It's Over

[jc456]

Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....

Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.

He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...

You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.

The same is true of your opinions. What makes your opinions better than his? What makes you a better judge of "proven facts" than him? What you consider fact or lie is still just your opinion. Why is your opinion somehow better?

Cause my opinions are based on reality and his are based on conspiracy theories that defy logic and reason. His opinions are also based on predictable narratives that we all saw trump setting up before the election even began. You can play the whole “how do we know anything is really real game” but it’s all BS

The truth is that no one cares about your opinions. Everybody forms their own by whatever method they choose. Other people might be interested in be the actual facts or evidence (if any) you may have used in forming yours because opinions can change as other factors change. I don't care about what you imagine to be reality. I do care about what constitutes actual reality and welcome all facts or evidence that accurately describe and define it. Again why should anyone accept that your opinions are based on logic and reason while someone elses' are not? Just demanding that it is so ain't gonna get it. That is just more BS piled higher and deeper.
And if you have video what you shows something to back your claims why haven't you linked it?

We know it’s fake, otherwise they would not have to lie

 

[OKTexas]

Autopsy said so

LOL

Liar. Nothing on there says he died from drugs.

Cause of death: Cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression

Manner of death: Homicide.

Stupid commie try reading this link.

Minnesota v. Derek Chauvin et al: The Prosecution’s Dirty Little Secret - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

On May 29, 2020, the Hennepin County Attorney’s Office charged former Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin with third-degree murder (later raised to

spectator.org

.

LOL

That's an email.

I posted the toxicology report showing he had only 11 ng/ml in his system and I posted the medical examiner's report.

The fact is 11 ng/ml is a lethal dose.

Fentanyl is itself so toxic that it is sufficient to kill without help from other dangerous drugs in the cocktail. People who died from fentanyl overdose had readings from 0.75 ng/mL to an astounding 113 ng/mL. The average death dose was 9.96 ng/mL.

What Is a Fatal Dose of Fentanyl? - LewRockwell

Here is a toxicology report on deaths from fentanyl overdose. The report says: “Despite the ubiquitous presence of multiple drugs in these decedents, the effects of fentanyl were evidently so strong that there were no statistical differences in the fentanyl level (mean and standard deviation)...

www.lewrockwell.com

.

 

[Slade3200]

Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....

Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.

He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...

You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.

The same is true of your opinions. What makes your opinions better than his? What makes you a better judge of "proven facts" than him? What you consider fact or lie is still just your opinion. Why is your opinion somehow better?

Cause my opinions are based on reality and his are based on conspiracy theories that defy logic and reason. His opinions are also based on predictable narratives that we all saw trump setting up before the election even began. You can play the whole “how do we know anything is really real game” but it’s all BS

The truth is that no one cares about your opinions. Everybody forms their own by whatever method they choose. Other people might be interested in be the actual facts or evidence (if any) you may have used in forming yours because opinions can change as other factors change. I don't care about what you imagine to be reality. I do care about what constitutes actual reality and welcome all facts or evidence that accurately describe and define it. Again why should anyone accept that your opinions are based on logic and reason while someone elses' are not? Just demanding that it is so ain't gonna get it. That is just more BS piled higher and deeper.
And if you have video what you shows something to back your claims why haven't you linked it?

You want video of something that proves the election was legit? Are you serious?! I’ve looked at the facts. I watch Lindells movie showing the “proof”. I’ve looked at Trumps claims and I’ve listened to court decisions and state election officials. I’ve tried to debate all these points with people here that think the election was stolen and nobody hangs around. They repeats some talking points and then bail on the debate when I ask about details

 

[jc456]

Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....

Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.

He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...

You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.

The same is true of your opinions. What makes your opinions better than his? What makes you a better judge of "proven facts" than him? What you consider fact or lie is still just your opinion. Why is your opinion somehow better?

