Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The same is true of your opinions. What makes your opinions better than his? What makes you a better judge of "proven facts" than him? What you consider fact or lie is still just your opinion. Why is your opinion somehow better?You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....
Of course you have zero proof of thatThere was a concerted effort to educate voters on how to properly prepare a mail in ballot. They also learned from their mistakes in the primariesIn FL ballots have to be requested, other States just mail out ballots willy nilly, no verification if the voter still lives at the registered address,
Tens of millions voted by mail for the first time in 2020
I doubt if they want to go back to standing in line.
That train has left the station
Yep, and ballot rejection rates went from 6%, on average, to .003%. Only in a commie world would that make any sense when there were so many first timers? Statics say first timers should make more mistakes.
.
Pure commie BS. Most probably never saw ballots cast in their names.
.
There is NO EVIDENCE of people requesting mail in ballots and finding that someone had cast a ballot in their name
That he was killed by police or that he hadn't already killed himself when police became involved were certainly lies used to stir up violent riots that killed people.I didn’t see any of them spreading lies to create an angry mob. George Floyd diedWho got the people killed in the Summer of love protests? Pelosi, AOC, Harris, Waters. When is their trial?He said the election was stolen from him. He went to court. None of his claims showed merit for a case. Its all a PR stunt and a lie that has people like you duped
His lies and refusal to concede got people killed
But it is only your imagination that the demonstrators tried to overthrow the government.If the rules were judicially changed then that is a legal change. The remedy is to challenge it in court or change it through legislation. Not try and overthrow the government.You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....
The fact is that the rules were judicially changed just before the election in favor of the Democrats and allowed for the ability to more. easily cheat. It can’t get any more factual than that.
Do you have a link to stats on that? Doesn’t sound believable unless there were large tech advances for verificationIn FL ballots have to be requested, other States just mail out ballots willy nilly, no verification if the voter still lives at the registered address,
Tens of millions voted by mail for the first time in 2020
I doubt if they want to go back to standing in line.
That train has left the station
Yep, and ballot rejection rates went from 6%, on average, to .003%. Only in a commie world would that make any sense when there were so many first timers? Statistics say first timers should make more mistakes.
.
Untrue. Nixon did not extend the war and anti-American communist sympathizers were the ones claiming he did.According to rightwingnut whataboutisms, that was excusable because Nixon extended the Vietnam War.The only ones to bomb the capitol were commie leftist scum in 1983.Clubs, Bear gas and pipe bombs.I’m not seeing false narratives here. I’m seeing tweets and speeches and events laid out pretty clearly. And the only defense I’m hearing from Trumps people is “he’s already out of office, this is unconstitutional” ... so weakit’s not that simple. The majority of their presentation consists of videos and actual Trump statements. Can’t lie about that. Whether they called spear a and flags ‘arms’ really makes no difference to the trial.It's really simple, the commies are lying and their slick hollywood production is mostly fiction.Ok if they said armed with guns and nobody was armed with guns then they were wrong. I didn’t hear it. What’s your point?Did they say armed with guns? I don’t know what quote you’re talking about and I don’t see what it has to do with this discussionI didn’t say they were armed. Since when does being armed set the bar for what qualifies with insurrection?! Damn your arguments are thinIf the courts refused to hear the evidence then there was a reason for that and Trumps team should have presented better cases. But that’s how our system works. You go through the system, you don’t try and overthrow it when you’re not happy with the results. This is basic shit people. Shouldn’t be complicated to understandHe tried the courts. They refused to hear evidence. He is telling the truth and has more credibility than the MSM. And stop the drama. Trump did not do one thing tyrannical.The way to fight back is in court. Not tyrannyYou mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest
I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.
“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
If they were trying to overthrow something they wouldn't have shown up with flags and banners, they would have guns. You commie drama queens are so pathetic. I carry a pocket knife, does that mean I'm armed?
.
Your fantastic house managers claimed they were armed. Are you saying they lied?
Had you been listening yesterday, you'd know they did.
Bullshit, out of context quotes are worthless and are used to build a false narrative.
.
Yet you missed the lies about the crowd being armed with guns.
.
They were also adept at beating people with the American Flag
Pipe bombs in the capitol, you're such a liar.
.
