It's easier to condemn homosexuality

[Faun]

Funny how Iowa still uses those marriage instructions you've deluded yourself into believing you've discredited.

The ones you think allows adoptive parents to marry their adopted children?

Oh, maybe you like that idea?

Pervert

Ya mean like this couple....?

Father, Adopted Son Seek Right To Marry Each Other

Judge Lawrence J. O’Toole, of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, denied the couple’s request saying that he was “sensitive to the situation” but that they cannot marry “because they are legally father and son.”​

... if you were right that couples such as this one could marry each other in Iowa, they would have ran to Iowa in a heartbeat to get married.

Nope, affinity marriage is illegal in Iowa.

Do you not understand you're own argument?

You argue you're pamphlet represents the Iowa state law, if it did, that couple could. Iowa prohibits affinity marriage, PROVING YOURE PAMPHLET IRRELEVANT.

And FaunPerv, no matter how hard it makes you, an adopted parent cannot marry an adopted stepchild

You are one deranged MF, if you think otherwise.

The derangement is all yours as you've been claiming that same-sex close-family members could marry each other.

Seems you finally figured out they can't.

I WISH. If only Iowa 595 agreed.

But sadly, only the following Marriages are considered void in Iowa.

If I've forgotten to post them directly in the past, please allow me to post them now.......

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

I know, Right?

Not a single same sex family member would have their license declared void.

You must be thinking the same as me........

WOW, those Supreme Court Justices were complete morons!

I'll leave you to argue with yourself.

Before, you said that couple couldn't get married in Iowa...

Nope, affinity marriage is illegal in Iowa.​

... now you say they can marry.

Let me know who wins this argument you're having with yourself.

 

[Pop23]

The ones you think allows adoptive parents to marry their adopted children?

Oh, maybe you like that idea?

Pervert

Ya mean like this couple....?

Father, Adopted Son Seek Right To Marry Each Other

Judge Lawrence J. O’Toole, of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, denied the couple’s request saying that he was “sensitive to the situation” but that they cannot marry “because they are legally father and son.”​

... if you were right that couples such as this one could marry each other in Iowa, they would have ran to Iowa in a heartbeat to get married.

Nope, affinity marriage is illegal in Iowa.

Do you not understand you're own argument?

You argue you're pamphlet represents the Iowa state law, if it did, that couple could. Iowa prohibits affinity marriage, PROVING YOURE PAMPHLET IRRELEVANT.

And FaunPerv, no matter how hard it makes you, an adopted parent cannot marry an adopted stepchild

You are one deranged MF, if you think otherwise.

The derangement is all yours as you've been claiming that same-sex close-family members could marry each other.

Seems you finally figured out they can't.

I WISH. If only Iowa 595 agreed.

But sadly, only the following Marriages are considered void in Iowa.

If I've forgotten to post them directly in the past, please allow me to post them now.......

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

I know, Right?

Not a single same sex family member would have their license declared void.

You must be thinking the same as me........

WOW, those Supreme Court Justices were complete morons!

I'll leave you to argue with yourself.

Before, you said that couple couldn't get married in Iowa...

Nope, affinity marriage is illegal in Iowa.​

... now you say they can marry.

Let me know who wins this argument you're having with yourself.

Where did I say that related individuals by affinity can marry?

Affinity (law) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Adopted children are related by affinity, not blood


595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage



Check out item #1. It references Blood related, not by affinity.

Too bad I had to spoil another of your perverted fantasies.

Once you get you're head out youre butt, maybe you could make a point that sticks?

 

[Faun]

Ya mean like this couple....?

Father, Adopted Son Seek Right To Marry Each Other

Judge Lawrence J. O’Toole, of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, denied the couple’s request saying that he was “sensitive to the situation” but that they cannot marry “because they are legally father and son.”​

... if you were right that couples such as this one could marry each other in Iowa, they would have ran to Iowa in a heartbeat to get married.

Nope, affinity marriage is illegal in Iowa.

Do you not understand you're own argument?