Cause my opinions are based on reality and his are based on conspiracy theories that defy logic and reason. His opinions are also based on predictable narratives that we all saw trump setting up before the election even began. You can play the whole “how do we know anything is really real game” but it’s all BS

The truth is that no one cares about your opinions. Everybody forms their own by whatever method they choose. Other people might be interested in be the actual facts or evidence (if any) you may have used in forming yours because opinions can change as other factors change. I don't care about what you imagine to be reality. I do care about what constitutes actual reality and welcome all facts or evidence that accurately describe and define it. Again why should anyone accept that your opinions are based on logic and reason while someone elses' are not? Just demanding that it is so ain't gonna get it. That is just more BS piled higher and deeper.
And if you have video what you shows something to back your claims why haven't you linked it?

You want video of something that proves the election was legit? Are you serious?! I’ve looked at the facts. I watch Lindells movie showing the “proof”. I’ve looked at Trumps claims and I’ve listened to court decisions and state election officials. I’ve tried to debate all these points with people here that think the election was stolen and nobody hangs around. They repeats some talking points and then bail on the debate when I ask about details

Then there’s no reason to be concerned with a forensic audit of mail in ballots? Right?

 

[OldLady]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

But in the meantime, T**** can continue to twist arms in the Republican party like the thug he is, and Trumpism will continue unabated. That is not an acceptable outcome to me.

And you are a republican ?

No, an Independent, slightly left leaning moderate.

 

[Ringtone]

Turn your fucking ringtone off.

And I have listlessly shuffled through the tedious echoes

of endless, wayward discussions—​

Strung out from the feet of my feet to the feet at your doorstep,

past the bathroom and down the hall.​

I have flirted with fancies and consorted with the shadows on the wall
(Attired in a three-piece suit and matching tie!)
And I have littered my life with wasted days beneath the dismal pall.

 

[jc456]

Sing it, Roy.

Despite Democratic impeachment managers laying out a methodical case on Wednesday, Senate Republicans seem intent as ever on acquitting Donald Trump over his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Republicans Unswayed By Evidence Trump 'Incited' Mob Against U.S. Capitol

Let History judge those Republicans for their vote

But in the meantime, T**** can continue to twist arms in the Republican party like the thug he is, and Trumpism will continue unabated. That is not an acceptable outcome to me.

And you are a republican ?

No, an Independent, slightly left leaning moderate.

Who cherishes left demofks, believing everything they say! Yeah, nope

You’re a demofk

 

[9thIDdoc]

Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....

Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.

He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...

You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.

The same is true of your opinions. What makes your opinions better than his? What makes you a better judge of "proven facts" than him? What you consider fact or lie is still just your opinion. Why is your opinion somehow better?

Cause my opinions are based on reality and his are based on conspiracy theories that defy logic and reason. His opinions are also based on predictable narratives that we all saw trump setting up before the election even began. You can play the whole “how do we know anything is really real game” but it’s all BS

The truth is that no one cares about your opinions. Everybody forms their own by whatever method they choose. Other people might be interested in be the actual facts or evidence (if any) you may have used in forming yours because opinions can change as other factors change. I don't care about what you imagine to be reality. I do care about what constitutes actual reality and welcome all facts or evidence that accurately describe and define it. Again why should anyone accept that your opinions are based on logic and reason while someone elses' are not? Just demanding that it is so ain't gonna get it. That is just more BS piled higher and deeper.
And if you have video what you shows something to back your claims why haven't you linked it?

You want video of something that proves the election was legit? Are you serious?! I’ve looked at the facts. I watch Lindells movie showing the “proof”. I’ve looked at Trumps claims and I’ve listened to court decisions and state election officials. I’ve tried to debate all these points with people here that think the election was stolen and nobody hangs around. They repeats some talking points and then bail on the debate when I ask about details

No, you said there was video that proved there was an attempt to overthrow the government. Where is it?

 

[Slade3200]

Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....

Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.

He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...

You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.

