iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,920
- 1,600
ok - my bad then. trying to follow along on the live feed, in here, and get work done.I was replying to a specific allegation by Easy, not a compare and contrast essay on the two parties' behavior. But if you look at Post 148, you will see what I think of the whole thing.and the dems are not fishing for a crime that never happened? they're not looking for any transparency - they're trying AGAIN to validate something / ANYTHING to go after trump for.No, Republicans are not looking for transparency. They are fishing for a conspiracy theory that never happened.Republicans are asking him questions to attempt to get real answers / transparency. Mueller has already contradicted his own report findings several times despite attempting to stick to his report.This fucking old bat was in charge of an investigation into the POTUS???
Are you fucking kidding me?
This motherfucker can’t tie his shoes.
What a joke!
Refer to the report....it’s outside my purview....please repeat the question....what page?
Mueller has no idea what anyone is about to ask him. He is also under the restrictions the White House imposed on his testimony, and harm to ongoing investigations. When they cite a page or a comment, he has to think about all of these things and consider his answers carefully.
Mueller isn't out to "get" anybody, but the Republicans at the hearing are clearly out to "get" Mueller. They're peppering him with their rapid fire testimony and then jumping in with more questions before he can find the citation, put it in context and determine whether or not he can answer the question.
Republicans are deliberately questioning Mueller about things the White House has told him he cannot speak to, to make it look like Mueller is hiding things.
We're not being fooled.
they were after collusion / conspiracy. when that was found to be 100% incorrect, they go for obstruction.
how is that *NOT* fishing for any crime you can pin on trump?
thank you for the clarification.