You argue you're pamphlet represents the Iowa state law, if it did, that couple could. Iowa prohibits affinity marriage, PROVING YOURE PAMPHLET IRRELEVANT.

And FaunPerv, no matter how hard it makes you, an adopted parent cannot marry an adopted stepchild

You are one deranged MF, if you think otherwise.

The derangement is all yours as you've been claiming that same-sex close-family members could marry each other.

Seems you finally figured out they can't.

I WISH. If only Iowa 595 agreed.

But sadly, only the following Marriages are considered void in Iowa.

If I've forgotten to post them directly in the past, please allow me to post them now.......

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

I know, Right?

Not a single same sex family member would have their license declared void.

You must be thinking the same as me........

WOW, those Supreme Court Justices were complete morons!

I'll leave you to argue with yourself.

Before, you said that couple couldn't get married in Iowa...

Nope, affinity marriage is illegal in Iowa.​

... now you say they can marry.

Let me know who wins this argument you're having with yourself.

Where did I say that related individuals by affinity can marry?

Imbecile. The same law which prohibits affinity marriage also prohibits consanguineous marriage...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   
   
2. Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   
   
3. Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   
   
4. Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   
   
5. Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

​

 

[Pop23]

Nope, affinity marriage is illegal in Iowa.

Do you not understand you're own argument?

You argue you're pamphlet represents the Iowa state law, if it did, that couple could. Iowa prohibits affinity marriage, PROVING YOURE PAMPHLET IRRELEVANT.

And FaunPerv, no matter how hard it makes you, an adopted parent cannot marry an adopted stepchild

You are one deranged MF, if you think otherwise.

The derangement is all yours as you've been claiming that same-sex close-family members could marry each other.

Seems you finally figured out they can't.

I WISH. If only Iowa 595 agreed.

But sadly, only the following Marriages are considered void in Iowa.

If I've forgotten to post them directly in the past, please allow me to post them now.......

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

I know, Right?

Not a single same sex family member would have their license declared void.

You must be thinking the same as me........

WOW, those Supreme Court Justices were complete morons!

I'll leave you to argue with yourself.

Before, you said that couple couldn't get married in Iowa...

Nope, affinity marriage is illegal in Iowa.​

... now you say they can marry.

Let me know who wins this argument you're having with yourself.

Where did I say that related individuals by affinity can marry?

Imbecile. The same law which prohibits affinity marriage also prohibits consanguineous marriage...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

And yet they qualify blood related in this manner:


595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage

No such qualification for affinity marriage, simply blood marriage.

 

[Faun]

The derangement is all yours as you've been claiming that same-sex close-family members could marry each other.

Seems you finally figured out they can't.

I WISH. If only Iowa 595 agreed.

But sadly, only the following Marriages are considered void in Iowa.

If I've forgotten to post them directly in the past, please allow me to post them now.......

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

I know, Right?

Not a single same sex family member would have their license declared void.

You must be thinking the same as me........

WOW, those Supreme Court Justices were complete morons!

I'll leave you to argue with yourself.

Before, you said that couple couldn't get married in Iowa...

Nope, affinity marriage is illegal in Iowa.​

... now you say they can marry.

Let me know who wins this argument you're having with yourself.

Where did I say that related individuals by affinity can marry?

Imbecile. The same law which prohibits affinity marriage also prohibits consanguineous marriage...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

And yet they qualify blood related in this manner:


595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage

No such qualification for affinity marriage, simply blood marriage.

Shows just how stupid you are. You actually saying it's illegal for a same-sex consanguineous couple to get married, but should they slip through the cracks and manage to get married despite 595.3, then their marriage is legal because of 595.19.

 

[Pop23]

I WISH. If only Iowa 595 agreed.

But sadly, only the following Marriages are considered void in Iowa.

If I've forgotten to post them directly in the past, please allow me to post them now.......

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

I know, Right?

Not a single same sex family member would have their license declared void.

You must be thinking the same as me........

WOW, those Supreme Court Justices were complete morons!

I'll leave you to argue with yourself.