The same is true of your opinions. What makes your opinions better than his? What makes you a better judge of "proven facts" than him? What you consider fact or lie is still just your opinion. Why is your opinion somehow better?

Cause my opinions are based on reality and his are based on conspiracy theories that defy logic and reason. His opinions are also based on predictable narratives that we all saw trump setting up before the election even began. You can play the whole “how do we know anything is really real game” but it’s all BS

The truth is that no one cares about your opinions. Everybody forms their own by whatever method they choose. Other people might be interested in be the actual facts or evidence (if any) you may have used in forming yours because opinions can change as other factors change. I don't care about what you imagine to be reality. I do care about what constitutes actual reality and welcome all facts or evidence that accurately describe and define it. Again why should anyone accept that your opinions are based on logic and reason while someone elses' are not? Just demanding that it is so ain't gonna get it. That is just more BS piled higher and deeper.
And if you have video what you shows something to back your claims why haven't you linked it?

You want video of something that proves the election was legit? Are you serious?! I’ve looked at the facts. I watch Lindells movie showing the “proof”. I’ve looked at Trumps claims and I’ve listened to court decisions and state election officials. I’ve tried to debate all these points with people here that think the election was stolen and nobody hangs around. They repeats some talking points and then bail on the debate when I ask about details

No, you said there was video that proved there was an attempt to overthrow the government. Where is it?

Are you joking?

 

[9thIDdoc]

Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....

Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.

He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...

You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.

The same is true of your opinions. What makes your opinions better than his? What makes you a better judge of "proven facts" than him? What you consider fact or lie is still just your opinion. Why is your opinion somehow better?

Cause my opinions are based on reality and his are based on conspiracy theories that defy logic and reason. His opinions are also based on predictable narratives that we all saw trump setting up before the election even began. You can play the whole “how do we know anything is really real game” but it’s all BS

The truth is that no one cares about your opinions. Everybody forms their own by whatever method they choose. Other people might be interested in be the actual facts or evidence (if any) you may have used in forming yours because opinions can change as other factors change. I don't care about what you imagine to be reality. I do care about what constitutes actual reality and welcome all facts or evidence that accurately describe and define it. Again why should anyone accept that your opinions are based on logic and reason while someone elses' are not? Just demanding that it is so ain't gonna get it. That is just more BS piled higher and deeper.
And if you have video what you shows something to back your claims why haven't you linked it?

You want video of something that proves the election was legit? Are you serious?! I’ve looked at the facts. I watch Lindells movie showing the “proof”. I’ve looked at Trumps claims and I’ve listened to court decisions and state election officials. I’ve tried to debate all these points with people here that think the election was stolen and nobody hangs around. They repeats some talking points and then bail on the debate when I ask about details

No, you said there was video that proved there was an attempt to overthrow the government. Where is it?

Are you joking?

Not even a little. Are you?

 

[Slade3200]

Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....

Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.

He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...

You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.

The same is true of your opinions. What makes your opinions better than his? What makes you a better judge of "proven facts" than him? What you consider fact or lie is still just your opinion. Why is your opinion somehow better?

Cause my opinions are based on reality and his are based on conspiracy theories that defy logic and reason. His opinions are also based on predictable narratives that we all saw trump setting up before the election even began. You can play the whole “how do we know anything is really real game” but it’s all BS

The truth is that no one cares about your opinions. Everybody forms their own by whatever method they choose. Other people might be interested in be the actual facts or evidence (if any) you may have used in forming yours because opinions can change as other factors change. I don't care about what you imagine to be reality. I do care about what constitutes actual reality and welcome all facts or evidence that accurately describe and define it. Again why should anyone accept that your opinions are based on logic and reason while someone elses' are not? Just demanding that it is so ain't gonna get it. That is just more BS piled higher and deeper.
And if you have video what you shows something to back your claims why haven't you linked it?

