knows no boundaries, does it?

If 595.3 (4) was talking about 595.19, it would have referenced it. Just as 595.3 (2) referenced 595.2. Furthermore, and also to highlight your ineptitude, 595.3 and 595.19 have nothing to do with each other.

Why on Earth did you think they did?? (I actually know the answer )

595.3 identifies who is eligible to get married; whereas 595.19 identifies which marriages are void.

Funniest part? You're almost stupid enough to argue this nonsense as you are not to stop. <SMH>

And of course you have a legal expert to back up your fantasy?

Here's the opinion from a family law attorney, who specializes in family law in Iowa:


Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com


Family Law Attorney

• West Des Moines, IA
• IA licensed

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Thus indicating the part of the statute that defines who may marry.

A Family Law Attorney from Iowa backs my argument.

Makes you look the fool again.

Your turn, your expert witness to cooperate you're story is...........

Too funny

Two separate sections in the law. One is for who is eligible to get married while the other is about which marriages are void.

And you're dumb enough to confuse the two.

Do you really think the forum needed more reason to laugh at you, perv?

It's not my opinion, it is that of a practicing Family law attorney, as well as the two attorneys that agree with him:

Again the link:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

That sound you hear is not laughter, it's you're argument going:

BOOM!

But you have your butt buddy Skylar on you're side

Either of you Family Law Attorneys? I don't think working the fry station counts for much against the word of an expert.

 

[Faun]

Nope, you're still wrong as Iowa law also prohibits marriage to couples too close through affinity...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

"In which marriage is prohibited by law" which is defined in Iowa 595.19, as such:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage shall be valid.

Notice: no same sex blood related immediate family couples listed. And #1 only related to blood, not affinity, so all affines are prohibited.

And............

5 legal experts say so as well.

And you?

A big goose egg

But that's to be expected.

My, my, your ignorance knows no boundaries, does it?

If 595.3 (4) was talking about 595.19, it would have referenced it. Just as 595.3 (2) referenced 595.2. Furthermore, and also to highlight your ineptitude, 595.3 and 595.19 have nothing to do with each other.

Why on Earth did you think they did?? (I actually know the answer )

595.3 identifies who is eligible to get married; whereas 595.19 identifies which marriages are void.

Funniest part? You're almost stupid enough to argue this nonsense as you are not to stop. <SMH>

And of course you have a legal expert to back up your fantasy?

Here's the opinion from a family law attorney, who specializes in family law in Iowa:


Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com


Family Law Attorney

• West Des Moines, IA
• IA licensed

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Thus indicating the part of the statute that defines who may marry.

A Family Law Attorney from Iowa backs my argument.

Makes you look the fool again.

Your turn, your expert witness to cooperate you're story is...........

Too funny

Two separate sections in the law. One is for who is eligible to get married while the other is about which marriages are void.

And you're dumb enough to confuse the two.

Do you really think the forum needed more reason to laugh at you, perv?

It's not my opinion, it is that of a practicing Family law attorney, as well as the two attorneys that agree with him:

Again the link:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

That sound you hear is not laughter, it's you're argument going:

BOOM!

But you have your butt buddy Skylar on you're side

Either of you Family Law Attorneys? I don't think working the fry station counts for much against the word of an expert.

Your appeal to authority is noted, meanwhile, Iowa still says such a couple cannot legally get a marriage license...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   
   
2. Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   
   
3. Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   
   
4. Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   
   
5. Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

​

 

[Pop23]

"In which marriage is prohibited by law" which is defined in Iowa 595.19, as such:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage shall be valid.

Notice: no same sex blood related immediate family couples listed. And #1 only related to blood, not affinity, so all affines are prohibited.

And............

5 legal experts say so as well.

And you?

A big goose egg

But that's to be expected.

My, my, your ignorance knows no boundaries, does it?

If 595.3 (4) was talking about 595.19, it would have referenced it. Just as 595.3 (2) referenced 595.2. Furthermore, and also to highlight your ineptitude, 595.3 and 595.19 have nothing to do with each other.

Why on Earth did you think they did?? (I actually know the answer )

595.3 identifies who is eligible to get married; whereas 595.19 identifies which marriages are void.

Funniest part? You're almost stupid enough to argue this nonsense as you are not to stop. <SMH>

And of course you have a legal expert to back up your fantasy?