Before, you said that couple couldn't get married in Iowa...

Nope, affinity marriage is illegal in Iowa.​

... now you say they can marry.

Let me know who wins this argument you're having with yourself.

Where did I say that related individuals by affinity can marry?

Imbecile. The same law which prohibits affinity marriage also prohibits consanguineous marriage...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

And yet they qualify blood related in this manner:


595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage

No such qualification for affinity marriage, simply blood marriage.

Shows just how stupid you are. You actually saying it's illegal for a same-sex consanguineous couple to get married, but should they slip through the cracks and manage to get married despite 595.3, then their marriage is legal because of 595.19.

No crack to slip through. They have the right to a valid licence.

The list of those blood relatives that don't has been supplied many times

And that assertion has been backed up by 5 legal experts that were also linked to.

Of course, you've supplied none.

 

[Faun]

I'll leave you to argue with yourself.

Before, you said that couple couldn't get married in Iowa...

Nope, affinity marriage is illegal in Iowa.​

... now you say they can marry.

Let me know who wins this argument you're having with yourself.

Where did I say that related individuals by affinity can marry?

Imbecile. The same law which prohibits affinity marriage also prohibits consanguineous marriage...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

And yet they qualify blood related in this manner:


595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage

No such qualification for affinity marriage, simply blood marriage.

Shows just how stupid you are. You actually saying it's illegal for a same-sex consanguineous couple to get married, but should they slip through the cracks and manage to get married despite 595.3, then their marriage is legal because of 595.19.

No crack to slip through. They have the right to a valid licence.

The list of those blood relatives that don't has been supplied many times

And that assertion has been backed up by 5 legal experts that were also linked to.

Of course, you've supplied none.

The law says they don't. Shows just how retarded you are.

 

[Pop23]

Where did I say that related individuals by affinity can marry?

Imbecile. The same law which prohibits affinity marriage also prohibits consanguineous marriage...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

And yet they qualify blood related in this manner:


595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage

No such qualification for affinity marriage, simply blood marriage.

Shows just how stupid you are. You actually saying it's illegal for a same-sex consanguineous couple to get married, but should they slip through the cracks and manage to get married despite 595.3, then their marriage is legal because of 595.19.

No crack to slip through. They have the right to a valid licence.

The list of those blood relatives that don't has been supplied many times

And that assertion has been backed up by 5 legal experts that were also linked to.

Of course, you've supplied none.

The law says they don't. Shows just how retarded you are.

Just the opposite is true. And it's not just me who says so, its 5 legal experts.

Against you.

Laughing my ass off

 

[Faun]

Imbecile. The same law which prohibits affinity marriage also prohibits consanguineous marriage...

595.3 LICENSE.

Previous to the solemnization of any marriage, a license for that purpose must be obtained from the county registrar. The license must not be granted in any case:

1. 
   
   
   • Where either party is under the age necessary to render the marriage valid.
   • Where either party is under eighteen years of age, unless the marriage is approved by a judge of the district court as provided by section 595.2.
   • Where either party is disqualified from making any civil contract.
   • Where the parties are within the degrees of consanguinity or affinity in which marriages are prohibited by law.
   • Where either party is a ward under a guardianship and the court has made a finding that the ward lacks the capacity to contract a valid marriage.

And yet they qualify blood related in this manner:


595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage

No such qualification for affinity marriage, simply blood marriage.

Shows just how stupid you are. You actually saying it's illegal for a same-sex consanguineous couple to get married, but should they slip through the cracks and manage to get married despite 595.3, then their marriage is legal because of 595.19.

No crack to slip through. They have the right to a valid licence.

The list of those blood relatives that don't has been supplied many times

And that assertion has been backed up by 5 legal experts that were also linked to.

Of course, you've supplied none.

The law says they don't. Shows just how retarded you are.

Just the opposite is true. And it's not just me who says so, its 5 legal experts.

Against you.

Laughing my ass off

Umm, if you weren't delusional, there would be such married couples.