You want video of something that proves the election was legit? Are you serious?! I’ve looked at the facts. I watch Lindells movie showing the “proof”. I’ve looked at Trumps claims and I’ve listened to court decisions and state election officials. I’ve tried to debate all these points with people here that think the election was stolen and nobody hangs around. They repeats some talking points and then bail on the debate when I ask about details

No, you said there was video that proved there was an attempt to overthrow the government. Where is it?

Are you joking?

Not even a little. Are you?

Go to YouTube and type in capital riot videos. You can spend all day watching them

 

[9thIDdoc]

Autopsy said so

LOL

Liar. Nothing on there says he died from drugs.

Cause of death: Cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression

Manner of death: Homicide.

Read your own cut and paste:

"Manner of death classification is a statutory function of the medical examiner,..."
"Manner of death is not a legal determination of culpability or intent, and should not be used to usurp the judicial process."

So that is what you immediately try to do.
"Homicide" is a medical term. "Murder" must be determined in a court of law.

Are you on Fentanyl? Where did I say the medical examiner's office prosecutes? I showed their report lists his death as a homicide (meaning he was killed, as opposed to suicide) and that kneeling on his neck contributed to it.

"Homicide is when one person kills another, while murder is homicide with intent (pre-planned). Murder is not defined by common law, rather it is defined by statute. However, homicide has quite a different connotation and results in different legal ramifications, sometimes none at all. "

Homicide literally means "the killing of a human". Suicide is a type of homicide and is an illegal act in many places.
The actual cause of death was stated to be cardiopulmonary arrest (meaning his heart stopped and he stopped breathing resulting in death).
Other significant conditions (which may have caused or contributed to his death) included arteriosclerotic heart disease, fentanyl intoxication (poisoning) and recent meth. use.

"Liar. Nothing on there says he died from drugs."

No, but nothing on there states he didn't die from drug overdose or that the actions of police contributed to his death. Also nothing states that he was killed any one else. That is simply your own misinterpretation.

 

[9thIDdoc]

Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....

Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.

He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...

You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.

The same is true of your opinions. What makes your opinions better than his? What makes you a better judge of "proven facts" than him? What you consider fact or lie is still just your opinion. Why is your opinion somehow better?

Cause my opinions are based on reality and his are based on conspiracy theories that defy logic and reason. His opinions are also based on predictable narratives that we all saw trump setting up before the election even began. You can play the whole “how do we know anything is really real game” but it’s all BS

The truth is that no one cares about your opinions. Everybody forms their own by whatever method they choose. Other people might be interested in be the actual facts or evidence (if any) you may have used in forming yours because opinions can change as other factors change. I don't care about what you imagine to be reality. I do care about what constitutes actual reality and welcome all facts or evidence that accurately describe and define it. Again why should anyone accept that your opinions are based on logic and reason while someone elses' are not? Just demanding that it is so ain't gonna get it. That is just more BS piled higher and deeper.
And if you have video what you shows something to back your claims why haven't you linked it?

You want video of something that proves the election was legit? Are you serious?! I’ve looked at the facts. I watch Lindells movie showing the “proof”. I’ve looked at Trumps claims and I’ve listened to court decisions and state election officials. I’ve tried to debate all these points with people here that think the election was stolen and nobody hangs around. They repeats some talking points and then bail on the debate when I ask about details

No, you said there was video that proved there was an attempt to overthrow the government. Where is it?

Are you joking?

Not even a little. Are you?

Go to YouTube and type in capital riot videos. You can spend all day watching them

So? Which one proves they were trying to overthrow the government as you claimed?

 

[Slade3200]

Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....

Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.

He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...

You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.

The same is true of your opinions. What makes your opinions better than his? What makes you a better judge of "proven facts" than him? What you consider fact or lie is still just your opinion. Why is your opinion somehow better?