Here's the opinion from a family law attorney, who specializes in family law in Iowa:


Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com


Family Law Attorney

• West Des Moines, IA
• IA licensed

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Thus indicating the part of the statute that defines who may marry.

A Family Law Attorney from Iowa backs my argument.

Makes you look the fool again.

Your turn, your expert witness to cooperate you're story is...........

Too funny

Two separate sections in the law. One is for who is eligible to get married while the other is about which marriages are void.

And you're dumb enough to confuse the two.

Do you really think the forum needed more reason to laugh at you, perv?

It's not my opinion, it is that of a practicing Family law attorney, as well as the two attorneys that agree with him:

Again the link:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

That sound you hear is not laughter, it's you're argument going:

BOOM!

But you have your butt buddy Skylar on you're side

Either of you Family Law Attorneys? I don't think working the fry station counts for much against the word of an expert.

Your appeal to authority is noted, meanwhile, Iowa still says such a couple cannot legally get a marriage license...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

Nope, says the experts:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

 

[Faun]

My, my, your ignorance knows no boundaries, does it?

If 595.3 (4) was talking about 595.19, it would have referenced it. Just as 595.3 (2) referenced 595.2. Furthermore, and also to highlight your ineptitude, 595.3 and 595.19 have nothing to do with each other.

Why on Earth did you think they did?? (I actually know the answer )

595.3 identifies who is eligible to get married; whereas 595.19 identifies which marriages are void.

Funniest part? You're almost stupid enough to argue this nonsense as you are not to stop. <SMH>

And of course you have a legal expert to back up your fantasy?

Here's the opinion from a family law attorney, who specializes in family law in Iowa:


Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com


Family Law Attorney

• West Des Moines, IA
• IA licensed

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Thus indicating the part of the statute that defines who may marry.

A Family Law Attorney from Iowa backs my argument.

Makes you look the fool again.

Your turn, your expert witness to cooperate you're story is...........

Too funny

Two separate sections in the law. One is for who is eligible to get married while the other is about which marriages are void.

And you're dumb enough to confuse the two.

Do you really think the forum needed more reason to laugh at you, perv?

It's not my opinion, it is that of a practicing Family law attorney, as well as the two attorneys that agree with him:

Again the link:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

That sound you hear is not laughter, it's you're argument going:

BOOM!

But you have your butt buddy Skylar on you're side

Either of you Family Law Attorneys? I don't think working the fry station counts for much against the word of an expert.

Your appeal to authority is noted, meanwhile, Iowa still says such a couple cannot legally get a marriage license...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

Nope, says the experts:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

You can quote a random attorney offering free advice all you want... Iowa law still says otherwise...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   
   
2. Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   
   
3. Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   
   
4. Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   
   
5. Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

​

 

[Pop23]

And of course you have a legal expert to back up your fantasy?

Here's the opinion from a family law attorney, who specializes in family law in Iowa:


Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com


Family Law Attorney

• West Des Moines, IA
• IA licensed

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Thus indicating the part of the statute that defines who may marry.

A Family Law Attorney from Iowa backs my argument.

Makes you look the fool again.

Your turn, your expert witness to cooperate you're story is...........

Too funny

Two separate sections in the law. One is for who is eligible to get married while the other is about which marriages are void.

And you're dumb enough to confuse the two.

Do you really think the forum needed more reason to laugh at you, perv?

It's not my opinion, it is that of a practicing Family law attorney, as well as the two attorneys that agree with him:

Again the link:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

That sound you hear is not laughter, it's you're argument going:

BOOM!

But you have your butt buddy Skylar on you're side

Either of you Family Law Attorneys? I don't think working the fry station counts for much against the word of an expert.

Your appeal to authority is noted, meanwhile, Iowa still says such a couple cannot legally get a marriage license...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

Nope, says the experts:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

You can quote a random attorney offering free advice all you want... Iowa law still says otherwise...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

When I want legal advice, I seek out an attorney. When I want specific advice about Family Law, I seek out an Attorney who specializes in Family Law, not a anonymous random goat headed poster on an Internet forum.

Are you an Attorney?

No?

Then I'll stick with this guy who is, and who's specialty relates to the issue in question.

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

See, you lose again.

But then again, that's to be expected of a loser

 

[Faun]

Two separate sections in the law. One is for who is eligible to get married while the other is about which marriages are void.