 

[Pop23]

And yet they qualify blood related in this manner:


595.19 VOID MARRIAGES. 1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by blood are void: a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister, daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's daughter, or sister's daughter. b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or sister's son. c. Between first cousins. 2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage

No such qualification for affinity marriage, simply blood marriage.

Shows just how stupid you are. You actually saying it's illegal for a same-sex consanguineous couple to get married, but should they slip through the cracks and manage to get married despite 595.3, then their marriage is legal because of 595.19.

No crack to slip through. They have the right to a valid licence.

The list of those blood relatives that don't has been supplied many times

And that assertion has been backed up by 5 legal experts that were also linked to.

Of course, you've supplied none.

The law says they don't. Shows just how retarded you are.

Just the opposite is true. And it's not just me who says so, its 5 legal experts.

Against you.

Laughing my ass off

Umm, if you weren't delusional, there would be such married couples.

And you've provided no proof there aren't.

 

[Faun]

Shows just how stupid you are. You actually saying it's illegal for a same-sex consanguineous couple to get married, but should they slip through the cracks and manage to get married despite 595.3, then their marriage is legal because of 595.19.

No crack to slip through. They have the right to a valid licence.

The list of those blood relatives that don't has been supplied many times

And that assertion has been backed up by 5 legal experts that were also linked to.

Of course, you've supplied none.

The law says they don't. Shows just how retarded you are.

Just the opposite is true. And it's not just me who says so, its 5 legal experts.

Against you.

Laughing my ass off

Umm, if you weren't delusional, there would be such married couples.

And you've provided no proof there aren't.

I don't have to prove a negative. You said it would happen. You can't prove it did.

 

[Pop23]

No crack to slip through. They have the right to a valid licence.

The list of those blood relatives that don't has been supplied many times

And that assertion has been backed up by 5 legal experts that were also linked to.

Of course, you've supplied none.

The law says they don't. Shows just how retarded you are.

Just the opposite is true. And it's not just me who says so, its 5 legal experts.

Against you.

Laughing my ass off

Umm, if you weren't delusional, there would be such married couples.

And you've provided no proof there aren't.

I don't have to prove a negative. You said it would happen. You can't prove it did.

Then I'll reissue the challange lil billy goat boy:

Since iowa does not require blood or DNA tests, you supply funding for everyone married since 2009 and prove you're point.

And again, the fun fact:

If the test turns up an opposite sex blood related family couple. Their license would be voided.

If the test turns up a same sex blood related same sex couple, theirs would be valid.

Laughing my ass off at you AGAIN!

 

[Skylar]

No crack to slip through. They have the right to a valid licence.

The list of those blood relatives that don't has been supplied many times

And that assertion has been backed up by 5 legal experts that were also linked to.

Of course, you've supplied none.

The law says they don't. Shows just how retarded you are.

Just the opposite is true. And it's not just me who says so, its 5 legal experts.

Against you.

Laughing my ass off

Umm, if you weren't delusional, there would be such married couples.

And you've provided no proof there aren't.

I don't have to prove a negative. You said it would happen. You can't prove it did.

Yeah, but he imagines it did. Just like he imagined it would. So you're talking apples and oranges.

You're talking about the real world. He's talking about his imagination.

 

[Pop23]

The law says they don't. Shows just how retarded you are.

Just the opposite is true. And it's not just me who says so, its 5 legal experts.

Against you.

Laughing my ass off

Umm, if you weren't delusional, there would be such married couples.

And you've provided no proof there aren't.

I don't have to prove a negative. You said it would happen. You can't prove it did.

Yeah, but he imagines it did. Just like he imagined it would. So you're talking apples and oranges.

You're talking about the real world. He's talking about his imagination.

The real world (a foreign land to you) is that Iowa does not require blood nor DNA testing.

Fauns attempt to get Skylar to save his ass is funny as hell though.

 

[Faun]

The law says they don't. Shows just how retarded you are.

Just the opposite is true. And it's not just me who says so, its 5 legal experts.

Against you.