Cause my opinions are based on reality and his are based on conspiracy theories that defy logic and reason. His opinions are also based on predictable narratives that we all saw trump setting up before the election even began. You can play the whole “how do we know anything is really real game” but it’s all BS

The truth is that no one cares about your opinions. Everybody forms their own by whatever method they choose. Other people might be interested in be the actual facts or evidence (if any) you may have used in forming yours because opinions can change as other factors change. I don't care about what you imagine to be reality. I do care about what constitutes actual reality and welcome all facts or evidence that accurately describe and define it. Again why should anyone accept that your opinions are based on logic and reason while someone elses' are not? Just demanding that it is so ain't gonna get it. That is just more BS piled higher and deeper.
And if you have video what you shows something to back your claims why haven't you linked it?

You want video of something that proves the election was legit? Are you serious?! I’ve looked at the facts. I watch Lindells movie showing the “proof”. I’ve looked at Trumps claims and I’ve listened to court decisions and state election officials. I’ve tried to debate all these points with people here that think the election was stolen and nobody hangs around. They repeats some talking points and then bail on the debate when I ask about details

No, you said there was video that proved there was an attempt to overthrow the government. Where is it?

Are you joking?

Not even a little. Are you?

Go to YouTube and type in capital riot videos. You can spend all day watching them

So? Which one proves they were trying to overthrow the government as you claimed?

All of them... are you playing dumb?

 

[Faun]

In FL ballots have to be requested, other States just mail out ballots willy nilly, no verification if the voter still lives at the registered address,

Tens of millions voted by mail for the first time in 2020
I doubt if they want to go back to standing in line.

That train has left the station

Yep, and ballot rejection rates went from 6%, on average, to .003%. Only in a commie world would that make any sense when there were so many first timers? Statistics say first timers should make more mistakes.

.

Do you have a link to stats on that? Doesn’t sound believable unless there were large tech advances for verification

GA rejection rate in 2016 6.42%, in 2020 .35%.
AK rejection rate in 2016 3.17% in 2020 .95%

Election results, 2020: Analysis of rejected ballots

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

This is the first link that was handy, I've seen others that are different, but I'm not going to take the time to find them. You're welcome to do so.

.

Ok those numbers are 100x different than you originally posted and don’t seem too out of whack when looking at the historical data of the other states. Thanks for posting the link though. I’ll give you credit for that. Doesn’t show fraud

forensic audit of ballots is needed, as I already stated in previous posts, but you all are against that, and still haven't explained why? So I interpret that as you know they are fraudulent ballots.

You lost. Get over it or eat yourself up over it. Either way, no skin off anyone's back.

It is the skin off the back of freedom around the world. If the US is not free no one is. Selfish, stupid, led by the nose bastards are to dumb to figure that out.

Nope. We had a free and fair election. The rightful person was declared the winner and Trump & his cult were prevented from stealing it. That's what the world sees. Well, that and his cult are out of their friggin' minds.

 

[Faun]

In FL ballots have to be requested, other States just mail out ballots willy nilly, no verification if the voter still lives at the registered address,

Tens of millions voted by mail for the first time in 2020
I doubt if they want to go back to standing in line.

That train has left the station

Yep, and ballot rejection rates went from 6%, on average, to .003%. Only in a commie world would that make any sense when there were so many first timers? Statistics say first timers should make more mistakes.

.

Do you have a link to stats on that? Doesn’t sound believable unless there were large tech advances for verification

GA rejection rate in 2016 6.42%, in 2020 .35%.
AK rejection rate in 2016 3.17% in 2020 .95%

Election results, 2020: Analysis of rejected ballots

Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics

ballotpedia.org

This is the first link that was handy, I've seen others that are different, but I'm not going to take the time to find them. You're welcome to do so.

.

Ok those numbers are 100x different than you originally posted and don’t seem too out of whack when looking at the historical data of the other states. Thanks for posting the link though. I’ll give you credit for that. Doesn’t show fraud

forensic audit of ballots is needed, as I already stated in previous posts, but you all are against that, and still haven't explained why? So I interpret that as you know they are fraudulent ballots.