1983 United States Senate bombing - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
And our duly impeached scumbag Bill Clinton pardoned them.
In my opinion Nixon was both a sleeze and the crook he claimed he wasn't but he didn't start or extend the war unnecessarily. Overall he helped reduce American casualties. But I still hate him because of some deaths he is responsible for through not being able to keep his mouth shut while trying to pander to the American public.Learn the meaning of the word, "extended." Then calculate how many Americans died because he didn't pull us out of Vietnam when he promised.A campaign promise that he delivered on. I'm not a Dick Nixon fan but give him credit where credit is due. Kennedy escalated the war. So did Johnson. Nixon ended it.After extending it. Didn't he campaign in '68 to end it?Nixon is the one who ended the Vietnam War.According to rightwingnut whataboutisms, that was excusable because Nixon extended the Vietnam War.The only ones to bomb the capitol were commie leftist scum in 1983.Clubs, Bear gas and pipe bombs.I’m not seeing false narratives here. I’m seeing tweets and speeches and events laid out pretty clearly. And the only defense I’m hearing from Trumps people is “he’s already out of office, this is unconstitutional” ... so weakit’s not that simple. The majority of their presentation consists of videos and actual Trump statements. Can’t lie about that. Whether they called spear a and flags ‘arms’ really makes no difference to the trial.It's really simple, the commies are lying and their slick hollywood production is mostly fiction.Ok if they said armed with guns and nobody was armed with guns then they were wrong. I didn’t hear it. What’s your point?Did they say armed with guns? I don’t know what quote you’re talking about and I don’t see what it has to do with this discussionI didn’t say they were armed. Since when does being armed set the bar for what qualifies with insurrection?! Damn your arguments are thinIf the courts refused to hear the evidence then there was a reason for that and Trumps team should have presented better cases. But that’s how our system works. You go through the system, you don’t try and overthrow it when you’re not happy with the results. This is basic shit people. Shouldn’t be complicated to understandHe tried the courts. They refused to hear evidence. He is telling the truth and has more credibility than the MSM. And stop the drama. Trump did not do one thing tyrannical.The way to fight back is in court. Not tyrannyYou mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest
I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.
“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
If they were trying to overthrow something they wouldn't have shown up with flags and banners, they would have guns. You commie drama queens are so pathetic. I carry a pocket knife, does that mean I'm armed?
.
Your fantastic house managers claimed they were armed. Are you saying they lied?
Had you been listening yesterday, you'd know they did.
Bullshit, out of context quotes are worthless and are used to build a false narrative.
.
Yet you missed the lies about the crowd being armed with guns.
.
They were also adept at beating people with the American Flag
Pipe bombs in the capitol, you're such a liar.
.
1983 United States Senate bombing - Wikipedia
And our duly impeached scumbag Bill Clinton pardoned them.
Read your own cut and paste:LOLAutopsy said so
Liar. Nothing on there says he died from drugs.
Cause of death: Cardiopulmonary arrest complicating law enforcement subdual, restraint, and neck compression
Manner of death: Homicide.
Nixon ended some of our participation. Congress decided the war.A campaign promise that he delivered on. I'm not a Dick Nixon fan but give him credit where credit is due. Kennedy escalated the war. So did Johnson. Nixon ended it.After extending it. Didn't he campaign in '68 to end it?Nixon is the one who ended the Vietnam War.According to rightwingnut whataboutisms, that was excusable because Nixon extended the Vietnam War.The only ones to bomb the capitol were commie leftist scum in 1983.Clubs, Bear gas and pipe bombs.I’m not seeing false narratives here. I’m seeing tweets and speeches and events laid out pretty clearly. And the only defense I’m hearing from Trumps people is “he’s already out of office, this is unconstitutional” ... so weakit’s not that simple. The majority of their presentation consists of videos and actual Trump statements. Can’t lie about that. Whether they called spear a and flags ‘arms’ really makes no difference to the trial.It's really simple, the commies are lying and their slick hollywood production is mostly fiction.Ok if they said armed with guns and nobody was armed with guns then they were wrong. I didn’t hear it. What’s your point?Did they say armed with guns? I don’t know what quote you’re talking about and I don’t see what it has to do with this discussionI didn’t say they were armed. Since when does being armed set the bar for what qualifies with insurrection?! Damn your arguments are thinIf the courts refused to hear the evidence then there was a reason for that and Trumps team should have presented better cases. But that’s how our system works. You go through the system, you don’t try and overthrow it when you’re not happy with the results. This is basic shit people. Shouldn’t be complicated to understandHe tried the courts. They refused to hear evidence. He is telling the truth and has more credibility than the MSM. And stop the drama. Trump did not do one thing tyrannical.The way to fight back is in court. Not tyrannyYou mean if he caved to obvious fraud. You have had fours years of him. What made people think he would not fight back?Wrong about what?! Do you honestly think that riot would have happened if it wasn’t for Trump drilling in the unsubstantiated claim that the election was being stolen from him? Be honest
I saw an interview with Sen Angus King of Maine and he talked about a law professor who used the “but for” criteria of guilt.