Laughing my ass off

Umm, if you weren't delusional, there would be such married couples.

And you've provided no proof there aren't.

I don't have to prove a negative. You said it would happen. You can't prove it did.

Then I'll reissue the challange lil billy goat boy:

Since iowa does not require blood or DNA tests, you supply funding for everyone married since 2009 and prove you're point.

And again, the fun fact:

If the test turns up an opposite sex blood related family couple. Their license would be voided.

If the test turns up a same sex blood related same sex couple, theirs would be valid.

Laughing my ass off at you AGAIN!

You're too fucking retarded.

You're argument is now reduced to ... Iowa doesn't allow close-family marriage but if such couples can trick the government into not knowing they're related, then they can marry each other even though the law forbids such marriages.

Dumbfuck.... that has always been the case in every state since the birth of this nation. It certainly has nothing to do with same-sex marriages becoming legal.

 

[Pop23]

Just the opposite is true. And it's not just me who says so, its 5 legal experts.

Against you.

Laughing my ass off

Umm, if you weren't delusional, there would be such married couples.

And you've provided no proof there aren't.

I don't have to prove a negative. You said it would happen. You can't prove it did.

Then I'll reissue the challange lil billy goat boy:

Since iowa does not require blood or DNA tests, you supply funding for everyone married since 2009 and prove you're point.

And again, the fun fact:

If the test turns up an opposite sex blood related family couple. Their license would be voided.

If the test turns up a same sex blood related same sex couple, theirs would be valid.

Laughing my ass off at you AGAIN!

You're too fucking retarded.

You're argument is now reduced to ... Iowa doesn't allow close-family marriage but if such couples can trick the government into not knowing they're related, then they can marry each other even though the law forbids such marriages.

Dumbfuck.... that has always been the case in every state since the birth of this nation. It certainly has nothing to do with same-sex marriages becoming legal.

I've said it before, frame you're own debate, you're lousy at framing mine.

Iowa law allows the legal marriage of blood related immediate family members.

I've backed my opinion with at least 5 legal experts.

That debate has been won by me.

You lose again

 

[Faun]

Umm, if you weren't delusional, there would be such married couples.

And you've provided no proof there aren't.

I don't have to prove a negative. You said it would happen. You can't prove it did.

Then I'll reissue the challange lil billy goat boy:

Since iowa does not require blood or DNA tests, you supply funding for everyone married since 2009 and prove you're point.

And again, the fun fact:

If the test turns up an opposite sex blood related family couple. Their license would be voided.

If the test turns up a same sex blood related same sex couple, theirs would be valid.

Laughing my ass off at you AGAIN!

You're too fucking retarded.

You're argument is now reduced to ... Iowa doesn't allow close-family marriage but if such couples can trick the government into not knowing they're related, then they can marry each other even though the law forbids such marriages.

Dumbfuck.... that has always been the case in every state since the birth of this nation. It certainly has nothing to do with same-sex marriages becoming legal.

I've said it before, frame you're own debate, you're lousy at framing mine.

Iowa law allows the legal marriage of blood related immediate family members.

I've backed my opinion with at least 5 legal experts.

That debate has been won by me.

You lose again

Keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, Iowa states otherwise...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

 

[Pop23]

And you've provided no proof there aren't.

I don't have to prove a negative. You said it would happen. You can't prove it did.

Then I'll reissue the challange lil billy goat boy:

Since iowa does not require blood or DNA tests, you supply funding for everyone married since 2009 and prove you're point.

And again, the fun fact:

If the test turns up an opposite sex blood related family couple. Their license would be voided.

If the test turns up a same sex blood related same sex couple, theirs would be valid.

Laughing my ass off at you AGAIN!

You're too fucking retarded.

You're argument is now reduced to ... Iowa doesn't allow close-family marriage but if such couples can trick the government into not knowing they're related, then they can marry each other even though the law forbids such marriages.

Dumbfuck.... that has always been the case in every state since the birth of this nation. It certainly has nothing to do with same-sex marriages becoming legal.