Explain what you want done in your audit?

Kinematic history of the paper. It can tell you where it came from. It can tell you if it was folded or filled out by a machine. It can show you if it was misaligned and sent to adjudication. It can determine if it is a legal ballot by the codes on the ballot itself.

Plus no charge to the taxpayers, the service has been offered for free. So why no ballots? Fraud is why.

Sounds bizarre and has no chance of exposing any voter fraud.

Mail in ballots have a bar code identifiable to a registered voter. Impossible to fake

Then why are they withholding the ballots? You seem to think there is nothing to worry about, why don't your keepers?

To drive you even crazier than you already are.

 

[Faun]

Autopsy said so

LOL

Liar. Nothing on there says he died from drugs.

Cause of death: Cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression

Manner of death: Homicide.

Read your own cut and paste:

"Manner of death classification is a statutory function of the medical examiner,..."
"Manner of death is not a legal determination of culpability or intent, and should not be used to usurp the judicial process."

So that is what you immediately try to do.
"Homicide" is a medical term. "Murder" must be determined in a court of law.

Are you on Fentanyl? Where did I say the medical examiner's office prosecutes? I showed their report lists his death as a homicide (meaning he was killed, as opposed to suicide) and that kneeling on his neck contributed to it.

"Homicide is when one person kills another, while murder is homicide with intent (pre-planned). Murder is not defined by common law, rather it is defined by statute. However, homicide has quite a different connotation and results in different legal ramifications, sometimes none at all. "

Homicide literally means "the killing of a human". Suicide is a type of homicide and is an illegal act in many places.
The actual cause of death was stated to be cardiopulmonary arrest (meaning his heart stopped and he stopped breathing resulting in death).
Other significant conditions (which may have caused or contributed to his death) included arteriosclerotic heart disease, fentanyl intoxication (poisoning) and recent meth. use.

"Liar. Nothing on there says he died from drugs."

No, but nothing on there states he didn't die from drug overdose or that the actions of police contributed to his death. Also nothing states that he was killed any one else. That is simply your own misinterpretation.

"Homicide" does not mean the killing of a human, period. It means the killing of a human by another...

Definition of HOMICIDE

a person who kills another; a killing of one human being by another… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Which is why suicide is not a homicide...

http://www.bcps-mentalhealth.com/downloads/Suicide_Manual_2017.pdf

Suicide is not homicide. ​

"No, but nothing on there states he didn't die from drug overdose or that the actions of police contributed to his death. Also nothing states that he was killed any one else. That is simply your own misinterpretation."

It omits things that didn't kill him, like a piano falling on his head or a drug overdose. And yes, it does day the police actions contributed to his death...

Cause of death: Cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression

Manner of death: Homicide

 

[9thIDdoc]

Autopsy said so

LOL

Liar. Nothing on there says he died from drugs.

Cause of death: Cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression

Manner of death: Homicide.

Read your own cut and paste:

"Manner of death classification is a statutory function of the medical examiner,..."
"Manner of death is not a legal determination of culpability or intent, and should not be used to usurp the judicial process."

So that is what you immediately try to do.
"Homicide" is a medical term. "Murder" must be determined in a court of law.

Are you on Fentanyl? Where did I say the medical examiner's office prosecutes? I showed their report lists his death as a homicide (meaning he was killed, as opposed to suicide) and that kneeling on his neck contributed to it.

"Homicide is when one person kills another, while murder is homicide with intent (pre-planned). Murder is not defined by common law, rather it is defined by statute. However, homicide has quite a different connotation and results in different legal ramifications, sometimes none at all. "

Homicide literally means "the killing of a human". Suicide is a type of homicide and is an illegal act in many places.
The actual cause of death was stated to be cardiopulmonary arrest (meaning his heart stopped and he stopped breathing resulting in death).
Other significant conditions (which may have caused or contributed to his death) included arteriosclerotic heart disease, fentanyl intoxication (poisoning) and recent meth. use.

