Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tell you what then.
How about you find a single source, outside of yourself, that claims all 27 amendments are part of the Bill of Rights.
Just one.
Bill of Rights and Later Amendments - USHistory.org
https://www.ushistory.org › documents › amendments
All Amendments to the United States Constitution
http://hrlibrary.umn.edu › all_amendments_usconst
These amendments were ratified December 15, 1791, and form what is known as the "Bill of Rights." AMENDMENT I. Congress shall make no law respecting an ...
STILL part of the bill of rights.
Not to pick nits, but Jake Candless wasn’t hired to save the boy. He was the boy’s grandfather.I was watching a western called “big jake”
The cowboy was hired to save someone, but he committed so many felonies, one time before they left for the journey, he threw his son off the horse, that’s domestic violence, according to democrats he should have been striped of his right to own a gun, well today big jake would probably be on meth, because of government regulations.
And?Not to pick nits, but Jake Candless wasn’t hired to save the boy. He was the boy’s grandfather.
SO....................they were the original.
This is a lie; the 1st and 2d Amendments do not grant any rights to anyone.The 1st amendment granted people freedom of speech, to peacefully assemble, and petition the government, without repercussion from the government.
So long as those restrictions do not abridge / infringe those rights - yes.I’m sorry did you just say the government CAN put restrictions on our first and second amendment??
SO....................they were the original.
The can't be amended or added to?
The others grant rights also.
Let’s not infringe those rights to begin withSo long as those restrictions do not abridge / infringe those rights - yes.
So long as those restrictions do not abridge / infringe those rights - yes.
Jurisprudence here is pretty clear:Which of course is the tricky part.
Does requiring a permit to gather in specific locations abridge/infringe on the right to assemble?
"Free speech" does not include the right to wrongfully harm other people.Do libel/slander laws abridge/infringe on the right to free speech?
Jurisprudence here is pretty clear:
Governments can impose time/place/manner restrictions -- that is, require permits - when the exercise of 1st amendment rights involves the use of public property; these restrictions must be content-neutral.
"Free speech" does not include the right to wrongfully harm other people.
No, it doesn't...........yet, they still COULD BE amended.The Bill of Rights is a specific thing, the first 10 amendments to the US Constitution. The fact that other amendments were added later does not change what the Bill of Rights is.
That's right.Every source you have used proves you are wrong yet you still insist that you are not
Guarantees.The Bill of Rights is the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution. It spells out Americans’ rights in relation to their government. It guarantees civil rights and liberties to the individual—like freedom of speech, press, and religion.
No, it doesn't...........yet, they still COULD BE amended.
That's right.
The Bill of Rights is the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution.
No, I didn't, not ALL, 27 amendments, just some amendments in 11-27 related to the rights of citizens, which I pointed out.Yes the Constitution can be amended but the Bill of Rights will always only be the first 10 Amendments.
You just spent a day telling me all the Amendments are the Bill of Rights.
Now you see the light. Glad I could educate you.
No, I didn't, not ALL, 27 amendments, just some amendments in 11-27 related to the rights of citizens, which I pointed out.
Read and learn.WTF?
ANOTHER.............. Trump U. reading "comprehension' correspondence course graduate?
The 1st amendment granted people freedom of speech, to peacefully assemble, and petition the government, without repercussion from the government.
Well then, why did James Madison even bother?
WTF?
People have no "natural rights".
If they did, every person, in every country on earth would have these rights, AND................They DON'T.
And never did.
NO, it doesn't............See above.
GOT IT......................Decades ago.
You obviously STILL don't.
SURE, it does.
That's why James Madison, named the document............."The defense of pre-existing rights".
csac.history.wisc.edu
This is a lie.
See guns seized from Fulton teacher who police say had tens of thousands of rounds of ammo
Police found assault rifles, shotguns, handguns and ammunition when they searched the man's home in the town of Oswego.www.syracuse.com
I believe his constitutional rights were violated
The democrats want this.
You brought up the shitty reasoning for violating peoples Constitutional rights. I responded.NO, shit, moron.
What does that have to do with...........ANYTHING?
They do, idiot.
Does, the safety on a gun prevent the gun from firing accidently?
It does, when people engage it.