I've said it before, frame you're own debate, you're lousy at framing mine.

Iowa law allows the legal marriage of blood related immediate family members.

I've backed my opinion with at least 5 legal experts.

That debate has been won by me.

You lose again

Keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, Iowa states otherwise...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Yet your discredited pamphlet can lead to the truth, which is:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

All means same sex family can marry.

 

[Faun]

I don't have to prove a negative. You said it would happen. You can't prove it did.

Then I'll reissue the challange lil billy goat boy:

Since iowa does not require blood or DNA tests, you supply funding for everyone married since 2009 and prove you're point.

And again, the fun fact:

If the test turns up an opposite sex blood related family couple. Their license would be voided.

If the test turns up a same sex blood related same sex couple, theirs would be valid.

Laughing my ass off at you AGAIN!

You're too fucking retarded.

You're argument is now reduced to ... Iowa doesn't allow close-family marriage but if such couples can trick the government into not knowing they're related, then they can marry each other even though the law forbids such marriages.

Dumbfuck.... that has always been the case in every state since the birth of this nation. It certainly has nothing to do with same-sex marriages becoming legal.

I've said it before, frame you're own debate, you're lousy at framing mine.

Iowa law allows the legal marriage of blood related immediate family members.

I've backed my opinion with at least 5 legal experts.

That debate has been won by me.

You lose again

Keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, Iowa states otherwise...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Yet your discredited pamphlet can lead to the truth, which is:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

All means same sex family can marry.

Iowa's marriage application instructions are not "discredited" simply because you believe them to be. In fact, Iowa still uses them and urges all applicants to read them.

And look... such marriages, in accordance with Iowa law, are banned...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

 

[Pop23]

Then I'll reissue the challange lil billy goat boy:

Since iowa does not require blood or DNA tests, you supply funding for everyone married since 2009 and prove you're point.

And again, the fun fact:

If the test turns up an opposite sex blood related family couple. Their license would be voided.

If the test turns up a same sex blood related same sex couple, theirs would be valid.

Laughing my ass off at you AGAIN!

You're too fucking retarded.

You're argument is now reduced to ... Iowa doesn't allow close-family marriage but if such couples can trick the government into not knowing they're related, then they can marry each other even though the law forbids such marriages.

Dumbfuck.... that has always been the case in every state since the birth of this nation. It certainly has nothing to do with same-sex marriages becoming legal.

I've said it before, frame you're own debate, you're lousy at framing mine.

Iowa law allows the legal marriage of blood related immediate family members.

I've backed my opinion with at least 5 legal experts.

That debate has been won by me.

You lose again

Keep telling yourself that. Meanwhile, Iowa states otherwise...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Yet your discredited pamphlet can lead to the truth, which is:

595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

All means same sex family can marry.

Iowa's marriage application instructions are not "discredited" simply because you believe them to be. In fact, Iowa still uses them and urges all applicants to read them.

And look... such marriages, in accordance with Iowa law, are banned...

State of Iowa
Marriage Instructions​

IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!

Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.​

Then step parents can Marry the stepdaughter because your pamphlet doesn't mention affinity marriage.

The law ACTUALLY a does reference blood marriage, like such:
595.19 VOID MARRIAGES.
1. Marriages between the following persons who are related by
blood are void:
a. Between a man and his father's sister, mother's sister,
daughter, sister, son's daughter, daughter's daughter, brother's
daughter, or sister's daughter.
b. Between a woman and her father's brother, mother's
brother, son, brother, son's son, daughter's son, brother's son, or
sister's son.
c. Between first cousins.
2. Marriages between persons either of whom has a husband or wife
living are void, but, if the parties live and cohabit together after
the death or divorce of the former husband or wife, such marriage
shall be valid.

AND, I've posted 5 (count em 5) legal experts that back me up. That same sex blood related family members can Marry in Iowa.

You, well we can expect Skylar to show up with his stupid ass crap again.....

But sadly, you won't supply a single legal expert to back up you're argument.