"Liar. Nothing on there says he died from drugs."

No, but nothing on there states he didn't die from drug overdose or that the actions of police contributed to his death. Also nothing states that he was killed any one else. That is simply your own misinterpretation.

"Homicide" does not mean the killing of a human, period. It means the killing of a human by another...

Definition of HOMICIDE

a person who kills another; a killing of one human being by another… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Which is why suicide is not a homicide...

http://www.bcps-mentalhealth.com/downloads/Suicide_Manual_2017.pdf

​

Suicide is not homicide. ​

"No, but nothing on there states he didn't die from drug overdose or that the actions of police contributed to his death. Also nothing states that he was killed any one else. That is simply your own misinterpretation."

It omits things that didn't kill him, like a piano falling on his head or a drug overdose. And yes, it does day the police actions contributed to his death...

Cause of death: Cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression​

​

Manner of death: Homicide​

​

View attachment 457089​

As I tried to explain to you earlier homicide is NOT listed as the cause of death so your attempts to twist the word to better suit yourself are irrelevant.
You simply fail to understand what is written plainly. Actual cause of death was the fact that his heart and lungs stopped working. He notes that death occurred while the man was being restrained by police but nowhere does he state that that contributed to the death. "Other significant conditions" list possible reasons his heart and lungs may have stopped and include heart disease/low blood pressure, fentanyl OD, and methamphetamine use. No trauma is mentioned. No reason to believe his death was caused by anyone else.

 

[Faun]

Autopsy said so

LOL

Liar. Nothing on there says he died from drugs.

Cause of death: Cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression

Manner of death: Homicide.

Read your own cut and paste:

"Manner of death classification is a statutory function of the medical examiner,..."
"Manner of death is not a legal determination of culpability or intent, and should not be used to usurp the judicial process."

So that is what you immediately try to do.
"Homicide" is a medical term. "Murder" must be determined in a court of law.

Are you on Fentanyl? Where did I say the medical examiner's office prosecutes? I showed their report lists his death as a homicide (meaning he was killed, as opposed to suicide) and that kneeling on his neck contributed to it.

"Homicide is when one person kills another, while murder is homicide with intent (pre-planned). Murder is not defined by common law, rather it is defined by statute. However, homicide has quite a different connotation and results in different legal ramifications, sometimes none at all. "

Homicide literally means "the killing of a human". Suicide is a type of homicide and is an illegal act in many places.
The actual cause of death was stated to be cardiopulmonary arrest (meaning his heart stopped and he stopped breathing resulting in death).
Other significant conditions (which may have caused or contributed to his death) included arteriosclerotic heart disease, fentanyl intoxication (poisoning) and recent meth. use.

"Liar. Nothing on there says he died from drugs."

No, but nothing on there states he didn't die from drug overdose or that the actions of police contributed to his death. Also nothing states that he was killed any one else. That is simply your own misinterpretation.

"Homicide" does not mean the killing of a human, period. It means the killing of a human by another...

Definition of HOMICIDE

a person who kills another; a killing of one human being by another… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Which is why suicide is not a homicide...

http://www.bcps-mentalhealth.com/downloads/Suicide_Manual_2017.pdf

​

Suicide is not homicide. ​

"No, but nothing on there states he didn't die from drug overdose or that the actions of police contributed to his death. Also nothing states that he was killed any one else. That is simply your own misinterpretation."

It omits things that didn't kill him, like a piano falling on his head or a drug overdose. And yes, it does day the police actions contributed to his death...

Cause of death: Cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression​

​

Manner of death: Homicide​

​

View attachment 457089​

As I tried to explain to you earlier homicide is NOT listed as the cause of death so your attempts to twist the word to better suit yourself are irrelevant.
You simply fail to understand what is written plainly. Actual cause of death was the fact that his heart and lungs stopped working. He notes that death occurred while the man was being restrained by police but nowhere does he state that that contributed to the death. "Other significant conditions" list possible reasons his heart and lungs may have stopped and include heart disease/low blood pressure, fentanyl OD, and methamphetamine use. No trauma is mentioned. No reason to believe his death was caused by anyone else.

