Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yeah, in context...instead of making an asshole out of yourself, be an adult and admit you don't understand rap music.Guess that leaves you out. .Educated people don't use words like ni&&er except in an historical context.Yes your stupidity is amusing. Many of us have tried to educated you but it turns out you're just a stupid n*gger.
Educated people use it WHEN the word applies in any context.
and 99% of black rappers who use the word multiple times.
it's only racist when the intent is (damn you clowns are ignorant.)Guess that leaves you out. .Educated people don't use words like ni&&er except in an historical context.
Educated people use it WHEN the word applies in any context.
and 99% of black rappers who use the word multiple times.
To people like daws101, it's OK when black people use a WORD they consider racist. They base their determination of whether or not a WORD is racist on who uses it.
your post proves it correct and your grade school retort " I know you are but what am I ." is the nail in the coffin.false! it doesn't matter what "race" he is.Guess that leaves you out. .Educated people don't use words like ni&&er except in an historical context.
Educated people use it WHEN the word applies in any context.
Guess it means you don't realize he is one.
Contrary to popular belief, a ****** is a person who: Is loud, ignorant and annoying. Ghetto, smells like shit, and is almost 100% uneducated. They love to complain, but don't get off their lazy asses to do anything about it. Many of them are also fat.
While others may think differently, there is a wide margin of difference between a ******, and a African person. Anyone can be a ******, despite their race, color or creed.
from that description you are a ******!
Since I'm not any of those things that fit the definition, I can't be one. Too bad you are.
your post proves it correct and your grade school retort " I know you are but what am I ." is the nail in the coffin.false! it doesn't matter what "race" he is.Guess that leaves you out. .Educated people use it WHEN the word applies in any context.
Guess it means you don't realize he is one.
Contrary to popular belief, a ****** is a person who: Is loud, ignorant and annoying. Ghetto, smells like shit, and is almost 100% uneducated. They love to complain, but don't get off their lazy asses to do anything about it. Many of them are also fat.
While others may think differently, there is a wide margin of difference between a ******, and a African person. Anyone can be a ******, despite their race, color or creed.
from that description you are a ******!
Since I'm not any of those things that fit the definition, I can't be one. Too bad you are.
no double standard applies.yeah, in context...instead of making an asshole out of yourself, be an adult and admit you don't understand rap music.Guess that leaves you out. .Educated people don't use words like ni&&er except in an historical context.
Educated people use it WHEN the word applies in any context.
and 99% of black rappers who use the word multiple times.
I understand that when a black rapper uses a TERM considered racist it isn't considered racist. However, when a white person uses the same TERM, it's considered racist. Be an adult and admit that you apply a double standard to the same TERM.
If a black calls other blacks a ******, why should they have a problem if someone agrees with them.
intent is always a factor.it's only racist when the intent is (damn you clowns are ignorant.)Guess that leaves you out. .Educated people use it WHEN the word applies in any context.
and 99% of black rappers who use the word multiple times.
To people like daws101, it's OK when black people use a WORD they consider racist. They base their determination of whether or not a WORD is racist on who uses it.
If the TERM is racist, intent is not a factor.
boy ?wow that's desperate.your post proves it correct and your grade school retort " I know you are but what am I ." is the nail in the coffin.false! it doesn't matter what "race" he is.Guess that leaves you out. .
Guess it means you don't realize he is one.
Contrary to popular belief, a ****** is a person who: Is loud, ignorant and annoying. Ghetto, smells like shit, and is almost 100% uneducated. They love to complain, but don't get off their lazy asses to do anything about it. Many of them are also fat.
While others may think differently, there is a wide margin of difference between a ******, and a African person. Anyone can be a ******, despite their race, color or creed.
from that description you are a ******!
Since I'm not any of those things that fit the definition, I can't be one. Too bad you are.
It's not my fault you're a ******. It's the way you were raised boy.
intent is always a factor.it's only racist when the intent is (damn you clowns are ignorant.)Guess that leaves you out. .
and 99% of black rappers who use the word multiple times.
To people like daws101, it's OK when black people use a WORD they consider racist. They base their determination of whether or not a WORD is racist on who uses it.
If the TERM is racist, intent is not a factor.
