Boss
Take a Memo:
- Thread starter
- #1,301
[Q
Hey don't try and use the Bible against me, I'm not a Christian. I was just pointing out that SCOTUS doesn't control religious doctrine. You people seem to want to equate this with Civil Rights but the movement for civil rights was led by a black pastor, Dr. King. It was a grass-roots movement spearheaded by the church and the issue of homosexuals marrying is condemned by the church. There is no moral equivalency, but hey... don't let that stop you from claiming it!
"Condemned by the church'?
What church? Certainly the Catholic Church- but most Americans are not Catholics. There is no 'the church' in America- and as you point out- you don't belong to any of them.
Most churches do not accept same gender marriage yet- but a considerable number do. The United Church of Christ, Unitarians,
And not that Christians care what Jews think- but Reform Jews accept gay marriage and rabbi's will marry same gender couples.
But hey- not as if you care what minorities like Jews or homosexuals think- right?
Misleading as usual. Most churches do not accept or condone homosexuality or homosexual marriage. Tolerating it is not accepting or condoning it. That is where you're confused. Are there a few oddball examples out there of churches who accept and condone homosexuality? Sure there are, religion is widespread and diverse in this country because we have religious freedom. It's a far cry from "most" or "a majority" by any stretch. And that is not going to change due to a SCOTUS ruling... and it certainly isn't going to change when the ramifications of that ruling are realized.
But YOUR moral relativist viewpoint IS going to change. You're already finding no reason to object to polygamy or brother/sister marriage in some cases. When the time comes, you will support virtually ANY kind of marriage demanded by any pervert minority. All you need to embolden you is the knowledge that other pinheads like you have your back.