Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm sorry you hate the truth.Good luck, getting your $$$ back from the Trump U. reading "comprehension" correspondence course.
Why do you think the 10th amendment talks about rights being delegated to the people by the constitution?Sure Q-NUT.
No. Because of your obvious inability to deliver same and your penchant from tucking your tail and running away.Just because you SAY SO?
YOU claimed there IS a federal limit on the number of guns someone can have.NO, shit.
And thus, you understand the fact there are not federal regulations granting unlimited numbers of guns" means nothing.No, shit.
You just agreed the 2nd does not allow for a limit on the number of guns someone can own.It doesn't, Q-NUT.
The 2nd amendment also doesn't prohibit limits either.
So long as those limits do not violate the constitution - sure.Amendment X
States' rights
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
So.............the states or municipalities within the state, can set limits.
I just did you fucking, moron.I'm sorry you hate the truth.
Its still the truth.
Disagree?
Copy/paste the specific language of the grants you claim.
WTF Q-NUT?Why do you think the 10th amendment talks about rights being delegated to the people by the constitution?
Where's the language that supports this.
This is a lie.I just did you fucking, moron.
Tuck that tail real right as you run away.FUCK off, back to the ignore list for you, DUMBfuck.
Yes they did. The War of Independence was fought because the British Colonial Government was abrogating those rights. One through Eight were all things the British were doing. Nine and Ten were catch alls, to stop the government from doing things the founders missed in One through Eight. If the government was obeying Nine and Ten our country would be a lot freer and healthier.Amendment 1 Freedoms, Petitions, Assembly
Amendment 2 Right to bear arms
Amendment 3 Quartering of soldiers
Amendment 4 Search and arrest
Amendment 5 Rights in criminal cases
Amendment 6 Right to a fair trial
Amendment 7 Rights in civil cases
Amendment 8 Bail, fines, punishment
Amendment 9 Rights retained by the People
Amendment 10 States' rights
SO.................People had ALL these rights, BEFORE 1791?
The constitution was originally only binding on the FEDERAL government. It has subsequently been expanded to be binding on state, county and local governments as well.Just because you SAY SO?
NO, shit.
No, shit.
It doesn't, Q-NUT.
The 2nd amendment also doesn't prohibit limits either.
Amendment X
States' rights
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
So.............the states or municipalities within the state, can set limits.
No you didn't. You posted things the government is RESTRICTED from doing.I just did you fucking, moron.
WHY do you think the document is called..............
BILL of "RIGHTS"?
WTF Q-NUT?
FUCK off, back to the ignore list for you, DUMBfuck.
Really?Yes they did. The War of Independence was fought because the British Colonial Government was abrogating those rights.
One warped opinion of "history".One through Eight were all things the British were doing. Nine and Ten were catch alls, to stop the government from doing things the founders missed in One through Eight. If the government was obeying Nine and Ten our country would be a lot freer and healthier.
See above.The constitution was originally only binding on the FEDERAL government. It has subsequently been expanded to be binding on state, county and local governments as well.
WTF?No you didn't. You posted things the government is RESTRICTED from doing.
Whep...so much for that defense of the 2nd Amendment.The same reason speed limits do not prevent speeding or rape laws do not prevent all rapes
Whep...so much for that defense of the 2nd Amendment.
Your unmasking as 100% liberal is complete.
It's a weak argument that unenforceable laws are never going to reduce gun violence?Oh no, I am 100% in defense of the 2nd amendment.
But I am also 100% against weak, stupid arguments, which is what that was. Read the thread and you will find plenty of defense of the 2nd from me.
I am not shocked you would support such a stupid, weak argument as that...that is your OP
It's a weak argument that unenforceable laws are never going to reduce gun violence?
A law against speeding reduces speeding because police with radar guns are out actively enforcing the law.That was not the argument.
The argument was that if a law does not prevent the crime then it is ineffective, and as such, unnecessary.
The problem is that no law can prevent a crime, which is why it is a weak ass argument.
Read them.Amendment 1 Freedoms, Petitions, Assembly
Amendment 2 Right to bear arms
Amendment 3 Quartering of soldiers
Amendment 4 Search and arrest
Amendment 5 Rights in criminal cases
Amendment 6 Right to a fair trial
Amendment 7 Rights in civil cases
Amendment 8 Bail, fines, punishment
Amendment 9 Rights retained by the People
Amendment 10 States' rights
SO.................People had ALL these rights, BEFORE 1791?
Nope. Driving isn't a Constitutional right firearms are. Any gun law is an infringment on the Constitutional right of law abiding citizens.Wow, republicans are dense.
Gun laws do NOT prevent people from doing stupid things, but they help.
Just as driving laws don't prevent accidents or speeding, but they help.
If republicans had their way, the incident, wouldn't have even been newsworthy, UNTIL, the nut job loser. shot up a Walmart, school or his place of employment.
WTF?Read them.
What do they say?
I'll help you with the first few.
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
You see? No right is granted.
Well then, why did James Madison even bother?The rights exist independently and predate the laws of man.
WTF?The Amendments to the Constitution enshrine the prohibitions of the powers of the government to abridge these natural rights.
NO, it doesn't............See above.The Second Amendment prohibits the Government from impeding the natural right to self protection by infringing on the right to bare arms...
GOT IT......................Decades ago.Get it now?
SURE, it does.The Bill of Rights doesn't create the Rights...it defends pre-existing rights from the overreach of the government.
And that's relevant..............HOW?Nope. Driving isn't a Constitutional right firearms are.
So, in 89 years, why hasn't the 1934 National Firearms Act been repealed?Any gun law is an infringment on the Constitutional right of law abiding citizens.