"As I tried to explain to you earlier homicide is NOT listed as the cause of death..."

Idiot.

 

[9thIDdoc]

Autopsy said so

LOL

Liar. Nothing on there says he died from drugs.

Cause of death: Cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression

Manner of death: Homicide.

Read your own cut and paste:

"Manner of death classification is a statutory function of the medical examiner,..."
"Manner of death is not a legal determination of culpability or intent, and should not be used to usurp the judicial process."

So that is what you immediately try to do.
"Homicide" is a medical term. "Murder" must be determined in a court of law.

Are you on Fentanyl? Where did I say the medical examiner's office prosecutes? I showed their report lists his death as a homicide (meaning he was killed, as opposed to suicide) and that kneeling on his neck contributed to it.

"Homicide is when one person kills another, while murder is homicide with intent (pre-planned). Murder is not defined by common law, rather it is defined by statute. However, homicide has quite a different connotation and results in different legal ramifications, sometimes none at all. "

Homicide literally means "the killing of a human". Suicide is a type of homicide and is an illegal act in many places.
The actual cause of death was stated to be cardiopulmonary arrest (meaning his heart stopped and he stopped breathing resulting in death).
Other significant conditions (which may have caused or contributed to his death) included arteriosclerotic heart disease, fentanyl intoxication (poisoning) and recent meth. use.

"Liar. Nothing on there says he died from drugs."

No, but nothing on there states he didn't die from drug overdose or that the actions of police contributed to his death. Also nothing states that he was killed any one else. That is simply your own misinterpretation.

"Homicide" does not mean the killing of a human, period. It means the killing of a human by another...

Definition of HOMICIDE

a person who kills another; a killing of one human being by another… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Which is why suicide is not a homicide...

http://www.bcps-mentalhealth.com/downloads/Suicide_Manual_2017.pdf

​

Suicide is not homicide. ​

"No, but nothing on there states he didn't die from drug overdose or that the actions of police contributed to his death. Also nothing states that he was killed any one else. That is simply your own misinterpretation."

It omits things that didn't kill him, like a piano falling on his head or a drug overdose. And yes, it does day the police actions contributed to his death...

Cause of death: Cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression​

​

Manner of death: Homicide​

​

View attachment 457089​

As I tried to explain to you earlier homicide is NOT listed as the cause of death so your attempts to twist the word to better suit yourself are irrelevant.
You simply fail to understand what is written plainly. Actual cause of death was the fact that his heart and lungs stopped working. He notes that death occurred while the man was being restrained by police but nowhere does he state that that contributed to the death. "Other significant conditions" list possible reasons his heart and lungs may have stopped and include heart disease/low blood pressure, fentanyl OD, and methamphetamine use. No trauma is mentioned. No reason to believe his death was caused by anyone else.

"As I tried to explain to you earlier homicide is NOT listed as the cause of death..."

Idiot.

View attachment 457292

Manner of death and cause of death are two different things which is why they are listed in two different sections. The homicide is not reported as the cause of death in the official report by the medical examiner no matter how much you want to froth at the mouth about being able to find the word elsewhere in the report (and obviously not understanding it's meaning). And this despite the fact the man went to the trouble to state "Manner of death is is a statutory function of the medical examiner as part of a death certification for purposes of vital statistics and public health. Manner of death is not a legal determination of culpability or intent, and should not be used to usurp the judicial process." Which is exactly what you do when you assert that homicide means he was killed by another person. If the man was killed (rather than dying of natural causes) by another person must be proven in a court of law. Neither you nor the medical examiner are allowed to decide that. The medical examiner was well aware of that as he pointed out. So what's your problem?