Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A Case That Could Seriously Undermine Roe v. Wade Is Before SCOTUS
Pro-aborts have seen the writing on the wall, Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned, or in someway rendered irrelevant indirectly by Louisiana's law that abortion doctors have to have hospital privileges.
That's why the push is on to have the states go beyond Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion all the way to the moment of birth, like they have just done in New York, and they tried to do in Virginia.
It will become a state to state battle and our nation will be divided between life states and death states, in the same way the states were once divided between free states and slave states.
There are maybe two justices right now that might support the overturning of RvW...neither of which were appointed by Trump.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Concerning law and predictability of decision making, you are correct. The fear however is that after spending hundreds of millions of dollars on getting Gorsuch and Kavenaugh, the anti-abortion lobby will achieve its goal of effectively overruling Roe and Casey by making the right to terminate a pregnancy in even the first trimester a state, and not a federal, constitutional matter. And if the anti-abortion lobby doesn't get the result it believes is rightfully theirs, what will they do?The law passed in Louisiana requires doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. I expect the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS) will find this restriction on abortions to be unconstitutional. My belief is based upon a SCOTUS decision in a similar case back in 2016. The entire decision is quite lengthy so I will give just two relevant excerpts
In 2013, the Texas Legislature enacted House Bill 2 (H. B. 2), which contains the two provisions challenged here. The "admittingprivileges requirement" provides that a "physician performing or inducing an abortion ... must, on the date [of service], have active admitting privileges at a hospital ... located not further than 30 miles from the" abortion facility. The "surgical-center requirement" requires an "abortion facility" to meet the "minimum standards ... for ambulatory surgical centers" under Texas law.
We conclude that neither of these provisions confers medical benefits sufficient to justify the burdens upon access that each imposes. Each places a substantial obstacle in the path of women seeking a previability abortion, each constitutes an undue burden on abortion access, Casey, supra, at 878, 112 S.Ct. 2791 (plurality opinion), and each violates the Federal Constitution. Amdt. 14, § 1.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12719084930434459940&q=Whole+Woman%E2%80%99s+Health+v.+Hellerstedt&hl=en&as_sdt=40006&as_vis=1
It's no more dangerous that any other outpatient procedure. LOLThat's true, New York has brought back back alley abortions, only they will be performed inside the clinic.That's why democrats want abortions to be performed by hires right off the street.
It is a mystery to me how abortion advocates can insist that they're concerned about the best interests of women, and then fight to have serious, risky medical procedures performed by any schlub who wanders in off the street.
Don't like abortions, don't have one. But don't try to control women's bodies. Before you know it, the majority of women just might pass laws controlling men's bodies.A Case That Could Seriously Undermine Roe v. Wade Is Before SCOTUS
Pro-aborts have seen the writing on the wall, Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned, or in someway rendered irrelevant indirectly by Louisiana's law that abortion doctors have to have hospital privileges.
That's why the push is on to have the states go beyond Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion all the way to the moment of birth, like they have just done in New York, and they tried to do in Virginia.
It will become a state to state battle and our nation will be divided between life states and death states, in the same way the states were once divided between free states and slave states.
Nah... We’ll just keep lobbying to defend the defenseless against killers.Don't like abortions, don't have one. But don't try to control women's bodies. Before you know it, the majority of women just might pass laws controlling men's bodies.A Case That Could Seriously Undermine Roe v. Wade Is Before SCOTUS
Pro-aborts have seen the writing on the wall, Roe v. Wade will soon be overturned, or in someway rendered irrelevant indirectly by Louisiana's law that abortion doctors have to have hospital privileges.
That's why the push is on to have the states go beyond Roe v. Wade to legalize abortion all the way to the moment of birth, like they have just done in New York, and they tried to do in Virginia.
It will become a state to state battle and our nation will be divided between life states and death states, in the same way the states were once divided between free states and slave states.
Sorry...never will and never should happen. You can give up on that fantasy right now.Except when someone grows the brains and nerve to point out that it’s a man’s baby, too, stipulated upon the contract of copulation.
Which you only do to feel self righteous. If you truly cared about preventing abortions, you would be undertaken the proven effective steps to do so.Nah... We’ll just keep lobbying to defend the defenseless against killers.
“Never”... Famous last words...Sorry...never will and never should happen. You can give up on that fantasy right now.Except when someone grows the brains and nerve to point out that it’s a man’s baby, too, stipulated upon the contract of copulation.
Not worried....“Never”... Famous last words...Sorry...never will and never should happen. You can give up on that fantasy right now.Except when someone grows the brains and nerve to point out that it’s a man’s baby, too, stipulated upon the contract of copulation.
Good... All the better for advancing men’s, and fathers rights...Not worried....“Never”... Famous last words...Sorry...never will and never should happen. You can give up on that fantasy right now.Except when someone grows the brains and nerve to point out that it’s a man’s baby, too, stipulated upon the contract of copulation.
Actually, I only spoke to that one "right", which isn't a right and will never be. The same principle by which we legalize abortion -- woman's choice -- will prevent that silly "right".Good... All the better for advancing men’s, and fathers rights...Not worried....“Never”... Famous last words...Sorry...never will and never should happen. You can give up on that fantasy right now.Except when someone grows the brains and nerve to point out that it’s a man’s baby, too, stipulated upon the contract of copulation.
I don’t really much care what you thought you were talking about. Or what you “consider” to be a right. I find it more productive to get the laws corrected; and leave you to think what you want. I’m not trying to change your mind. We’re working to change the law. But you’re “not worried”. So I guess we’re done here. Catch you around...Actually, I only spoke to that one "right", which isn't a right and will never be. The same principle by which we legalize abortion -- woman's choice -- will prevent that silly "right".Good... All the better for advancing men’s, and fathers rights...Not worried....“Never”... Famous last words...Sorry...never will and never should happen. You can give up on that fantasy right now.Except when someone grows the brains and nerve to point out that it’s a man’s baby, too, stipulated upon the contract of copulation.
It's no more dangerous that any other outpatient procedure. LOLThat's true, New York has brought back back alley abortions, only they will be performed inside the clinic.That's why democrats want abortions to be performed by hires right off the street.
It is a mystery to me how abortion advocates can insist that they're concerned about the best interests of women, and then fight to have serious, risky medical procedures performed by any schlub who wanders in off the street.
Which you only do to feel self righteous. If you truly cared about preventing abortions, you would be undertaken the proven effective steps to do so.Nah... We’ll just keep lobbying to defend the defenseless against killers.
45 years says you are a fool, then. You only care about feing self righteous, not preventing abortions.. I find it more productive to get the laws corrected;
I’ve prevented thousands of pregnancies though. It’s called being “responsible”.45 years says you are a fool, then. You only care about feing self righteous, not preventing abortions.. I find it more productive to get the laws corrected;
If men could get pregnant eve would have died of starvation...If men could get pregnant there would be abortion clinics every four blocks.
If men could get pregnant there would be abortion clinics every four blocks.