And you're dumb enough to confuse the two.

Do you really think the forum needed more reason to laugh at you, perv?

It's not my opinion, it is that of a practicing Family law attorney, as well as the two attorneys that agree with him:

Again the link:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

That sound you hear is not laughter, it's you're argument going:

BOOM!

But you have your butt buddy Skylar on you're side

Either of you Family Law Attorneys? I don't think working the fry station counts for much against the word of an expert.

Your appeal to authority is noted, meanwhile, Iowa still says such a couple cannot legally get a marriage license...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

Nope, says the experts:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

You can quote a random attorney offering free advice all you want... Iowa law still says otherwise...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

When I want legal advice, I seek out an attorney. When I want specific advice about Family Law, I seek out an Attorney who specializes in Family Law, not a anonymous random goat headed poster on an Internet forum.

Are you an Attorney?

No?

Then I'll stick with this guy who is, and who's specialty relates to the issue in question.

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

See, you lose again.

But then again, that's to be expected of a loser

You can call yourself a weiner all ya want, Iowa law still says the following people can't get married...

Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

 

[Pop23]

It's not my opinion, it is that of a practicing Family law attorney, as well as the two attorneys that agree with him:

Again the link:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

That sound you hear is not laughter, it's you're argument going:

BOOM!

But you have your butt buddy Skylar on you're side

Either of you Family Law Attorneys? I don't think working the fry station counts for much against the word of an expert.

Your appeal to authority is noted, meanwhile, Iowa still says such a couple cannot legally get a marriage license...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

Nope, says the experts:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

You can quote a random attorney offering free advice all you want... Iowa law still says otherwise...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

When I want legal advice, I seek out an attorney. When I want specific advice about Family Law, I seek out an Attorney who specializes in Family Law, not a anonymous random goat headed poster on an Internet forum.

Are you an Attorney?

No?

Then I'll stick with this guy who is, and who's specialty relates to the issue in question.

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

See, you lose again.

But then again, that's to be expected of a loser

You can call yourself a weiner all ya want, Iowa law still says the following people can't get married...

Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

And the degrees of consanguinity are?

The iowa legislature obviously saw the bolded problematic and decided to outline what they were by clarifying it in 595.19

That is backed up with this answer, by a qualified Iowa Family Law Attorney:

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Link: Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

Link provided, question answered by a credentialed expert.

Unless you are an attorney, you have zero cache, and you lost again

You actually are an embarrassment to your side

But I don't mind showing everyone exactly that.

 

[Faun]

Your appeal to authority is noted, meanwhile, Iowa still says such a couple cannot legally get a marriage license...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

Nope, says the experts:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

You can quote a random attorney offering free advice all you want... Iowa law still says otherwise...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

When I want legal advice, I seek out an attorney. When I want specific advice about Family Law, I seek out an Attorney who specializes in Family Law, not a anonymous random goat headed poster on an Internet forum.

Are you an Attorney?

No?

Then I'll stick with this guy who is, and who's specialty relates to the issue in question.

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

See, you lose again.

But then again, that's to be expected of a loser

You can call yourself a weiner all ya want, Iowa law still says the following people can't get married...

Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

And the degrees of consanguinity are?

The iowa legislature obviously saw the bolded problematic and decided to outline what they were by clarifying it in 595.19

That is backed up with this answer, by a qualified Iowa Family Law Attorney:

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Link: Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

Link provided, question answered by a credentialed expert.

Unless you are an attorney, you have zero cache, and you lost again

You actually are an embarrassment to your side

But I don't mind showing everyone exactly that.

And that has what to do with your point that you idiotically think same-sex siblings or parents/children can marry each other? You're now changing your argument from this being about gender to it being about the degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

 

[Pop23]

Nope, says the experts:

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

You can quote a random attorney offering free advice all you want... Iowa law still says otherwise...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

When I want legal advice, I seek out an attorney. When I want specific advice about Family Law, I seek out an Attorney who specializes in Family Law, not a anonymous random goat headed poster on an Internet forum.

Are you an Attorney?

No?

Then I'll stick with this guy who is, and who's specialty relates to the issue in question.

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

See, you lose again.

But then again, that's to be expected of a loser

You can call yourself a weiner all ya want, Iowa law still says the following people can't get married...

Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

And the degrees of consanguinity are?

The iowa legislature obviously saw the bolded problematic and decided to outline what they were by clarifying it in 595.19

That is backed up with this answer, by a qualified Iowa Family Law Attorney:

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Link: Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

Link provided, question answered by a credentialed expert.

Unless you are an attorney, you have zero cache, and you lost again

You actually are an embarrassment to your side

But I don't mind showing everyone exactly that.

And that has what to do with your point that you idiotically think same-sex siblings or parents/children can marry each other? You're now changing your argument from this being about gender to it being about the degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

Nope, mines the same, blood related, not on the list, good to go

Twisted in knots are you?

 

[Faun]

You can quote a random attorney offering free advice all you want... Iowa law still says otherwise...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

When I want legal advice, I seek out an attorney. When I want specific advice about Family Law, I seek out an Attorney who specializes in Family Law, not a anonymous random goat headed poster on an Internet forum.

Are you an Attorney?

No?

Then I'll stick with this guy who is, and who's specialty relates to the issue in question.

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

See, you lose again.

But then again, that's to be expected of a loser

You can call yourself a weiner all ya want, Iowa law still says the following people can't get married...

Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

And the degrees of consanguinity are?

The iowa legislature obviously saw the bolded problematic and decided to outline what they were by clarifying it in 595.19

That is backed up with this answer, by a qualified Iowa Family Law Attorney:

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Link: Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

Link provided, question answered by a credentialed expert.

Unless you are an attorney, you have zero cache, and you lost again

You actually are an embarrassment to your side

But I don't mind showing everyone exactly that.

And that has what to do with your point that you idiotically think same-sex siblings or parents/children can marry each other? You're now changing your argument from this being about gender to it being about the degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

Nope, mines the same, blood related, not on the list, good to go

Twisted in knots are you?

He's talking about degrees and you're talking gender.

Nice epic fail, perv23.

 

[Pop23]

When I want legal advice, I seek out an attorney. When I want specific advice about Family Law, I seek out an Attorney who specializes in Family Law, not a anonymous random goat headed poster on an Internet forum.

Are you an Attorney?

No?

Then I'll stick with this guy who is, and who's specialty relates to the issue in question.

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

See, you lose again.

But then again, that's to be expected of a loser

You can call yourself a weiner all ya want, Iowa law still says the following people can't get married...

Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

And the degrees of consanguinity are?

The iowa legislature obviously saw the bolded problematic and decided to outline what they were by clarifying it in 595.19

That is backed up with this answer, by a qualified Iowa Family Law Attorney:

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Link: Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

Link provided, question answered by a credentialed expert.

Unless you are an attorney, you have zero cache, and you lost again

You actually are an embarrassment to your side

But I don't mind showing everyone exactly that.

And that has what to do with your point that you idiotically think same-sex siblings or parents/children can marry each other? You're now changing your argument from this being about gender to it being about the degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

Nope, mines the same, blood related, not on the list, good to go

Twisted in knots are you?

He's talking about degrees and you're talking gender.

Nice epic fail, perv23.

No, not sure you get it nanny goat guy.

Simply put, Iowa law prohibits all forms of affinity marriage, but allows certain kinds of blood marriages, regardless of degree, because bonehead justices changed one part of Iowa 595 while remaining silent on 595.19.

Found a legal expert to back your silly notions yet?

I have

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

And backed that up with:

From Cpaatlaw.com:

The state of Iowa chose to remain silent on this question; its statute declares as void any marriage between "a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter" (and vice versa) in Iowa Code Ann. § 595.19. The court in Varnum v. Brien did not mention 595.19 or consanguinity and the legislature has not updated the statute since. As such, Iowa has seen fit to allow close same-sex relatives to marry; accordingly, an unmarried woman can marry her daughter and pass wealth to her tax free.

Two attorneys against one troll.

Glad I could, once again.........

KICK YOUR TROLL ASS!

 

[Faun]

You can call yourself a weiner all ya want, Iowa law still says the following people can't get married...

Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

And the degrees of consanguinity are?

The iowa legislature obviously saw the bolded problematic and decided to outline what they were by clarifying it in 595.19

That is backed up with this answer, by a qualified Iowa Family Law Attorney:

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Link: Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

Link provided, question answered by a credentialed expert.