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
The U.S. Constitution applies to citizens and non-citizens alike. Check the text.
The notion that the U.S. Constitution only protects U.S. citizens is palpably false. It is an indictment of our education system that any American could think such an outrageous thing.
The drafters of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were educated men. They chose their words carefully. They debated over precise word choice. One can assume every word they chose was done with a purpose.
The Constitution and the first ten amendments distinguish between the concept of "people/persons" and the concept of "citizen." For example, Article I, Section 3, says "No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States...".
A "person" is therefore different from a "citizen." Everyone is a person, but only some are citizens.
This distinction is seen again in Article II, Section 1: "No Person except a natural born Citizen ... shall be eligible to the Office of President." Again, you may be a person, but you can't be President unless you are also a citizen. The drafters of the Constitution knew when they wanted it to apply to people and when they wanted it to apply only to citizens.
The first two paragraphs of Article IV, Section 2, clearly distinguish between "citizen" and "person." It reads:
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
Therefore, only citizens are entitled to "privileges and immunities" but all persons charged with a crime who then cross state lines shall "be delivered up." It does not matter if you are a citizen or not if you are a fugitive. Of course that makes sense.
The point, however, is that the Constitution and its Amendments clearly distinguish between "citizen" and "persons." "Citizen" means those either born in the United States (and subject to the jurisdiction thereof) or naturalized. "Persons" and "people" mean everyone.
For instance, the First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law ... abridging ... the right of the people peaceably to assemble...". The First Amendment therefore grants to all people the same protection against certain congressional action, regardless of citizenship status.
The Fourth Amendment, likewise, applies to the "people," and not just citizens. It reads: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated ...".
Likewish, the Fifth Amendment:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, ... nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
And the Sixth Amendment:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused [not just citizens] shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
The notion that the U.S. Constitution does not apply to non-citizens is incorrect. It even applies to those in the country illegally. For instance, the government cannot keep an illegal alien locked up indefinitely. An undocumented worker will still get an attorney appointed to him if charged with a crime. I hope this little blog post helps alleviate that misconception.
BlueCarp: The U.S. Constitution applies to citizens and non-citizens alike. Check the text.
speaking of intent....intent is always a factor.it's only racist when the intent is (damn you clowns are ignorant.)and 99% of black rappers who use the word multiple times.
To people like daws101, it's OK when black people use a WORD they consider racist. They base their determination of whether or not a WORD is racist on who uses it.
If the TERM is racist, intent is not a factor.
are you a mind reader? how exactly do you determine intent?
The constitution of 1993 includes a wide range of provisions guaranteeing the civil and human rights of Russia's citizens.Tuesday, January 17, 2012
The U.S. Constitution applies to citizens and non-citizens alike. Check the text.
The notion that the U.S. Constitution only protects U.S. citizens is palpably false. It is an indictment of our education system that any American could think such an outrageous thing.
The drafters of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were educated men. They chose their words carefully. They debated over precise word choice. One can assume every word they chose was done with a purpose.
The Constitution and the first ten amendments distinguish between the concept of "people/persons" and the concept of "citizen." For example, Article I, Section 3, says "No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States...".
A "person" is therefore different from a "citizen." Everyone is a person, but only some are citizens.
This distinction is seen again in Article II, Section 1: "No Person except a natural born Citizen ... shall be eligible to the Office of President." Again, you may be a person, but you can't be President unless you are also a citizen. The drafters of the Constitution knew when they wanted it to apply to people and when they wanted it to apply only to citizens.
The first two paragraphs of Article IV, Section 2, clearly distinguish between "citizen" and "person." It reads:
The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.
Therefore, only citizens are entitled to "privileges and immunities" but all persons charged with a crime who then cross state lines shall "be delivered up." It does not matter if you are a citizen or not if you are a fugitive. Of course that makes sense.
The point, however, is that the Constitution and its Amendments clearly distinguish between "citizen" and "persons." "Citizen" means those either born in the United States (and subject to the jurisdiction thereof) or naturalized. "Persons" and "people" mean everyone.
For instance, the First Amendment states that "Congress shall make no law ... abridging ... the right of the people peaceably to assemble...". The First Amendment therefore grants to all people the same protection against certain congressional action, regardless of citizenship status.