“But for” Trumps statements and acts, would the riots have occurred.
If Trump had accepted the results after all his legal challenges were exhausted, would the riots have occurred?
If they were trying to overthrow something they wouldn't have shown up with flags and banners, they would have guns. You commie drama queens are so pathetic. I carry a pocket knife, does that mean I'm armed?
.
Your fantastic house managers claimed they were armed. Are you saying they lied?
Had you been listening yesterday, you'd know they did.
Bullshit, out of context quotes are worthless and are used to build a false narrative.
.
Yet you missed the lies about the crowd being armed with guns.
.
They were also adept at beating people with the American Flag
Pipe bombs in the capitol, you're such a liar.
.
1983 United States Senate bombing - Wikipedia
And our duly impeached scumbag Bill Clinton pardoned them.
Why Conservatives are viewed as morons supporting any conspiracy theory that covers their actions.That he was killed by police or that he hadn't already killed himself when police became involved were certainly lies used to stir up violent riots that killed people.I didn’t see any of them spreading lies to create an angry mob. George Floyd diedWho got the people killed in the Summer of love protests? Pelosi, AOC, Harris, Waters. When is their trial?He said the election was stolen from him. He went to court. None of his claims showed merit for a case. Its all a PR stunt and a lie that has people like you duped
His lies and refusal to concede got people killed
Cause my opinions are based on reality and his are based on conspiracy theories that defy logic and reason. His opinions are also based on predictable narratives that we all saw trump setting up before the election even began. You can play the whole “how do we know anything is really real game” but it’s all BSThe same is true of your opinions. What makes your opinions better than his? What makes you a better judge of "proven facts" than him? What you consider fact or lie is still just your opinion. Why is your opinion somehow better?You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....
No that’s not my imagination. There’s actually recorded video of it happeningBut it is only your imagination that the demonstrators tried to overthrow the government.If the rules were judicially changed then that is a legal change. The remedy is to challenge it in court or change it through legislation. Not try and overthrow the government.You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....
The fact is that the rules were judicially changed just before the election in favor of the Democrats and allowed for the ability to more. easily cheat. It can’t get any more factual than that.
Ok those numbers are 100x different than you originally posted and don’t seem too out of whack when looking at the historical data of the other states. Thanks for posting the link though. I’ll give you credit for that. Doesn’t show fraudDo you have a link to stats on that? Doesn’t sound believable unless there were large tech advances for verificationIn FL ballots have to be requested, other States just mail out ballots willy nilly, no verification if the voter still lives at the registered address,
Tens of millions voted by mail for the first time in 2020
I doubt if they want to go back to standing in line.
That train has left the station
Yep, and ballot rejection rates went from 6%, on average, to .003%. Only in a commie world would that make any sense when there were so many first timers? Statistics say first timers should make more mistakes.
.
GA rejection rate in 2016 6.42%, in 2020 .35%.
AK rejection rate in 2016 3.17% in 2020 .95%
Election results, 2020: Analysis of rejected ballots
Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politicsballotpedia.org
This is the first link that was handy, I've seen others that are different, but I'm not going to take the time to find them. You're welcome to do so.