Unless you are an attorney, you have zero cache, and you lost again

You actually are an embarrassment to your side

But I don't mind showing everyone exactly that.

And that has what to do with your point that you idiotically think same-sex siblings or parents/children can marry each other? You're now changing your argument from this being about gender to it being about the degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

Nope, mines the same, blood related, not on the list, good to go

Twisted in knots are you?

He's talking about degrees and you're talking gender.

Nice epic fail, perv23.

No, not sure you get it nanny goat guy.

Simply put, Iowa law prohibits all forms of affinity marriage, but allows certain kinds of blood marriages, regardless of degree, because bonehead justices changed one part of Iowa 595 while remaining silent on 595.19.

Found a legal expert to back your silly notions yet?

I have

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

And backed that up with:

From Cpaatlaw.com:

The state of Iowa chose to remain silent on this question; its statute declares as void any marriage between "a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter" (and vice versa) in Iowa Code Ann. § 595.19. The court in Varnum v. Brien did not mention 595.19 or consanguinity and the legislature has not updated the statute since. As such, Iowa has seen fit to allow close same-sex relatives to marry; accordingly, an unmarried woman can marry her daughter and pass wealth to her tax free.

Two attorneys against one troll.

Glad I could, once again.........

KICK YOUR TROLL ASS!

Oh, I get it alright.

You think an attorney who's discussing degrees of consanguinity and not gender is corroborating your insanity that two family members of the same gender can marry each other.

You think the state of Iowa prohibits a man from marrying his brother-in-law but not his biological brother.

You think a law which describes who is ineligible to marry is the same law which describes which marriages are void.

You think family members would marry each other to avoid paying taxes but can't find a single couple who did so.

And lastly, for you to swallow all of the above idiocy, you have to ignore Iowa law which bans ALL marriages within degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

The license must not be granted in any case ... where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

See? I get it exactly.

 

[Pop23]

And the degrees of consanguinity are?

The iowa legislature obviously saw the bolded problematic and decided to outline what they were by clarifying it in 595.19

That is backed up with this answer, by a qualified Iowa Family Law Attorney:

Posted on Jun 11
Iowa Code Sec. 595.19 lists "void" marriages. This section doesn't prohibit marriages between a woman and her grandmother's brother.

Link: Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

Link provided, question answered by a credentialed expert.

Unless you are an attorney, you have zero cache, and you lost again

You actually are an embarrassment to your side

But I don't mind showing everyone exactly that.

And that has what to do with your point that you idiotically think same-sex siblings or parents/children can marry each other? You're now changing your argument from this being about gender to it being about the degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

Nope, mines the same, blood related, not on the list, good to go

Twisted in knots are you?

He's talking about degrees and you're talking gender.

Nice epic fail, perv23.

No, not sure you get it nanny goat guy.

Simply put, Iowa law prohibits all forms of affinity marriage, but allows certain kinds of blood marriages, regardless of degree, because bonehead justices changed one part of Iowa 595 while remaining silent on 595.19.

Found a legal expert to back your silly notions yet?

I have

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

And backed that up with:

From Cpaatlaw.com:

The state of Iowa chose to remain silent on this question; its statute declares as void any marriage between "a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter" (and vice versa) in Iowa Code Ann. § 595.19. The court in Varnum v. Brien did not mention 595.19 or consanguinity and the legislature has not updated the statute since. As such, Iowa has seen fit to allow close same-sex relatives to marry; accordingly, an unmarried woman can marry her daughter and pass wealth to her tax free.

Two attorneys against one troll.

Glad I could, once again.........

KICK YOUR TROLL ASS!

Oh, I get it alright.

You think an attorney who's discussing degrees of consanguinity and not gender is corroborating your insanity that two family members of the same gender can marry each other.

You think the state of Iowa prohibits a man from marrying his brother-in-law but not his biological brother.

You think a law which describes who is ineligible to marry is the same law which describes which marriages are void.

You think family members would marry each other to avoid paying taxes but can't find a single couple who did so.

And lastly, for you to swallow all of the above idiocy, you have to ignore Iowa law which bans ALL marriages within degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

See? I get it exactly.

Now show the refernced degrees

Do you not understand what your talking about? Or why iowa chose to add definition. The attorneys do.