The Fourth Amendment, likewise, applies to the "people," and not just citizens. It reads: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated ...".
Likewish, the Fifth Amendment:
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, ... nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
And the Sixth Amendment:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused [not just citizens] shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
The notion that the U.S. Constitution does not apply to non-citizens is incorrect. It even applies to those in the country illegally. For instance, the government cannot keep an illegal alien locked up indefinitely. An undocumented worker will still get an attorney appointed to him if charged with a crime. I hope this little blog post helps alleviate that misconception.
BlueCarp: The U.S. Constitution applies to citizens and non-citizens alike. Check the text.
great, but no one has argued with that. the constitution applies to American citizens and any foreigner who is in the USA legally. It does not apply to non Americans in their country of citizenship.
It does not apply to "all persons" as some fool earlier claimed.
But lets give you little test. Do the rights of the US constitution apply to a Russian citizen residing in Russia?
speaking of intent....intent is always a factor.it's only racist when the intent is (damn you clowns are ignorant.)To people like daws101, it's OK when black people use a WORD they consider racist. They base their determination of whether or not a WORD is racist on who uses it.
If the TERM is racist, intent is not a factor.
are you a mind reader? how exactly do you determine intent?
boy ?wow that's desperate.your post proves it correct and your grade school retort " I know you are but what am I ." is the nail in the coffin.false! it doesn't matter what "race" he is.Guess it means you don't realize he is one.
Contrary to popular belief, a ****** is a person who: Is loud, ignorant and annoying. Ghetto, smells like shit, and is almost 100% uneducated. They love to complain, but don't get off their lazy asses to do anything about it. Many of them are also fat.
While others may think differently, there is a wide margin of difference between a ******, and a African person. Anyone can be a ******, despite their race, color or creed.
from that description you are a ******!
Since I'm not any of those things that fit the definition, I can't be one. Too bad you are.
It's not my fault you're a ******. It's the way you were raised boy.
I have hemorrhoids older than you ..
make that up yourself or did you need help?speaking of intent....intent is always a factor.it's only racist when the intent is (damn you clowns are ignorant.)
If the TERM is racist, intent is not a factor.
are you a mind reader? how exactly do you determine intent?
Speaking of retard. Look in the mirror.
make that up yourself or did you need help?speaking of intent....intent is always a factor.If the TERM is racist, intent is not a factor.
are you a mind reader? how exactly do you determine intent?
Speaking of retard. Look in the mirror.
really ? in the case it's ignorant racist false assumption about race. who's the retard again?boy ?wow that's desperate.your post proves it correct and your grade school retort " I know you are but what am I ." is the nail in the coffin.false! it doesn't matter what "race" he is.
Contrary to popular belief, a ****** is a person who: Is loud, ignorant and annoying. Ghetto, smells like shit, and is almost 100% uneducated. They love to complain, but don't get off their lazy asses to do anything about it. Many of them are also fat.
While others may think differently, there is a wide margin of difference between a ******, and a African person. Anyone can be a ******, despite their race, color or creed.
from that description you are a ******!
Since I'm not any of those things that fit the definition, I can't be one. Too bad you are.
It's not my fault you're a ******. It's the way you were raised boy.
I have hemorrhoids older than you ..
One of them is attached to your neck.
Boy isn't a reference to age moron.
you assholes provide all the proof necessary..make that up yourself or did you need help?speaking of intent....intent is always a factor.
are you a mind reader? how exactly do you determine intent?
Speaking of retard. Look in the mirror.
You sure seem to be able to determine things without any proof.
really ? in the case it's ignorant racist false assumption about race. who's the retard again?boy ?wow that's desperate.your post proves it correct and your grade school retort " I know you are but what am I ." is the nail in the coffin.Since I'm not any of those things that fit the definition, I can't be one. Too bad you are.
It's not my fault you're a ******. It's the way you were raised boy.
I have hemorrhoids older than you ..
One of them is attached to your neck.
Boy isn't a reference to age moron.
you assholes provide all the proof necessary..make that up yourself or did you need help?speaking of intent....are you a mind reader? how exactly do you determine intent?
Speaking of retard. Look in the mirror.
You sure seem to be able to determine things without any proof.