.
but still opinions, and we don't accept your opinion as fact. you hang out in your TDS world. reality was antifa was the instigator. it's recorded.Cause my opinions are based on reality and his are based on conspiracy theories that defy logic and reason. His opinions are also based on predictable narratives that we all saw trump setting up before the election even began. You can play the whole “how do we know anything is really real game” but it’s all BSThe same is true of your opinions. What makes your opinions better than his? What makes you a better judge of "proven facts" than him? What you consider fact or lie is still just your opinion. Why is your opinion somehow better?You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....
post the video.No that’s not my imagination. There’s actually recorded video of it happeningBut it is only your imagination that the demonstrators tried to overthrow the government.If the rules were judicially changed then that is a legal change. The remedy is to challenge it in court or change it through legislation. Not try and overthrow the government.You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....
The fact is that the rules were judicially changed just before the election in favor of the Democrats and allowed for the ability to more. easily cheat. It can’t get any more factual than that.
forensic audit of ballots is needed, as I already stated in previous posts, but you all are against that, and still haven't explained why? So I interpret that as you know they are fraudulent ballots.Ok those numbers are 100x different than you originally posted and don’t seem too out of whack when looking at the historical data of the other states. Thanks for posting the link though. I’ll give you credit for that. Doesn’t show fraudDo you have a link to stats on that? Doesn’t sound believable unless there were large tech advances for verificationIn FL ballots have to be requested, other States just mail out ballots willy nilly, no verification if the voter still lives at the registered address,
Tens of millions voted by mail for the first time in 2020
I doubt if they want to go back to standing in line.
That train has left the station
Yep, and ballot rejection rates went from 6%, on average, to .003%. Only in a commie world would that make any sense when there were so many first timers? Statistics say first timers should make more mistakes.
.
GA rejection rate in 2016 6.42%, in 2020 .35%.
AK rejection rate in 2016 3.17% in 2020 .95%
Election results, 2020: Analysis of rejected ballots
Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics
This is the first link that was handy, I've seen others that are different, but I'm not going to take the time to find them. You're welcome to do so.
.
Explain what you want done in your audit?forensic audit of ballots is needed, as I already stated in previous posts, but you all are against that, and still haven't explained why? So I interpret that as you know they are fraudulent ballots.Ok those numbers are 100x different than you originally posted and don’t seem too out of whack when looking at the historical data of the other states. Thanks for posting the link though. I’ll give you credit for that. Doesn’t show fraudDo you have a link to stats on that? Doesn’t sound believable unless there were large tech advances for verificationIn FL ballots have to be requested, other States just mail out ballots willy nilly, no verification if the voter still lives at the registered address,
Tens of millions voted by mail for the first time in 2020
I doubt if they want to go back to standing in line.
That train has left the station
Yep, and ballot rejection rates went from 6%, on average, to .003%. Only in a commie world would that make any sense when there were so many first timers? Statistics say first timers should make more mistakes.
.
GA rejection rate in 2016 6.42%, in 2020 .35%.
AK rejection rate in 2016 3.17% in 2020 .95%
Election results, 2020: Analysis of rejected ballots
Ballotpedia: The Encyclopedia of American Politics
This is the first link that was handy, I've seen others that are different, but I'm not going to take the time to find them. You're welcome to do so.
.
Guilty how? Be specific. What EXACTLY did he say (word for word) that incited a riot?T**** is clearly guilty. The Republican senators are looking pretty ugly right now.
what kind of weapons did they have?No that’s not my imagination. There’s actually recorded video of it happeningBut it is only your imagination that the demonstrators tried to overthrow the government.If the rules were judicially changed then that is a legal change. The remedy is to challenge it in court or change it through legislation. Not try and overthrow the government.You can have whatever opinion you want but your opinions are not based on proven facts. They are based on emotional bias and lies that have been told to you by an Ex-president.He did win the election in a landslide...if you want to change my mind call for a real ballot and signature audit in every state....but I have a right to my opinion...and until your side is ready to open up the election to inspection you can't say I'm lying...I just have a different opinion from yours...same with Trump...Everybody saying that Trump won the 2020 election is telling a lie. Anybody saying the election was stolen, is telling a lie.Like who?....and who says he was lying?...who is the arbiter of truth?...
Just saying he lied doesn't make it so...you must prove he lied...which I'm sure Trump would love to watch them try...that would require evidence to the contrary to be presented and no way do the guilty dems want that....
The fact is that the rules were judicially changed just before the election in favor of the Democrats and allowed for the ability to more. easily cheat. It can’t get any more factual than that.