But who are they to argue with a dipshit Internet troll such as you?

 

[Faun]

And that has what to do with your point that you idiotically think same-sex siblings or parents/children can marry each other? You're now changing your argument from this being about gender to it being about the degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

Nope, mines the same, blood related, not on the list, good to go

Twisted in knots are you?

He's talking about degrees and you're talking gender.

Nice epic fail, perv23.

No, not sure you get it nanny goat guy.

Simply put, Iowa law prohibits all forms of affinity marriage, but allows certain kinds of blood marriages, regardless of degree, because bonehead justices changed one part of Iowa 595 while remaining silent on 595.19.

Found a legal expert to back your silly notions yet?

I have

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

And backed that up with:

From Cpaatlaw.com:

The state of Iowa chose to remain silent on this question; its statute declares as void any marriage between "a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter" (and vice versa) in Iowa Code Ann. § 595.19. The court in Varnum v. Brien did not mention 595.19 or consanguinity and the legislature has not updated the statute since. As such, Iowa has seen fit to allow close same-sex relatives to marry; accordingly, an unmarried woman can marry her daughter and pass wealth to her tax free.

Two attorneys against one troll.

Glad I could, once again.........

KICK YOUR TROLL ASS!

Oh, I get it alright.

You think an attorney who's discussing degrees of consanguinity and not gender is corroborating your insanity that two family members of the same gender can marry each other.

You think the state of Iowa prohibits a man from marrying his brother-in-law but not his biological brother.

You think a law which describes who is ineligible to marry is the same law which describes which marriages are void.

You think family members would marry each other to avoid paying taxes but can't find a single couple who did so.

And lastly, for you to swallow all of the above idiocy, you have to ignore Iowa law which bans ALL marriages within degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

See? I get it exactly.

Now show the refernced degrees

Do you not understand what your talking about? Or why iowa chose to add definition. The attorneys do.

But who are they to argue with a dipshit Internet troll such as you?

Degrees of consanguinity have nothing at all to do with gender.

Now ya know.

 

[Pop23]

[/FONT][/B]

Nope, mines the same, blood related, not on the list, good to go

Twisted in knots are you?

He's talking about degrees and you're talking gender.

Nice epic fail, perv23.

No, not sure you get it nanny goat guy.

Simply put, Iowa law prohibits all forms of affinity marriage, but allows certain kinds of blood marriages, regardless of degree, because bonehead justices changed one part of Iowa 595 while remaining silent on 595.19.

Found a legal expert to back your silly notions yet?

I have

Can a woman and her great-uncle marry? - Avvo.com

And backed that up with:

From Cpaatlaw.com:

The state of Iowa chose to remain silent on this question; its statute declares as void any marriage between "a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter" (and vice versa) in Iowa Code Ann. § 595.19. The court in Varnum v. Brien did not mention 595.19 or consanguinity and the legislature has not updated the statute since. As such, Iowa has seen fit to allow close same-sex relatives to marry; accordingly, an unmarried woman can marry her daughter and pass wealth to her tax free.

Two attorneys against one troll.

Glad I could, once again.........

KICK YOUR TROLL ASS!

Oh, I get it alright.

You think an attorney who's discussing degrees of consanguinity and not gender is corroborating your insanity that two family members of the same gender can marry each other.

You think the state of Iowa prohibits a man from marrying his brother-in-law but not his biological brother.

You think a law which describes who is ineligible to marry is the same law which describes which marriages are void.

You think family members would marry each other to avoid paying taxes but can't find a single couple who did so.

And lastly, for you to swallow all of the above idiocy, you have to ignore Iowa law which bans ALL marriages within degrees of consanguinity or affinity.

Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.​

See? I get it exactly.

Now show the refernced degrees

Do you not understand what your talking about? Or why iowa chose to add definition. The attorneys do.

But who are they to argue with a dipshit Internet troll such as you?

Degrees of consanguinity have nothing at all to do with gender.
Now ya know.

yippee skippy!

Appears it does in Iowa thanks to stupid asses Iowa Supreme Court justices.

Now, care to provide any evidence that conflict with the 5 legal experts and two web resources I've supplied dozens of times indicating that same sex closely related family members can Marry in Iowa?

Or are you going to continue this charade?

Charade continues is 3.....2.....1